Abstract
Continent ileostomies are performed in patients who are not candidates for or do not want a traditional J-pouch after total colectomy. In these cases, patients may opt for a type of continent ileostomy instead of an end ileostomy. The most common types of continent ileostomies include the Kock (K) pouch, S-pouch and Barnett Continent Intestinal Reservoir. The normal fluoroscopic and CT appearance of these types of continent ileostomies are reviewed. CT provides better evaluation of the proximal small bowel and pouch for inflammatory bowel disease, while fluoroscopy is superior in evaluating the nipple valve. Common complications of these types of continent ileostomies are discussed including slipped nipple valve, pouch inflammation, fistulas, and polyps. Radiologist should be familiar with the different types of continent ileostomies that exist and their common complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Historically, patients with diseases requiring proctocolectomy received an end ileostomy with external bag appliance and no control of the excretion process. In the late 1960's, Dr. Kock described a continent ileostomy allowing patients control over the timing of bowel elimination and omitting the external appliance as well. It was called the Kock pouch (K-pouch) [1]. A continent one-way valve was created from intussuscepted ileum which allowed intermittent drainage of an ileal pouch through the anterior abdominal wall. Throughout the years, there have been different adaptions of this procedure with the eventual creation of the ileal-J pouch.
While the Ileal J-pouch has become the procedure of choice following proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), there remains a select group of patients that will need to consider a continent ileostomy. Common indications include those with impaired anal sphincter function or short mesentery rendering a tension free ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) impossible. Additional indications include patients with refractory pouchitis and/or J-pouch complications who do not want a pouch revision but still would like to maintain continence. Other patients who may consider a continent ileostomy are those with severe pelvic floor dysfunction that impairs their quality of life, or patients dissatisfied at having more than 8 bowel movements a day with a typical J-pouch.
Radiologists may be asked to evaluate both newly created and existing continent ileostomies and should be familiar with the different configurations that exist, including the normal appearance of these pouches and common complications that can occur. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to familiarize radiologists with the normal fluoroscopic and CT appearance of continent ileostomies and provide examples of common complications.
Types of continent ileostomies
Since the initial K-pouch operation, several modifications have been developed, with the most common being the Barnett continent intestinal reservoir (BCIR) and the S pouch. These pouch configurations are important for the radiologist to understand and recognize as they provide a helpful roadmap to colorectal surgeons when complications arise, and pouch revisions are needed.
The K-pouch procedure is performed by creating a reservoir from the ileum. The ileum is opened longitudinally and sutured into a U-shaped limb. The limb is then folded vertically to create the reservoir. Intussuscepting the efferent ileal loop retrograde into the pouch creates a one-way nipple valve that prevents reservoir contents from entering the stoma (Fig. 1). In total, a K-pouch requires approximately 60 cm of functioning ileum to create to the pouch [2]. Patients are required to intubate the nipple valve and drain the K-pouch several times a day using a semirigid catheter.
The Barnett Continent Intestinal Reservoir or BCIR procedure utilizes an intestinal collar to help support and reinforce the nipple valve [3]. Like the K-pouch, the BCIR also utilizes a U-shaped ileal pouch and a similar nipple valve created but from intussuscepting the afferent limb that is divided/transected about 15 cm away from the pouch. The bowel upstream is anastomosed to the pouch to allow gastrointestinal flow into the pouch. The pouch inlet limb is then wrapped around this valve to provide more stabilization of the valve and prevent its slippage (Fig. 2).
The S-pouch is a 3-limb pouch in which three adjacent loops of ileum are used to construct the ileal reservoir. The efferent limb is used to create a nipple valve like the K-pouch. The S-pouch is then closed vertically, as in a K-pouch. The valve and the pouch inlet are in opposite orientation from one another, making the procedure technically easier and reducing injury of the pouch during intubation (Fig. 3) [4].
Imaging technique
Both CT and fluoroscopy evaluations of the continent ileostomies can provide valuable information.
Double contrast pouchogram
At our institution, the double contrast exam is preferred. The empty pouch is typically intubated by the patient, if they are able, using a semirigid catheter commonly supplied by the patient. The patient intubates their stoma either in supine or standing position. If the patient is unable to intubate their stoma, the radiologist may attempt to intubate the pouch with the patient in either position. Contrast is injected through the stoma to outline the nipple tract. The catheter can often be manipulated through the visible subcutaneous tract and the nipple valve under fluoroscopic guidance. Viewing the stoma and nipple tract in profile is helpful to identify redundancy and kinking of the tract. This is usually best done with the patient in the lateral position. If the pouch cannot be intubated, further assistance may be required by the colorectal surgeon or via endoscopic intubation.
With the patient in the supine position, 60 ml of high-density barium is injected into the pouch under fluoroscopic guidance. Next, the patient is asked to barrel roll one or two times on the fluoroscopic table to thoroughly coat the walls of the pouch. A clamp is applied to the intubation catheter to prevent the tube from slipping into the ileal reservoir during rolling. Any residual barium is then aspirated via the catheter. Repositioning of the patient and the catheter may be required to successfully empty the pouch. After most of the barium has been aspirated, air is injected into the pouch until the pouch is insufflated (80–160 ml typically).
Image acquisition is obtained in multiple projections so that the entire pouch is documented. The radiographic images should include views of the nipple valve in profile and the pouch inlet as well as the pre-pouch ileum if opacified. Once the entire pouch has been thoroughly evaluated, images are obtained as contrast material (high-density barium) is injected through the catheter while being slowly retracted. This is helpful in evaluating for stomal fistulas and other tract abnormalities.
CT technique
CT imaging of patients with a continent ileostomy can be done multiple ways. An intravenous contrast-enhanced single portal venous phase CT exam can provide adequate information about the pouch if it is distended with fluid contents. At our institution, we have adopted a monophasic CT enterography technique. Patients are asked to drink 3 bottles of neutral oral contrast at 45, 30, and 15 min before the CT scan. A single monophasic CT enterography exam is performed with IV contrast material (patients do not empty their pouches before the exam). Table 1 lists the standard IV contrast dosing used at our institution. Coronal, sagittal, and axial CT images are created. The enterography technique is anticipated to provide consistent pouch distention, better visualization of the proximal small bowel, and optimal mucosal enhancement of the pouch. The pouch is not routinely intubated for the CT scan; however, if patients have difficulty intubating their stoma, the CT scan can be performed with the catheter in place. Figure 4 illustrates a normal CT appearance of a K-pouch.
Normal pouch appearance
At fluoroscopy, continent ileostomies can vary in size depending on the frequency of pouch emptying and the amount of pouch accommodation. A typical pouch is approximately 160–175 ml at the time of maturation 4 weeks after surgery. The pouch mucosa should be smooth without nodularity or fold thickening. The ileal mucosal fold pattern should be maintained. Additionally, it is important to remember that the nipple valve extends into or inside the pouch and represents a normal filling defect (Fig. 5).
When the nipple valve is evaluated in profile, it should appear symmetric on either side of the catheter and protrude into the pouch approximately 4–6 cm; however, this can vary due to patient abdominal wall width and body habitus (Fig. 6) [5]. The pre-pouch ileum should be of normal caliber and mucosal pattern.
Both the pouch and nipple valve should be evaluated by CT. The pouch should be evaluated for normal mucosal enhancement, wall thickening, and pre-pouch ileal inflammation. Any intra-pouch findings like enteroliths, polyps, or masses should be reported. While the positioning of the nipple valve is more difficult to appreciate at CT, other complications such a fistulas or inflammation can be assessed using multiplanar images. The tract between the nipple valve and the stoma should be inspected for fistula and redundancy.
At both fluoroscopy and CT, it is important to evaluate the orientation of the pouch inlet tract/pre-pouch ileum in relation to the nipple valve. This can be helpful in differentiating the various types of continent ileostomies. The S-pouch will have the pouch inlet and the nipple valve situated opposite one another (Fig. 7a). A BCIR will have a similar pouch inlet and nipple valve orientation to a K-pouch but should demonstrate the pre-pouch ileum wrapping around nipple valve (Fig. 7b). A K-pouch will have the pouch inlet and nipple valves near one another (Fig. 7c). No matter the type of continent ileostomy, it is important to remember that the normal nipple valve should extend inside the pouch several centimeters.
Complications
A meta-analysis comparing different types of ileal pouches (including J, S, and K pouches) found that there were no appreciable differences in the perioperative complications between them [6]. Complication rates have been reported in 20–44% of patients. [6,7,8] The most common complications include peristomal fistula, slipped nipple valve causing inability to intubate the pouch, intra-pouch enteroliths, and development of a recurrent Crohn’s phenotype involving the pouch and the pre-pouch ileum.
Enteroliths
Enteroliths are a common finding in a continent ileostomy pouch secondary to pooling and stasis of enteric contents. Figure 8 depicts both the fluoroscopic and CT appearance of enteroliths within continent ileostomy pouches.
Slipped nipple
Nipple valve complication rates with continent ileostomies are approximately 30% and often increase over time [8, 9]. Nipple slippage or valve prolapse can be either partial or complete. Common symptoms of a slipped or prolapsed nipple valve include difficulty intubating the pouch. A recent study by Ecker found that 33% of complications were associated with the nipple valve. Of those, intubation problems and nipple slippage both accounted for 19% of complications. [10]
The radiologic findings of a slipped nipple include loss of the nipple symmetry when viewing the nipple valve en face (Fig. 9). Additionally, a tortuous or non-linear course of the catheter and nipple valve should raise concern for a slipped valve. Fluoroscopy is the easiest method for evaluating the nipple valve and its orientation. However, in more dramatic cases this can also be detected with CT (Fig. 9). At CT the nipple valve should follow a relatively straight course and should protrude into the pouch. Retraction of the nipple valve outside of the pouch or its excessive angulation suggests slippage. Complete valve prolapse occurs when there is separation of the valve from the anterior abdominal wall. Detection of this complication is crucial because it typically requires surgical correction.
Fistulas
A fistula can develop at the valve any time after surgery and has been reported in up to 25% of patients [8]. Fistulas can occur at the nipple valve, the afferent limb, or at the pouch. When occurring at the base of the valve, fistulas can lead to symptoms of incontinence. Risk factors for fistula include the use of mesh at surgery to strengthen the pouch, Crohn’s phenotype, and repeated forceful intubation of the nipple valve. Surgical revision is usually required when this occurs and is one of the major causes for overall pouch excision in these patients.
At fluoroscopy, the barium-coated pouch should be distended fully with air to opacify any fistulous tracts involving the pouch. To evaluate the pre-pouch ileum for a fistula, contrast should be refluxed into the pouch inlet and pre-pouch ileum when possible. A pouch or pre-pouch fistula should raise concern for development of a Crohn’s phenotype (Fig. 10).
Fistula development at the base of the nipple can occur secondary to trauma from forceful cannulation or secondary to surgical technique. Abnormal accumulation of contrast material along the subcutaneous or nipple valve tract is a red flag for a sinus tract or fistula (Fig. 11).
At CT, fistulas involving the pouch, the pouch inlet or pre-pouch ileum will look like penetrating Crohn’s phenotype seen in other parts of the small bowel and colon. A fistula from the pouch to the skin or other part of the nipple may be difficult to detect given that the nipple tract is not routinely injected with contrast, and scanning plane obliquity (without multiplanar reformatted views at various angles) makes en face evaluation difficult. A rim enhancing or air-filled tract between the base of the nipple and the nipple tract would suggest a fistula (Fig. 12). Contrast material can be administered via a catheter while simultaneously removing the tube in patients with a high clinical suspicion of fistula. Immediate CT scan would be necessary after contrast injection.
Inflammation
Pouchitis is inflammation of the pouch often accompanied by bacterial overgrowth [8]. The frequency of K-pouchitis is between 26 and 29% [8] for all types of K-pouch patients. Patients present with increased pouch output, abdominal pain, bloating, and possibly bloody stool output. Recurrent pouchitis can be a cause for pouch removal, but it is initially treated with antibiotics or other anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients with Crohn’s phenotype are generally not candidates for a continent ileostomy as they have a 4.5 × greater risk of pouch failure compared to patients with FAP or ulcerative colitis [8]. These patients can also develop pouchitis and other typical changes seen with Crohn’s phenotype, increasing the risk of pouch failure.
At fluoroscopy, pouchitis is best viewed with a double contrast technique so that the mucosa of the pouch can be adequately evaluated. Mucosal fold thickening and nodularity are the most common findings of pouchitis at fluoroscopy (Fig. 13).
At CT, inner wall hyperenhancement (often asymmetric in Crohn’s phenotype disease) and wall thickening are suggestive of pouchitis. In more severe Crohn’s phenotype cases, stricturing and penetrating disease can also occur involving the pouch and/or the pre-pouch ileum (Figs. 13, 14).
Polyps
Polyps within the pouches are commonly encountered. Patients with Crohn’s phenotype disease can develop inflammatory polyps within the pouch and in the pre-pouch ileum. Additionally, continent ileostomies have been performed for patients with FAP. Careful scrutiny of the pouch for polyps is important in this population as adenomas harbor an increased risk of subsequent cancer. Double contrast fluoroscopic images will demonstrate a round filling defect protruding into the pouch. This may or may not be associated with findings of pouchitis (Fig. 15a). With contrast-enhanced CT, an enhancing soft tissue nodule protruding into the pouch lumen is typically seen (Fig. 15b); however, small sessile polyps can carpet the entire pouch in patients with FAP and may mimic diffuse wall thickening with mild irregularity. Polyps can be differentiated from residual small bowel contents since polyps will enhance following IV contrast administration.
Summary
For patients who wish to maintain continence, continent ileostomies are an alternative if a standard J-pouch has failed or is not appropriate. These pouches can be adequately evaluated with both CT and fluoroscopy. CT provides better evaluation of the proximal small bowel and pouch for inflammatory bowel disease, while fluoroscopy is superior in evaluating the nipple valve. Patients at our institution with continent ileostomies are routinely evaluated with both a dedicated CT enterography and fluoroscopic pouchogram. Radiologists should be familiar with the normal and abnormal appearance of the continent ileostomy at CT and fluoroscopy, and they should be able to recognize common complications.
Availability to data/materials
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Nessar G, Wu JS (2012) Evolution of continent ileostomy. World J Gastroenterol 18:3479-3482. doi:https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3479
Angistriotis A, Shen B, Kiran RP (2022) Construction of and Conversion to Continent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002631
Deputy M, Worley G, Patel K, Fletcher J, Hart A, Block M, Oresland T, Myrelid P, Faiz O (2021) Long-term outcome and quality of life after continent ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: A systematic review. Colorectal Dis 23:2286-2299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15788
Beck DE (2008) Continent ileostomy: current status. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21:62-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1055323
Stephens DH, Mantell BE, Kelly KA (1979) Radiology of the continent ileostomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 132:717-721. doi:https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.132.5.717
Simillis C, Afxentiou T, Pellino G, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Faiz O, Tekkis PP (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing adverse events and functional outcomes of different pouch designs after restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 20:664-675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14104
Parc Y, Klouche M, Bennis M, Lefevre JH, Shields C, Tiret E (2011) The continent ileostomy: an alternative to end ileostomy? Short and long-term results of a single institution series. Dig Liver Dis 43:779-783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2011.05.017
Wu XR, Ke HX, Kiran RP, Shen B, Lan P (2020) Continent Ileostomy as an Alternative to End Ileostomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020:9740980. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9740980
Ecker KW (1999) Die kontinente Ileostomie Gegenwärtige Indikationen, Vorgehensweisen und Ergebnisse. Chirurg 70:635-642
Ecker KW, Tonsmann M, Ecker NKJ, Moslein G (2022) Salvage surgery for continent ileostomies (CI) after a first successful revision: more long-term blame on the reservoir than the nipple valve. Int J Colorectal Dis 37:553-561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04054-x
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Desiree Lanzino Ph.D., Lucy Bahn Ph.D. and Sonia Watson Ph.D. in editing the manuscript.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Flicek, K.T., Shawki, S.F. Continent ileostomies: what the radiologist needs to know. Abdom Radiol 48, 2969–2977 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03705-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03705-z