Abstract
Human hydatid cyst disease is an international public health issue that particularly affects the developing countries. In this article, we discuss the epidemiology of hydatid disease in third world countries, the life cycle of echinococcus granulosus and how to make the clinical diagnosis of the disease, including laboratory tests and imaging modalities as well as uncommon presentation of this entity that we have encountered at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC). We emphasize on the new World Health Organization classification of hepatic echinococcosis with examples from our clinical practice at AUBMC, and finally we describe the treatment, including medical and interventional therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Human hydatid cyst disease is an international public health issue that particularly affects developing countries. It is caused by an infection with any of four species of echinococcosis, of which the most prevalent worldwide is the tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus responsible for cystic echinococcosis [1, 2]. Other species of Echinococcus are responsible for rare clinical presentations. Echinococcus Multilocularis for example is the larval stage of the fox tapeworm and is responsible for alveolar echinococcus which usually presents as a space occupying lesion that infiltrates the liver and spreads to other organs [3]. Echinococcus vogeli or Echinococcus oligoarthritis are the species responsible for polycystic Echinococcosis which presents as multiple cysts on almost any organ. It is usually asymptomatic unless complications develop [4].
Cystic echinococcosis can involve any visceral organ in the body including the kidney, lungs, and brain, but due to the bowel venous drainage system, it tends to favor the liver where hepatic infection accounts for two-third of all cases.
Echinococcus granulosus worms (2–7 mm in size) consist of a scolex with suckers and hooks, as well as three or more proglottid segments which have both male and female sexual organs and can produce eggs 30–40 µm in size containing embryos (oncospheres).
Dogs act as definitive hosts for E. Granulosus, and are responsible for transmitting the disease to humans. Sheep act as intermediate hosts, and areas where sheep are raised tend to have the highest rates of endemic disease. Humans are incidental hosts for the parasite, and up until today there are no human to human-reported cases. When infected, humans develop visceral Echinococcal cysts, which are fluid-filled structures limited by a parasite-derived membrane, which contain a germinal epithelium [5].
Hydatid disease of the liver is associated with a number of complications such as biliary tree obstruction with superimposed infection resulting in cholangitis or other superimposed infections that might lead to the development of abscesses. Other important and dangerous complication includes intraperitoneal leakage causing peritonitis and in extreme cases anaphylactic shock leading to death. Therefore, it is important to strictly abide by treatment guidelines to decrease the rate of possible complications [6].
Epidemiology
The global burden of hydatid disease is estimated at 1 million cases at any one time [7]. Most of these cases are cystic (E. granulosus) and especially prevalent in areas with a temperate climate, notably the Mediterranean regions, southern and central parts of Russia, central Asia, China, Australia, and South America [1]. Although better diagnostic methods and surveillance programs are being employed, epidemiological studies and surveys are not available in all the areas endemic to hydatid disease [8], which results in an underestimated overall prevalence of echinococcal infection in general.
Regardless, the number of recognized cases is increasing, which may be due, in part, to better diagnostic technology and surveillance programs [2, 4]. The prevalence of hydatid cyst disease in animals varies between the different geographic areas of the middle east and North Africa region. The prevalence as well as the yearly human incidence in some of the endemic countries are summarized in Table 1 as it is reported in available epidemiology studies. [6, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Life cycle of echinococcus
The transmission cycle of Echinococcus includes an intermediate host (such as sheep or pigs) and a definitive host (such as dogs). Humans are incidental hosts. The adult worm is usually found in the small intestine of dogs (the definitive host). The gravid proglottid segments can release up to thousands of eggs daily which end up being expelled in the feces of the host and are subsequently ingested by an unsuspecting intermediate host (usually sheep) or accidental host (humans). Once in the intestine of the intermediate/accidental host, the eggs hatch to release onchospheres that penetrate into the circulation through the intestinal mucosa. Once they reach the liver or other visceral organs they develop into cysts that enlarge and produce protoscolices. As the definitive host ingests the infected organs, the protoscolices attach to the intestinal mucosa and develop into adult worms as the life cycle starts anew [5, 14, 18]. (Fig. 1).
A complete life cycle takes 4–7 weeks. The transmission of the disease requires both a definitive host for the adult worms and an intermediate host for the eggs to hatch and cysts to grow. For this reason, human-to-human transmission is not possible [14].
Diagnosis
The vast majority of cases are diagnosed incidentally by imaging. In the case of a symptomatic patient, after obtaining a detailed medical history (focused on contact with dogs or wild life, living in endemic areas…) and conducting a proper physical exam, the diagnosis of hydatid disease is achieved through a combination of imaging and serology. A typical diagnostic scenario would start with a patient presenting with non-specific symptoms such as epigastric and/or right upper quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, or malaise/fatigue. The clinical interview should include exposure to risk of hydatid disease (contact with wildlife, improperly washed vegetables, history of travel to endemic areas, etc.) especially in endemic areas. When the history is suggestive, a vigilant physician should ask for an ultrasound examination of the abdomen, where a cyst would be usually found in affected patients. If the history and the radiological findings are very suggestive, most physicians will proceed to treatment and refrain from additional tests. However, when in doubt, some dedicated assays are available. Detection of E. Granulosus-specific antigen and immune complexes with ELISA usually confirms the diagnosis with a sensitivity and specificity of 93.5% and 89.7%, respectively. In the rare cases where imaging was inconclusive and ELISA was negative but the history is very suggestive, US-guided percutaneous biopsies can be performed to collect some cystic fluid and test it for E. Granulosus antigen 5 (Ag5) and antigen B (AgB). However, the risk of secondary hydatid cyst formation due to spillage is high and so oral Albendazole must be administered 4 days before the procedure and continued for a month following the intervention, which also serves to decrease the risk of anaphylactic shock during the aspiration procedure [19]. We will focus on the imaging aspect of diagnosis and the use of ultrasonography, CT, and MRI in the diagnostic imaging of hydatid disease and the characteristic findings [20].
Imaging
Ultrasound imaging provides a fast and accurate method of capturing liver lesions with a sensitivity reaching 90–95% [21]. Hydatid cysts commonly have the appearance of a simple fluid-filled cyst on ultrasound but they can vary in appearance and characteristics depending on the developmental stage of the disease. The WHO classified the different types of cysts based on these variations in ultrasound features, each with a tailored treatment regimen [20]. The different features are outlined in the next section.
CT scan and MRI are more sensitive and specific in the detection and characterization of hydatid disease. However, these relatively expensive procedures are not always required for the diagnosis of hydatid disease and are more essential in cases of extrahepatic involvement [22]. CT scan has an additional advantage in the rapid diagnosis of cyst rupture with exact delineation of the location and type of rupture, prompting surgical intervention in emergency situations [23].
Classification
The World Health Organization 2001 classifies hepatic hydatid cysts based on ultrasound features.
- CL:
-
Unilocular anechoic cystic lesion without any internal echoes and septations. (Fig. 2)
- CE 1:
-
Uniformly anechoic cyst with fine echoes settled in it representing hydatid sand. (Fig. 3)
- CE 2:
-
Cyst with multiple septations giving it multivesicular appearance, rosette appearance, or honeycomb appearance with unilocular mother cyst. This stage is the active stage of the cyst. (Fig. 4)
- CE 3:
-
Unilocular cyst with daughter cysts with detached laminated membranes appearing as water lily sign. This is the transitional stage of the cyst. (Fig. 5)
- CE 4:
-
Mixed hypo and hyperechoic contents with absent daughter cysts, these contents give an appearance of ball of wool sign indicating the degenerative nature of the cyst. (Fig. 6)
- CE 5:
-
Arch like thick partially or completely calcified wall. This stage of cyst is inactive and infertile. (Fig. 7)
Uncommon presentations
Liver hydatid with intrahepatic venous thrombosis
Intrahepatic venous thrombosis secondary to liver hydatid is an uncommon occurrence that seems to be more common in areas endemic to hydatid disease but remains a rare finding. On MR imaging, it tends to present as an exophytic mass that appears hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images with a hypointense rim. The mass effect of the cyst on the IVC or hepatic veins, in combination with inflammation response, can lead to thrombosis. (Fig. 8) [24].
Pancreatic hydatid
Pancreatic hydatid disease is a very rare presentation of the disease with incidence no more than 2% in endemic areas. These cysts vary in their location between the head of the pancreas, body, and tail. The imaging characteristics of hydatid disease are rarely present in cases of pancreatic presentation and one must keep a high index of suspicion for cystic lesions in the pancreas in endemic areas (Fig. 9) [25].
Paraspinal hydatid eroding into the vertebrae
Skeletal hydatid disease is another uncommon presentation. Its seen in up to 2% of cases and tends to present clinically with signs of disk disease with neurological compromise. On imaging, they tend to present with lytic lesions with a dense calcified rim. The disk space tends to be spared. A classical daughter cyst in parent cyst appearance is common. With time bone invasion is more likely and if MR imaging is available the parent cyst usually has a signal similar to that of muscle on T1 [26]. (Fig. 10).
Isolated renal hydatid
A slightly more common presentation (up to 4%) is isolated kidney hydatid disease. The clinical presentation depends on the size and involvement of kidney or neighboring structures. On imaging, it can be tricky to diagnose the disease especially in cases of simple hydatid cysts due to the similar appearance of a simple renal cyst [27]. (Fig. 11).
Isolated splenic hydatid
Splenic hydatid disease is seen in up to 4% of cases and tends to be insidious in its clinical presentation mainly with some left upper quadrant pain and fullness. On imaging, the lesions tend to be very large because of the late time of presentation and are more commonly simple cysts [28] (Fig. 12).
Serum assay
In addition to imaging, different serological tests have been developed to establish a diagnosis. Initial screening consists of indirect hemagglutination (IHA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG, IgM, or IgE antibodies. Then, if necessary, a confirmatory test using specific antigens is carried out. These tests included arc-5 immunoelectrophoresis and immunoblotting [23].
PCR is currently used for typing in research, especially in epidemiological studies. It does not serve a purpose for clinical diagnosis of hydatidosis because echinococcal DNA is not found in the serum or urine of patients with uncomplicated disease [29]. DNA can enter the circulation in the case of ruptured cysts and therefore can only be detected in such cases [29].
Percutaneous aspiration, while not required in most cases, can be done pre-surgically to confirm the diagnosis by direct visualization of the protoscolices under microscopy. This technique carries, albeit not very commonly, the major risk of anaphylaxis due to fluid leakage during the procedure, as well as cyst infection, pneumonia, and hemobilia [23, 30]. Anaphylaxis can be avoided by pre-treating the patient with oral Albendazole for 4 days before the procedure, followed by oral Albendazole for a month after the aspiration. However, since one of the treatment interventions for hydatid disease is PAIR (Puncture-Aspiration-Injection-Reaspiration), most protocols consider that once the cyst has been punctured, PAIR should be initiated, as a diagnostic and therapeutic intervention.
Treatment
The treatment can be medical, surgical, endoscopic, minimally invasive, or expectant. The choice of the treatment modality depends on the stage of the cyst, the complications, and the locally available resources [20].
Medical
Antihelminthic chemotherapy has a 30% cure rate, defined as cyst disappearance on imaging [31]. Albendazole is the antihelminthic agent of choice for liver hydatid disease [32]. Short-term therapy is given as a neoadjuvant agent while awaiting surgical or percutaneous treatment [33, 34]. Treatment with Albendazole prior to surgery led to a higher rate of non-viable cysts at the time of surgery [35, 36]. In 2011, an RCT by Shams-Ul-Bari et al. showed that patients who received Albendazole 12 weeks prior and 12 weeks after surgery had no recurrences compared to 17% recurrence in patients with no medical therapy [37]. Medical therapy can also be useful in inoperable cases (multiple lung and/or liver cysts and peritoneal involvement) where it is considered an indication. [38]. Cysts tend to calcify after treatment (Arch like calcifications either partially or completely along the outer border that may progress to involute the inner center with calcification suggestive of inactive and infertile disease. (Fig. 13a, b).
Watch and wait approach
In this approach, inactive uncomplicated cysts can be monitored with ultrasound for changes over time—without administration of treatment. It is a highly stage-dependent method, for which only CE4 and CE5 cysts are candidates. A long-term retrospective study demonstrated that 97.4% of spontaneously inactive cysts remained inactive without treatment [39].
Surgical
The mainstay of hydatid cyst treatment remains surgical [40]. The current WHO guidelines, however, require that surgery be combined with medical treatment for a lower recurrence and seeding rate. Prior to surgery, the patient should be treated with at least 4 days of Albendazole or Mebendazole. Albendazole must be continued for at least 1 month and Mebendazole for at least 3 months post procedure [38].
It is done through open or laparoscopic approach with no controlled trials comparing the two approaches in the literature. Retrospective studies, however, show that laparoscopy is safe and effective in the resection of hepatic hydatid cysts if it falls in a physically and easily accessible location [40, 41] and it is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay than open surgery [41].
Percutaneous drainage
Percutaneous treatment can be used as an alternative for surgery in patients with uncomplicated, single compartment cysts (CE1 and CE3a) less than 5 cm in size [20]. Septated complex cysts, cysts communicating with the biliary system, and inaccessible cysts are a contraindication to this procedure. In this method, also called Puncture-Aspiration-Injection-Reaspiration (PAIR), aspiration of the cystic fluid is done under ultrasound or CT guidance using a multipurpose drain catheter. A protoscolicidal agent is then injected into the cavity through the catheter. The contents are then reaspirated about 15 min later [20]. The protoscolicidal solutions of choice in PAIR are 20% NaCl and 95% ethanol [20].
It is recommended that PAIR be preceded by 4 days and then followed by 1 month of Albendazole therapy.
Conclusion
Mediterranean regions and other developing countries are particularly affected by liver hydatid disease.
Echinococcus Granulosus, a tapeworm that is responsible for the disease, has a particular life cycle, with sheep usually acting as intermediate host, dogs as definite host, and humans as incidental recipient.
Diagnosis is done either by serology and/or imaging, with a wide array of treatment options depending on the stage of the disease and the resources available to the managing team. Therefore, each case of liver hydatid disease should be individually classified according to the WHO classification and treated according to the local skills and expertise of the health care team on site.
References
Polat P, et al. (2003) Hydatid disease from head to toe. Radiographics 23(2):475–494 (quiz 536–7)
Torgerson PR, Budke CM (2003) Echinococcosis—an international public health challenge. Res Vet Sci 74(3):191–202
Kern P, et al. (2006) WHO classification of alveolar echinococcosis: principles and application. Parasitol Int 55:S283–S287
Meneghelli UG, et al. (1992) Polycystic hydatid disease (Echinococcus vogeli): clinical, laboratory and morphological findings in nine Brazilian patients. J Hepatol 14(2):203–210
Eckert J, Deplazes P (2004) Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clin Microbiol Rev 17(1):107–135
Eckert J (2001) WHO-OIE manual on echinococcosis in humans and animals: a public health problem of global concern, Citeseer
Otero-Abad B, Torgerson PR (2013) A systematic review of the epidemiology of echinococcosis in domestic and wild animals. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7(6):e2249
Seimenis A (2003) Overview of the epidemiological situation on echinococcosis in the Mediterranean region. Acta Trop 85(2):191–195
Araj GF, Mourad Y (2014) Hydatid disease: the Lebanese contribution. J Med Liban 62(4):217–226
Kamhawi S (1995) A retrospective study of human cystic echinococcosis in Jordan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 89(4):409–414
Mukbel RM, Torgerson PR, Abo-Shehada MN (2000) Prevalence of hydatidosis among donkeys in northern Jordan. Vet Parasitol 88(1–2):35–42
Seimenis A, Morelli D, Mantovani A (2006) Zoonoses in the Mediterranean region. Ann Ist Super Sanita 42(4):437–445
Chahed MK, et al. (2015) High risk areas for Echinococcosis-hydatidosis in Tunisia. Tunis Med 93(1):33–37
Lahmar S, et al. (2004) Transmission dynamics of the Echinococcus granulosus sheep-dog strain (G1 genotype) in camels in Tunisia. Vet Parasitol 121(1–2):151–156
Lahmar S, Kilani M, Torgerson PR (2001) Frequency distributions of Echinococcus granulosus and other helminths in stray dogs in Tunisia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 95(1):69–76
Sadjjadi SM (2006) Present situation of echinococcosis in the Middle East and Arabic North Africa. Parasitol Int 55(Suppl):S197–S202
Hassounah O, Behbehani K (1976) The epidemiology of Echinococcus infection in Kuwait. J Helminthol 50(2):65–73
Haridy FM, Ibrahim BB, Morsy TA (2000) Sheep-dog-man. The risk zoonotic cycle in hydatidosis. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 30(2):423–429
Duman L, Girgin M, Hamcan S (2016) Uncomplicated hydatid cysts of the liver: clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. J Gastrointest Dig Syst 6(3):1–6
Brunetti E, et al. (2010) Expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in humans. Acta Trop 114(1):1–16
Safioleas M, et al. (1994) Diagnostic evaluation and surgical management of hydatid disease of the liver. World J Surg 18(6):859–865
Tuzun M, et al. (2002) Cerebral hydatid disease CT and MR findings. Clin Imaging 26(5):353–357
Alexiou K, et al. (2012) Complications of hydatid cysts of the liver: spiral computed tomography findings. Gastroenterol Res 5(4):139–143
Mahajan D, et al. (2013) Hydatid cyst of liver: a rare cause of secondary budd-chiari syndrome. Postgrad Med Edu Res 47(3):159–161
Ahmed Z, et al. (2016) Primary hydatid cyst of pancreas: case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 27:74–77
Patel D, Shukla D (2010) Back bugged: a case of sacral hydatid cyst. J Neurosci Rural Pract 1(1):43–45
Hota D, et al. (2015) Isolated renal hydatidosis presenting as renal mass: a diagnostic dilemma. Urol Case Rep 3(4):103–105
Pukar M, Pukar SM (2013) Giant solitary hydatid cyst of spleen—a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 4(4):435–437
Chaya D, Parija SC (2014) Performance of polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis using serum, urine, and cyst fluid samples. Trop Parasitol 4(1):43–46
Sevinç B, et al. (2015) Three complications of Pair (puncture, aspiration, injection, reaspiration) in one case: recurrent hemobilia, cyst infection and pneumonia. Int J Surg Case Rep 8:189–192
Guidelines for treatment of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in humans (1996) WHO informal working group on echinococcosis. Bull World Health Organ 74(3):231–242
Stojkovic M, et al. (2009) Treatment response of cystic echinococcosis to benzimidazoles: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3(9):e524
Koca T, et al. (2016) Cystic eechinococcosis in childhood: five-years of experience from a single-center. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 40(1):26–31
Gomez IGC, et al. (2015) Review of the treatment of liver hydatid cysts. World J Gastroenterol 21(1):124–131
Gil-Grande LA, et al. (1993) Randomised controlled trial of efficacy of albendazole in intra-abdominal hydatid disease. Lancet 342(8882):1269–1272
Arif SH, et al. (2008) Albendazole as an adjuvant to the standard surgical management of hydatid cyst liver. Int J Surg 6(6):448–451
Shams Ul B, et al. (2011) Role of albendazole in the management of hydatid cyst liver. Saudi J Gastroenterol 17(5):343–347
Pakala T, Molina M, Wu GY (2016) Hepatic echinococcal cysts: a review. J Clin Transl Hepatol 4(1):39–46
Piccoli L, et al. (2014) Long-term sonographic and serological follow-up of inactive echinococcal cysts of the liver: hints for a “watch-and-wait” approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8(8):e3057
Yagci G, et al. (2005) Results of surgical, laparoscopic, and percutaneous treatment for hydatid disease of the liver: 10 years experience with 355 patients. World J Surg 29(12):1670–1679
Zaharie F, et al. (2013) Open or laparoscopic treatment for hydatid disease of the liver? A 10-year single-institution experience. Surg Endosc 27(6):2110–2116
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fadel, S.A., Asmar, K., Faraj, W. et al. Clinical review of liver hydatid disease and its unusual presentations in developing countries. Abdom Radiol 44, 1331–1339 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1794-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1794-7