Abstract
Background: We determined the radiologic characteristics of intrahepatic cholangicarcinoma (ICC) on single-level dynamic computed tomography during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) and assessed the hemodynamics of the tumor.
Methods: Eleven patients with pathologically confirmed ICC underwent single-level dynamic CTHA. After placing the catheter tip in the proper hepatic artery and running a 30-s continuous scan, scanning was performed every 15 or 30 s for 120 s. The change of contrast-enhancement pattern of the ICCs were interpreted retrospectively.
Results: The pattern of enhancement was classified into two types: vascular and hypovascular. In the vascular type, the contrast enhancement gradually spread from each intratum oral artery and became mottled. It changed from a mottled and hypoattenuated pattern to an even and hyperattenuated appearance in comparison with the adjacent liver approximately 120 s after the injection of contrast agent. In the hypovascular type, the tumor was barely enhanced and remained hypoattenuated compared with the adjacent liver at 120 s after the beginning of the injection. The 11 ICCs were classified into eight vascular types and three hypovascular types. Intratumoral arteries were visualized in nine tumors: eight vascular types and one hypovascular type.
Conclusion: The contrast-enhancement pattern of ICC on single-level dynamic CTHA is related to the intratumoral artery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a primary adenocarcinoma of the liver that arises from the epithelial cells of the intrahepatic bile ducts, specifically a segmental or more peripheral duct, and presents as a focal liver mass [1], in contrast to hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor) [2], which originates from hepatic ducts. After hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is the second most common primary hepatic malignant tumor and accounts for 10% of primary liver cancers [3].
On contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), ICC has been depicted as an irregular mass of markedly low attenuation with contrast enhancement at the tumor periphery durng hepatic arterial and portal venous phases [4]. This pattern differs from that associated with hypervascular tumors such as HCC, which most commonly have predominatly high attenuation during the hepatic arterial phase and isoattenuation or low attenuation during the portal venous phase [4]. Imaging modalities such as CT during arterial portography (CTAP) [5, 6], CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) [7, 8], dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [9], and Doppler ultrasound [10] have facilitated investigation of the hemodynamics of liver tumors. In particular, single-level dynamic CTHA, a new method of delineating the blood flow in hepatic tumors, has been used to elucidate the hemodynamics of HCC [11, 12], but, although the CT features of ICC have been described [13, 14], to our knowledge, its appearance on single-level dynamic CTHA has not been described. Therefore, we investigated the radiologic characteristics of ICC on single-level dynamic CTHA and assessed its hemodynamics.
Materials and methods
Between December 1995 and March 2002, 18 consecutive patients with suspected ICC on CT, MRI, or sonography were referred for investigation, and single-level dynamic CTHA was carried out in 12 (four patients did not undergo imaging because they had undergone angiography at a previous hospital, and the other two patients had a prolonged series of examinations that included angiography, CTAP, and conventional CTHA). One of the 12 patients was excluded from the evaluation because of incorrect breath-holding during scanning. Therefore, 11 patients (eight men, three women; age range, 45–72 years; mean age; 60.1 years) formed the study population and all gave informed consent. All 11 tumors (diameter, 2–6 cm; mean, 4.3 cm) had been detected on conventional CTHA performed immediately before single-level dynamic CTHA, and all were classified as the mass-forming type according to the classification of primary liver cancer proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, which defines mass-forming type tumors as a nodular tumor in the liver parenchyma that has originated from peripheral bile ducts. The tumor was located in the right lobe in six patients and in the left lobe in five patients. After the single-level dynamic CTHA examination, 10 patients underwent laparotomy: eight had the tumor surgically resected, and two tumors were inoperable because of peritoneal dissemination. The pathologic diagnosis of ICC was obtained from the resected specimen (eight patients), intraoperative biopsy (two patients), or percutaneous needle biopsy (one patient).
Angiography, unenhanced CT, CTAP, and conventional CTHA were performed before single-level dynamic CTHA, as was celiac and superior mesenteric angiography for evaluation of the arterial anatomy. The single-level dynamic CTHA examination took place more than 10 min after conventional CTHA, the findings of which were used to determine the most suitable craniocaudal level that ensured that the axial plane including the maximal cross-sectional diameter of the tumor would be scanned. After placing a 5-F angiographic catheter tip into the proper hepatic artery under fluorosopic guidance, iopamidol (Iopamiron 300, Schering, Berlin, Germany) was diluted with saline to 100 mg/mL. Sixty milliliters of the solution was injected at a rate of 3 mL/s by using a power injector. Scans were obtained with helical CT (Somaton Plus-4, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) or multidetector CT (Aquilion, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan). Scanning was started immediately after the injection of contrast medium; during a single breath-hold, a 30-s continuous scan was obtained with 5-mm collimation, 1-s scan time, 2-s interscan time, 280 mAs, 120 kVp, and 512 × 512 matrix for the Somaton Plus-4 or 5-mm collimation, 0.5-s scan time, 0.5-s interscan time, 300 mAs, 120 kVp, and 512 × 512 matrix for the Aquilion. After the continuous scan, scans were obtained every 15 or 30 s for 120 s. Oxygen was administered to patients during the imaging procedure. The CT image of every scan was documented on laser film.
Retrospective interpretation of the CT images was established by consensus between two observers. The change of contrast-enhancement pattern of ICC on the single-level dynamic CTHA images were interpreted visually, as were recording the time to appearance of an intratumoral artery and peripheral enhancement.
Results
Single-level dynamic CTHA demonstrated the hemodynamics of all tumors, and the contrast-enhancement patterns were classified into two types, vascular and hypovascular, each of which had a distinctive time course. In the vascular type (Fig. 1), at 1 to 5 s (mean, 2.75 s) after the injection of contrast, intratumoral arteries were seen immediately and clearly. Contrast enhancement of the adjacent liver appeared 5 to 12 s (mean, 8.0 s) after the beginning of the injection, and peripheral enhancement began almost simultaneously. The contrast enhancement gradually spread from each intratumoral artery and became mottled for approximately 30 s after the beginning of the injection. Enhancement of the adjacent liver disappeared, but that of the tumor did not and instead changed from a mottled and hypoattenuated pattern to an even and hyperattenuated appearance in comparison with the adjacent liver approximately 120 s after the beginning of the injection. In the hypovascular type (Fig. 2), contrast enhancement of the adjacent liver appeared 6 to 12 s (mean, 9.7 s) after the beginning of the injection of contrast, but the tumor was barely enhanced and remained hypoattenuated when compared with the adjacent liver at 120 s after the beginning of the injection. Of the 11 ICCs, eight were classified as vascular and three as hypovascular. All eight vascular tumors had the mottled hyperattenuated pattern of enhancement until approximately 1.5 min after the injection of contrast, when four became evenly hyperattenuated.
Intratumoral arteries were visualized in nine tumors: all eight vascular type tumors and one hypovascular type. In seven vascular tumors, the enhancement spread from the intratumoral artery; however, in the hypovascular type of tumor, the intratumoral artery was only faintly visualized and the contrast enhancement barely spread from it.
Peripheral enhancement, i.e., thin mild incomplete rimlike enhancement surrounding the tumor, was seen in eight cases (six vascular and two hypovascular) and started to appear 5 to 12 s (average, 9.2 s) after the injection of contrast material. In four vascular-type tumors scanned by multidetector CT, arteries were seen at the tumor periphery immediately after the injection of contrast (Fig. 3), and the enhancement spread from each artery, resulting in peripheral enhancement. Segmental stainings, wedge-shape segmental hyperattenuated areas extending from the hepatic hilus to the surface, or segmental boundaries of the liver were seen in 10 of 11 (90.1%) patients, until approximately 2 min after the injection of contrast, and they mimicked the enhancement pattern and overlapped the peripheral enhancement (Figs. 1, 3).
Discussion
Previous reports of the radiologic findings of ICC on conventional dynamic CT and dynamic MRI have shown that the tumor usually appears as an avascular mass, a rounded nonencapsulated hypodense mass with irregular margins, and with delayed contrast enhancement [3, 13, 14, 15]. Those imaging modalities have limitations in demonstrating the hemodynamics of ICC in detail, so the actual time course of the contrast enhancement of the tumor has not been established. Differential diagnosis of ICC from other liver tumors is important because its rate of lymph node metastasis is high and lymph node dissection is essential [16, 17]. However, even at biopsy, the histopathologic diagnosis of ICC is difficult and requires reasonable exclusion of other adenocarcinomas that may have metastasized to the liver [18]. To date, single-level dynamic CTHA has not been used extensively for evaluation of ICC because it is an uncommon tumor; we have been using conventional CTHA for the differential diagnosis of ICC since November 1994, and in the present study we reviewed our findings of the hemodynamics and the radiologic characteristics of this tumor.
The blood supply to liver neoplasms such as HCC, cavernous hemangioma, and colorectal metastasis is mainly through the hepatic artery [19, 20], and intratumoral arteries are frequently seen in hypervascular tumors, such as HCC, and in focal nodular hyperplasia [11, 21]. However, there have been few reports of intratumoral arteries of ICC being demonstrated on CT. In the present study, intratumoral arteries were identified immediately after the injection of contrast, which affected the vasucularity of the ICC. Although there have been few reports about the clinical utility of arterial chemoinfusion therapy in ICC [22], our results suggests the feasibility of arterial chemoinfusion therapy for ICC. A mottled pattern of contrast enhancement has been reported as a characteristic appearance of ICC [23], although how it occurred was not described. Our results suggest that tumor enhancement gradually spreads from each intratumoral artery thus producing the mottled appearance. We consider that the intratumoral arteries are hepatic arteries encased by the tumor or neovascularities; however, determination of the origin of the intratumoral artery of ICC will require further study.
HCC and colorectal liver metastases frequently show rim enhancement on CTHA, and Ueda et al. suggested that it reflects a drainage area [11], whereas Irie et al. believed that the rim enhancement of liver metastasis on CTHA corresponds to compressed liver parenchyma around the metastasis because it would not have a portal blood supply and would compensate for this by increasing the arterial blood supply [24]. As for the peripheral enhancement seen in ICC, it is thought to be a relative hypervascularity [25, 26]. In the present series, four vascular-type tumors that were scanned by multidetector CT had arteries detected in the periphery of the tumor immediately after injection of the contrast, and the contrast enhancement spread from each artery, resulting in a peripheral enhancement. There were also tumors in which peripheral enhancement mimicked the enhancement pattern and overlapped sgmental stainings. Because hepatic arterial flow increases to compensate for the decrease in portal venous flow, caused by the narrowing or obstruction of the portal vein from invasion or extrinsic compression by the tumor, dynamic CT and CTHA can depict these areas of segmental stainings that correspond to areas of low attenuation on CTAP [27, 28]. It is assumed that the most of the increased enhancement is a functional change resulting from increased perfusion because the pathologic changes in liver cells in these areas have been slight in most cases [29, 30]. We believe these findings corroborate that the peripheral enhancement of ICC is caused by a relative hypervascularity in the tumor periphery. In other words, we speculate that peripheral enhancement of ICC does not correspond to the area of tumor cells but of the liver parenchyma. We recognize that the number of patients in this study is small, and we know that markedly hypervascular ICCs have been reported [31]; therefore, further investigations are needed before drawing conclusions.
In summary, single-level dynamic CTHA is useful for evaluating the hemodynamics of ICC. We believe that the blood supply for this tumor is the hepatic artery and that the enhancement pattern is related to the intratumoral artery. Further, we presume the peripheral contrast enhancement of ICC is caused by a relative hypervascularity in the tumor periphery.
References
InstitutionalAuthorNameLiver Cancer Group of Japan (1998) Classification of primary liver cancer, 1st English ed Kanehara Tokyo 6–7
G Klatskin (1965) ArticleTitleAdenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis Am J Med 34 241–256 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9343(65)90178-6
JR Craig RL Peters HA Edmondson (1989) Tumors of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts: atlas of tumor pathology, 2nd series, fasc 26 Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Washington, DC 197–221
EM Loyer H Chin RA DuBrow et al. (1999) ArticleTitleHepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: enhancement patterns with quadruple phase helical CT—a comparative study Radiology 212 866–875 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgslKqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10478259
O Matsui M Kadoya M Suzuki et al. (1983) ArticleTitleWork in progress: dynamic sequential computed tomography during arterial portography in the detection of hepatic neoplasms Radiology 146 721–727 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyC2crhtFU%3D Occurrence Handle6298857
O Matsui M Kadoya T Kameyama et al. (1991) ArticleTitleBenign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply Radiology 178 493–497 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C3c3isFI%3D Occurrence Handle1846240
A Prando S Wallace ME Bernardino et al. (1979) ArticleTitleComputed tomographic arteriography of the liver Radiology 130 697–701 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSaC3sjnsFA%3D Occurrence Handle218242
K Takayasu Y Muramatsu N Moriyama et al. (1992) ArticleTitleFocal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: arterial angio-CT and microangiography J Comput Assist Tomogr 16 212–215 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2C1crgt1M%3D Occurrence Handle1545015
K Ohtomo Y Itai K Yoshikawa et al. (1987) ArticleTitleHepatic tumors: dynamic MR imaging Radiology 163 27–31 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiC2cfgtVc%3D Occurrence Handle3029804
S Tanaka T Kitamura M Fujita et al. (1990) ArticleTitleColor Doppler flow imaging of liver tumors AJR 154 509–514 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC28vjtFY%3D Occurrence Handle2154912
K Ueda O Matsui Y Kawamori et al. (1998) ArticleTitleHypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of hemodynamics with dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography Radiology 206 161–166 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FosFOhtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9423667
K Ueda O Matsui Y Kawamori et al. (1998) ArticleTitleDifferentiation of hypervascular hepatic pseudolesions from hepatocellular carcinoma: value of single-level dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography J Comput Assist Tomogr 22 703–708 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00004728-199809000-00006 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvis1Ojuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9754101
PR Ros JL Buck ZD Goodman et al. (1988) ArticleTitleIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic–pathologic correlation Radiology 167 689–693 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieB3cvhsFU%3D Occurrence Handle2834769
TK Kim BI Choi JK Han et al. (1997) ArticleTitlePeripheral cholangiocarcinoma of the liver: two-phase spiral CT findings Radiology 204 539–543 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA1c3lsVI%3D Occurrence Handle9240550
P Soyer DA Bluemke R Reichle et al. (1995) ArticleTitleImaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. 1: Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma AJR 165 1427–1431 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2s3mvFU%3D Occurrence Handle7484579
S Isaji Y Kawarada H Taoka et al. (1999) ArticleTitleClinicopathological features and outcome of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 6 108–116 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005340050092 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzivFemuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10398896
Y Kawarada R Mizumoto (1990) ArticleTitleDiagnosis and treatment of cholangiocellular carcinoma of the liver Hepatogastroenterology 37 176–181 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB2MnhtVw%3D Occurrence Handle2160420
RG Lee (1994) Diagnostic liver pathology Mosby St. Louis 457–461
HR Bierman RL Byron KH Kelley (1951) ArticleTitleStudies on the blood supply of tumors in man. III: Vascular patterns of the liver by hepatic arteriography in vivo J Natl Cancer Inst 12 107–131 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Cy2D3cvitlE%3D Occurrence Handle14874125
T Nakashima (1975) Vascular changes and hemodynamics in hepatocellular carcinoma K Okuda RL Peter (Eds) Hepatocellular carcinoma Wiley New York 169–203
S Miyayama O Matsui K Ueda et al. (2000) ArticleTitleHemodynamics of small hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: evaluation with single-level dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography AJR 174 1567–1569 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgt1SqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10845482
N Tanaka K Yamakado A Nakatsuka et al. (2002) ArticleTitleArterial chemoinfusion therapy through an implanted port system for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-initial experience Eur J Radiol 41 42–48 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00414-4 Occurrence Handle11750151
JM Lacomis RL Baron JH Oliver III et al. (1997) ArticleTitleCholangiocarcinoma: delayed CT contrast enhancement patterns Radiology 203 98–104 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB3s3ktVI%3D Occurrence Handle9122423
T Irie Y Tsushima S Terahata et al. (1997) ArticleTitleRim enhancement in colorectal metastases at CT during infusion hepatic arteriography: does it represent liver parenchyma or live tumor cell zone Acta Radiol 38 416–421 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3svns1M%3D Occurrence Handle9191433
Y Zhang M Uchida T Abe et al. (1999) ArticleTitleIntrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of dynamic CT and dynamic MRI J Comput Assist Tomogr 23 670–677 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00004728-199909000-00004 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvlt1Cktg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10524843
K Takayasu S Ikeya K Mukai et al. (1990) ArticleTitleCT of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: late contrast enhancement in six patients AJR 154 1203–1206 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB2cjit1w%3D Occurrence Handle2159688
Y Itai AA Moss HI Goldberg (1982) ArticleTitleTransient attenuation difference of lobar or segmental distribution detected by dynamic computed tomography Radiology 143 719–726 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2C1MfmslI%3D Occurrence Handle7079499
PC Freeny WM Marks (1986) ArticleTitleHepatic perfusion abnormalities during CT angiography: detection and interpretation Radiology 159 685–691 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimB3cnnsFE%3D Occurrence Handle3010374
Y Yamashita M Takahashi S Kanazawa et al. (1992) ArticleTitleParenchymal changes of the liver in cholangiocarcinoma: CT evaluation Gastrointest Radiol 17 161–166 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3c7ltlM%3D Occurrence Handle1312967
M Nagino Y Nimura J Kamiya et al. (1998) ArticleTitleImmediate increase in arterial blood flow in embolized hepatic segments after portal vein embolization: CT demonstration AJR 171 1037–1039 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjtl2mtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9762992
Y Yoshida Y Imai T Murakami et al. (1999) ArticleTitleIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with marked hypervascularity Abdom Imaging 24 66–68 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002619900442 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7jsVahsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9933676
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Present address: Department of Surgery, Teikyo University, School of Medicine, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miura, F., Okazumi, S., Takayama, W. et al. Hemodynamics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Evaluation with single-level dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography. Abdom Imaging 29, 467–471 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0177-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0177-4