Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
A potential problem with 18F-FDG PET is the misinterpretation of physiological accumulation of the radiotracer, leading to a false positive result. Sources of such misinterpretation documented in the literature include non-specific inflammation, abscess, sarcoidosis and other granulomatous diseases, recent radiotherapy, brown adipose tissue, thymic hyperplasia, muscle contraction, laryngeal nerve palsy, gastritis, colitis, atherosclerotic plaque and occult lung infarction [1–9]. A relatively high false positive rate due to such causes could interfere with therapeutic decision making and patient management. To the best of our knowledge, the accumulation of 18F-FDG in the distal oesopaghus has not previously been clearly described as a potential cause of false positive findings. Interestingly, this is a not infrequent situation in our experience, especially in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux. Moreover, when considering the PET study only, such accumulation might be misinterpreted as focal uptake in the paravertebral region, mimicking lymph node accumulation (Fig. 1). On the other hand, fusion images, such as those obtained using a PET-CT scanner, might allow correct interpretation of 18F-FDG accumulation in the distal oesopaghus as non-tumoural and non-specific (Fig. 1).
To verify the prevalence of this phenomenon, we reviewed the whole series of 2,158 consecutive patients who had undergone 18F-FDG PET-CT at our centres during the period January to June 2004. To avoid potentially true pathological uptake, 47 patients who were known to have oesophageal cancer were excluded.
In our series, 18F-FDG accumulation, usually characterised by diffuse distribution and a mild to moderate or occasionally intense degree of activity, was observed in the distal part of the oesophagus in 135 patients (6.2% of cases). Typically, in non-neoplastic cases, 18F-FDG accumulation was evident on PET-CT fusion imaging either in the lumen of the oesophagus (Fig. 1) or as concentric, diffuse and homogeneous uptake in the oesophageal wall: this latter condition was observed with higher frequency in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux (Fig. 2). In all these patients, endoscopic examination proved negative for malignancy. Finally, in three other patients an unknown oesophageal cancer was disclosed by 18F-FDG PET-CT performed for other reasons; in these cases eccentric and focal 18F-FDG uptake in the oesophageal wall was evident on PET-CT fusion imaging (Fig. 3).
In conclusion, diffuse accumulation of 18F-FDG in the distal oesophagus is not an unusual finding. However, accurate evaluation of PET-CT fusion imaging usually allows such accumulation to be localised to the oesophageal lumen or (in cases of concentric, diffuse and homogeneous uptake) to the oesophageal wall. Accordingly it can be correctly attributed to either physiological uptake or inflammation due to gastro-oesophageal reflux. By contrast, when PET-CT fusion imaging reveals eccentric and focal 18F-FDG uptake in the oesophageal wall, a tumoural lesion should be suspected and endoscopy is strongly recommended.
References
Ak I, Gulbas Z. Intense F-18 accumulation in stomach in a patient with Hodgkin lymphoma: Helicobacter pylori infection as a pitfall in oncologic diagnosis with F-18 FDG PET imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2005;30:41
Truong MT, Erasmus JJ, Munden RF, Marom EM, Sabloff BS, Gladish GW, et al. Focal FDG uptake in mediastinal brown fat mimicking malignancy: a potential pitfall resolved by PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1127–32
Hanif MZ, Ghesani M, Shah AA, Kasai T. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in atherosclerotic plaque in the medistinum mimicking malignancy: another potential for error. Clin Nucl Med 2004;29:93–5
Naumann R, Beuthien-Baumann B, Fischer R, Kittner T, Bredow J, Kropp J, et al. Simultaneous occurrence of Hodgkin’s lymphoma and eosinophilic granuloma: a potential pitfall in positron emission tomography imaging. Clin Lymphoma 2002;2:121–4
Heller MT, Meltzer CC, Fukui MB, Rosen CA, Chander S, Martinelli MA, et al. Superphysiologic FDG uptake in the non-paralyzed vocal cord. Resolution of a false-positive PET result with combined PET-CT imaging. Clin Positron Imaging 2000;3:207–11
Lorenzen J, de Wit M, Buchert R, Igel B, Bohuslavizki KH. Granulation tissue: pitfall in therapy control with F-18-FDG PET after chemotherapy. Nucklearmedizin 1999;38:333–6
Kamel EM, Goerres GW, Burger C, von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in patients with lung cancer: detection with PET-CT image fusion—report of six cases. Radiology 2002;224:153–6
Jacobsson H, Celsing F, Ingvan M, Stone-Enlander S, Larsson SA. Accumulation of FDG in axillary sweat glands in hyperhidrosis: a pitfall in whole-body PET examination. Eur Radiol 1998;8:482–3
Kamel EM, McKee TA, Calcagni ML, Schmidt S, Markl S, Castaldo S, et al. Occult lung infaction may induce false interpretation of 18F-FDG PET in primary staging of pulmonary malignancies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (in press). DOI 10.1007/s00259-004-1718-3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rampin, L., Nanni, C., Fanti, S. et al. Value of PET-CT fusion imaging in avoiding potential pitfalls in the interpretation of 18F-FDG accumulation in the distal oesophagus. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32, 990–992 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-1836-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-1836-6