Abstract
Background
Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1(PD-L1) inhibitor therapy have been approved for the treatment of many cancers, although their incidence of some side effects was high. We aim to fully investigate the incidence risk of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors–related pneumonia and diarrhea in NSCLC patients, as well as treatment-related deaths.
Methods
PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Clinical trials.gov databases were searched up to Sep 17, 2020, for clinical trials of PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC. Randomized controlled trials and their references were screened.
Results
Seventeen trials were included in our meta-analysis, including 11,363 patients. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly increased the risk of developing all-grade and high-grade (grade ≥ 3) pneumonia (risk ratio [RR] = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.39–3.76; P < 0.01; RR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.72–3.29; P < 0.01, respectively). The use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor did not increase the risk of developing all-grade and high-grade diarrhea (RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.62–1.01; P = 0.06; RR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.70–1.31; P = 0.78, respectively). There was no significant difference between the rate of death in PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (P = 0.079).
Conclusion
These data suggest that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly increase the risk of all-grade and high-grade pneumonia in NSCLC patients and PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy increases the risk of all-grade pneumonia in NSCLC patients compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination regimens. Physicians should pay more attention to NSCLC patients who treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In recent years, immunotherapy has made a significant breakthrough in anticancer treatment, especially the research of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have shown strong clinical benefits for a variety of solid tumors. PD-1 was expressed by activated T lymphocytes and combined with PD-L1 (on the surface of tumor cells) to restrict the activation of T lymphocytes. ICIs can reactivate T cell-mediated antitumor immunity by blocking the PD-1 and PD-L1 pathway [1, 2]. Until now, there are five PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors approved by the FDA for treatment of different advanced solid tumors, including two PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and three PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab).
However, for its characteristic of increasing the activity of the immune system, it may also affect various organ systems, which consequently lead to immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), such as pruritus, rash, diarrhea, colitis, hypophysitis, thyroiditis, pancreatitis, nephritis, and pneumonitis [3,4,5,6]. Among patients treated with these monoclonal antibodies, diarrhea occurs in more than one-quarter of patients regardless of the type of cancer, and the mortality rate is high although the incidence of pneumonia is not high [7,8,9]. Since pneumonia and diarrhea can seriously affect the quality of life (QOL) of patients, close concern should be paid to the immune-related adverse effects of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, among different clinical trials, NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have substantial differences in the risk of developing pneumonia and diarrhea, and the risk factors behind these differences have not been identified. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to research irAEs of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in NSCLC patients.
Materials and methods
Search strategy and study selection
Two researchers (ZQ.T. and DY.W.) independently searched the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Clinical trial.gov databases until Sep 17, 2020, with the following keywords: “NSCLC,” “non-small cell lung cancer,” “nivolumab/Opdivo/MDX 1106,” “pembrolizumab/Keytruda/MK-3475,” “atezolizumab/Tecentriq/MPDL3280A,” “avelumab/MSB0010718C/Bavencio,” and “durvalumab/MEDI-4736/Imfinzi.” Studies were considered suitable for inclusion if (1) they are published in peer-reviewed journals and were phase II or III randomized controlled trials; (2) they studied individuals diagnosed with squamous or non-squamous NSCLC; (3) the intervention arms were patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combination therapy (plus chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy); (4) the comparative arms were patients with chemotherapy or placebo; and (5) the outcomes should include the incidence of pneumonia and diarrhea as well as treatment-related death. We excluded studies if they were performed in animals, or the full text could not be retrieved, or if they were published as reviews (including meta-analysis), commentaries, interim analyses, or case reports. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline.
Quality assessment
Two researchers independently reviewed the quality and potential bias of the included studies. Select the Cochrane Collaboration’s RCT bias risk assessment tool, including selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other biases. The risk of bias graph and risk of bias summary of these studies were shown in Supplemental Figs. S1 and S2. Select the GRADE approach to describe the overall quality of the evidence. GRADE evidence profile (EP) and Summary of Findings table (SOF) were shown in Supplemental Figs. S3 and S4.
Data extraction
Data were independently extracted by two researchers. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Data including clinical trial information of the study, first author, year of publication, trial phases, study drugs, the dosage of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, total number of patients evaluated for safety, number of patients with pneumonia and diarrhea, as well as treatment-related deaths were extracted. The most of the included studies used Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CACTE) 4.0 to evaluate the grade of pneumonia and diarrhea.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.3. Calculate 95% CI for all types of data and risk ratio (RR) for the dichotomous data and select Mantel-Haenszel method as statistical method. The heterogeneity test was performed by Cochrane’s Q test and the I2 statistic was selected to estimate. According to the heterogeneity of the included studies, different effect models were chosen to calculate the RR value. If I2 > 50%, the random effect model was selected; otherwise, the fixed effect model was selected. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate whether the RR of pneumonia and diarrhea varied with drug type (PD-1 vs PD-L1), histology (squamous vs non-squamous), control group (placebo vs chemotherapy vs monoclonal antibody), and treatment regimen (PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy vs combination). The significance of the subgroup analysis was evaluated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.
Results
Literature search
The literature search produced 2371 potential-related experiments. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, the preliminary screening excluded 2310 articles for one of the following reasons: review, letter, non-randomized controlled trial, case report, cohort studies, meta-analyses, and animal studies. The remaining 61 RCTs were carefully read and screened, 44 of which were excluded because date did not adequate for evaluation of pneumonia and diarrhea or other reasons. The remaining 17 RCTs met the inclusion criteria for systematic evaluation and meta-analysis (3 phase II and 14 phase III trials, Fig. 1) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
Characteristics of included studies
Totally, 11,363 patients were included in 17 studies for meta-analysis. Of these, eleven investigated PD-1 inhibitors (five focused on nivolumab and six were about pembrolizumab) and six researched PD-L1 inhibitors, including atezolizumab (n = 4), avelumab (n = 1), and durvalumab (n = 1). Histologic types of NSCLC included 3074 (27.05%) squamous cell carcinoma and 8289 (72.95%) non-squamous carcinoma. All studies used a randomized approach, 14 of which were open-label studies and 3 were three-blind studies. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of included trials.
Incidence and risk ratio of pneumonia
Of the 6112 patients in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group, 296 patients (4.84%) occurred all-grade pneumonia, while 112 patients (2.13%) occurred all-grade pneumonia among the 5251 patients in the control group. The RR of all-grade pneumonia was 2.28 (95% CI 1.39–3.76; P < 0.01) (Fig. 2). High-grade pneumonia occurred in 145 patients (2.37%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group and in 43 patients (0.82%) in the control group. The RR of high-grade pneumonia was 2.38 (95% CI 1.72–3.29; P < 0.01) (Fig. 3). The incidence of all-grade pneumonia in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors therapy was significantly higher than that in platinum-based chemotherapy (RR = 4.41, 95% CI 1.36–14.27, P = 0.01) (Supplemental Fig. S5). In the case of high-grade pneumonia, it was also higher in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors therapy (RR = 4.48, 95% CI 2.48–8.08, P < 0.01) (Supplemental Fig. S6).
The results of all-grade pneumonia in different drug types, histological types, control groups, and treatment regimens were significantly heterogeneous (P < 0.01, I2 = 69%). Therefore, a subgroup analysis was performed based on these differences. Table 2 summarized RR of all-grade pneumonia in the subgroup analysis. “Treatment” was identified as the patients treated with immunotherapy, and “Control” was treated with non-immunotherapy. There were no significant differences in RR for two drug types (PD-1 vs PD-L1) (P = 0.21). RR for all-grade pneumonia was significantly different for histological types (squamous:RR = 4.00 vs non-squamous:RR = 1.76; P < 0.001).
According to a further stratification study of the control treatment, the RR of all-grade pneumonia was found to be significantly different between the three groups (placebo, chemotherapy, and other monoclonal antibodies, P < 0.001). We found that there was no difference in the risk of all-grade pneumonia between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and other monoclonal antibodies (P = 0.20). However, patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had a significantly increased risk of all-grade pneumonia when compared with non-immunotherapy (chemotherapy or placebo). Further stratification studies were performed according to the treatment regimen (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy vs combination therapy). The treatment regimen (monotherapy:RR = 2.44 vs combination:RR = 1.82; P < 0.001) was significantly different for RR of all-grade pneumonia. Hence, patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors, patients with squamous histological type, and patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy had higher risk of all-grade pneumonia.
Incidence and risk ratio of diarrhea
Of the 6112 patients in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group, 840 patients (13.74%) occurred all-grade diarrhea, while of the 5251 patients in the control group, 760 (14.47%) occurred all-grade diarrhea. The RR of all-grade diarrhea was 0.79 (95% CI 0.62–1.01; P = 0.06) (Fig. 4). High-grade of diarrhea occurred in 90 patients (1.47%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group and in 69 patients (1.31%) in the control group. The RR of high-grade diarrhea was 0.96 (95% CI 0.70–1.31; P = 0.78) (Fig. 5). The incidence of all-grade and high-grade diarrhea in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors therapy was higher than that in platinum-based chemotherapy, but they were not statistically significant (P = 0.06, P = 0.10, respectively) (Supplemental Figs. S7–S8).
Similarly, the results of all-grade diarrhea in different drug types, histological types, control groups, and treatment regimens were significantly heterogeneous (P < 0.01, I2 = 83%). Table 3 summarized RR of all-grade diarrhea in the subgroup analysis. There were no significant differences in RR between two drug types (PD-1 vs PD-L1) (P = 0.10). The RR for all-grade diarrhea was significantly different for histological types (P < 0.001). According to a further stratified study of control treatment, there was no significant difference in RR of all-grade diarrhea between the three groups (placebo, chemotherapy, and other monoclonal antibodies, P = 0.32). However, patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had a significantly increased risk of all-grade diarrhea when compared with non-immunotherapy. Further stratification studies were performed according to the treatment regimen (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy vs combination therapy). Treatment regimens (P = 0.94) showed no significant difference in RR for all-grade diarrhea.
Treatment-related deaths
Totally, 67 treatment-related deaths were reported (n = 5944). There were 34 deaths related to PD-1 inhibitors and 33 related to PD-L1 inhibitors. There was no significant difference between the rate of death in PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (P = 0.079). The most treatment-related deaths were attributed to pneumonitis or pneumonia (n = 23). Trials reporting treatment-related deaths and causes of deaths were summarized in Supplemental Table S1.
Publication bias
Funnel plots for the risk ratio of pneumonia and diarrhea were shown in Supplemental Fig. S9. The funnel plots of all-grade and high-grade pneumonia had significant publication bias, while no significant publication bias was found for all-grade and high-grade diarrhea.
Discussion
In recent years, ICIs have become one of the most popular therapeutic regimens for various types of cancer. Compared with traditional antitumor therapies, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can kill tumor cells by activating their immune system. PD-1 is an essential immunological checkpoint receptor that is expressed on activated T cells and activates the autoimmune system and recognizes tumor cells by triggering cytotoxic CD4+/CD8+ T cell activation. PD-1/PD-L1 has proven to be a valuable clinical target for the treatment of cancer [27, 28]. Although some clinical trials have shown that ICIs have the potential to prolong PFS and OS, irAEs are completely different from traditional chemotherapy and targeted therapy-related adverse effects. They are usually characterized by organ specificity, nonlinear dose dependence, and delayed onset [29]. Among those immune-related adverse reactions, pneumonia is usually clinically severe and can be life-threatening. Although diarrhea rarely causes death, it seriously affects patients’ quality of life. Therefore, it is vital for us to understand the incidence risk of pneumonia and diarrhea.
This meta-analysis revealed that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly increased the risk of developing all-grade and high-grade pneumonia and incidence of pneumonia was 4.84% for all-grade and 2.37% for high-grade. Compared to chemotherapy, patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were 2.28 times more likely to develop all-grade pneumonia and 2.38 times for high-grade. The incidence of diarrhea was 13.74% for all-grade and 1.47% for high-grade in NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not increase the risk of all-grade and high-grade diarrhea compared to chemotherapy. Ma et al. summarized that in NSCLC treated with ICIs the incidence of pneumonia was 3.1% for all-grade and 1.4% for high-grade, both of which were significantly higher than that in melanoma and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [30]. Nishino et al. summarized that in NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy the incidence of pneumonia was 4.1% for all-grade and 1.8% for high-grade [31]. Besides, Mohamed et al. found that the incidence of all-grade and high-grade pneumonia was higher in PD-1 inhibitor but not in PD-L1 inhibitor when compared to traditional chemotherapy regimens for NSCLC and melanoma [32]. Moreover, Zhang et al. found that the incidence of diarrhea of all grades (grades 1–2 and grades 3–5, respectively) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor was lower than that treated with docetaxel alone [33]. The risk of diarrhea with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy was higher than with chemotherapy alone. Nishijima et al. and some clinical trials demonstrated that treatment-related adverse events in PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors were fewer than that in chemotherapy [10, 11, 34]. However, we proved that patients treated with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors had higher incidence risk of pneumonia than chemotherapy.
Pneumonia and diarrhea were common side effects during treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and apart from reducing the patient’s quality of life, the development of these toxicities may result in changes or termination of the dosing regimen. They were usually mild, but there are also severe case reports (such as death from pneumonia). Thus, as the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors increases, the identification and management of irAEs will become increasingly important in preventing adverse effects on patients’ health-related quality of life. Baseline imaging studies of high-resolution chest CT (with and without comparison) should be performed before starting the use of ICIs. It is important to let patients know the possible signs and symptoms of pneumonia and report to their doctors, including new or increased dyspnea, shortness of breath, cough, chest pain, and fever [35, 36]. Primary pneumonia can be treated with immunosuppressants and careful clinical observation on a dose-withheld basis. It is recommended that the checkpoint inhibitor regimen should not be restarted until chest CT scan shows improvement or complete resolution of pneumonia [37].
Withal, there are several limitations to this study. Firstly, the studies we included were RCTs. In actual work, there were many small trials with nonsignificant results, such as cohort studies and observational studies, and we should include these into meta-analysis showing significant results. Secondly, there was significant heterogeneity between all-grade diarrhea trials, so was all-grade pneumonia trials. Different doses, dosing intervals, and patient’s baseline characteristics may increase the heterogeneity of clinical trials. Thirdly, the data were extracted from published clinical trial results, and there was no separate patient information such as medical records. Therefore, it is impossible to analyze other factors that may lead to the development of pneumonia and diarrhea, such as diarrhea induced by food. Fourthly, the funnel plots of all-grade and high-grade pneumonia were shown significant publication bias. This may be due to that the studies were conducted by different investigators in different international agencies who may have a potential bias against the reported incidence of pneumonia and diarrhea. Besides, pneumonia and diarrhea were not the primary end points of the included studies. We described the GRADE results to assess the overall quality of evidence across study end points, including GRADE evidence profile and the Summary of Findings table. GRADE evidence profile indicated that the overall quality of the evidence used to assess pneumonia and diarrhea were high-quality evidence. Specifically, in evaluating the quality of evidence for all-grade and high-grade pneumonia, one point was reduced due to publication bias while one point was increased by the effect size RR > 2, and it was ultimately high-quality evidence. Although GRADE results showed high-quality evidence to support our conclusions, because of publication bias, we still need to be cautious about our conclusions, and more clinical trials are needed to fully investigate PD-1/PD-L1–related pneumonia and diarrhea.
Conclusions
In summary, this study has demonstrated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly increase the risk of all-grade and high-grade pneumonia in NSCLC patients compared to conventional chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy increases the risk of all-grade pneumonia in NSCLC patients compared with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination regimens. Physicians should pay more attention to NSCLC patients who treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
References
Velcheti V, Schalper KA, Carvajal DE, Anagnostou VK, Syrigos KN, Sznol M, Herbst RS, Gettinger SN, Chen L, Rimm DL (2014) Programmed death ligand-1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Lab Investig 94(1):107–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.2013.130
Seidel JA, Otsuka A, Kabashima K (2018) Anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapies in cancer: mechanisms of action, efficacy, and limitations. Front Oncol 8:86. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00086
Nagai H, Muto M (2018) Optimal management of immune-related adverse events resulting from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review and update. Int J Clin Oncol 23(3):410–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1259-6
Kumar V, Chaudhary N, Garg M, Floudas CS, Soni P, Chandra AB (2017) Current diagnosis and management of immune related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Front Pharmacol 8:49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00049
Weber JS, Yang JC, Atkins MB, Disis ML (2015) Toxicities of immunotherapy for the practitioner. J Clin Oncol 33(18):2092–2099. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.60.0379
Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD (2018) Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med 378(2):158–168. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1703481
Naidoo J, Page DB, Li BT, Connell LC, Schindler K, Lacouture ME, Postow MA, Wolchok JD (2015) Toxicities of the anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies. Ann Oncol 26(12):2375–2391. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv383
Weber JS, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Topalian SL, Schadendorf D, Larkin J, Sznol M, Long GV, Li H, Waxman IM, Jiang J, Robert C (2017) Safety profile of nivolumab monotherapy: a pooled analysis of patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol 35(7):785–792. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.66.1389
Abdel-Rahman O, Helbling D, Schmidt J, Petrausch U, Giryes A, Mehrabi A, Schob O, Mannhart M, Oweira H (2017) Treatment-related death in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oncol (Royal Coll Radiol (Great Britain)) 29(4):218–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2016.11.007
Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, Chow LQ, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhaufl M, Arrieta O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Lena H, Poddubskaya E, Gerber DE, Gettinger SN, Rudin CM, Rizvi N, Crino L, Blumenschein GR Jr, Antonia SJ, Dorange C, Harbison CT, Graf Finckenstein F, Brahmer JR (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373(17):1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1507643
Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crino L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, Antonia S, Pluzanski A, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Waterhouse D, Ready N, Gainor J, Aren Frontera O, Havel L, Steins M, Garassino MC, Aerts JG, Domine M, Paz-Ares L, Reck M, Baudelet C, Harbison CT, Lestini B, Spigel DR (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373(2):123–135. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504627
Carbone DP, Reck M, Paz-Ares L, Creelan B, Horn L, Steins M, Felip E, van den Heuvel MM, Ciuleanu TE, Badin F, Ready N, Hiltermann TJN, Nair S, Juergens R, Peters S, Minenza E, Wrangle JM, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Borghaei H, Blumenschein GR Jr, Villaruz LC, Havel L, Krejci J, Corral Jaime J, Chang H, Geese WJ, Bhagavatheeswaran P, Chen AC, Socinski MA, CheckMate I (2017) First-line nivolumab in stage IV or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 376(25):2415–2426. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613493
Gandhi L, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, De Angelis F, Domine M, Clingan P, Hochmair MJ, Powell SF, Cheng SY, Bischoff HG, Peled N, Grossi F, Jennens RR, Reck M, Hui R, Garon EB, Boyer M, Rubio-Viqueira B, Novello S, Kurata T, Gray JE, Vida J, Wei Z, Yang J, Raftopoulos H, Pietanza MC, Garassino MC, Investigators K (2018) Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 378(22):2078–2092. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801005
Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu TE, Pluzanski A, Lee JS, Otterson GA, Audigier-Valette C, Minenza E, Linardou H, Burgers S, Salman P, Borghaei H, Ramalingam SS, Brahmer J, Reck M, O'Byrne KJ, Geese WJ, Green G, Chang H, Szustakowski J, Bhagavatheeswaran P, Healey D, Fu Y, Nathan F, Paz-Ares L (2018) Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden. N Engl J Med 378(22):2093–2104. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801946
Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, Molina J, Kim JH, Arvis CD, Ahn MJ, Majem M, Fidler MJ, de Castro G Jr, Garrido M, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Im E, Dolled-Filhart M, Garon EB (2016) Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387(10027):1540–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7
Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, Tafreshi A, Gumus M, Mazieres J, Hermes B, Cay Senler F, Csoszi T, Fulop A, Rodriguez-Cid J, Wilson J, Sugawara S, Kato T, Lee KH, Cheng Y, Novello S, Halmos B, Li X, Lubiniecki GM, Piperdi B, Kowalski DM, Investigators K (2018) Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 379(21):2040–2051. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1810865
Langer CJ, Gadgeel SM, Borghaei H, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Patnaik A, Powell SF, Gentzler RD, Martins RG, Stevenson JP, Jalal SI, Panwalkar A, Yang JC, Gubens M, Sequist LV, Awad MM, Fiore J, Ge Y, Raftopoulos H, Gandhi L, investigators K (2016) Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for advanced, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. Lancet Oncol 17(11):1497–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30498-3
Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csoszi T, Fulop A, Gottfried M, Peled N, Tafreshi A, Cuffe S, O'Brien M, Rao S, Hotta K, Leiby MA, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Rangwala R, Brahmer JR, Investigators K (2016) Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 375(19):1823–1833. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606774
Wu YL, Lu S, Cheng Y, Zhou C, Wang J, Mok T, Zhang L, Tu HY, Wu L, Feng J, Zhang Y, Luft AV, Zhou J, Ma Z, Lu Y, Hu C, Shi Y, Baudelet C, Cai J, Chang J (2019) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated advanced NSCLC: CheckMate 078 randomized phase III clinical trial. J Thorac Oncol 14(5):867–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.006
Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, Kowalski DM, Cho BC, Turna HZ, Castro G Jr, Srimuninnimit V, Laktionov KK, Bondarenko I, Kubota K, Lubiniecki GM, Zhang J, Kush D, Lopes G, Investigators K (2019) Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 393(10183):1819–1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32409-7
West H, McCleod M, Hussein M, Morabito A, Rittmeyer A, Conter HJ, Kopp HG, Daniel D, McCune S, Mekhail T, Zer A, Reinmuth N, Sadiq A, Sandler A, Lin W, Ochi Lohmann T, Archer V, Wang L, Kowanetz M, Cappuzzo F (2019) Atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower130): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(7):924–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30167-6
Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, Vansteenkiste J, Mazieres J, Park K, Smith D, Artal-Cortes A, Lewanski C, Braiteh F, Waterkamp D, He P, Zou W, Chen DS, Yi J, Sandler A, Rittmeyer A, Group PS (2016) Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387(10030):1837–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00587-0
Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J, Gadgeel SM, Hida T, Kowalski DM, Dols MC, Cortinovis DL, Leach J, Polikoff J, Barrios C, Kabbinavar F, Frontera OA, De Marinis F, Turna H, Lee JS, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, He P, Chen DS, Sandler A, Gandara DR, Group OAKS (2017) Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 389(10066):255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X
Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, Orlandi F, Stroyakovskiy D, Nogami N, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Moro-Sibilot D, Thomas CA, Barlesi F, Finley G, Kelsch C, Lee A, Coleman S, Deng Y, Shen Y, Kowanetz M, Lopez-Chavez A, Sandler A, Reck M, Group IMS (2018) Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 378(24):2288–2301. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716948
Barlesi F, Vansteenkiste J, Spigel D, Ishii H, Garassino M, de Marinis F, Ozguroglu M, Szczesna A, Polychronis A, Uslu R, Krzakowski M, Lee JS, Calabro L, Aren Frontera O, Ellers-Lenz B, Bajars M, Ruisi M, Park K (2018) Avelumab versus docetaxel in patients with platinum-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (JAVELIN Lung 200): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 19(11):1468–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30673-9
Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Yokoi T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M, Cho BC, Bourhaba M, Quantin X, Tokito T, Mekhail T, Planchard D, Kim YC, Karapetis CS, Hiret S, Ostoros G, Kubota K, Gray JE, Paz-Ares L, de Castro Carpeno J, Wadsworth C, Melillo G, Jiang H, Huang Y, Dennis PA, Ozguroglu M, Investigators P (2017) Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 377(20):1919–1929. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709937
Katsuya Y, Horinouchi H, Asao T, Kitahara S, Goto Y, Kanda S, Fujiwara Y, Nokihara H, Yamamoto N, Watanabe S, Tsuta K, Ohe Y (2016) Expression of programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) in thymic epithelial tumors: impact on treatment efficacy and alteration in expression after chemotherapy. Lung Cancer 99:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.05.007
Domingues D, Turner A, Silva MD, Marques DS, Mellidez JC, Wannesson L, Mountzios G, de Mello RA (2014) Immunotherapy and lung cancer: current developments and novel targeted therapies. Immunotherapy 6(11):1221–1235. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt.14.82
Kadono T (2017) Immune-related adverse events by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nihon Rinsho Men'eki Gakkai kaishi 40(2):83–89. https://doi.org/10.2177/jsci.40.83
Ma K, Lu Y, Jiang S, Tang J, Li X, Zhang Y (2018) The relative risk and incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitors related pneumonitis in patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 9:1430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01430
Nishino M, Giobbie-Hurder A, Hatabu H, Ramaiya NH, Hodi FS (2016) Incidence of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor-related pneumonitis in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2(12):1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2453
Rahouma M, Baudo M, Yahia M, Kamel M, Gray KD, Elmously A, Ghaly G, Eldessouki I, Abouarab A, Cheriat AN, Karim NA, Mohamed A, Morris J, Gaudino M (2019) Pneumonitis as a complication of immune system targeting drugs?-a meta-analysis of anti-PD/PD-L1 immunotherapy randomized clinical trials. J Thoracic Dis 11(2):521–534. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.01.19
Zhang C, Zhang S, Xu D, Liu R, Zhu Q, Zhao Y, Mao Y, Tian Y (2019) Incidence risk of PD-1/PD-L1 related diarrhea in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res 11:3957–3969. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S202756
Nishijima TF, Shachar SS, Nyrop KA, Muss HB (2017) Safety and tolerability of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis. Oncologist 22(4):470–479. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0419
Balaji A, Verde F, Suresh K, Naidoo J (2017) Pneumonitis from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Oncology 31(10):739–746 754
O'Kane GM, Labbe C, Doherty MK, Young K, Albaba H, Leighl NB (2017) Monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events associated with programmed cell death protein-1 axis inhibitors in lung cancer. Oncologist 22(1):70–80. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0164
FDA. Highlights of prescribing information. OPDIVO (nivolumab). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/125554s005lbl.pdf. Accessed 08/07/2020
Funding
This work was supported by the Haiyan Fund Project of the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital (JJZD2019-03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. M.D. proposed the study protocol and supervised the progress of the work. ZQ.T. and DY.W. both searched databases, selected studies, extracted data, and analyzed data. ZQ.T. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. D.L. assisted in solving various professional problems encountered during the work and interpreting the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 16 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S1
Risk of bias graph (SVG 261 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S2
Risk of bias summary (SVG 502 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S3
Evidence profile (JPEG 366 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S4
The Summary of Findings table (JPEG 129 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S5
Forest plots for the risk ratio of all-grade pneumonia (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors vs platinum-based chemotherapy) (SVG 490 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S6
Forest plots for the risk ratio of high-grade pneumonia (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors vs platinum-based chemotherapy) (SVG 474 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S7
Forest plots for the risk ratio of all-grade diarrhea (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors vs platinum-based chemotherapy) (SVG 467 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S8
Forest plots for the risk ratio of high-grade diarrhea (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors vs platinum-based chemotherapy) (SVG 454 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S9
Funnel plots. a All-grade pneumonia; b high-grade pneumonia; c all-grade diarrhea; d high-grade diarrhea (TIF 109 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tong, ZQ., Wu, DY., Liu, D. et al. Incidence risk of PD-1/PD-L1–related pneumonia and diarrhea in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 77, 1079–1088 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-03083-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-03083-9