Abstract
An online SPE-HPLC-HESI-MS/MS method and an online SPE-HPLC-APPI-MS/MS method were developed to analyze 72 microconstituents in reclaimed water. In this study, 55 reclaimed water samples were collected from the sprinkler system for a year-long period at Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus, where reclaimed water was reused for daily irrigation. Analysis results showed that several analytes were continuously detected in all reclaimed water samples and others will show rather transient signal increases. Coprostanol, bisphenol A, and DEET’s maximum concentration exceeded 10,000 ng/L. The four most frequently detected compounds were diphenhydramine (100 %), DEET (98 %), atenolol (98 %) and carbamazepine (96 %).
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Water stress has become a serious problem worldwide because of the rapid population growth on the earth. Properly managed water resources are critical for sustainable development of water supply. In order to improve the management efficiency of water resources, wastewater treated to varying degrees are commonly reused worldwide for landscape, agriculture, irrigation, recharging, etc. In the US, treated water (reused or reclaimed) has been used in more than 3,000 application sites. Over 40 × 106 m3 of reclaimed water is used in California every year [1, 2]. Nevertheless, potential adverse effects may still arise when reusing treated water. It is proved that current wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with primary treatment and secondary treatment processes could not remove PPCPs completely because PPCPs have been detected in the effluent of WWTPs [3–7]. Tertiary treatments such as granular active carbon adsorption, and advanced oxidation processes or micro- and ultra filtration or reverse osmosis have shown better removal efficiency but these treatments are not widely used in the majority of WWTPs [8–10]. Therefore, when reusing treated water, PPCPs will likely enter the natural ecosystem and distribute among environmental compartments where they may cause an effect. When treated water is used for irrigation, compounds with strong sorption and recalcitrant to degradation may remain on the surface of the soil and be taken by plants. Research about uptake of human pharmaceuticals in plants grown from soil suggested that compounds introduced by irrigation may be more available for plant uptake than those introduced by biosolid application [1]. In addition, microconstituents will enter surface water by direct irrigation or runoff not only exposing organism in the aqueous environment to rather complex mixtures [2, 11, 12], but creating a potential link to drinking water sources. When treated water is disposed by deep well injection practice, PPCPs could migrate through uncontained aquifers and contaminate ground water, this connection could then impact sources used for drinking water. The presence of microconstituents in surface samples is becoming ubiquitous and assessing differences between reclaimed water and surface waters will likely become more difficult [13] as treatment technology improves and more sensitive analytical methods are developed. Because of this, it is essential to create comprehensive monitoring methods to assess presence of PPCPs in treated wastewater and to follow their movement as they enter the natural ecosystem.
At Florida International University’s Biscayne Bay Campus, treated wastewater from the North District WWTP is used for irrigation. The North District WWTP is located at NE 154 Street and is east of Biscayne Boulevard, and it receives wastewater from the North District of Miami-Dade County. The wastewater treatment plant was designed to have a flow of 454,249 m3 per day with average daily flow around 425,858 m3 per day. The facilities include screening, grit removal, primary sedimentation, activated sludge treatment by oxygenation and chlorination. Extra filtration (DynaSand Filtration, Leopold Filtration and Tetra filtration) and disinfection are applied to effluents before release to make the reclaimed water ready for use in irrigation. The present study monitored the reclaimed water stream collected between January 2011 and December 2011.
In this work, two methods including online SPE-HESI-MS/MS and online SPE-APPI-MS/MS were used to detect 72 microconstituents in the reclaimed water samples. This study provided key information about the chemical ecology of microconstituents in a typical treated wastewater stream that is routinely introduced to an environmental setting through water reuse.
Experimental
Chemicals
All the reference standards were >95 % purity and used as received. The identity of all analytes and surrogate standards and their origin are presented in the Electronic Supplementary Material. Basic chemical information and a description of the surrogate standards used for each analyte quantitation are shown in Electronic Supplementary Material, Table S1.
Sampling
Reclaimed water used for irrigation was collected directly from a sprinkler system using 500 mL polyethylene terephthalate bottles and was stored in the freezer at <10 °C until analysis time. The source of reclaimed water used in this study is the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department North District Wastewater Treatment Plant. Pure oxygen-activated sludge is used in the WWTP as the main secondary treatment process [14]. Extra filtration and disinfection are applied to effluents before release to make the reclaimed water ready for use in irrigation. The presence of chlorine was checked and controlled by aqua comparator test kit (Orbeco Hellige, Sarasota, USA) after sampling.
Sample preparation
Reclaimed water samples were filtered through glass fiber filters with a pore size of 0.45 μm. Samples were analyzed within 14 days in order to avoid potential degradation and transformation of analytes. One milliliter of reclaimed water samples were diluted to 5 mL before analysis. The pH of sample was adjusted to 2 using formic acid when sample was analyzed in the negative mode.
Online SPE concentration and HPLC separation
For pharmaceuticals (analytes 1 to 53), water samples (5 mL) were loaded to a Thermo Hypersil Gold aQ (20 mm × 2.1 mm, 12 μm particle size) preconcentration column first. Then, the preconcentration column was washed with 1,000 μL of water at the same speed as loading speed and connected to the analytical column (Thermo Hypersil Gold aQ, 50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm particle size) after the valve had switched to inject position. After the washing step, the loading column and analytical column underwent the same gradient in both positive and negative mode. The gradient programs of the loading and analytical pump are shown in Electronic Supplementary Material, Table S2. For hormones and sterols (analytes 54 to 72), the online SPE-APPI-MS/MS method followed the program described by Wang & Gardinali [15].
Mass spectrometry
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed using a TSQ Quantum Access triple quadrupole QqQ Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with an Ion MAX source housing capable of operating heated electrospray ionization (HESI) and atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) mode. Quantitation for all sources was performed using selected reaction monitoring mode. Instrument control and data acquisition were performed using Xcalibur software (rev. 2.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). Source parameters for analytes were optimized using HESI using flow injection with a carrier stream of mobile phase. A mobile phase of 0.1 % formic acid in water/MeOH (50:50, v/v) was used for positive mode and water/MeOH (50:50, v/v) was used for negative mode. Each analyte and surrogate was injected to the ion source at a concentration of 10 μg/mL. Compound-dependent parameters such as tube lens and collision energy (CE) were optimized to obtain maximum signals in the QqQ system. The precursor ion, fragment ions and mass-dependent parameters are listed in Table 1.
Source-dependent parameters for optimal HESI detection were as follows: capillary temperature (350 °C), vaporizer temperature (250 °C), sheath gas pressure (30 arbitrary units), aux gas pressure (20 arbitrary units), ion sweep gas pressure (5 arbitrary units) and spray voltage (4,000 V for positive polarity and 4,000 V for negative polarity). APPI parameters were previously described by Wang & Gardinali 2012 [15].
Method detection limit
Method detection limits (MDLs) were determined according to EPA guidelines [16]. Eight replicate tap water samples were spiked with all compounds at concentration ranging from one to eight times of the tested detection limit (DL) and analyzed using optimized conditions. MDLs were calculated from the calculated concentrations of the eight replicates for 5 mL sample size.
QA/QC
Blanks were run with each analytical batch to check for potential contamination and assess background levels of native analytes. Laboratory blank spike (LBS) and duplicate (LBSD) were also run with each analytical batch to check both accuracy and precision by evaluating the recovery of analytes. Isotopic dilution was used to increase the precision and accuracy of analysis. A five-point calibration curve was constructed with each batch to check for linearity (R 2 > 0.99) and analytical sensitivity. Method performance of analytes measured in APPI was verified and reported in Wang and Gardinali [15].
Result and discussion
Optimization of online SPE procedure
Water samples (5 mL) were loaded to the preconcentration column at different flow rates: 500, 1,000, 1,500, and 2,000 μL/min. Absolute recoveries of analytes (based on the response only) detected in the positive and negative ion modes are shown in Fig. 1a and b, respectively. Loading speed of 2,000 and 1,000 μL/min were chosen for positive mode and negative mode respectively because analytes were better recovered at these two flow rates. In the negative mode, the pH of samples was adjusted to 2 in order to increase the recovery of salicylic acid and clofibric acid on the loading column.
In order to reduce suppression by matrix coelution, a wash step was introduced after the samples were loaded to the preconcentration column. Only water was used to wash the preconcentration column because some analytes are rapidly affected by small portion of most organic solvent. Three different volumes of water (1, 2, and 3 mL) were tested in both positive and negative mode and results are shown in Fig. 2a and b, respectively. In the HESI+, recoveries of metronidazole, lisinopril, and primidone were significantly reduced when wash volume was above 1 mL. Similarly, in the HESI−, acetaminophen was not retained in the preconcentration column when the wash volume was more than 1 mL. This result is consistent with previous reported value [15]. Therefore, the Hypersil Gold aQ column is not a good choice to retain acetaminophen. Hydrochlorothiazide’s recoveries are also severely affected when wash volume was more than 1 mL. Thus, 1 mL was also chosen as the wash volume in the negative mode. The same as acetaminophen, the Hypersil aQ column is not a good choice to retain hydrochlorothiazide.
Method detection limits
The calibration ranges, linearity, spike levels, MDLs, recovery and relative standard deviation (RSD) of analytes are shown in Table 2. The linearity of most analytes was more than 0.99. Only several of them were lower than 0.99 likely because of the lack of a proper surrogate for the quantitation. MDLs were calculated on the basis of 5 mL sample. Method detection limits were calculated from the standard deviation of eight replicated spiked water samples. MDLs of 14 analytes were below 5 ng/L, 12 analytes were less than 10 ng/L and 26 analytes were more than 10 ng/L. These MDLs are more than adequate for reclaimed water and can be improved by increasing the sample volume to 20 mL for cleaner matrices.
Application on reclaimed water samples
A total of 55 samples were analyzed over a year period. More than one compound was found in 100 % of the reclaimed water samples. The reason for the high detection frequency is that the treatment processes in the North District WWTP only include primary and secondary treatments that are not designed to remove microconstituents. Even though extra filtration and chlorination are applied to effluent, PPCPs and hormones are still not completely removed; 33 out of 72 target compounds were detected more than once during the sampling period. The total average concentration of analytes was 7,246 ng/L, which indicated that the reclaimed water carrying at least 7,246 ng/L of unregulated chemicals. The detected concentrations of all target compounds are shown in Fig. 3. About 15 % of the detections were more than 1,000 ng/L and 80 % of the high concentrations were derived from gemfibrozil, atenolol, caffeine, and bisphenol A.
Among the high concentration compounds, coprostanol, bisphenol A, and DEET are the three compounds maximum concentrations that exceeded 10,000 ng/L (Fig. 4). Bisphenol A is known to behave as a weak environmental estrogen, more recent research has demonstrated that bisphenol A may be similar to estradiol in stimulating adverse cellular responses [17]. DEET’s chronic aquatic toxicity data for fish (8.42 × 106 ng/L), daphnia (5.13 × 106 ng/L), and algae (9.65 × 106 ng/L) [18] are all order of magnitude above the measured concentrations. Only two hormones (estrone and estradiol) were detected in the reclaimed water samples. The maximum detected concentrations of estrone (50.8 ng/L) and estradiol (58.5 ng/L) were relatively high compared to lowest observed effect concentration for fish (usually a few nanograms per liter) [19], but the detection frequency is only 2 %. Based on the concentrations detected, acute toxicity to aquatic organisms is unlikely to occur because most of the reported LC50 are 100–1,000 higher than concentrations presented in the reclaimed water.
In addition, the detection frequency is a critical factor since long-term chronic exposure to PPCPs, especially compounds with endocrine disruption effects, may cause problems even though their concentrations are low. The four most frequently detected compounds were diphenhydramine (100 %), DEET (98 %), atenolol (98 %), and carbamazepine (96 %). Diphenhydramine has been reported in water, sediment and fish, but the effects of diphenhydramine on aquatic organisms is still largely unknown. The reclaimed water samples showed chronic level of diphenhydramine all year long with a maximum concentration of 1,091 ng/L. A previous study indicated that the no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) of diphenhydramine on reproduction of D. magna is 800 ng/L. As much as 17 % of the reclaimed water sampler exceeded this benchmark but there is no good way to assess its relevance. Atenolol was detected at a maximum concentration of 3,761 ng/L in 98 % of reclaimed water samples. Reproductive performance of Daphnia magna, the most sensitive organisms tested, showed a NOEC for atenolol at 1.8 × 106 ng/L [20]. Winter and his coworker used fathead minnows as test species and undertook embryo-larval development assessment (early life stage or ELS) and short-term adult reproduction studies. The results of the ELS study showed that the NOECgrowth and LOECgrowth of atenolol were 3.2 × 106 ng/L and 10 × 106 ng/L, respectively. Short-term reproduction study, or NOECreproduction and LOECreproduction of atenolol were 10 × 106 ng/L and >10 × 106 ng/L, respectively [21]. Compared to the toxicity test results, the detected concentrations of atenolol in reclaimed water samples are much lower than any of the concentration that will cause chronic effect to fish. Carbamazepine is an anticonvulsant pharmaceutical that is commonly found in effluent of WWTPs, surface water and drinking water [3, 22]. In this study, carbamazepine was detected in 96 % of reclaimed water samples with a maximum concentration of 173 ng/L. The chronic effect of carbamazepine to rainbow trout exposed carbamazepine for 42 days indicated that both physiological condition status and muscle-based biomarkers were significantly affected at levels above 2.0 × 106 ng/L [23, 24]. By comparing with toxicity studies, the detected concentrations of compounds present in the reclaimed water were generally lower than the lowest-observed-effect concentrations for chronic effects, thus the risk associated with their occurrence is probably minimal.
Although for a single compound, the detected concentrations were lower than the chronic NOECs, most of the time more than one analytes was found in the samples. The resulting additive effects of PPCP mixture could cause effects to organisms eventually. During the year study, multiple compounds were found in all reclaimed water samples and 13 % samples had total concentrations exceeded 10,000 ng/L. However, the effect and interactions of PPCP mixture in the environmental samples is an area under development and further investigations are required to fully assess the potential implications. However, investigation has shown that biological resources inhabiting water bodies influenced by reclaimed water could accumulate PPCPs [11].
To obtain a broader view of the results, target compounds were divided into 15 groups on the basis of their general application or origins. The percent of detection frequencies of each group are shown in Fig. 5. The number of compounds in the group does not reflect the detection frequency. Detection frequency was influenced by the usage of compounds and their removal rate in the WWTPs. Wastewater indicators, β-blockers and analgesics/anti-inflammatories were the three most commonly detected groups, with a combined 67 % of detection frequency. The three groups also represented 69 % of the total measured concentrations, making them the most common and most abundant group of compounds present in the reclaimed water (Fig. 6). Another group that should be of concern is the lipid regulator group. Even though the percent of detection frequency is relatively low (6 %), compounds in the lipid regulator group accounts for as much as 20 % of the total concentration.
Average concentrations of analytes were added up monthly and results are shown in Fig. 7. The lowest total average concentration appeared in August, September and October. These three months are the wet season in South Florida. It is unlikely the rain diluted the sewage water and decreased the concentrations of target compounds. The three months with highest total average concentration were March, January, and May, which belong to the dry season in South Florida. Therefore, it is very likely that the weather changing has influence on the concentration of target compounds in the reclaimed water.
Conclusions
An online SPE-HPLC-HESI-MS/MS method and an online SPE-HPLC-APPI-MS/MS method were successful applied on simultaneously detection of 72 compounds in reclaimed water samples. The online SPE method was robust, sensitive, and reliable, making it suitable for routine analysis of environmental water samples. Reclaimed water samples were collected from the sprinkler system for a year-long period in Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus, where it is routinely reused for irrigation. Analysis showed that multiple analytes were detected in all reclaimed water samples all the time. About 15 % of the detected compounds were above 1,000 ng/L. Among compounds with high concentrations (>1,000 ng/L), coprostanol, bisphenol A, and DEET’s maximum concentrations exceeded 10,000 ng/L. The four most frequently detected compounds were diphenhydramine (100 %), DEET (98 %), atenolol (98 %), and carbamazepine (96 %). Wastewater indicators, β-blockers, and analgesics/anti-inflammatories were the three most detected groups and these three groups covered 67 % of detection frequency and 69 % of the total concentration. The 1-year study confirmed that current treatment in the North District WWTP does not effectively remove PPCPs from effluent. The microconstituents are continuously released to the environment through water reuse. This trend is not likely to change until effective treatment processes are incorporated into the WWTPs. Although no single compounds detected are above an acute or chronic benchmark to induce an effect, the implication of chronic exposure to multiple stressors is still largely unknown. In addition, parent compounds may degrade to thousands of metabolites, which are possibly more toxic pollutants than parent compounds. Pollutants may accumulate in the biological resources through long-term exposure. Monitoring chemical will not solve the need of restoration and environmental quality management eventually, since they are not biological relevant. Thus, in the future, microbial assemblages may be a tool used to disclose chronic low level pollution, because they are highly response to environmental pressure and represent comprehensive environmental signals.
References
Wu C, Spongberg AL, Witter JD, Fang M, Czajkowski KP (2010) Uptake of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products by Soybean Plants from Soils Applied with Biosolids and Irrigated with Contaminated Water. Environ Sci Technol 44(16):6157–6161
Xu J, Wu L, Chen W, Jiang P, Chang AC-S (2009) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), and endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCS) in runoff from a potato field irrigated with treated wastewater in Southern California. J Health Sci 55(2):306–310
Deblonde T, Cossu-Leguille C, Hartemann P (2011) Emerging pollutants in wastewater: a review of the literature. Int J Hyg Environ Health 214(6):442–448
Ingrand V, Herry G, Beausse J, de Roubin M-R (2003) Analysis of steroid hormones in effluents of wastewater treatment plants by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1020(1):99–104
Kim SD, Cho J, Kim IS, Vanderford BJ, Snyder SA (2007) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in South Korean surface, drinking, and waste waters. Water Res 41(5):1013–1021
Ryu J, Yoon Y, Oh J (2011) Occurrence of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals in 11 WWTPs in Seoul, Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 15(1):57–64
Sui Q, Huang J, Deng S, Yu G, Fan Q (2010) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals, caffeine and DEET in wastewater treatment plants of Beijing, China. Water Res 44(2):417–426
Broséus R, Vincent S, Aboulfadl K, Daneshvar A, Sauvé S, Barbeau B, Prévost M (2009) Ozone oxidation of pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors and pesticides during drinking water treatment. Water Res 43(18):4707–4717
Pisarenko AN, Stanford BD, Yan D, Gerrity D, Snyder SA (2012) Effects of ozone and ozone/peroxide on trace organic contaminants and NDMA in drinking water and water reuse applications. Water Res 46(2):316–326
Yoon Y, Westerhoff P, Snyder SA, Wert EC (2006) Nanofiltration and ultrafiltration of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals and personal care products. J Membr Sci 270(1–2):88–100
Wang J, Gardinali P (2012) Analysis of selected pharmaceuticals in fish and the fresh water bodies directly affected by reclaimed water using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 404:2711–2720
Blasco C, Picó Y (2009) Prospects for combining chemical and biological methods for integrated environmental assessment. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 28(6):745–757
Helgeson T, McNeal M (2009) A reconnaissance-level quantitative comparison of reclaimed water, surface water, and ground water. WaterReuse Foundation, Alexandria
Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ (2008) The effect of signal suppression and mobile phase composition on the simultaneous analysis of multiple classes of acidic/neutral pharmaceuticals and personal care products in surface water by solid-phase extraction and ultra performance liquid chromatography-negative electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 74(5):1299–1312
Wang C, Gardinali PR (2012) Comparison of multiple API techniques for the simultaneous detection of microconstituents in water by on-line SPE-LC-MS/MS. J Mass Spectrom 47(10):1255–1268
Ripp J (1996) Analytical Detection Limit Guidance & Laboratory Guide for Determining Method Detection Limits, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Laboratory Certification Program
Beverly SR (2011) Bisphenol A: an endocrine disruptor with widespread exposure and multiple effects. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 127(1–2):27–34
Aronson D, Weeks J, Meylan B, Guiney PD, Howard PH (2012) Environmental release, environmental concentrations, and ecological risk of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET). Integr Environ Assess Manage 8(1):135–166
Larsen MG, Hansen KB, Henriksen PG, Baatrup E (2008) Male zebrafish (Danio rerio) courtship behaviour resists the feminising effects of 17β-ethinyloestradiol-morphological sexual characteristics do not. Aquat Toxicol 87(4):234–244
Küster A, Alder AC, Escher BI, Duis K, Fenner K, Garric J, Hutchinson TH, Lapen DR, Péry A, Römbke J, Snape J, Ternes T, Topp E, Wehrhan A, Knacker T (2009) Environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals in the European Union: a case study with the β-blocker atenolol. Integr Environ Assess Manage 6(S1):514–523
Winter MJ, Lillicrap AD, Caunter JE, Schaffner C, Alder AC, Ramil M, Ternes TA, Giltrow E, Sumpter JP, Hutchinson TH (2008) Defining the chronic impacts of atenolol on embryo-larval development and reproduction in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Aquat Toxicol 86(3):361–369
Heberer T, Reddersen K, Mechlinski A (2002) From municipal sewage to drinking water: fate and removal of pharmaceutical residues in the aquatic environment in urban areas. Water Sci Technol 46(3):81–88
Li Z-H, Zlabek V, Velisek J, Grabic R, Machova J, Randak T (2009) Physiological condition status and muscle-based biomarkers in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), after long-term exposure to carbamazepine. J Appl Toxicol 30(3):197–203
Li Z-H, Zlabek V, Grabic R, Velisek J, Machova J, Randak T (2010) Enzymatic alterations and RNA/DNA ratio in intestine of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, induced by chronic exposure to carbamazepine. Ecotoxicology 19(5):872–878
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Thermo Scientific for providing analytical support. This is contribution number 600 from the Southeast Environmental Research Center at Florida International University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published in the special paper collection Liquid Chromatography—Tandem Mass Spectrometry with guest editors Damià Barceló and Mira Petrovic.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 651 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, C., Gardinali, P.R. Detection and occurrence of microconstituents in reclaimed water used for irrigation – a potentially overlooked source. Anal Bioanal Chem 405, 5925–5935 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6799-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6799-z