Abstract
Human liver microsomes (HLMs) are used to simulate human xenobiotic metabolism in vitro. In forensic and clinical toxicology, HLMs are popularly used to study the metabolism of new designer drugs for example. In this work, we present an automated online extraction system we developed for HLM experiments, which was compared to a classical offline approach. Furthermore, we present studies on the metabolism of 11 cathinones; for eight of these, the metabolism has not previously been reported. Metabolites were identified based on MS2 and MS3 scans. Fifty-three substances encompassing various classes of drugs were employed to compare the established offline and the new online methods. The metabolism of each of the following 11 cathinones was studied using the new method: 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-benzylcathinone, benzedrone, butylone, dimethylcathinone, ethylone, flephedrone, methedrone, methylone, methylethylcathinone, naphyrone, and pentylone. The agreement between the offline and the online methods was good; a total of 158 metabolites were identified. Using only the offline method, 156 (98.7%) metabolites were identified, while 151 (95.6%) were identified using only the online method. The metabolic pathways identified for the 11 cathinones included the reduction of the keto group, desalkylation, hydroxylation, and desmethylenation in cathinones containing a methylenedioxy moiety. Our method provides a straightforward approach to identifying metabolites which can then be added to the library utilized by our clinical toxicological screening method. The performance of our method compares well with that of an established offline HLM procedure, but is as automated as possible.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Identifying metabolites is a necessary task during the drug development process as well as in the clinical and forensic toxicological laboratory. Whereas the main focus during drug development is to determine the presence of a metabolite, the main focus in the toxicological laboratory is to use the metabolites to prove the intake of a particular drug (e.g., a drug of abuse) when urine samples are analyzed. Therefore, metabolite generation by in vivo and in vitro systems is an important tool in both of these fields of application.
Human liver microsomes (HLMs) have become popular tools for simulating human xenobiotic metabolism in vitro, mainly because they are easy to use and store. Phase I metabolism can be studied using HLMs by simply adding NADPH as a cofactor for the main drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP) [1]. However, there are also some drawbacks of this approach, such as the absence of enzymes such as N-acetyltransferase (NAT) or glutathione-S-transferase (GST). In other words, metabolic pathways involving those enzymes cannot be studied using HLMs [1].
In the pharmaceutical industry, HLMs are used for metabolite identification and to predict the clearance of drug candidates in vivo, for example [1]. In the field of forensic and clinical toxicology, HLMs are popularly employed to study, for instance, the metabolism of new designer drugs. The aim of such studies is usually to investigate the metabolism of a new designer drug in order to make it detectable in toxicological screening procedures, or to quantify it using dedicated methods. Examples include the metabolism of the synthetic cannabimimetic JWH-018, for which Wintermeyer et al. [2] used HLMs to study its phase I metabolism in vitro. Meyer et al. [3] studied the metabolism of methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) using HLMs (amongst other methods), and Zaitsu et al. [4] identified several metabolites of butylone and ethylone. The use of mass spectrometry in studies of the metabolism of drugs of abuse and doping agents was recently reviewed, focusing on clinical and forensic toxicology [5].
The process used in HLM experiments can be automated, and this is an especially common approach in the pharmaceutical industry, where a high throughput of experiments is needed. Several methodologies with fully integrated workflows have recently been presented. Drexler et al. [6] developed a sophisticated automated approach to study the metabolic stabilities of drug candidates. This approach involved incubation using HLMs, which was carried out in microplates using an automated liquid handling robot. Similar approaches were presented by Xu et al. [7] and by Jenkins et al. [8], which also used a liquid handling robot to carry out the HLM experiments. Lai et al. [9] described a system where the autosampler was modified to include a heated agitator and the samples were subsequently injected into the online extraction system. The system was used to screen the stability of a prodrug in development. Kool et al. [10] developed an online system using rat liver microsomes to study the affinity of ligands for CYP enzymes.
Regarding the throughput required, assays using, for example, specialized liquid-handling robots are usually overkill for metabolite-generating experiments in the clinical toxicological laboratory, and the high throughput achievable is also not needed.
One possible method for achieving a certain degree of lower-level automation and miniaturization was presented by Nicoli et al. [11] and Curcio et al. [12], which used a capillary as the reaction vessel for HLM experiments. This method included automated metabolite generation, but required manual sample preparation of the incubation mixture.
The main aim of the work presented in this paper was to create an automated method with adequate throughput for our toxicological laboratory to generate phase I metabolites which could then be added to the library utilized by our clinical toxicological screening method [13]. Our approach used a modified, heated autosampler loop for incubation, and the samples were then transferred onto an online extraction LC-MS system. After loading the components for the incubation onto the autosampler, no additional manual steps were needed.
A second aim of this work was to study the metabolism of 11 different cathinones using HLMs; for eight of these, the metabolism has not previously been reported, to our knowledge. Cathinones are a new class of designer drugs that have appeared in the drugs-of-abuse market in recent years. They are reported to inhibit plasma membrane monoamine transporters, thereby increasing the amount of monoamine neurotransmitter in the synaptic cleft [14], which leads to the pharmacological effects of these drugs.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Acetonitrile was purchased from Romil (Cambridge, UK), acetone from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), and methanol and 2-propanol from Seelze (Seelze, Germany); all were of HPLC gradient grade purity. Purified water was produced in-house using a central water purification installation (Burkhalter AG, Worblaufen, Switzerland).
HPLC-grade ammonium acetate and ammonium carbonate were obtained from Scharlau (Taegerig, Switzerland), while analytical grade formic acid and ammonia were from Merck. Analytical grade EDTA, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, potassium hydrogen phosphate, tris base and glacial acetic acid were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland). Glycerol Ph. Eur. was purchased from Haenseler (Herisau, Switzerland).
Human liver microsomes (pooled, male and female), β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate hydrate (NADP+), D-glucose-6-phosphate dipotassium hydrate (G6P), and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) from S. cerevisiae were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich.
Amitriptyline, chlorpromazine, chlorprothixene, duloxetine, ethylone, fenfluramine, fluoxetine, fluphenazine, ketamine, methylone, methylphenidate, mianserine, naphyrone, oxycodone, and phencyclidine were purchased from Cerilliant (Round Rock, TX, USA). Bromazepam, butylone, flephedrone, methaqualone, methylfentanyl, psilocin, tilidine, and zolpidem were obtained from Lipomed (Arlesheim, Switzerland). Amlodipine, bisacodyl, desipramine, flupentixol, maprotiline, perphenazine, promazine, propafenone, sertindole, strychnine, and thioridazine were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. Amisulpride, diclofenac, opipramol, pipamperone, and reboxetine were obtained from TRC (North York, Canada). 3,4-Methylenedioxy-N-benzylcathinone, benzedrone, dimethylcathinone, methedrone, methylethylcathinone, and pentylone were purchased from LGC Standards (Wesel, Germany). Aripiprazol, clotiapine, cinnarizine, cyclizine, dextropropoxyphene, doxylamine, fluvoxamine, meclozine, paroxetine, penfluridol, pethidine, pentazocine, remifentanil, sildenafil, thiethylperazine, thioproperazine, tramadol, and zaleplone were provided by their respective manufacturers.
LC-MS analysis
The turbulent flow online extraction HPLC system consisted of an HTC PAL autosampler, one Allegro pump for the online extraction, and one Allegro pump for the analytical chromatography, all controlled by Aria 1.6.3 software (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basel, Switzerland). The autosampler was equipped with a Hamilton 100 μl syringe for CTC autosamplers (Hamilton, Bonaduz, Switzerland).
The detailed conditions for the online extraction and LC-MS analysis are described in our previous publications [13, 15]. In brief, samples were extracted online using chromatography based on turbulent flow under alkaline conditions using ammonium carbonate buffer 10 mM, pH 8.0. A Cyclone and a C18 XL column (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific) were connected in series to achieve sufficient extraction for substances over a wide polarity range. Analytical chromatography was performed under acidic conditions on a Betasil phenyl/hexyl column (100 × 3 mm, 3 μm particles, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using ammonium acetate 5 mM in water plus 0.1% formic acid and ammonium acetate 5 mM in methanol plus 0.5% formic acid as mobile phases. A mixture of acetonitrile/acetone/2-propanol 1/1/1 (v/v/v) was used as a wash phase. The combination of the two extraction columns and the analytical column could be connected inline and divided again via two six-port switching valves controlled by Aria software.
A LXQ linear ion trap mass spectrometer was used for detection, as controlled by XCalibur 2.0.7 SP1 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Ionization was performed under atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) conditions because of its better performance in terms of ion suppression susceptibility as compared with electrospray ionization (ESI). The vaporizer temperature was fixed at 450 °C, the capillary temperature at 275 °C, the sheath gas flow at 30 arbitrary units (AU), the auxiliary gas flow at 5 AU, and the discharge current was set to 5 μA. Both positive and negative ionization were used, with the polarity constantly switching. Chromatograms were recorded in untargeted data-dependent acquisition mode. In positive ionization mode, MS2 spectra were recorded for the four most abundant ions, and in negative ionization mode they were recorded for the two most abundant ions. MS3 spectra were recorded for the most abundant ion from each MS2 spectrum. The threshold for the acquisition of fragment spectra was set to 100 counts per second. The isolation width was set to 1 amu, while the normalized collision energy for the fragmentation was set to 35%.
For the online metabolism experiment, the injection loop was modified to a 200 μl injection loop placed in a column oven (Thermo Fisher Scientific) that kept the temperature constant at 37 °C.
Metabolism studies
Identification of metabolites
Metabolites were identified using their MS2 and MS3 mass spectra. Methods applied were neutral-loss scans and comparisons of their fragmentation patterns to the parent substances. Raw files were examined both manually and assisted by MassFrontier 7 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Solutions
G6P was prepared as a 0.1 M solution in water and NADP+ as a 10 mg/ml solution in water; both were stored as aliquots at −20 °C until use. The G6PD was dissolved in a mixture consisting of 20% 40 mM Tris-acetate buffer containing 1 mM EDTA and 80% glycerol to achieve an activity of 103 IU/ml at a protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. Aliquots were stored at −20 °C until use. The HLM suspensions were stored as aliquots at −80 °C until usage.
Stock solutions of the test substances were prepared at 1 mg/ml in water or methanol, depending on the solubility of the substance, and stored at −20 °C until use. Dilutions to 10 mg/l were freshly prepared in phosphate buffer 0.1 M, pH 7.4. The remaining amount of organic solvent was always below 1% (v/v).
Offline method
The method was adapted from that of Sohl et al. [16]. To generate the NADPH needed for the reactions, a NADPH-generating system was used. It consisted of 50 parts 0.1 M G6P, 25 parts 10 mg/ml NADP+, and 1 part G6PD at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and an activity of 103 IU/ml; all solutions were prepared as described above. The mixture was pre-incubated for 1 min before adding it to the incubation mixture to start the reaction.
Five hundred picomoles of total CYP were used in the incubation mixture per incubation. The substances were added diluted in phosphate buffer 0.1 M, pH 7.4 at a concentration of 10 mg/l. The total volume of the incubation mixture was 112 μl.
The mixture was incubated in a water bath at 37 °C for 3 h under occasional gently mixing. After 3 h, the reaction was stopped by adding 110 μl of ice-cold acetonitrile to the incubation mixture. After vigorous vortexing and centrifugation for 5 min at 11,700×g and 10 °C, the supernatant was transferred into autosampler vials and stored at 10 °C until injection. One hundred microliters were analyzed as described above.
Online method
The same components (NADPH-generating system, HLM suspension, and substances in phosphate buffer) were used as described above and used for the offline method. The autosampler was modified with a 200 μl injection loop which could be heated to 37 °C using a column oven. The heated autosampler loop served as the incubation vessel. The HLM suspension, the NADPH-generating system, and the phosphate buffer 0.1 M, pH 7.4 containing the substances at a concentration of 10 mg/l were stored separately in the cooled autosampler stack at 10 °C until usage.
To combine the incubation mixture, the autosampler was programmed using the standard options of the Aria software to first pipette the HLM suspension (15 μl), then the NADPH-generating system (10 μl), and finally the phosphate buffer containing the substances (75 μl) into the heated loop. Afterwards, using the installed 100 μl syringe of the autosampler, the whole incubation mixture was slowly mixed twice by aspiration followed by immediate ejection. To ensure that the 100 μl incubation mixture was in the heated region of the loop inside the column oven, a 30 μl air gap was pushed behind the incubation mixture.
The mixture was incubated in the loop for 50 min, and then the injection valve was switched to the active position, which caused the incubation mixture to be transferred onto the online extraction columns. By transferring the incubation mixture onto the online extraction columns, the reaction was stopped by separating the drug-metabolizing enzymes from the small organic molecules.
Intermediate precision of the online method
To check the stability of the HLM suspension and the NADPH-generating system in the cooled autosampler stack, venlafaxine was chosen as a test compound and repeatedly injected over a 6 h period. Stability was evaluated by calculating the ratio of the peak area of O-desmethylvenlafaxine to the peak area of venlafaxine.
To check the between-day intermediate precision of the method, including different lots of HLM suspensions, clotiapine was injected on four different days. We checked whether all of the metabolites could be identified on all of the days.
Method comparison
Fifty-three compounds from various drug classes were metabolized with the offline method as well as the online method in order to compare the efficiency of metabolite generation by the new online procedure.
HLM metabolism of 11 cathinones
To study the phase I metabolism of the 11 cathinones (3,4-methylenedioxy-N-benzylcathinone, benzedrone, butylone, dimethylcathinone, ethylone, flephedrone, methedrone, methylone, methylethylcathinone, naphyrone, and pentylone), they were metabolized with the new online metabolite generation system, and the resulting chromatograms were analyzed in order to identify metabolites. The structures of the different cathinones studied are shown in Fig. 1.
Results
Online method
Using the online method, manual workup was reduced significantly. The only manual steps needed were the loading of the HLM suspension, the substances in phosphate buffer, and the NADPH-generating system onto the autosampler.
During method development, the poor dispensability of the highly viscous HLM suspension was identified as a problem. This was solved by setting the drawing speed of the autosampler syringe to a low value (5 μl/s) and adjusting the waiting time before the syringe was lifted out of the autosampler vial from 0.1 s to 1 s in order to allow enough time for the viscous suspension to flow into the autosampler syringe.
The remaining volume of HLM suspension that could not be dispensed was reduced to <5 μl by adjusting the penetration level of the autosampler syringe.
The incubation duration of 50 min was a compromise between the speed and efficiency of metabolite generation; both shorter and longer incubation times are possible with this system. The chromatographic run after the 50 min incubation took about 33 min. However, a new incubation could be started 3 min after the chromatography of the previous incubation was initiated. When a series of different drugs were tested, the time needed for single substances could therefore be reduced to only 50 min (because the previous incubation was analyzed during the incubation of the next sample) instead of 83 min, which represents the sum of the incubation time plus the chromatographic time.
Intermediate precision of the online method
The autosampler stability experiment using the demethylation of venlafaxine to its main metabolite, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, showed that the HLM suspension and the NADPH-generating system were stable enough to be used over a time period of at least 6 h when kept in the cooled autosampler stack at 10 °C; the O-desmethylvenlafaxine to venlafaxine peak ratio was still 50% of its initial value after 6 h. This is acceptable considering the goal of the method, which was to generate metabolites which would then be added to the library of our toxicological screening method.
In the interday experiment using the metabolites of clotiapine and different lots of HLM suspensions, the same six metabolites (desmethyl-, MI, MII, MIII, MIV, and MV, as shown in Table 1) were identified on all four days, demonstrating that the method achieves reproducible results.
Method comparison
The phase I metabolites of the 53 test compounds identified with the offline and the online methods are shown in Table 1. A chromatogram for pipamperone and its metabolites as well as the corresponding mass spectra of the metabolites can be seen in Fig. 2.
Using the offline method, a total of 156 metabolites were identified. Using the online method, a total of 151 metabolites were identified, among which two metabolites were identified that were not identified by the offline method, and seven metabolites identified by the offline method were not identified using the online method. Therefore, a total of 158 metabolites were identified using both methods, among which 156 (98.7%) were identified by the offline method and 151 (95.6%) by the online method. The seven metabolites that were not identified using the online method were dehydronorketamine, didesmethyltramadol, didesmethyldoxylamine, didesmethylchlorpromazine, cyclic dinordextropropoxyphene, and two oxidation products of thioridazine. The two metabolites identified solely by the online method were dehydrosertindole and an oxidation product of thioproperazine.
Not all of the metabolites could be identified unambiguously using only LC-MS. For example, the differentiation of N-oxide- and hydroxy metabolites was not always possible using the acquired MS spectra only. In Table 1, those metabolites are denoted using the naming scheme of M plus a Roman numeral, and the different chemical structures are mentioned in the final column. To elucidate the exact structure of each metabolite, complementary techniques need to be applied.
HLM phase I metabolism of 11 cathinones
The proposed structures of the identified phase I metabolites are shown in Figs. 3, 4, and 5. The general metabolism pathways seen in several substances include desalkylation of the amine group (cf. Fig. 1). This metabolite was seen in all cathinones tested apart from naphyrone, which contains a tertiary amine included in a 5-ring instead of the secondary amine present in all of the other tested substances. Other metabolites observed for more than one substance include those resulting from the reduction of the keto group and hydroxylation products. In cathinones containing a methylenedioxy moiety, this moiety can be desmethylenated to the respective diol, a metabolite which exhibited quite a high intensity in our experiments. Combinations of the mentioned phase I metabolites were also observed for some substances, indicating subsequent metabolism steps.
Discussion
The majority of the metabolites identified using the offline method (95.6% of them) could be identified using the online method. A possible issue for the other seven metabolites that could not be identified using the online method may be the difference in incubation times. In the offline method, substances were incubated for 3 h, but this was reduced to 50 min in the online method to speed up the process.
As sertindole is light sensitive, the lack of identification of dehydrosertindole by the offline method could be due to the instability of the parent compound. In the opaque loop used for online incubation, the incubation mixture was always protected from the light, which was not the case in the Eppendorf vials that were used for the offline method.
The online method minimizes the manual preparation steps required compared to the offline method. This helped to speed up the whole process and to minimize errors. The autosampler modifications required were minimal and could be done in a few minutes. The system can therefore be used sequentially for clinical toxicological analysis and for metabolism experiments.
In 2005, a method using similar instrumentation was published. Lai et al. [9] used an automated online extraction system to study pro-drug stability. The autosampler was modified and included a heated agitator for sample incubation. Incubation vials containing the biological matrix (e.g., S9 fraction) diluted with buffer were stored in the cooled autosampler stack. The autosampler was programmed to add the cofactors (e.g., the NADPH-generating system) to this vial and subsequently transport the whole vial to the heated agitator. After a pre-incubation, the test substance was added. At programmed time points, the autosampler withdrew an aliquot for analysis, which was subsequently extracted online using turbulent flow chromatography. Compared with our method, the autosampler needed more modifications (e.g., the heated agitator). In our approach, only the loop needed to be changed in daily operation. Also, fewer manual steps were needed, since the autosampler adds not only cofactors and the test substance to the incubation mixture but also the HLM suspension. However, our method was slower and did not allow sampling at different time points, since the aim of the method was a different one. We were not interested in kinetic experiments, only the end points.
Compared to the method of Nicoli et al. [11] and Curcio et al. [12], where a capillary was used as reaction vessel for the HLM experiments, our method coupled the use of a modified injection loop online to an online extraction system. No manual sample pretreatment was necessary.
Compared to fully integrated and automated solutions, as presented by Drexler et al. [6], Xu et al. [7], and Jenkins et al. [8] for instance, our method had a much lower throughput. The aim of this work was not a fully integrated high-throughput method but a method that is as automated and makes it as easy as possible to generate metabolites that can be added to the library of our toxicological screening method, and to study the metabolism of new designer drugs.
To our knowledge, among the 11 cathinones studied, only butylone, ethylone, and methylone have had their metabolisms published already [4, 17, 18], and these have always been based on the use of HLMs. For butylone and ethylone, Zaitsu et al. [4] identified the normetabolite, produced by the reduction of the keto group to the corresponding alcohol and demethylenation with subsequent methylation by the catechol-O-methyltransferase. Meyer et al. [18] were also able to detect those metabolites for butylone using their standard toxicological GC-MS screening procedure. In our experiments, we also detected the normetabolites for butylone and ethylone. Since we did not add the co-substrate needed for the methylation (S-adenosylmethionine; SAM) to the incubation mixture, we could not detect the methylated derivatives of both cathinones, only the demethylenyl-diol-metabolites. Interestingly, we did not observe the products of keto-group reduction, but we were able to identify an additional hydroxy metabolite for both butylone and ethylone.
The metabolism of methylone was studied by Kamata et al. [17]. They identified the normetabolite and the demethylenation products, which were methylated by the catechol-O-methyltransferase. Meyer et al. [18] identified an additional metabolite, the demethylenated normetabolite, which was again methylated by the catechol-O-methyltransferase. We also detected the normetabolite, but no demethylenation products. Instead, we detected a metabolite due to the reduction of the keto group plus a hydroxy metabolite.
No information on the metabolism of the other cathinones could be found in the literature. However, the metabolic pathways described for butylone, ethylone, and methylone were also observed in most other cathinones.
Conclusions
The method presented in this paper provides an easy way to identify metabolites (which can then be added to the library of our clinical toxicological screening method) at an adequate throughput. The performance of the method compared well with that of an established offline HLM procedure, but it requires less manual work.
Abbreviations
- APCI:
-
Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization
- AU:
-
Arbitrary units
- bk:
-
Beta-keto
- CYP:
-
Cytochrome P450
- EDTA:
-
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- ESI:
-
Electrospray ionization
- GST:
-
Glutathione-S-transferase
- G6P:
-
Glucose-6-phosphate
- G6PD:
-
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
- HPLC:
-
High-pressure liquid chromatography
- HLMs:
-
Human liver microsomes
- IU:
-
International units
- LC-MS:
-
Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
- MDPV:
-
Methylenedioxypyrovalerone
- NADP+ :
-
Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (oxidized form)
- NADPH:
-
Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (reduced form)
- NAT:
-
N-Acetyltransferase
References
Asha S, Vidyavathi M (2010) Role of human liver microsomes in in vitro metabolism of drugs—a review. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160:1699–1722
Wintermeyer A, Moller I, Thevis M, Jubner M, Beike J, Rothschild MA, Bender K (2010) In vitro phase I metabolism of the synthetic cannabimimetic JWH-018. Anal Bioanal Chem 398:2141–2153
Meyer MR, Du P, Schuster F, Maurer HH (2010) Studies on the metabolism of the alpha-pyrrolidinophenone designer drug methylenedioxy-pyrovalerone (MDPV) in rat and human urine and human liver microsomes using GC-MS and LC-high-resolution MS and its detectability in urine by GC-MS. J Mass Spectrom 45:1426–1442
Zaitsu K, Katagi M, Kamata HT, Kamata T, Shima N, Miki A, Tsuchihashi H, Mori Y (2009) Determination of the metabolites of the new designer drugs bk-MBDB and bk-MDEA in human urine. Forensic Sci Int 188:131–139
Meyer MR, Maurer HH (2011) Current status of hyphenated mass spectrometry in studies of the metabolism of drugs of abuse, including doping agents. Anal Bioanal Chem
Drexler DM, Belcastro JV, Dickinson KE, Edinger KJ, Hnatyshyn SY, Josephs JL, Langish RA, McNaney CA, Santone KS, Shipkova PA, Tymiak AA, Zvyaga TA, Sanders M (2007) An automated high throughput liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry process to assess the metabolic stability of drug candidates. Assay Drug Dev Technol 5:247–264
Xu R, Manuel M, Cramlett J, Kassel DB (2010) A high throughput metabolic stability screening workflow with automated assessment of data quality in pharmaceutical industry. J Chromatogr A 1217:1616–1625
Jenkins KM, Angeles R, Quintos MT, Xu R, Kassel DB, Rourick RA (2004) Automated high throughput ADME assays for metabolic stability and cytochrome P450 inhibition profiling of combinatorial libraries. J Pharm Biomed Anal 34:989–1004
Lai F, Khojasteh-Bakht SC (2005) Automated online liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric metabolic study for prodrug stability. J Chromatogr B 814:225–232
Kool J, van Liempd SM, van Rossum H, van Elswijk DA, Irth H, Commandeur JN, Vermeulen NP (2007) Development of three parallel cytochrome P450 enzyme affinity detection systems coupled on-line to gradient high-performance liquid chromatography. Drug Metab Dispos 35:640–648
Nicoli R, Curcio R, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL (2009) Development of an in-capillary approach to nanoscale automated in vitro cytochromes p450 assays. J Med Chem 52:2192–2195
Curcio R, Nicoli R, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL (2010) Evaluation of an in-capillary approach for performing quantitative cytochrome P450 activity studies. Anal Bioanal Chem 398:2163–2171
Mueller DM, Duretz B, Espourteille FA, Rentsch KM (2011) Development of a fully automated toxicological LC-MS(n) screening system in urine using online extraction with turbulent flow chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem 400:89–100
Cozzi NV, Sievert MK, Shulgin AT, Jacob P 3rd, Ruoho AE (1999) Inhibition of plasma membrane monoamine transporters by beta-ketoamphetamines. Eur J Pharmacol 381:63–69
Mueller DM, Rentsch KM (2011) Online extraction toxicological MS(n) screening system for serum and heparinized plasma and comparison of screening results between plasma and urine in the context of clinical data. J Chromatogr B
Sohl CD, Cheng Q, Guengerich FP (2009) Chromatographic assays of drug oxidation by human cytochrome P450 3A4. Nat Protoc 4:1252–1257
Kamata HT, Shima N, Zaitsu K, Kamata T, Miki A, Nishikawa M, Katagi M, Tsuchihashi H (2006) Metabolism of the recently encountered designer drug, methylone, in humans and rats. Xenobiotica 36:709–723
Meyer MR, Wilhelm J, Peters FT, Maurer HH (2010) Beta-keto amphetamines: studies on the metabolism of the designer drug mephedrone and toxicological detection of mephedrone, butylone, and methylone in urine using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 397:1225–1233
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Thermo Fisher Scientific for providing the LC-MS system and the online extraction instrument.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mueller, D.M., Rentsch, K.M. Generation of metabolites by an automated online metabolism method using human liver microsomes with subsequent identification by LC-MS(n), and metabolism of 11 cathinones. Anal Bioanal Chem 402, 2141–2151 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5678-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5678-8