Abstract
In biomolecular interaction analysis, direct optical detection is attracting increasing interest in academia and industry. Therefore, a previous review has been updated. Optical principles are given in brief, focussing especially on modern and frequently used techniques. Commercialized methods are listed with some specific applications. In addition, some of the many applications found in the literature are listed; others which have been reviewed elsewhere are cited. Overall, the growing interest in direct optical monitoring of biomolecular interaction is demonstrated and future trends are outlined. Because optical methods is a very wide field, the paper concentrates on the currently most common methods, microrefractometry and microreflectivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
A recent article in Science “Who needs labels?” [1] was the reason for considering the development of direct optical sensing during the past five years as an update to a previous review [2]. Especially, the growing interest in quantitative monitoring of protein–protein interactions, in miniaturization and parallelization, and in increasing applications make approaches of direct optical detection in bioanalysis competitive with fluorescence techniques which use labelled compounds. Thereby, besides innovations in optical techniques and improvements of transduction platforms, the potential application of such techniques to a huge variety of bioanalytical problems is the main innovation. Therefore, quite a few reviews have been published in recent years, either reviewing the different transduction methods [3] or reviewing applications and discussing trends [4–8].
In addition to analytical microarrays based on labelled compounds [9, 10], many direct optical techniques for microarray analysis have been reviewed. Loss of bioactivity and cost of labelling are increasingly regarded as disadvantages of fluorescence arrays, especially going from immunosensors to biosensors dealing with nucleic acids and whole-cell systems, besides protein–protein interactions. Therefore, for higher throughput, protein microarrays and, in proteomics [11, 12], direct optical techniques have had their first applications. Stimuli-responsive applications are certainly preferably performed by using direct optical techniques [13]. These will also help to obtain more information in the signalling chain or to discriminate between agonists and antagonists [14].
Quite a few systems using direct optical detection are now commercially available [7]. Commercialization started when Biacore entered the market [15, 16], using the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technique [17, 18]. Accordingly, in recent years this technique has opened the market and, as will be discussed later, a large number of companies supply different instrumentation using various optical detection techniques.
Non-optical screening approaches [19] relying on other label-free techniques for example impedance spectroscopy, acoustic systems, or micro-electro mechanical sensors, will not be discussed here. Also, techniques such as FTIR [20], FTIR Microscopy [21], ATR-FTIR [22], Raman spectroscopy [23], surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy [24], terahertz spectroscopy [25], circular dichroism [26], and the optical read-out of cantilevers [27] are not a subject of this paper. FTR chemical imaging is also a strongly emerging technology [28]. However, space restrictions force the author to concentrate on techniques known from direct optical sensing and based on refractometry and reflectometry in the UV–visible range.
Optical principles
Fluorescence-monitoring-based instrumentation relies on equipment well-established commercially, uses standard procedures and assays, and achieves a very low limit of detection, even down to single-molecule detection. For this reason, most routine assays use fluorescence read-out or plate readers. In pharmaceutical companies and in clinical diagnostics, this approach is commonly used. However, as mentioned before, expenditure and costs, and problems with bioactivity are a disadvantage in combination with the problem of photo-bleaching which normally does not allow time-resolved monitoring for evaluation of kinetics.
In contrast, this type of monitoring can easily be done with direct optical techniques which at present allow even the use of direct assays in which reagents are no longer necessary; this is an advantage in many routine applications [29–31]. The disadvantage is the problem with non-specific binding and the higher limit of detection compared with fluorescence techniques. However, photothermal refraction, known for many years [32, 33], is regarded as overcoming problems of high limits of detection and could even achieve detection of few molecules in very small volume elements.
Direct optical detection methods have been reviewed quite frequently in recent years [2, 3, 8]. The optical principles have been presented in textbooks [34], handbooks [35], and monographs [36–39]. In general, these optical techniques can use optodes and measure colour changes, but they are more generally applicable using direct reflection techniques. These can be classified according to two principles—microrefractometry and microreflectometry. This means the spectroscopy of biomolecules at the surface is monitored by measuring the interaction between a thin biomolecular layer containing recognition sites and a ligand or an analyte in solution. The radiation reflectance in general measures changes in the so-called optical thickness which is the product of the refractive index n and the physical thickness d of this interaction layer. Fresnel equations [34] can be used to explain these effects, which either result in changes of the evanescent field at the interface of the optical transducer or in white light interference at this layer.
Looking at microrefractometry, the refractive index of the optical thickness is especially interesting, because exponential decay of the evanescent field into the interaction layer causes inhomogeneous signal penetration of this interaction layer. This enables effects in restricted elements of the interaction layer, or close to it, and the bulk to be distinguished, but reduces the effects at a distance from the transducer surface. Furthermore, the refractive index is rather temperature-dependent which requires very strict temperature control (thermostatting) or very good referencing. Accordingly, surface plasmon techniques control the temperature down to 0.01 K. The principle of this waveguide-based principle is explained in Fig. 1a, where at the interface waveguide/interaction layer the electric field vector (coupled to the guided radiation within the waveguide) decays exponentially into this layer and analyte-containing solution. Among the various realizations of evanescent field effects readout, SPR [39, 40] (Fig. 2a), grating couplers [41, 42] (Fig. 2b), resonant mirror [43, 44] (Fig. 2c), Mach–Zehnder-Interferometer [45, 46] (Fig. 2d), Young interferometer [47] (Fig. 2e), and Bragg gratings [48] (Fig. 2f) are best known in research applications (to name just the most commonly used) and, as Table 2 demonstrates, in commercialization, too. All these optical principles have been frequently explained and reviewed [2–4, 36], therefore Table 1 only attempts to summarize the evanescent field techniques and to classify according to the read-out principle of effective refractive index caused in the waveguide by effects in proximity to the interface waveguide/sample bulk.
In contrast, using microreflectometry, the signal is nearly independent of temperature because a volume increase of the interaction layer with temperature is compensated by a decrease of the refractive index with temperature. In addition, reflectometry concentrates on measuring changes in the physical thickness of this interaction layer, using an approach that is independent of the layer thickness because exponential decay of the evanescent field is not essential for the signal. In principle, white light is reflected at the interfaces of the interaction layer, the reflected radiations superimpose to form an interference spectrum (Fig. 1b) which shifts with wavelength upon changes in the optical thickness (in linear dependence on the physical thickness between a few hundred nanometres and micrometres). Therefore this method is called reflectometric interference spectroscopy (RIfS) [2]. Thus, microreflectometric methods are also predominant in measuring cell-based assays, interaction at thick layers shielding the transducer against non-specific binding, and in arrays without cross-talk from spot to spot. Accordingly, an increasing number of applications are being published (see later).
A family of reflectometric sensors has been developed, starting with white light interference, using the total interference spectrum [49], or measuring just a few wavelengths in the case of parallelized detection in microtiter plates [50], using four wavelengths for chemical detectors [51], and ending with the measurement at a single wavelength together with a reference which also enables modern quantitative imaging techniques [52]. Reflectometric interference turns out to be an optically very robust and simple method which enables direct determination of the interaction of small molecules and gives good results for parallelised measurements on chips, as will be demonstrated below.
A rather special device is the picoscope, which is, in principle, based on correlation of two different interferometer positions [53]. It can be combined with Fabri–Perot, Mach–Zehnder or Michelson set-ups, and has also been used as a biosensor.
Commercial instrumentation
Screening of recent literature and of company presentations on the internet reveals a large variety of commercially available instrumentation, as given in Table 2. As demonstrated, especially surface plasmon resonance and grating couplers have been commercialized. Formerly, a resonant mirror system was available commercially; however, the company has recently stopped supporting this system [54]. A recent development of grating couplers is the use of photonic crystals which are used in a commercialized system from SRU Biosystems in their BIND approach [55, 56]. Embedded gratings in fibres, for example Bragg gratings are also a possibility not yet really used in bioapplications, but more in remote sensing and security aspects [48]. Surface plasmon resonance is the method which many companies have commercialized as can be seen in Table 2.
Later than SPR and commercialized by fewer companies, reflectometry started a few years ago. Reflectometric interference is a stripped-down ellipsometry method [101] which uses polarised radiation and is especially useful to characterise biolayers for biosensing [102]. However, ellipsometry is rather complex and not suitable for simple biosensing. Nevertheless, based on this principle Maven Biotechnologies has developed LFIRE (label-free internal reflection ellipsometry) [103], which enables precise, real-time measurement of specific interactions between molecular entities in a microarray or well-plate format and combines the principles of ellipsometry and evanescent wave detection. However, the instrumentation thereby loses the advantages of simple RIfS of negligible temperature dependence. A typical application is given for reversed-phase protein arrays measuring antigen–antibody interaction or glycobiology [104]. ForteBio [105] avoids evanescence problems and utilizes what they call proprietary bio-layer interferometry (BLI). Coated fibres dip into the wells of a microtiter plate in this OCTET system, read-out shifts in interference spectra for 16 wells are simultaneously measured to calculate binding curves [106]. Biametrics [107] intends to bring a family of reflectometric interference instrumentation to the market, covering simple, robust single-wavelength devices, spectral measurements and quantitative imaging systems.
A rather interesting modification uses two parallel waveguides in a chip in which radiation is coupled in by a grating and coupled out by another grating forming a free-space Young interferometer. This principle can be identified in instrumentation commercialized by Farfield in Crewe (UK) [108]. The AnaLight instrument series supplies a variety of instruments for biophysics and surface analysis [109]. It is used to interrogate DNA immobilization and DNA−small-molecule interactions in real time [110].
New applications
In the area of evanescent field techniques, surface plasmon resonance applications dominate the literature. Some publications give good reviews [18, 39, 40, 69] and outline future trends [70]. A number of other applications, using specific commercial instruments, can be seen in Table 2. An interesting application using multiwavelength SPR is the study of conformational and electronic changes induced by the electron-transfer reaction in cytochrome c [111], the detection of pathogenic microorganisms [112], and the analysis of food samples [113]. Other applications are the combination of SPR microscopy and imaging to analyse kinetics quantitatively [114], fragment-based screening [115], the discrimination of mutants [116], and the quantitative analysis of small molecule interactions with nucleic acids [117].
Bragg grating-assisted plasmon–polariton fibres are new approaches, and their quality is demonstrated for bio-medical applications [118]. Newer approaches of resonant mirrors use porous silicon for measurement of very low DNA concentrations [119]. Further applications of Mach–Zehnder chips have been implemented in bioanalysis [120]. Integration of micro fluidics and the use of standard CMOS compatible processed lab-on-chip systems have been realised to measure DNA [121]. To reduce the limit of detection, magneto–optic modifications have been patented [122] and parallelised. Because zero compensation is more sensitive in principle, better results are achieved [123]. However, experimental expenditure increases. The resulting interference fringes of the superimposed partial beams leaving the two arms of a Young interferometer are used to monitor an anti-human serum albumin–human albumin immunoreaction in a micro fluidic sensing system [124].
Starting in reflectometry with antigen–antibody interaction, RIfS enables quantification of DNA–ligand interactions [125]. The ligand-induced assembly of the type I interferon receptor on supported lipid bilayers has been examined [126] and the adsorption of proteins on biomaterial surfaces has been quantitatively evaluated [127]. A modification of RIfS has been used to detect nucleic acid targets on optically coated silicon [128] and label-free oligonucleotides [129]. Biochips have been examined by use of a Fabri–Perot type interferometer [130]. Some additional applications have recently been reviewed in Ref. [8]. SPR and RIfS have been compared, giving practical tips for data evaluation and obtaining kinetic constants [131]. Another interesting approach is a Fourier transform version used as LC detector [132] or for characterizing antibodies on the basis of their affinity constants in affinity chromatography [133]. As a result of surface modification, affinity constants of LNA and DNA duplex formation have been determined [134], endocrine receptors have been examined [135], and cell morphology has also been examined by RIfS [136]. Binding of ubiquitin to short peptide segments of hydrolase has been studied in comparison with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, isothermal calorimetry, and NMR [137].
Hyphenated techniques are frequently used in analysis. It is easy to couple SPR to MALDI-TOF using the metal transducer. Coating the glass type surface with ITO (indium tin oxide) to achieve a matrix for laser desorption; mixtures of the emergency antibiotic vancomycin have been examined [138]. The spectroscopic detector can also be substituted with RIfS. Electrophoretic flow conditions can be monitored directly [139], because no metallic film, which would cause a breakdown of any applied electrical potential, is involved. Combining electrokinetics and reflectometric interference furnishes insight into hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions of fibronectins on biofilms and electrostatics of biopolymers [140, 141].The combination of interferometry with AFM has been reported recently [142]. Interesting is a combination of infrared spectroscopy with RIfS which besides interaction kinetics also provides sample identification [143].
Label-free detection in high-content screening [144] and the trends in fragment-based screening [145] have been reported recently. In a very recent publication reflectometric interference spectroscopy cannot only be used to monitor and quantify bio-interaction processes but can also be used to discriminate agonists and antagonists (Fig. 3) [14].
Conclusion
Direct optical detection has been developed as an interesting tool, not only to determine binding constants, i.e. study of thermodynamics and their equilibrium, but also to enable measurement of kinetics, i.e. the rate constants of processes even in competitive reaction schemes. As mentioned, these techniques enable the use of simpler assays (direct detection without reagents), are less expensive because labelling is avoided, and can overcome problems with loss of bioactivity (by labelling). Thus, these methods open an approach to signalling and even monitoring of system biology. Accordingly, besides antibody–antigen detection, hybridisation studies and measurements for drug design, protein–protein interaction, the measurement of nuclear receptors is now possible. This means the recent interest in bioanalysis is aimed at effect-directed analysis, i.e. at dose-related effects, and also considers membranes and cell-based assays as essential. Direct optical transduction has achieved a high standard; many instruments are available commercially and the principles have proved their feasibility in many applications. The trend in interaction monitoring of large molecules, complex structures, and proteins is directed to direct optical detection. Although fluorescence assays achieve far lower limits of detection and quantification, modern instrumentation provides possibilities of examining even interactions of small molecules and reaching LOD and LOQ down to 1 pg mm−2 in the case of appropriate binding constants and molecule size. Thereby, reflectometry is far less dependent on temperature effects and a high degree of parallelisation has been proved.
References
Perkel JM (2009) Who needs labels? Macromolecular interaction sans labels. Science Sep 19:1561–1565
Gauglitz G (2005) Direct optical sensors: principles and selected applications. Anal Bioanal Chem 381(1):141–155
Fan XD, White IM, Shopova SI, Zhu HY, Suter JD, Sun YZ (2009) Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: A review. Anal Chim Acta 620:8–26
Marazela MD, Morreno-Bondi MC (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 372:664
Cooper MA (2002) Optical biosensors in drug discovery. Nature 1:515–527
Cooper MA (2003) Label-free screening of bio-molecular interactions. Anal Bioanal Chem 377:834–842
Cooper MA (2006) Optical biosensors: where next and how soon? Drug Discovery Today 11:1061–1067
Gauglitz G, Proll G (2008) Strategies for label-free optical detection. In: Scheper T (ed) Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 109 (biosensing for the 21st century). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 395–432
Seidel M, Niessner R (2008) Automated analytical microarrays: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem 391:1521–1544
Bally M, Halter M, Vörös J, Grandin HM (2006) Optical microarray biosensing techniques. Surf Interface Anal 38:1442–1458
Rich RL, Myszka DG (2007) Higher-throughput, label-free, real-time molecular interaction analysis. Anal Biochem 361:1–6
Yu XB, Xu DK, Cheng Q (2006) Label-free detection methods for protein microarrays. Proteomics 6:5493–5503
Mendes PM (2008) Stimuli-responsive surfaces for bio-applications. Chem Soc Rev 37:2512–2529
Fechner P, Proell F, Carlquist M, Proll G (2009) An advanced biosensor for the prediction of estrogenic effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on the estrogen receptor alpha. Anal Bioanal Chem 393:1579–1585
http://www.biacore.com/lifesciences/products/systems_overview/index.html
Löfås S (2007) Biacore – Creating the Business of Label-Free Protein-Interaction Analysis. In: Marks RS, Cullen DC, Karube I, Lowe CR, Weetall HH (eds) Handbook of Biosensors and Biochips. John Wiley & Sons, pp 1261–1271
Liedberg B, Nylander C, Lundström I (1993) Sens Actuators 4:299
Homola J, Yee SS, Gauglitz G (1999) Surface plasmon resonance sensors. Sens Actuators B: Chemical 54(1–2):3–15
Cooper MA (2006) Non-optical screening platforms: the next wave in label-free screening? Drug Discovery Today 11(23/24):1068–1074
Ng LM, Simmons R (1999) Anal Chem 71:343R
Huleihel M, Pavlov V, Erukhimovitch V (2009) The use of FTIR microscopy for the evaluation of anti-bacterial agents activity. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 96:17–23
Goormaghtigh E, Gasper R, Benard A, Goldsztein A, Raussens V (2009) Protein secondary structure content in solution, films and tissues: Redundancy and complementarity of the information content in circular dichroism, transmission and ATR FTIR spectra. Biochim Biophys Acta, Proteins and Proteomic 1794:1332–1343
Krafft C, Roesch P, Popp J (2009) Raman spectroscopy in medicine. In: Bohr HC (ed) Handbook of molecular biophysics, XXXVIII–XXXIX. Wiley–VCH Verlag, Weinheim
Porter MD, Lipert RJ, Siperko LM, Wang G, Narayanan R (2008) SERS as a bioassay platform: fundamentals, design, and applications. Chemical Society Reviews 37:1001–1011
Kitagawa J, Ohkubo T, Onuma M, Kadoya Y (2006) THz spectroscopic characterization of biomolecule/water systems by compact sensor chips. Applied Physics Letters 89:041114/1–041114/3
Zubritsky E (1999) Anal Chem 71:545A
Fritz J (2008) Cantilever biosensors. Analyst 133:855–863
Bhargava R (2007) Towards a practical Fourier transform infrared chemical imaging protocol for cancer histopathology. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1155–1169
Kröger K, Bauer J, Fleckenstein B, Rademann J, Jung G, Gauglitz G (2002) Epitope-mapping of transglutaminase with parallel label-free optical detection. Biosens Bioelectron 17:937–944
Mehlmann M, Garvin AM, Steinwand M, Gauglitz G (2005) Reflectometric interference spectroscopy combined with MALDI–TOF mass spectrometry to determine quantitative and qualitative binding of mixtures of vancomycin derivatives. Anal Bioanal Chem 382:1942–1948
Schwarz B, Proll G, Gauglitz G (2010) Label-free point of care assay for infectious agents such as the H1N1 virus. Book of Abstracts Europt(r)ode X Prag, March 28–31, p213
Nolan TG, Weimer WA, Burgi DS, Dovichi NJ (1984) Laser induced phothermal refraction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Lasers, pp. 430–432
Seidel BS, Faubel W (1997) Miniaturized photothermal sensor as analytical tools for detection of very small volumes in chemical process control. Optical Engineering 36:46–472
Hecht E (2001) Optics, 4th edn. Addison Wesley, London
Albers WM et al (2003) Bioanalysis. In: Gauglitz G, Vo-Dinh T (eds) Handbook of spectroscopy, vol. 2. Wiley–VCH, Weinheim
Gauglitz G (1996) In: Baltes H, Göpel W, Hesse J (eds) Sensors update, vol 1. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim
Narayanaswamy R, Wolfbeis OS (2004) Optical sensors. In: Wolfbeis OS (ed) Springer series on chemical sensors and biosensors, vol. 1. Springer Heidelberg
Orellana G, Moreno-Bondi MC (2005) Frontiers in chemical sensors. In: Wolfbeis OS (ed) Springer series on chemical sensors and biosensors, vol. 3. Springer, Heidelberg
Homola J, Yee SS, Myszka D (2008) Surface plasmon resonance biosensors. In: Ligler FS, Taitt CR (eds) Optical biosensors, 2nd edn. Elsevier B.V, Amsterdam
Schasfoort RBM, McWhirter A (2008) SPR instrumentation. In: Schasfoort RBM, Tudos AJ (eds) Handbook of surface plasmon resonance. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 35–80
Fattinger C, Mangold C, Gale MT, Schuetz H (1995) Opt Eng (Bellingham, Wash) 34:2744–2753
Vörös J, Ramsden JJ, Csucs G, Szendrõ I, De Paul SM, Textor M, Spencer ND (2002) Optical grating coupler biosensors. Biomaterials 23:3699–3710
Cush R, Cronin JM, Stewart WJ (1993) Biosens Bioelectron 8:347
De Tommasi E, De Stefano L, Rea I, Di Sarno V, Rotiroti L, Arcari P, Lamberti A, Sanges C, Rendina I (2008) Porous silicon based resonant mirrors for biochemical sensing. Sensors 8:6549–6556
Ingenhoff J, Drapp B, Gauglitz G (1993) Biosensors using integrated optical devices. Fresenius J Anal Chem 346:580–583
Sepúlveda B, Armelles G, Lechuga LM (2007) Magneto-optical phase modulation in integrated Mach–Zehnder interferometric sensors. Sensor Actuator A 134:339–347
Ymeti A, Kanger JS, Greve J, Besselink GAJ, Lambeck PV, Wijn R, Heideman RG (2005) Integration of microfluidics with a four-channel integrated optical Young interferometer immunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 20:1417–1421
Maguis S, Laffont G, Ferdinand P, Carbonnier B, Kham K, Mekhalif T, Millot MC (2008) Biofunctionalized tilted Fiber Bragg Gratings for label-free immunosensing. Optics Express 16(23):19049–19062
Gauglitz G, Nahm W (1991) Fresenius J Anal Chem 341:279
Rothmund M, Brecht A, Berthel G, Gräfe D, Schütz A, Gauglitz G (1997) Label free binding assay with spectroscopic detection for pharmaceutical screening. Fresenius J Anal Chem 359:15–22
Reichl D, Krage R, Krummel C, Gauglitz G (2000) Sensing of volatile organic compounds using a simplified reflectometric interference spectroscopy setup. Appl Spectrosc 54:583–586
Pröll F, Markovic G, Schweizer N, Gauglitz G (2008) Imaging reflectometric interference spectroscopy (iRIfS): a versatile tool for high throughput biomolecular interaction analysis. In: Proceedings of The Tenth World Congress on Biosensors, Shanghai, China
Nikitin PI (2007) Picoscopes, new label-free biosensors. In Marks RS, Cullen DC, Karube I, Lowe CR, Weetall HH (eds) Handbook of biosensors and biochips. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
http://www.bioportfolio.com/biocorporate/223-Affinity%2BSensors.html
Cunningham BT, Chan L, Mathias PC, Ganesh N, George S, Lidstone E, Heeres J, Hergenrother PJ (2009) Photonic crystals: A platform for label-free and enhanced fluorescence biomolecular and cellular assays. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 1133
Lukosz W, Tiefenthaler K (1983) Embossing technique for fabricating integrated optical components in hard inorganic waveguiding materials. Optics letters 8(10):537–539
Tiefenthaler K, Lukosz W (1986) Optical sensor for selectively detecting substances and for detection of the variation of refractive index in substances. PCT Int Appl, p52. WO 8607149 A1 19861204
Kunz RE (1991) Proc SPIE-Int Soc Opt Eng 1587:98
Kunz RE, Edlinger J, Curtis BJ, Gale MT, Kempen LU, Rudigier H, Schuetz H (1994) Proc SPIE-Int Soc Opt Eng 2068:313–325
http://www.corning.com/lifesciences/us_canada/en/whats_new/epic_system /epic_products.aspx
Schröder R, Merten N, Mosolff Mathiesen J, Martini L, Kruljac-Letunic A, Krop F, Blaukat A, Fang Y, Tran E, Ulven T, Drewke C, Whistler J, Pardo L, Gomeza J, Kostenis E (2009) The C-Terminal Tail of CRTH2 is a Key Molecular Determinant That constrains Gai and Downstream Signaling Cascade Activation. J Biol Chem 284(2):1324–1336
Fang Y, Frutos AG, Verklereen R (2008) Label-free cell-based assays for GPCR screening. Comb Chem High T Scr 11:357–369
Cunningham BT, Li P, Schulz S, Lin B, Baird C, Gerstenmaier J, Genick C, Wang F, Fine E, Laing L (2004) Label-free assays on the BIND system. J Biomol Screen 9:481–490
Cunningham BT, Lin B, Qiu J, Li P, Pepper J, Hugh B (2002) A plastic colorimetric optical biosensor for multiparallel detection of label-free biochemical interactions. Sensor Actuator B 85:219–226
Li MZ, He F, Liao Q, Liu J, Xu L, Jiang L, Song YL, Wang S, Zhu DB (2008) Ultrasensitive DNA detection using photonic crystals. Angew Chem 120:7368–7372
Homola J (2008) Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species. Chem Rev 108:462–493
Schasfoort RBM, Schuck P (2008) Future trends in SPR technology. In: Schasfoort RBM, Tudos AJ (eds) Handbook of surface plasmon resonance. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 354–394
BiaCore homepage: System-Selection-Guide_FINAL_screen.pdf
http://www.biacore.com/lifesciences/products/systems_overview/index.html
http://www.biacore.com/lifesciences/Application_Support/publications/refdb/index.html
Kooyman RPH, Lenferink ATM et al (1991) Anal Chem 63:83
Lokate AMC, Beusink JB, Besselink GAJ, Pruijn GJM, Schasfoort RBM (2007) Biomolecular Interaction Monitoring of Autoantibodies by Scanning Surface Plasmon Resonance Microarray Imaging. J Am Chem Soc 129:14013–14018
http://www.sensata.com/sensors/spreeta-analytical-sensor-highlights.htm
Elkind JL, Stimpson DI, Strong AA et al (1999) Sens. Actuators B54:182
Sesay M, Cullen DC (2001) Environ Monitoring Assess 70:83
http://www.reichertspr.com/PDF/App_Note-2-Small-Molecule.pdf
Zayats M, Raitman OA, Chegel VI, Kharitonov AB, Willner I (2002) Probing antigen-antibody binding processes by impedance measurements on ion-sensitive field-effect transistor devices and complementary surface plasmon resonance analyses: development of cholera toxin sensors. Anal Chem 74:4763–4773
http://www.horiba.com/de/scientific/products/surface-plasmon-resonance-imaging-spri/
http://www.xantec.com/new/index.php?content=11&sub=12&haupt=12
http://www.ksvltd.com/content/AN_111_SPR200_PEMcharacterization.pdf
Valiokas R, Klenkar G, Tinazli A, Tamp R, Liedberg B, Piehler J (2006) Differential protein assembly on micropatterned surfaces with tailored molecular and surface multivalency. Chem Bio Chem 7:1325–1329
Azzam RMA, Bashara NM (1989) Ellipsometry and polarised light. North Holland, Amsterdam
Brecht A, Gauglitz G, Striebel C (1994) Characterization of biomembranes by spectral ellipsometry. Biosens Bioelectron 9:139–146
Wang J, Xu X, Zhang Z, Yang F, Yang X (2009) Real-time study of genomic DNA structural changes upon interaction with small molecules using dual polarization interferometry. Anal Chem 81:4914–4921
Boussaad S, Pean J, Tao NJ (2000) Anal Chem 72:222
Bergwerff AA, Van Knapen F (2006) Surface plasmon resonance biosensors for detection of pathogenic microorganisms: Strategies to secure food and environmental safety. J AOAC Int 98:826–831
McWhirter A, Wahlström L (2008) The Benefits and Scope of Surface Plasmon Resonance-based Biosensors in Food Analysis. In: Schasfoort RBM, Tudos AJ (eds) Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance. The Royal Society of Chemistry
Campbell CT, Kim G (2007) SPR microscopy and its application to high-throughput analyses of biomolecular binding events and their kinetics. Biomaterials 28:2380–2392
Neumann T, Junker HD, Schmidt K, Sekul R (2007) SPR-based fragment screening: advantages and applications. Curr Top Med Chem 7:1630–1642
Wang Y, Zhu X, Wu M, Xia N, Wang J, Zhou F (2009) Simultaneous and label-free determination of wild-type and mutant p53 at a single SPR chip preimmobilized with consensus DNA and monocolonal antibody. Anal Chem 81:8441–8446
Nguyen B, Tanious FA, Wilson WD (2007) Biosensor-surface Plasmon resonance: quantitative analysis of small molecule-nucleic acid interactions. Methods 42:150–161
Nemova G, Kashyap R (2007) Novel fiber Bragg grating assisted Plasmon-polariton for bio-medical refractive-index sensors. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 18:327–330
de Tommasi E, De Stefano L, Rea I, Di Sarno V, Rotiroti L, Arcari P, Lamberti A, Sanges C, Rendina I (2008) Porous silicon based resonant mirrors for biochemical sensing. Sensors 8:6549–6556
Hong JG, Choi JS, Han GY, Kang JK, Kim CM, Kim TS, Yoon DS (2006) A Mach–Zehnder interferometer based on silicon oxides for Biosensor applications. Anal Chim Acta 573–574:97–103
Sepúlveda B, Sánchez del Río J, Moreno M, Blanco FJ, Mayora K, Domínguez C, Lechuga LM (2006) Optical biosensor Microsystems based on the integration of highly sensitive Mach–Zehnder interferometer devices. J Opt A: Pure Appl Opt 8:561–566
Sepúlveda B, Armelles G, Lechuga LM (2007) Magneto-optical phase modulation in integrated Mach–Zehnder interferometric sensors. Sensor Actuator A-Phys 134:339–347
Lambeck PV, van Lith J, Hoekstra HJWM (2006) Three novel integrated optical sensing structures for the chemical domain. Sensor Actuator B-Chem 113:718–729
Ymeti A, Kanger JS, Greve J, Besselink GAJ, Lambeck PV, Wijn R, Heideman RG (2005) Integration of microfluidics with a four-channel integrated optical Young interferometer immunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 20:1417–1421
Piehler J, Brecht A, Gauglitz G, Maul C, Zerlin M, Thiericke R, Grabley S (1997) Label-free monitoring of DNA-ligand interactions. Anal Biochem 249:94–102
Lamken P, Lata S, Gavutis M, Piehler J (2004) Ligand-induced assembling of the type I interferon receptor on supported lipid bilayers. J Mol Biol 341:303–18
Lue XY, Huang Y, Qian WP, Tang ZM, Lu ZH (2003) An effective method for quantitative evaluation of proteins adsorbed on biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 66:722–727
Jenison R, Yang S, Haeberli A, Polisky B (2001) Interference-based detection of nucleic acid targets on optically coated silicon. Nat Biotechnol 19:62–65
Lu JH, Strohsahl CM, Miller BL, Rothberg LJ (2004) Reflectric interferometric detection of label-free oligonucleotides. Anal Chem 76:4416–4420
Lee JC, An JY, Kim BW (2007) Application of anodized aluminium oxide as a biochip substrate for a Fabry–Perot interferometer. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82:1045–1052
Gesellchen F, Zimmermann B, Herberg FW (2005) Direct optical detection of protein–ligand interactions. In: Nienhaus GU (ed) Protein–Ligand interactions: methods and applications. In: Methods in molecular biology 305. Humana Press Inc, Totowa
Shang Y, Zhao W, Xu E, Erchao T, Tong C, Wu J (2010) FTRIFS biosensor based on double layer porous silicon as a LC detector for target molecule screening from complex samples. Biosens Bioelectron 25:1056–1063
Proll G, Kumpf M, Mehlmann M, Tschmelak J, Griffith H, Abuknesha R, Gauglitz G (2004) Monitoring an antibody affinity chromatography with a label-free optical biosensor technique. J Immunol Methods 292:35–42
Moehrle B, Kumpf M, Gauglitz G (2005) Determination of affinity constants of locked nucleic acid (LNA) and DNA duplex formation using label free sensor technology. Analyst 130:1634–1638
Penttinen P, Jaehrling J, Damdimopoulos AE, Inzunza J, Lemmen JG, van der Saag P, Pettersson K, Gauglitz G, Mäkelä S, Pongratz I (2007) Diet-derived polyphenol metabolite enterolactone is a tissue-specific estrogen receptor activator. Endocrinology 148:4875–4886
Möhrle BP, Köhler K, Jaehrling J, Brock R, Gauglitz G (2006) Label-free characterisation of cell adhesion using reflectometric interference spectroscopy (RIfS). Anal Bioanal Chem 384:407–413
Roth G, Freund S, Moehrle B, Woellner K, Bruenjes J, Gauglitz G, Wiesmueller KH, Jung G (2007) Ubiquitin binds to a short peptide segment of hydrolase UCH-L3: a study by FCS, RlfS, ITC and NMR. Chem Bio Chem 8:323–331
Mehlmann M, Garvin AM, Steinwand M, Gauglitz G (2005) Reflectometric interference spectroscopy combined with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to determine quantitative and qualitative binding of mixtures of vancomycin derivatives. Anal Bioanal Chem 382:1942–1948
Kumpf M, Gauglitz G (2006) Biomolecular interaction analysis under electrophoretic flow conditions. Anal Bioanal Chem 384:1129–1133
Zimmermann R, Osaki T, Kratzmueller T, Gauglitz G, Dukhin SS, Werner C (2006) Electrostatic Switching of Biopolymer Layers. Insights from Combined Electrokinetics and Reflectometric Interference. Anal Chem 78:5851–5857
Osaki T, Renner L, Herklotz M, Werner C (2006) Hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions in the adsorption of fibronectin at maleic acid copolymer films. J Phys Chem B 110:12119–12124
Liu C, Zhang D, Zhang H (2008) Study of in-situ measurement system for porous alumina film based on AFM and reflectometric interference spectroscopy. Guangpuxue Yu Guangpu Fenxi 28:1679–1683
Leopold N, Busche S, Gauglitz G et al (2009) IR absorption and reflectometric interference spectroscopy (RIfS) combined to a new sensing approach for gas analytes absorbed into thin polymer films. Spectrochim Acta A 72:994–999
Proll G, Steinle L, Pröll F, Kumpf M, Möhrle B, Mehlmann M, Gauglitz G (2007) The potential of label-free detection in high-content-screening applications. J Chromatogr A 1161:2–8
Pröll F, Fechner P, Proll G (2009) Direct optical detection in fragment-based screening. Anal Bioanal Chem 393:1557–1562
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published in the special issue on Focus on Bioanalysis with Guest Editors Antje J. Baeumner, Günter Gauglitz and Frieder W. Scheller.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gauglitz, G. Direct optical detection in bioanalysis: an update. Anal Bioanal Chem 398, 2363–2372 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3904-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3904-4