Introduction

This is a lecture about discovery. It is therefore given within the context of Thomas Kuhn’s classical work, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” (73,650 citations). According to Kuhn [1] changes in science emerge by revolution, not evolution. The discovery of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) fits Kuhn’s concept of a “scientific revolution.”

Kuhn made two main points:

  1. 1.

    Crisis leads to innovation

  2. 2.

    Anomaly leads to the discovery of new paradigms

The discovery of the TVT artifical neoligament surgical principle began with two unrelated observations. The first observation was that a hemostat applied immediately behind the pubic symphysis at the level of the midurethra controlled urine loss on coughing. The second observation was that Teflon tape created a collagenous tissue reaction around it when implanted.

These observations led to two hypotheses:

  1. 1.

    A loose pubourethral ligament (PUL) causes urinary stress incontinence.

  2. 2.

    A tape implanted in the exact position of a damaged pubourethral ligament would create a collagenous “neoligament” to reinforce it, restoring function and continence.

At this point in the lecture, I would like to acknowledge an intellectual debt to Dr Robert Zacharin [2], whose 1963 anatomical works provided an inspirational starting point for not only TVT, but also the integral theory.

Animal studies

Following human cadaver testing on a half pelvis, an instrument, as shown in Fig 1, was developed that would precisely insert a tape into the position of the PUL to reinforce it [3].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The prototype tunneler was 30 cm long, with a removable insert containing a fairly blunt tip. The inset was reversed once the penetration was made between the vagina and the rectus sheath, so that the tape was protected at all times. The right angle at the distal end allowed the surgeon to know precisely where the tip was located. The vertical handle likewise indicated the lateral direction of the tip

In 1987, animal studies [3, 4] were commenced at the Royal Perth Hospital animal laboratory in conjunction with Professor John Papadimitriou, Professor of Pathology, University of Western Australia, an acknowledged expert researcher on macrophages, tissue reaction to implanted materials, and inflammation. The animal model chosen was a large dog. The aim was to develop and test the surgical methodology and the Mersilene tape for safety, efficacy, and transferability to humans.

The two ends of the tape remained loose in the vaginal cavity for periods ranging from 6 to 12 weeks [5]. The surgical methodology developed for the dogs was similar to that eventually used in the humans [57].

Although 10 out of 13 dogs developed abdominal sinuses, they remained afebrile and well at all times, with normal white cell counts. Radioactive gallium studies showed low inflammatory response in the tissues. Serum and wound lactic acid and LDH studies showed raised levels, while the tapes were in situ. Bacteriological studies of the abdominal and vaginal ends of the tape grew no pathogenic bacteria, only mixed organisms. Histology showed macrophages in the interstices of the Mersilene tape, even though it was made of densely knitted multifilament material. A collagenous cylinder formed to surround the tape (Fig 2). This quarantined any bacteria and allowed tape removal by pulling on the vaginal end [3, 4]. The neoligament was initially collagen III, but had commenced conversion to collagen I by 4–6 weeks. On testing for strength, the neoligament pulled out of the tensiometer grips at 0.64 MPa (92 lb/sq inch) [3].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Formation of artificial collagenous neoligaments. Specimen of vagina (V), vulva bladder (B) dissected from a dog 2 weeks after the implanted tape had been removed. Note the significant artificial collagenous neoligament created by tissue reaction against the tape (white arrows)

Conclusions from the animal studies

A safe, minimally invasive technique for the creation of an artificial collagenous neoligament was demonstrated. Other than a sticky yellow vaginal discharge, there were no ill effects from having a tape in the vagina for 6–12 weeks [3]. When the tape was removed, the abdominal sinuses closed within 48 h [3, 4]. The absence of pathogenic bacterial growth on the tapes indicated that the macrophages had adequately eliminated the bacteria [3]. The collagen fibers of the neoligament were aligned in linear formation along the tape [3].

Human studies: prototype TVT operations (1988–1989)

Between 1988 and 1989, 30 women with demonstrable stress incontinence (USI) underwent the prototype TVT operation [5], 25 with mixed incontinence and 5 with only USI. This operation involved insertion of Mersilene tape and removal at 6 weeks as per the animal studies. The tunneler was used to insert the Mersilene tape from the vagina across the rectus sheath (Fig 3) at the level of the midurethra. The tube was secured with interrupted sutures through holes in the distal ends of the tape so that it could be lowered in patients with obstructed micturition by cutting each suture in turn. As the sling was lowered towards the lower end of the symphysis, obstructed urine flow returned to normal and all 30 patients remained continent. Standing lateral X-rays were performed with dye inserted into a Foley catheter balloon before surgery, with the tape in situ, and after removal of the tape during both rest and straining [5].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Prototype tension-free vaginal tape (TVT). Perspective: coronal section immediately behind the pubic symphysis. The tape was configured around the rectus sheath into the vagina, through both ends of a rubber tube, exiting at its inferior end, both ends secured with interrupted sutures in holes set 0.5 cm apart

Results

At the end of 6 weeks, all patients remained continent. In those patients with stress and urge incontinence, the urge incontinence was cured simultaneously with the stress incontinence. However, within 2 weeks of the tape being removed, 50 % of the patients reported simultaneous recurrence of both the stress and the urge incontinence [5]. No bladder neck elevation was seen in any of the patients on post-op xray.

Four anomalies became evident.

  1. 1.

    Stress and urge were cured and recurred simultaneously. Did they have the same origin?

  2. 2.

    Urge incontinence had been surgically cured. This was incommensurable (incompatible) with existing concepts. What was the mechanism for cure?

  3. 3.

    No bladder neck elevation was noted in any of the patients cured of urinary stress incontinence, even in patients where the balloon was sited below the lower end of the symphysis at rest. These data invalidated the pressure equalization theory by Enhorning [8].

  4. 4.

    When the tape was grasped with a hemostat and the patient was asked to strain (Fig 4), three directional vector forces became evident, forward, backward, and downward around the tape. What was their role in urethral closure and urgency control?

    Fig. 4
    figure 4

    Demonstration of three directional forces acting around the pubourethral ligament (broken lines). On application of a hemostat onto the tape (large arrow) in the position of the pubourethral ligament, three directional forces became evident, backward/downward behind the tape (black arrows) and a forward vector distal to the tape (white arrow). PS pubic symphysis

Birth of a new paradigm: the integral theory

None of these anomalies could be explained using existing concepts. Conceptually, however, the findings were consistent with Kuhn’s comments that it is anomaly that leads to the discovery of new paradigms. A new theory began to evolve. Loose ligaments caused both stress and urge incontinence, albeit for different reasons: inactivation of urethral closure forces for USI and activation of the micturition reflex prematurely for urge incontinence [9].

A full copy of the theory is available on the website www.integraltheory.org

Collaboration with Ulf Ulmsten (1990–1993)

In late 1989, I presented the results of the 30 prototype TVT cases at the Royal Women’s Hospital Melbourne. There I met Ulf Ulmsten for the first time. He was intrigued by the surgery and the results and he visited me in Perth, Western Australia, the next year. Over a period of a week, he reviewed 80 patients and participated in three operating sessions at Royal Perth Hospital. At the end of the week, he said “I think your theory is correct. However, it needs more work.” Our collaboration had commenced.

Over the next 3 years we worked intensively on the further development of what became known as the TVT operation [6, 7]. It soon became evident that a removable tape would only work in half the cases and that a permanent midurethral tape was required. Mersilene was easy to use, non-stretch, and effective, but it had a high erosion rate (14 %). By 1996 polypropylene mesh tape had solved the problem of erosions and become universally accepted [7].

Where are we today (2015)?

The midurethral sling based on reinforcing the PUL has become the gold standard and is already in the category of Kuhn’s “normal science” [1], with hundreds of papers investigating various aspects of the surgery and anatomy. However, we have more crises [1].

  • FDA warnings have highlighted problems with mesh usage.

  • Native tissue repairs have a high failure rate over time.

  • Symptoms such as nocturia, urgency, chronic pelvic pain, abnormal bladder emptying are still considered incurable by “state of the art” publications on these subjects [10].

Yet, an increasing number of publications are confirming that such symptoms can be cured by the surgical repair of posterior fornix laxity [11, 12].

Future directions 2005

Further developments of the TVT paradigm were consistent with Kuhn’s comments: “Crisis leads to innovation.” In 2005, a new surgical tool based on the TVT neoligament surgical principle, an adjustable “micro” sling, was described [13]. Small strips measuring 0.7 mm wide of non-elastic monofilament macropore tape applied precisely to the PUL, uterosacral ligament (USL), arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis (ATFP), cardinal ligaments, and perineal body (Fig. 5) effectively address cystocele, rectocele, uterine prolapse, with high initial cure rates for accompanying symptoms such as urgency, nocturia, chronic pelvic pain, abnormal bladder emptying [12]. Erosion rates similar to those of TVT were reported [12]. This extension of the TVT neoligament paradigm to other ligaments is encouraging, but more extensive and more robust studies will be required before this new direction can emerge as another paradigm.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Top left Suspension of anterior vaginal wall using the TVT neoligament principle. Perspective: looking into the anterior wall of the vagina. The distal inverted U-shaped sling supports the central defect and re-attaches dislocated or loose paravaginal tissues to the arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis (ATFP) at its origins. The proximal transverse sling acts by re-attaching dislocated ATFP to the ischial spine, and then re-attaching dislocated pubocervical fascia and dislocated cardinal ligaments to the anterior cervical ring. Top right Suspension of the apex. Perspective: looking into the pelvic cavity from above. The uterosacral ligaments (USL) sling re-attaches the apex to the sacrum by reinforcing the uterosacral ligaments. The cardinal ligament TFS re-attaches the apex to the lateral side wall. Bottom Suspension of the posterior vaginal wall. Perspective: sitting lateral view. The USL sling re-attaches the apical part of the rectovaginal fascia to the uterosacral ligaments. The distal 50 % of the vagina is supported by repair of the deep transversus perinei, which also repairs descending perineal syndrome

Conclusions

  • Without new paradigms, there are no randomized controlled trials, no meta-analyses, no Cochrane, no science; indeed, no progress.

  • I urge the younger members to read Kuhn “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” It will open your minds to the discovery process.

  • Examine the relationship of symptoms to the four suspensory ligaments and perineal body. This is the next paradigm.

  • Do not disregard anomalies. Pursue them. Anomalies are the pathway to discovery.

  • Be open to new concepts.

  • Challenge everything. Innovation is born from challenge, not conformity.

  • Persist, even if you meet resistance. And you will certainly meet resistance, for resistance is a consequence of the incommensurability of competing paradigms.