Abstract
Purpose
Clinicians are not confident in diagnosing deep gluteal syndrome (DGS) because of the ambiguity of the DGS disease definition and DGS diagnostic pathway. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the DGS disease definition, and also to define a general DGS diagnostic pathway.
Methods
A systematic search was performed using four electronic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. In eligibility criteria, studies in which cases were explicitly diagnosed with DGS were included, whereas review articles and commentary papers were excluded. Data are presented descriptively.
Results
The initial literature search yielded 359 articles, of which 14 studies met the eligibility criteria, pooling 853 patients with clinically diagnosed with DGS. In this review, it was discovered that the DGS disease definition was composed of three parts: (1) non-discogenic, (2) sciatic nerve disorder, and (3) nerve entrapment in the deep gluteal space. In the diagnosis of DGS, we found five diagnostic procedures: (1) history taking, (2) physical examination, (3) imaging tests, (4) response-to-injection, and (5) nerve-specific tests (electromyography). History taking (e.g. posterior hip pain, radicular pain, and difficulty sitting for 30 min), physical examination (e.g. tenderness in deep gluteal space, pertinent positive results with seated piriformis test, and positive Pace sign), and imaging tests (e.g. pelvic radiographs, spine and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) were generally performed in cases clinically diagnosed with DGS.
Conclusion
Existing literature suggests the DGS disease definition as being a non-discogenic sciatic nerve disorder with entrapment in the deep gluteal space. Also, the general diagnostic pathway for DGS was composed of history taking (posterior hip pain, radicular pain, and difficulty sitting for 30 min), physical examination (tenderness in deep gluteal space, positive seated piriformis test, and positive Pace sign), and imaging tests (pelvic radiographs, pelvic MRI, and spine MRI). This review helps clinicians diagnose DGS with more confidence.
Level of evidence
IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Buttock pain and posterior hip pain are very common symptoms caused by a variety of disorders [8]. The entrapment of the sciatic nerve in posterior hip area potentially causes buttock and posterior hip pain. Conventionally, the term “piriformis syndrome” has been used to cover entrapment of the sciatic nerve by the piriformis muscle [5]. However, accumulating evidence shows that various disorders cause entrapment of the sciatic nerve in addition to piriformis muscle, such as the obturator internus muscle, levator ani muscle, gemelli muscle, and coccygeus muscle [6, 19]. Therefore, the more comprehensive term, “deep gluteal syndrome” has been adopted. It has been almost 2 decades since McCrory et al. first used the term “deep gluteal syndrome”, expressing a pathophysiological understanding of chronic hip, groin, and buttock pain [18].
However, clinicians are not confident in diagnosing deep gluteal syndrome (DGS). The problem arises from the ambiguity of the DGS disease definition, deep gluteal space definition, and DGS diagnostic pathway. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the DGS disease definition and deep gluteal space definition. Also, it was aimed at proposing a general DGS diagnostic pathway in reference to the included studies in this review.
Materials and methods
Eligibility criteria
Studies in which cases were diagnosed with DGS were included in this review. When the diagnostic pathway was not explicitly shown, the studies were excluded. Also, review articles and commentary papers were excluded.
Literature search
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using four electronic databases: MEDLINE (1946 to June 20th, 2019), EMBASE (1974 to June 20th, 2019), PubMed (1999 to June 20th, 2019), and Google Scholar (1999 to June 20th, 2019). We chose the key search term “deep gluteal syndrome”.
A 3-step screening process (title screening, abstract screening, and full-text screening) was adopted to select eligible articles. After duplicate articles were removed, two reviewers (**KK AND **AS) independently performed title and abstract screenings. If either of the reviewers included an article during title or abstract screening, it was moved to the next stage for screening. During full-text screening, discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus with the senior authors (**SU AND **OA). We did not register the protocol for this systematic review.
Data collection and analysis
All relevant data were collected in duplicate (**KK, **AD), including demographics of studies (authors’ name, country, publication year, patients number, the percentage of female in the study cohort, age), DGS disease definition, deep gluteal space definition, and DGS diagnostic pathway. When age was not expressed with mean, but expressed with median, minimum–maximum range, or interquartile range, we estimated the mean in reference to Wan et al. (2014) in order to output the pooled mean age [34]. The extracted data in DGS disease definition, deep gluteal space definition, and DGS diagnostic pathway were qualitatively synthesized.
Assessment of risk of bias
The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies [28]. A score of 0, 1, or 2 was given for each of the eight items on the MINORS checklist with a maximum score of 16 for non-comparative studies. The MINORS were independently scored in duplicate by two reviewers (**KK, **CA). Methodological quality was categorized a priori as follows: a score of 0–8 was considered as poor quality, 9–12 was considered as fair quality and 13–16 was considered as excellent quality, for non-comparative studies in the MINORS.
Results
Study identification and characteristics
The frequency of use of the term “deep gluteal syndrome” has recently increased in medical literature. In Google Scholar, more than 280 articles included the term “deep gluteal syndrome” and especially more than half of papers have been published in the last 5 years, as shown in Fig. 1.
The initial literature search yielded 359 articles, of which 14 studies (e.g. 11 full papers and 3 conference proceedings) met the eligibility criteria pooling 853 patients clearly diagnosed with DGS [2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 12, 16, 22,23,24, 26, 27, 29, 33]. In the pooled population, the mean age was 48.1 years (range 5–80 years) and 57.6% of the patients were female, as shown in Table 1. The results of the screening process are described in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram (Fig. 2) [20].In most of the studies with the pooled
Risk of bias in included studies
The consensus mean MINORS score of the included studies was 10.7 ± 1.5, indicating fair methodological quality. Seven studies satisfied the domain of inclusion of consecutive patients, having potentially low risk of selection bias, however, there were no studies in which data were prospectively collected. The MINORS scores in the included studies are shown in Appendix Table 3.
Definition of DGS disease and deep gluteal space
In the included studies, 11 studies explicitly described the DGS disease definition [2, 3, 10, 12, 16, 22,23,24, 26, 27, 33]. The most prominent DGS disease definition was signs and symptoms caused by non-discogenic entrapment of sciatic nerve in deep gluteal space. The DGS disease definition comprised three characteristics: (1) non-discogenic, (2) sciatic nerve pain, and (3) entrapment in deep gluteal space. Seven studies described deep gluteal space [2, 9, 10, 16, 23, 24, 26], as shown in Appendix Table 4. The most recognizable definition of deep gluteal space is as follows:
-
Anterior border: posterior acetabular column
-
Posterior border: gluteus maximus muscle
-
Medial border: sacrotuberous ligament
-
Lateral border: gluteal tuberosity
-
Superior border: sciatic notch
-
Inferior border: Ischial tuberosity
The definition of the deep gluteal space is illustrated in more detail in Fig. 3.
DGS diagnostic pathway
In the included studies, the DGS diagnosis was performed in reference to diagnostic procedures categorized into five domains: (1) history taking, (2) physical examination, (3) imaging tests, (4) response-to-injection, and (5) nerve-specific tests, as seen in Table 2. In most of the studies with the pooled 544 patients, history taking, physical examination, and imaging tests were all performed. Response-to-injection was also performed in eight studies with the pooled 470 patients. Nerve-specific tests were also performed in five studies with the pooled 336 patients.
In history taking, posterior hip pain, radicular pain, and worsening when sitting for more than 20–30 min were the most common symptoms in patients clinically diagnosed with DGS. In physical examination, tenderness in deep gluteal space, pertinent positive results with seated piriformis test (recreated posterior hip pain at the level of the piriformis or external rotators when examiners extend the knee and passively move the flexed hip into adduction with internal rotation in seated position) [33], and positive Pace sign (recreated posterior hip pain with active or resisted abduction and external rotation of the hip) [33] were predominantly seen. In qualitative synthesis, active piriformis test and active extension of the hip against resistance were counted as the Pace sign. In imaging tests, pelvic radiographs, and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were commonly used to find abnormalities in deep gluteal space (e.g. sciatic nerve entrapment in piriformis muscle or obturator internus muscle in deep gluteal space). Spinal MRI was also performed to rule out discogenic sciatic nerve entrapment. In response-to-injection, five studies with the pooled 218 patients used ultrasound-guided injection. Several medications were used in injection and the most common medications were local anaesthetic (e.g. mepivacaine and lidocaine) combined with corticosteroids (e.g. methylprednisolone). A general diagnostic pathway for DGS is demonstrated in Fig. 4.
Discussion
The most important finding of the present study was identification of the DGS disease definition, and also a clear definition of deep gluteal space. It was discovered that the DGS disease is defined by three characteristics: (1) non-discogenic, (2) sciatic nerve disorder, and (3) nerve entrapment in the deep gluteal space. In the diagnosis of DGS, we found five diagnostic procedures: (1) history taking, (2) physical examination, (3) imaging tests, (4) response-to-injection, and (5) nerve-specific tests. History taking, physical examination, and imaging tests were generally performed in cases clinically diagnosed with DGS, followed by response-to-injection and nerve-specific tests.
Previously, Kay et al. (2017) undertook a systematic review of the causes of DGS [11]. In this review, the most common cause of DGS was iatrogenic (from a previous intervention such as injection or debris from wear of arthroplasty prostheses) (30%) followed by piriformis syndrome (entrapment of the sciatic nerve by the piriformis muscle) (26%), and trauma (15%). Also, ischial tunnel syndrome is a non-discogenic sciatic nerve entrapment in the ischial tunnel (between ischial tuberosity and lesser trochanter) among the deep gluteal space, and it would be potentially categorized into DGS [17].
The term, “deep gluteal syndrome”, in itself, potentially covers cases with posterior hip pain in the deep gluteal space caused by anything outside of sciatic nerve entrapment, such as bursitis in the deep gluteal space, proximal hamstring tendinopathy, and piriformis muscle pyomyositis [13, 30]. Also, posterior femoral cutaneous nerve entrapment, inferior gluteal nerve entrapment, and superior gluteal nerve entrapment may be broadly categorized into DGS if these nerves are compressed in the deep gluteal space [21, 31, 32]. In searching the literature, we could not find any DGS cases outside of sciatic nerve entrapment. However, a future framework is required regarding whether DGS is specific to sciatic nerve entrapment or includes other pathological conditions.
A clear disease definition is essential in the provision of best clinical practice. DGS is currently clinically diagnosed based on the judgement of comprehensive information. However, many clinicians do not have confidence about the diagnosis and a clear definition of the DGS is needed. Here, definition of the DGS disease and the deep gluteal space was explicitly described. The most noticeable strength in this review lies in the identification of a potential DGS diagnostic pathway. A general diagnostic pathway for DGS in clinical practice was introduced in this review. The diagnostic pathway seems to comprehensively cover the three characteristics of the DGS disease definition. For instance, history taking and physical examination capture the signs/symptoms of sciatic nerve disorder. Martin et al. examined diagnostic test accuracy of seated piriformis test and Pace sign for cases with sciatic nerve entrapment in the gluteal region. It showed high accuracy of these tests with sensitivity 0.52 (95% confidence interval (95%CI 0.33–0.71) using seated piriformis test and 0.78 (95%CI 0.58–0.90) using Pace sign, and specificity 0.90 (95%CI 0.60–0.98) and 0.80 (95%CI 0.49–0.94), respectively [14]. Physical examination and pelvic radiographs comprehensively examine the possibility of the osseous biomechanical influences and spinal MRI excludes discogenic disorders [15]. Pelvic MRI confirms the presence of nerve entrapment in the deep gluteal space and excludes possibility of intra-pelvic entrapment. Among patients with posterior hip pain, lumbar spine or sacroiliac (SI) joint disorder should be ruled out [8] and, therefore, physical examinations and imaging tests specific to the lumber spine and SI joint should be considered in the DGS diagnostic pathway. Also, consultations with experts such as neurologists and gynaecologists can aid in differential diagnoses.
This review has several limitations. First, this review has risks of publication bias, since cases clearly diagnosed with DGS were published and listed in medical literature search engines, whereas underdiagnosed cases are probably less likely published in the medical literature. Publication bias may potentially oversimplify the DGS disease definition and the diagnostic pathway, since only typical cases are included aside from underdiagnosed cases [1]. To minimize risks of publication bias, we did a comprehensive search using Google Scholar. In our search, 280 articles were available in Google Scholar, in contrast only 22 articles were screened in PubMed. A second limitation is that the diagnostic pathway is not validated. Each diagnostic procedure should be assessed to confirm whether it accurately reflects three components of the DGS disease definition to satisfy content validity [4]. In future research directions, the conceptualization of a clear DGS disease definition is needed in the consideration of other pathophysiologies such as non-sciatic nerve entrapment in the deep gluteal space. An expert panels meeting may be necessary to clarify DGS diagnostic criteria using a Delphi consensus method [25].
The clinical relevance of this review is that it aids clinicians in the diagnosis of DGS with more confidence. Also, clarification of the DGS disease definition and the general diagnostic pathway guides future establishment of a clear diagnostic criteria.
Conclusion
The DGS disease definition was identified as being a non-discogenic sciatic nerve disorder with entrapment in the deep gluteal space. Also, we proposed the general diagnostic pathway for DGS using history taking (posterior hip pain, radicular pain, and difficulty sitting for more than 30 min), physical examination (tenderness in deep gluteal space, pertinent positive results with seated piriformis test, and positive Pace sign), and imaging tests (pelvic radiographs, pelvic MRI, and spine MRI).
Abbreviations
- DGS:
-
Deep gluteal syndrome
- MINORS:
-
The methodological index for non-randomized studies
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PRISMA:
-
The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- SI:
-
Sacroiliac
- 95% CI:
-
95% confidence interval
References
Andrews NA, Latrémolière A, Basbaum AI, Mogil JS, Porreca F, Rice AS et al (2016) Ensuring transparency and minimization of methodologic bias in preclinical pain research: PPRECISE considerations. Pain 157(4):901
Aguilera-Bohorquez B, Cardozo O, Brugiatti M, Cantor E, Valdivia N (2018) Endoscopic treatment of sciatic nerve entrapment in deep gluteal syndrome: clinical results. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition) 62(5):322–327
Barbero RA (2018) Deep gluteal syndrome. Br J Sports Med 52(Suppl 2):A1–A27 (C0104)
Bolarinwa OA (2015) Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J 22(4):195
Cass SP (2015) Piriformis syndrome: a cause of nondiscogenic sciatica. Curr Sports Med Rep 14(1):41–44
Diop M, Parratte B, Tatu L, Vuillier F, Faure A, Monnier G (2002) Anatomical bases of superior gluteal nerve entrapment syndrome in the suprapiriformis foramen. Surg Radiol Anat 24(3–4):155–159
Fernández-Jara J, Gutierrez-San Jose B, Alvarez-de Sierra Garcia B, Novo-Rivas U, Llorente-Galan S (2018) Diagnostic-therapeutic ultrasound-guided local anesthetic and corticosteroids injection in patients with deep gluteal syndrome: technique and results. Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) 2018, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Skeletal Radiol 47:898
Frank RM, Slabaugh MA, Grumet RC, Virkus WW, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ (2010) Posterior hip pain in an athletic population: differential diagnosis and treatment options. Sports Health 2(3):237–246
Girolami M, Tonetti L, Pipola V, Rimondi E, Albisinni U, Ricci A (2019) Quadratus Femoris muscle causing deep gluteal syndrome: a rare cause of refractory sciatica of extraspinal origin in the presence of an anatomic variation. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 32(4):667–670
Ham DH, Chung WC, Jung DU (2018) Effectiveness of endoscopic sciatic nerve decompression for the treatment of deep gluteal syndrome. Hip Pelvis 30(1):29–36
Kay J, Morrison L, Fejtek E, Simunovic N, Martin HD, Ayeni OR (2017) Surgical management of deep gluteal syndrome causing sciatic nerve entrapment: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 33(12):2263–2278
Leal F, Pato T, Frada R, Padin M, Cruz de Melo J (2018) Endoscopic treatment of deep gluteal syndrome: surgical technique and results. Abstracts from the 13th Congress of the European Hip Society 20–22 September 2018, The Hague, Netherlands. EHS Congress 2018—abstract book P04–246
Lempainen L, Sarimo J, Mattila K, Vaittinen S, Orava S (2009) Proximal hamstring tendinopathy: results of surgical management and histopathologic findings. Am J Sports Med 37(4):727–734
Martin HD, Kivlan BR, Palmer IJ, Martin RL (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for sciatic nerve entrapment in the gluteal region. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(4):882–888
Martin HD, Palmer IJ (2013) History and physical examination of the hip: the basics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 6(3):219–225
Martin HD, Shears SA, Johnson JC, Smathers AM, Palmer IJ (2011) The endoscopic treatment of sciatic nerve entrapment/deep gluteal syndrome. Arthroscopy 27(2):172–181
Martin RR, Martin HD, Kivlan BR (2017) Nerve entrapment in the hip region: current concepts review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 12(7):1163
McCrory P, Bell S (1999) Nerve entrapment syndromes as a cause of pain in the hip, groin and buttock. Sports Med 27(4):261–274
Meknas K, Christensen A, Johansen O (2003) The internal obturator muscle may cause sciatic pain. Pain 104(1–2):375–380
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269
Murinova N, Krashin D, Trescot AM (2016) posterior femoral cutaneous nerve entrapment: pelvic. Peripheral nerve entrapments. Springer, Cham, pp 683–690
Nordfors M (2013) The deep gluteal syndrome, an underestimated etiological factor for sciatica, low back pain and other chronic pain conditions? A case series report, review of the literature and a proposal for diagnostic criteria. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257536681
Park MS, Jeong SY, Yoon SJ (2019) Endoscopic sciatic nerve decompression after fracture or reconstructive surgery of the acetabulum in comparison with endoscopic treatments in idiopathic deep gluteal syndrome. Clin J Sport Med 29(3):203–208
Park MS, Yoon SJ, Jung SY, Kim SH (2016) Clinical results of endoscopic sciatic nerve decompression for deep gluteal syndrome: mean 2-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17(1):218
Reiman MP, Thorborg K, Covington K, Cook CE, Hölmich P (2017) Important clinical descriptors to include in the examination and assessment of patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: an international and multi-disciplinary Delphi survey. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(6):1975–1986
Rosales J, García N, Rafols C, Pérez M, Verdugo MA (2015) Perisciatic ultrasound-guided infiltration for treatment of deep gluteal syndrome: description of technique and preliminary results. J Ultrasound Med 34(11):2093–2097
Schröder RG, Martin RR, Bobb VL, Khoury AN, Palmer IJ, Martin HD (2016) Outcomes of non-operative management of deep gluteal syndrome—a case series of six patients. J Musculoskelet Disord Treat 2(2)
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716
Stajic S, Vojvodic A, Carro LP, Mihailovic J, Gasic M, Lukic G (2018) Role of sciatic nerve stiffness in surgical decision making and follow up in patients with deep gluteal syndrome. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/390120
Toda T, Koda M, Rokkaku T, Watanabe H, Nakajima A, Yamada T et al (2013) Sciatica caused by pyomyositis of the piriformis muscle in a pediatric patient. Orthopedics 36(2):e257–e259
Trescot AM (2016) Inferior gluteal nerve entrapment. Peripheral nerve entrapments. Springer, Berlin, pp 581–587
Trescot AM (2016) Superior gluteal nerve entrapment. Peripheral nerve entrapments. Springer, Berlin, pp 571–579
Vassalou EE, Katonis P, Karantanas AH (2018) Piriformis muscle syndrome: a cross-sectional imaging study in 116 patients and evaluation of therapeutic outcome. Eur Radiol 28(2):447–458
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14(1):135
Funding
No financial support for this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KK, SU, and OA conceptualized the work and formatted the research question. KK and AS performed searching. KK and CA assessed the quality of the included studies. KK, NS and AD performed data acquisition and statistical analysis. SU, HM, and OA interpreted the data and commented on the data. KK wrote the manuscript. OA supervised the study and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We disclosed conflict of interest in the ICMJE file.
Ethical approval
This is a systematic review, and therefore, IRB approval is not required.
Informed consent
This is a systematic review, and therefore, informed consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kizaki, K., Uchida, S., Shanmugaraj, A. et al. Deep gluteal syndrome is defined as a non-discogenic sciatic nerve disorder with entrapment in the deep gluteal space: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 3354–3364 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05966-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05966-x