Abstract
Purpose
To prospectively monitor health-related quality of life and return to work after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with isolated ACL tears.
Methods
Sixty consecutive patients with isolated ACL tears who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were prospectively monitored using the “Questions on Life Satisfaction Modules” (FLZM) and “Short-Form 12 (SF-12)” quality-of-life outcome measures. The Lysholm score and Tegner activity index were used as functional outcome measures. Additionally, return to work (months) together with level of physical workload was analysed. Outcome measures were assessed the day before surgery and at 6, 12 weeks and 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. Quality-of-life outcomes were correlated with functional outcome scores.
Results
Satisfaction with health (FLZM) significantly improved within the first 2 years (p < 0.05), and the physical component scale (SF12) showed a significantly higher score after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months as compared with preoperative values (p < 0.05). “General life satisfaction (FLZM)” was initially decreased at 6 weeks (p < 0.05) but increased during the further follow-up period, reaching a score not significantly different from preoperative values. Mean Lysholm score improved from 66 preoperatively to 89 post-operatively (p < 0.05) and the median Tegner activity index improved from four to six points (p < 0.05) at final follow-up. Mean time to return to work was 7 weeks (range 1–34 weeks), and it strongly depended on physical workload. A positive correlation between quality of life and functional outcome (Lysholm score) was observed.
Conclusion
General life satisfaction is impaired during the early post-operative course, but returns to preoperative values after 2 years. Satisfaction with health reaches higher values after 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively, and the SF-12 physical component scale was seen to improve during the follow-up period. Improved functional outcomes were observed to correlate with quality-of-life measurements. Thus, patients can preoperatively be informed that they will benefit from ACL reconstruction in terms of an improved knee function and satisfaction with health. Heavy physical workload must be considered as a risk factor for prolonged time lost to return to work. These patients have to be identified and informed about realistic expectations.
Level of evidence
II.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are treated operatively in 50–75% of cases in order to restore knee stability, improve knee function, and relieve discomfort [20]. Giving way, thigh muscle strength symmetry, patient-reported function, and return to sport achieve consensus among orthopaedic surgeons as key criteria for evaluating successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [12] as has been reported in a number of clinical follow-up studies [2, 4, 7,8,9]. Given the high demands on knee function during both occupational and recreational aspects of daily living, however, standardized functional knee scores and/or imaging follow-up examinations may not be suitable alone to characterize the outcome of such a procedure. Particularly, given the importance of the patients’ perceptions of benefits gained from surgical interventions, there has been a more recent shift in the orthopaedic field towards the use of patient-reported quality-of-life outcome measures to judge the success of interventions [13]. This approach allows measuring the effectiveness of a specific intervention by identifying individual priorities and problems, developing realistic goals, and assessing progress.
The purpose of this prospective case series was to monitor longitudinal changes in health-related quality-of-life measures following isolated arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. As a secondary outcome measure, time to return to work in relation to physical workload was monitored.
The primary hypothesis was that arthroscopic ACL reconstruction significantly improves health-related quality of life. The secondary hypothesis was that there is a positive correlation between quality of life and functional outcome scores. The tertiary hypothesis was that a higher physical workload significantly prolongs time to return to work.
This study was conducted to improve the understanding of patient satisfaction following ACL reconstruction and to identify a potential risk factor for prolonged incapacity to work.
Materials and methods
Inclusion criteria were isolated and symptomatic ACL tears in patients aged 18–60 years treated with arthroscopic anatomic single-bundle reconstruction between 2011 and 2013 in a specialized orthopaedic sports medicine unit. Patients with partial ACL tears, concomitant lesions of the medial collateral ligament, the posterolateral complex or multi-ligament injuries were excluded. Furthermore, patients were excluded if concomitant procedures such as meniscal repair, cartilage therapy (e.g. microfracturing, osteochondral transfer, chondrocyte implantation) or osteotomies were performed. Patients were only included if they were working on a regular basis before the injury, did not receive income from Workers’ Compensation and were not planning to apply for Workers’ Compensation.
Data acquisition was conducted by two independent investigators and took place the day before surgery (baseline) and 6, 12 weeks and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.
Demographics
ACL reconstruction was performed in 97 consecutive patients within the study period. 37 were excluded on ground of: age (n = 10), not working on a regular basis (n = 2), meniscal repair (n = 12), concomitant high tibial osteotomy (n = 1), and multi-ligament injury (n = 3). In total, 69 patients met the criterion for initial inclusion in this study. Six patients were lost to follow-up; two patients suffered a traumatic re-rupture and underwent revision surgery, and one patient required removal of a meniscus ganglion 3 months post-operatively. Thus, a total of 60 patients were available at final follow-up (follow-up rate 87%). The mean patient age at surgery was 35 years [range 18–6; Standard Deviation (SD) 10.7], 26 patients (43%) were female and 34 male (57%). All patients took part in regular recreational sporting activity prior to their knee injuries. None of the included patients were professional athletes. Time from injury to surgery was at least 6 weeks. Key criteria for scheduling surgery were a completely reabsorbed knee effusion and a range of motion of at least flexion/extension 90–0–0.
Operative technique and rehabilitation
An anatomic single-bundle technique with autologous hamstring grafts was performed in all patients. The femoral tunnel was drilled via an anteromedial portal. For femoral graft fixation a cortical suspension device (ACL tight-rope, Arthrex Naples USA) was used and tibial fixation was performed using a bio-absorbable interference screw (Arthrex Naples USA).
The post-operative protocol consisted of 2 weeks partial weight-bearing on crutches without limitation of range of motion. Physical therapy twice a week was recommended and a brace (Medi M4, Medi Bayreuth Germany) provided for a period of 6 months. Patients were permitted to start swimming and running on a treadmill from 8 weeks post-operatively and outdoor jogging after 12 weeks. Return to sport-specific training was allowed at 6 months and full return to contact/pivoting activities from 9 months post-operatively.
Assessment of health-related quality of life, functional outcome, and return to work
Health-related quality of life was assessed using “Questions on Life Satisfaction Modules” (“Fragen zur LebenszufriedenheitModule”, FLZM) [6] and Short-Form-12 Health Survey [18] as primary patient-reported outcome measures. FLZM is a standardized self-assessment test using two modules with eight items each. It evaluates individual weighting of the items and therefore deals adequately with the problem of relative importance of individual aspects of quality of life. The modules and items comprise: (1) General life satisfaction (GLS): “Friends/acquaintances”, “leisure time/hobbies”, “health”, “income/financial security”, “occupation/work”, “housing/living conditions”, “family life/children”, and “partner relationship/sexuality”. (2) Satisfaction with health (SwH): “Physical condition/fitness”, “ability to relax/stay on an even keel”, “energy/zest for life”, “mobility (e.g. walking, driving)”, “vision and hearing”, “freedom from anxiety”, “freedom from aches and pains”, and “independence from help/care”. On 0–100 scale (with 100 representing maximal satisfaction) as a reference, mean normative weighted and age-adjusted reference for GLS module is 65, and 90 for SwH module [6]. SF-12 is a multi-dimensional generic quality-of-life measure derived from 12 items selected from the SF-36 health survey across eight dimensions of health: “Physical functioning”, “role limitations—physical”, “bodily pain”, “general health”, “vitality”, “social functioning”, “role limitations—emotional”, and “mental health”. It produces two summary scores: (1) physical component scale (PCS) and mental component scale (MCS) which were transformed linearly to 0–100 scales, with 0 and 100 assigned to the lowest and highest possible scores, respectively.
The Lysholm score and Tegner activity index were used to evaluate the functional outcome [21]. Time (weeks) lost to return to work was recorded and type of occupation were assessed as “non-/mild-physical” or “heavy physical workload” using the German classification system according to the REFA Association of occupational medicine and social medicine [15, 16].
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB number: 415/15). All patients provided written informed consent to participate in this investigation.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM-SPSS, New York, USA). All data were tested for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
Longitudinal dependent samples were computed by the paired t test for parametric and the paired Wilcoxon test for nonparametric data. Characteristics between groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Correlation was calculated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. A nominal p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Results
Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life
Changes over time of FLZM and SF-12 are described in detail in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. FLZM summary scale “general life satisfaction” (GLS) significantly decreased initially (p < 0.05), but increased within the further follow-up time period. There was no difference observed between the preoperative sum score and the score 24 months post-operatively. Its subscale “health” was significantly higher at 12 and 24 months as compared to preoperatively (p < 0.05), in contrast “family life/children” was lower at 2 years.
FLZM summary scale “satisfaction with health” (SwH) significantly decreased initially (p < 0.05). Subsequently the score improved continuously. Other than “ability to relax/stay on an even keel”, “vision and hearing” and “energy/zest for life”, all items significantly improved within the first two post-operative years (p < 0.05).
Physical component scale (SF-12) showed a significantly higher score at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months compared to preoperatively (p < 0.05). The outcome of mental component scale (MCS) was constant from baseline to final follow-up with no difference observed. For details, see Table 5.
Longitudinal functional outcome and return to work
Changes over time of Lysholm score and Tegner activity index are presented in detail in Tables 6 and 7. Lysholm score decreased initially, but showed higher values at 12 weeks and 6, 12 and 24 months. From 12 to 24 months’ follow-up, no significant improvement was observed (n.s.). The median Tegner activity index improved from four to six points from preoperatively to 2 years post-operatively.
Preoperatively, all patients were in regular employment. Mean time to return to work was 7 weeks (1–34, SD 6). Forty patients (66.7%) worked in desk jobs, and 20 patients (23.3%) had occupations involving a heavy physical workload. With 5 weeks (1–18, SD 3.1) versus 10 weeks (1–34, SD 5.55), a significant difference in time to return to work was observed between the two groups (p < 0.05).
Correlation of health-related quality of life with functional outcome
There was a strong positive correlation between quality-of-life outcomes (FLZM GLS, FLZM SwH, and SF-12) and functional outcome (Lysholm score). Correlation coefficients were 0.38, 0.53, and 0.38 at 2 years.
Discussion
The most significant finding of this study was significant increase in health-related quality of life, functional outcome, and level of sporting activity 2 years following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The FLZM summary scale “satisfaction with health” and the SF-12 physical component scale were seen to increase continuously from 3 months post-operatively up to final follow-up. Lysholm and Tegner score were significant higher than preoperatively at 2 years.
Quality of life measures the difference and gap at a particular period of time between the individual’s hopes, expectations, and desires in the context of the individual`s present experiences and sense of reality [1]. It depends on individual current lifestyle, ambitions, experiences, and realistic priorities and goals. Improvement is related to the ability to identify and actively achieve these goals. “Good” quality of life therefore can be defined as the matching and fulfilled by experience of personal hopes. This is expressed by satisfaction, contentment, fulfilment, and the ability to cope. [1] The most widely used quality-of-life measure in orthopaedic research to date is the Short-Form health survey. It focusses on the lower extremity and is recognized as a good indicator for physical function [10]. Physical and mental well-being can also be monitored using the FLZM. More importantly, this score includes weighting for the relative importance of each dimension to the individual concerned. Consequently, the rating in a dimension that is of little importance to an individual does not contribute the same amount to the overall score as the rating in a dimension that is considered particularly important to that person [6]. There are few studies investigating quality of life after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction [5]. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first prospective case series to investigate patient satisfaction using a standardized health-related quality-of-life outcome scale that incorporates individually weighted importance of each dimension.
This study shows a significant increase in patient satisfaction with health (FLZM) in the first 2 years following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The subitems “physical condition/fitness” and “freedom from aches and pain” were significant higher at 12 and 24 months with only a slight difference between these two measurements, indicating that the rehabilitation programme is routinely completed within the first post-operative year. Patients were observed to be more active, as represented by a higher Tegner score, and had an increased knee function (Lysholm score), at 12 and 24 months. The patient satisfaction with health (FLZM) subscales “mobility” and “independence of help/care” were seen to be significantly lower at 6 weeks. Within this period, patients used crutches and did not fully weight-bear, resulting in restricted mobility and may explain the inability to return to work even among patients worked in desk jobs. After 6 months these subitems increased. At this point, post-operatively patients stopped wearing their knee-stabilizing brace, which may impair quality of life and is not recommended for routine use by some authors [14, 19]. “Freedom from anxiety” was significant higher after 12 weeks. Within this period, the risk of post-operative complications (e.g. infection, arthrofibrosis) decreases and patients usually begin to notice an improvement in knee function and step-wise progress in physiotherapy. Additionally, reduced fear of giving ways due to ACL insufficiency may help explain higher values during further follow-up which was seen to continue improving up to the final follow-up of the present study, at 2 years.
The FLZM summary scale “general life satisfaction” showed no difference after 2 years. Its subscales “friends/acquaintances”, “leisure time/hobbies“, and “partner relationship/sexuality” were significant lower at 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. This may be as a result of restricted mobility and impaired activities within the early post-operative period following ACL reconstruction, however, all subitems improved and reached results comparable to preoperative values after 2 years. The subitem “health” was significantly higher at 12 and 24 months, which underlines the beneficial effect of this surgical procedure. The SF-12 mental component scale did not differ between follow-up time-points and was comparable to preoperative values at 2 years. The SF-12 physical component scale, however, was significantly higher at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. Longitudinally monitored, both SF-12 (PCS) and FLZM (SwH) showed comparable trends.
Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is a well-established technique to address anterior cruciate ligament tears. Very positive short- to long-term functional outcomes for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction have been reported previously [3, 11, 22]. It is beyond the scope of the present study to comment on the ideal method for ACL reconstruction; however, functional outcomes observed in the present study are comparable with current literature and represent a significant clinical improvement [4, 9, 11].
While the FLZM has not been validated against knee specific functional outcome scores, Short-Form health survey has been previously validated against Lysholm score for patients with ACL insufficiency, with significant correlation observed [17]. In the present study, a positive correlation was observed between quality of life and functional outcome (Lysholm score), which would seem to indicate the importance of considering both when judging post-operative results, despite the differing nature of quality of life and functional scores.
Mean time to return to work was 7 weeks (1–34, SD 6) in this study, and it depended significantly on heavy physical workload.
Some limitations must, however, be considered in the present study, namely: (1) the study was performed at a tertiary care centre. Results may not reflect the characteristics of patients that present at different levels of institutions. (2) There is no control group for the reconstruction technique used in this study; however, it was beyond the scope of this study to investigate the relative merits of differing surgical techniques. Nevertheless, arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with the presented technique remains a mainstream and widely accepted treatment option. (3) The number of participants of this study is low when compared with other studies; however, these results do represent comparable outcomes. (4) Since improvement was seen to continue up to the 2-year follow-up period of this study, further longitudinal monitoring may have been necessary to identify further improvements and final, steady-state, outcomes. (5) Individuals that suffered from recurrent instability were excluded from further follow-up.
Since unrealistic patient expectations may cause dissatisfaction despite technical successful arthroscopic anatomic ACL reconstruction, surgeons should consider counselling their patients concerning realistic aims and goals. The present study adds valuable results to the existing literature, particularly given the nature of the patient cohort represented, with isolated ACL reconstructions without additional procedures performed. Following ACL reconstruction, patients can expect improved knee function, higher levels of sporting activity and an increased health-related quality of life. This information is useful in daily clinical practice when patients are preoperatively informed about benefits from ACL reconstruction.
Conclusion
General life satisfaction is impaired during the early post-operative course, but returns to preoperative values after 2 years. Satisfaction with health reaches higher values after 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively and the SF-12 physical component scale was seen to improve during the follow-up period. Improved functional outcomes were observed to correlate with quality-of-life measurements. Heavy physical workload must be considered as a risk factor for prolonged time lost to return to work.
References
Calman KC (1984) Quality of life in cancer patients–an hypothesis. J Med Ethics 10(3):124–127
Mayr HO, Benecke P, Hoell A, Schmitt-Sody M, Bernstein A, Suedkamp NP, Stoehr A (2016) Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 32:34–42
Kvist J, Kartus J, Karlsson J, Forssblad M (2014) Results from the Swedish national anterior cruciate ligament register. Arthroscopy 30:803–810
Schurz M, Tiefenboeck TM, Winnisch M, Syre S, Plachel F, Steiner G, Hajdu S, Hofbauer M (2016) Clinical and functional outcome of all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy 32:332–337
Filbay SR, Ackerman IN, Russell TG, Macri EM, Crossley KM (2014) Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 42:1247–1255
Henrich G, Herschbach P (2000) Questions on life satisfaction (FLZ M): A short questionnaire for assessing subjective quality of life. Eur J Psychol Assess 16(3):150–159
Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH (2012) Individualized anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a prospective study comparing anatomic single- and double-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 40:1781–1788
Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:512–520
Karikis I, Desai N, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L, Kartus J (2016) Comparison of anatomic double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts: a prospective randomized study with 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Am J Sports Med 44:1225–1236
Laucis NC, Hays RD, Bhattacharyya T (2015) Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics: a brief guide. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1628–1634
Liu Y, Cui G, Yan H, Yang Y, Ao Y (2016) Comparison between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 6- to 8-stranded hamstring autograft: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 44:2314–2322
Lynch AD, Logerstedt DS, Grindem H, Eitzen I, Hicks GE, Axe MJ, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA, Snyder-Mackler L (2015) Consensus criteria for defining “successful outcome” after ACL injury and reconstruction: a delaware-Oslo ACL cohort investigation. Br J Sports Med 49:335–342
Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F (2009) Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine 34(15):1590–1599
Mayr HO, Stüeken P, Münch E-O, Wolter M, Bernstein A, Suedkamp NP, Stoehr A (2013) Brace or no-brace after ACL graft? Four-year results of a prospective clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1156–1162
Saier T, Minzlaff P, Feucht MJ, Lämmle L, Burghoff M, Ihle C, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2016) Health-related quality of life after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3938-4
Schröter S, Mueller J, van Heerwaarden R, Lobenhoffer P, Stöckle U, Albrecht D (2012) Return to work and clinical outcome after open wedge HTO. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:213–219
Shapiro ET, Richmond JC, Rockett SE (1996) The use of a generic, patient-based health assessment (SF-36) for evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 24(2):196–200
Singh A, Gnanalingham K, Casey A, Crockard A (2006) Quality of life assessment using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with SF-36. Spine 31:639–643
Smith SD, Laprade RF, Jansson KS, Arøen A, Wijdicks CA (2013) Functional bracing of ACL injuries: current state and future directions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1131–1141
Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 32:1986–1995
Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49
Thompson SM, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Linklater J, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA (2016) Twenty-year outcome of a longitudinal prospective evaluation of isolated endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med 44(12):3083–3094
Acknowledgements
The authors thank E. Bartsch (Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany) for data acquisition.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study.
Funding
No funding was received.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Technical University of Munich (No. 415/15) and conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minzlaff, P., Heidt, T., Feucht, M.J. et al. Patient satisfaction with health is substantially improved following ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 582–588 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4623-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4623-6