Abstract
Purpose
Instability following non-operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture in young children frequently results in secondary chondral and/or meniscal injuries. Therefore, many contemporary surgeons advocate ACL reconstruction in these patients, despite the challenges posed by peri-articular physes and the high early failure rate. We report a novel management approach, comprising direct ACL repair reinforced by a temporary internal brace in three children.
Methods
Two patients (aged 5 and 6 years) with complete proximal ACL ruptures and a third (aged seven) with an associated tibial spine avulsion underwent direct surgical repair, supplemented with an internal brace that was removed after 3 months.
Results
Second-look arthroscopy, examination and imaging at 3 months confirmed knee stability and complete ACL healing in all cases. Normal activities were resumed at 4 months, and excellent objective measures of function, without limb growth disturbance, were noted beyond 2 years.
Conclusion
ACL repair in young children using this technique negates the requirement and potential morbidity of graft harvest and demonstrates the potential for excellent outcome as an attractive alternative to ACL reconstruction, where an adequate ACL remnant permits direct repair.
Level of evidence
IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Approximately 3.4 % of all anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries occur in skeletally immature patients [22, 35]. This proportion continues to increase as a result of greater clinical awareness, improved availability of diagnostic imaging [8, 23, 40, 43, 45] and a rise in the number of children involved in high-demand sport [1, 11, 34]. Furthermore, incomplete ACL injuries in children may progress to a complete tear with poor functional outcomes and subsequent meniscal and chondral damage, if not surgically reconstructed [2, 21, 25].
Although the optimal management of ACL injuries in adults is established, significant anatomical and physiological differences limit the transference of techniques to the treatment of paediatric ACL injuries, which remain controversial and continue to present a major management challenge. Whilst surgical treatment is now widely accepted to restore stability and prevent sequelae, the timing of surgery, graft choice and tunnel placement are contentious [5, 10, 27]. The challenge associated with the avoidance of physeal damage and consequent growth disturbance has resulted in those who continue to favour non-operative management.
Standard paediatric ACL reconstruction involves drilling and passing the graft across the open physes. Tunnel positions are compromised because although oblique tunnels are biomechanically favourable, they effectively increase the cross-sectional area of physeal disruption. This problem is exacerbated on the femoral side where the distal physis has an undulating orientation [10, 11, 22]. An alternative surgical treatment for ACL rupture by direct repair and temporary reinforcement with an internal brace, rather than reconstruction, reduces or negates physeal injury and any requirement for graft use. To date this technique has been used in the treatment of three young children with minor modifications: in a 5-year-old girl who sustained an ACL rupture whilst trampolining; in a 6-year-old boy in a skiing accident and in a 7-year-old girl who twisted her knee falling off a playground roundabout (Table 1).
Case report
A 5-year-old girl presented with knee pain and inability to weight bear after landing awkwardly whilst trampolining. Radiographs of the knee confirmed a haemarthrosis and excluded bony avulsion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was suggestive of an ACL tear, with a suspicion of a partial lateral meniscal tear (Fig. 1). Informed consent was gained to assess the patient’s knee under anaesthesia with a view to ACL repair.
Operative procedure
Examination under general anaesthesia (EUA) demonstrated a highly positive Lachman and pivot shift test. Arthroscopy performed through anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) portals revealed normal chondral surfaces and a partial thickness tear to the upper surface of the lateral meniscus. A complete ACL rupture with an empty lateral wall of the femoral notch was noted with a good remnant present (Fig. 2). A decision was made to proceed to direct ACL repair using the internal brace technique as described by MacKay et al. [32].
The torn ACL was initially mobilised and a suture passing device was used to secure a non-absorbable braided suture through the proximal end of the ACL remnant, enabling its subsequent approximation to the femoral ACL footprint. Two bites of the stump were required for satisfactory purchase. A femoral tunnel was made at the footprint using a calibrated paediatric guide. In order to avoid physeal damage, an all-epiphyseal technique was employed on the femoral side: using a paediatric ‘outside to in’ jig, a 2.4-mm guide wire was passed from the lateral epiphyseal cortex under fluoroscopic control such that it entered the joint in the centre of the femoral footprint. This was subsequently swapped for a 1.4-mm wire over which a 3.2-mm cannulated drill was used. The tibial tunnel was made using a transphyseal technique starting with a 2.4-mm guide wire within a paediatric guide. This tunnel was directed more centrally and vertically than for an adult procedure to minimise potential injury to the tibial tubercle apophysis whilst maintaining a central entry point within the tibial physis. Looped sutures were passed through each tunnel and into the joint. Both looped passing sutures and the suture attached to the ACL stump were simultaneously retrieved through the AM portal to avoid soft tissue bridging. The internal brace consisted of non-absorbable braided tape (FiberTape, Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) loaded onto a suspensory cortical fixation device (Tightrope RT), which also served to secure the ACL stump suture. The construct was pulled into the joint through the tibial tunnel and then up into the femoral tunnel using the passing sutures. The suspensory device was deployed under direct vision onto the lateral femoral cortex. The repair was visualised arthroscopically to confirm good approximation of the ACL tissue to its femoral footprint (Fig. 3). A bioabsorbable suture anchor screw was used to secure the distal end of the internal brace within the tibial metaphysis, and the ACL brace construct tension was fine-tuned using the femoral Tightrope.
Modified operative procedure
Two additional children (aged six and seven) have subsequently been treated using an all-epiphyseal technique with 2.4-mm-diameter intra-epiphyseal femoral and tibial tunnels: a looped shuttling suture was passed into the joint through each tunnel and retrieved through the AM portal cannula. The loop of the femoral suture was cut, resulting in two snare sutures: one snare was used to retrieve the ACL repair sutures back through the femoral tunnel; the other snare was attached to the tibial looped suture and pulled out of the joint through the tibial tunnel. This suture was then used to advance the internal brace construct from the lateral femoral cortex, through the femoral tunnel, into the joint and down into the tibial tunnel. Narrower tunnels could be employed with this modification as there was no longer a requirement to pass the suspensory device through the bone tunnels. Only a diameter of 2.4 mm was required to accommodate the sutures and suspensory tape, resulting in removal of less than half the total volume of bone—a particular advantage in these small children.
Post-operative course
Post-operative radiographs confirmed correct fixation positioning (Fig. 4), and the knee was immobilised in extension for 4 weeks to facilitate direct healing before commencing active knee flexion.
Outcome scores (KOOS-Child, Lysholm and Tegner) were collected pre-operatively and at up to 2 years post-operatively. Standard post-operative objective laxity testing was precluded because the children’s legs were too small to fit within our arthrometer. We therefore measured the pivot shift phenomenon and anteroposterior translation using a triaxial accelerometer at 1 year (KiRa, OrthoKey, Lewes, DE, USA) [6, 38], in comparison with the uninjured contralateral knee. Each measurement was taken three times. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Results
All patients demonstrated a stable knee with negative Lachman and pivot shift tests at EUA 3 months post-operatively. Repeat arthroscopy in all cases revealed undamaged articular cartilage, no synovitis or persisting meniscal lesion and a healed ACL that was firmly attached to the lateral wall of the notch (Fig. 5). Appropriate ACL tension was demonstrated throughout a full range of knee motion with no evidence of impingement. The temporary internal brace and bone fixation devices were removed without difficulty, and further intra-operative examination confirmed knee stability. Subsequent MRI confirmed a taut, healed and well-vascularised ACL in all patients. They returned to all normal activities without limitations at 4 months and remain with stable knees with no detectable clinical or radiological leg growth disturbance beyond 2 years (Fig. 6). Outcome scores demonstrated significant improvements at up to 2 years compared with pre-operative evaluation (Table 2). Objective laxity testing for anteroposterior and pivot shift stability using a triaxial accelerometer demonstrated no significant difference between the operated and contralateral uninjured knee (Table 3).
Discussion
This study demonstrates a new, safe technique in the surgical treatment of young children with ACL injuries with encouraging short-term results. Additional procedures were not required, other than planned removal of the internal brace construct, and no leg length discrepancy or malalignment has been noted. ACL repair in young children using this technique is an attractive alternative to ACL reconstruction. The advantages of repairing the patient’s native ACL include maintenance of proprioception and the absence of donor site morbidity. In addition, the requirement to harvest autograft or allograft, and concerns regarding adequate graft dimensions are eliminated.
Support for both operative and non-operative management of skeletally immature patients with ACL ruptures exists, with the majority of recent data leaning towards surgical intervention [41]. Kocher et al. [25] advocated initial immobilisation and restricted weight bearing for the treatment of partial ACL ruptures in children, followed by physiotherapy focusing on hamstring strengthening and a brace during sporting activity. Despite this, 31 % of the non-operated patients required subsequent surgical intervention due to instability or recurrent injury. A systematic review identified only one study where no difference in outcome between operative and non-operative management for complete ACL tears was reported [48, 49]. The authors attributed this to strict adherence of complete abstention from sport and continuous bracing in the non-operative group. Compliance with non-operative management is often difficult in this physically active demographic [10, 37], and with the increasing frequency of ACL ruptures in skeletally immature patients combined with the risk of meniscal and chondral injuries associated with persistent instability, the pendulum has now swung towards operative intervention [28, 44].
Treatment goals for a patient of any age with an ACL injury comprise: the recovery of a stable functional knee; prevention of further intra-articular damage; and expeditious return to daily activities and sport [41]. Timing of surgical intervention is critical; early ACL reconstruction in children (within 6 weeks) is associated with improved results and threefold fewer medial meniscal tears, [36] whereas delayed operative intervention leads to higher rates of meniscectomy and lower subjective outcome scores [19]. However, ACL reconstruction in patients with open physes results in a threefold increase in re-rupture rates when compared to the adult population [7, 31]. Smaller graft diameter has been suggested as a cause of failure [33], and mature hamstring allograft has been advocated as a solution [39]. Unfortunately, unrelated allograft tissue has a higher failure rate in primary paediatric ACL reconstruction [4, 13, 47]. Parental donated allograft provides biologically active tissue of greater diameter and is associated with better post-operative outcomes and failure rates, although the associated donor site morbidity to the uninjured parent is undesirable [17]. Perhaps the biggest challenge in these patients is the avoidance of iatrogenic physeal damage, potentially causing unilateral growth arrest, limb length discrepancy and angular deformity [25]. The distal femoral physis is particularly vulnerable due to its irregular contour and high proliferative potential. Utilisation of anatomical landmarks and fluoroscopy is recommended in order to achieve anatomical reconstruction whilst avoiding physeal damage [3, 50]. Transphyseal tibial drilling is of lesser concern as this tunnel is situated centrally within the physis and usually requires removal of less than 3 % of the physeal volume [24]. Up to 7 % of physeal volume can safely be removed if soft tissue graft material alone is placed across the physis [42], although it is critically important to avoid securing fixation devices crossing the physis [9], incomplete filling of the tunnel with graft [42], excessive graft tensioning [12] and the use of bone patella tendon bone graft due to the potential formation of an osseous bridge [20]. The vast majority of angular deformities and growth disturbances have been associated with bone plugs or fixation devices deployed across the physis [26]. Despite these risks, transphyseal ACL reconstruction is frequently performed in skeletally immature patients with good outcomes, no or minimal growth disturbance and a high rate of return to previous activity levels [27, 30, 46]. A number of physeal-sparing reconstruction techniques have been proposed in an effort to avoid impaired growth. The extra-articular Macintosh technique [14, 16] and subsequent modifications have demonstrated good results in various studies with no growth deformities [48]. More contemporary intra-articular procedures, using single or both physeal-sparing techniques, have been described with both methods yielding good results [18, 29, 48]. A meta-analysis of 55 studies (935 patients) for ACL surgery in skeletally immature patients revealed a 1.8 % risk of growth disturbance and re-rupture risk of 3.8 % with a significantly higher risk 0.34 % of angular deformity in the physeal-sparing, transosseous group when compared to the transphyseal transosseous group [15]. Physeal damage has been attributed to the deleterious effects of drilling parallel to the physis, including thermal injury, or from a pressure effect of the implant [48]. The internal bracing was electively removed in all cases presented here after 3 months to mitigate any tethering which could impair physeal growth.
Surgical repair of the ACL is an alternative to reconstruction in the pre-adolescent, avoiding a number of potential pitfalls, including the morbidity of parental allograft harvest and inadequacy of autogenous graft. However, it requires sufficient ACL remnant. Excellent outcomes have been observed thus far, and the technique continues to evolve: a reduction of tunnel diameter from 3.5 to 2.4 mm is significant in this demographic and improves the likelihood of all-epiphyseal reconstruction. Furthermore, the modified procedure circumvents the requirements for inter-osseous passage of suspensory fixation and arthroscopic knot tying. Additionally, any failure of this technique does not preclude future ACL reconstruction by conventional means, and although a second procedure is necessary for the removal of the FiberTape construct, conventional reconstruction options are still available. In addition to three paediatric cases described here, 16 adults with femoral ACL peel-off injuries have been treated in this way, with good early results.
This study has several limitations: as the technique is novel, only three patients are described with heterogeneous clinical presentations, arthroscopic findings and operative technique. Although laxity assessment using triaxial accelerometer data has been validated in adults, this has not to our knowledge been performed in children. Our values for both pivot shift and anteroposterior translation are higher (for operated and normal knees) than those documented for adults, but this may be due to constitutional increased joint mobility present in children. The short follow-up period excludes early failure and growth disturbance, but a longer course is required to assess longevity of this technique into adulthood. Nevertheless, this study demonstrates the potential benefits afforded by new instrumentation, materials and techniques and offers an attractive alternative to ACL reconstruction in children.
Conclusion
Knee instability following ACL rupture in skeletally immature patients can be treated with repair and temporary internal bracing rather than reconstruction, with similar short-term outcomes, if sufficient residual ACL remnant tissue is available.
References
Adams AL, Schiff MA (2006) Childhood soccer injuries treated in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 13:571–574
Aichroth PM, Patel DV, Zorrilla P (2002) The natural history and treatment of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in children and adolescents. A prospective review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:38–41
Anderson AF (2004) Transepiphyseal replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament using quadruple hamstring grafts in skeletally immature patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 1):201–209
Barrett GR, Luber K, Replogle WH, Manley JL (2010) Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young, active patient: Tegner activity level and failure rate. Arthroscopy 26:1593–1601
Beasley LS, Chudik SC (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament injury in children: update of current treatment options. Curr Opin Pediatr 15:45–52
Berruto M, Uboldi F, Gala L, Marelli B, Albisetti W (2013) Is triaxial accelerometer reliable in the evaluation and grading of knee pivot-shift phenomenon? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(4):981–985
Bourke HE, Gordon DJ, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA (2012) The outcome at 15 years of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft for ‘isolated’ anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:630–637
Caine D, Caine C, Maffulli N (2006) Incidence and distribution of pediatric sport-related injuries. Clin J Sport Med 16:500–513
Chudik S, Beasley L, Potter H, Wickiewicz T, Warren R, Rodeo S (2007) The influence of femoral technique for graft placement on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a skeletally immature canine model with a rapidly growing physis. Arthroscopy 23:1309–1319
Cohen M, Ferretti M, Quarteiro M, Marcondes FB, de Hollanda JP, Amaro JT, Abdalla RJ (2009) Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes. Arthroscopy 25:831–838
Dorizas JA, Stanitski CL (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament injury in the skeletally immature. Orthop Clin North Am 34:355–363
Edwards TB, Greene CC, Baratta RV, Zieske A, Willis RB (2001) The effect of placing a tensioned graft across open growth plates. A gross and histologic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:725–734
Ellis HB, Matheny LM, Briggs KK, Pennock AT, Steadman JR (2012) Outcomes and revision rate after bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years or younger with closed physes. Arthroscopy 28:1819–1825
Frank C, Jackson RW (1988) Lateral substitution for chronic isolated anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:407–411
Frosch KH, Stengel D, Brodhun T, Stietencron I, Holsten D, Jung C, Reister D, Voigt C, Niemeyer P, Maier M, Hertel P, Jagodzinski M, Lill H (2010) Outcomes and risks of operative treatment of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in children and adolescents. Arthroscopy 26:1539–1550
Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 147:45–50
Goddard M, Bowman N, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA (2013) Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children using living donor hamstring tendon allografts. Am J Sports Med 41:567–574
Guzzanti V, Falciglia F, Stanitski CL (2003) Physeal-sparing intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in preadolescents. Am J Sports Med 31:949–953
Henry J, Chotel F, Chouteau J, Fessy MH, Berard J, Moyen B (2009) Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in children: early reconstruction with open physes or delayed reconstruction to skeletal maturity? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:748–755
Hudgens JL, Dahm DL (2012) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury in skeletally immature patients. Int J Pediatr 2012:932702. doi:10.1155/2012/932702
Janarv PM, Nystrom A, Werner S, Hirsch G (1996) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients. J Pediatr Orthop 16:673–677
Johnston DR, Ganley TJ, Flynn JM, Gregg JR (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients. Orthopedics 25:864–871
Jones SJ, Lyons RA, Sibert J, Evans R, Palmer SR (2001) Changes in sports injuries to children between 1983 and 1998: comparison of case series. J Public Health Med 23:268–271
Kercher J, Xerogeanes J, Tannenbaum A, Al-Hakim R, Black JC, Zhao J (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature: an anatomical study utilizing 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstructions. J Pediatr Orthop 29:124–129
Kocher MS, Micheli LJ, Zurakowski D, Luke A (2002) Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in children and adolescents. Am J Sports Med 30:697–703
Kocher MS, Saxon HS, Hovis WD, Hawkins RJ (2002) Management and complications of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients: survey of the Herodicus Society and The ACL Study Group. J Pediatr Orthop 22:452–457
Kocher MS, Smith JT, Zoric BJ, Lee B, Micheli LJ (2007) Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature pubescent adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2632–2639
Lawrence JT, Argawal N, Ganley TJ (2011) Degeneration of the knee joint in skeletally immature patients with a diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament tear: is there harm in delay of treatment? Am J Sports Med 39:2582–2587
Lawrence JT, Bowers AL, Belding J, Cody SR, Ganley TJ (2010) All-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1971–1977
Liddle AD, Imbuldeniya AM, Hunt DM (2008) Transphyseal reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in prepubescent children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1317–1322
Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2012) Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 40:1551–1557
Lubowitz JH, MacKay G, Gilmer B (2014) Knee medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner anatomic repair with internal bracing. Arthrosc Tech 3(4):e505–e508
Ma CB, Keifa E, Dunn W, Fu FH, Harner CD (2010) Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 17:81–83
Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S (2006) Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee 13:184–188
McCarroll JR, Rettig AC, Shelbourne KD (1988) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the young athlete with open physes. Am J Sports Med 16:44–47
Millett PJ, Willis AA, Warren RF (2002) Associated injuries in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament tears: does a delay in treatment increase the risk of meniscal tear? Arthroscopy 18:955–959
Mohtadi N, Grant J (2006) Managing anterior cruciate ligament deficiency in the skeletally immature individual: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Sport Med 16:457–464
Nakamura K, Koga H, Sekiya I, Watanabe T, Mochizuki T, Horie M, Nakamura T, Otabe K, Muneta T (2015) Evaluation of pivot shift phenomenon while awake and under anaesthesia by different manoeuvres using triaxial accelerometer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3740-3
Pallis M, Svoboda SJ, Cameron KL, Owens BD (2012) Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States Military Academy. Am J Sports Med 40:1242–1246
Prince JS, Laor T, Bean JA (2005) MRI of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and associated findings in the pediatric knee: changes with skeletal maturation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:756–762
Schub D, Saluan P (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the young athlete: evaluation and treatment. Sports Med Arthrosc 19:34–43
Seil R, Pape D, Kohn D (2008) The risk of growth changes during transphyseal drilling in sheep with open physes. Arthroscopy 24:824–833
Shea KG, Pfeiffer R, Wang JH, Curtin M, Apel PJ (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament injury in pediatric and adolescent soccer players: an analysis of insurance data. J Pediatr Orthop 24:623–628
Soprano JV (2005) Musculoskeletal injuries in the pediatric and adolescent athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep 4:329–334
Stanitski CL, Harvell JC, Fu F (1993) Observations on acute knee hemarthrosis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 13:506–510
Streich NA, Barie A, Gotterbarm T, Keil M, Schmitt H (2010) Transphyseal reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in prepubescent athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1481–1486
van Eck CF, Schkrohowsky JG, Working ZM, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2012) Prospective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft. Am J Sports Med 40:800–807
Vavken P, Murray MM (2011) Treating anterior cruciate ligament tears in skeletally immature patients. Arthroscopy 27:704–716
Woods GW, O’Connor DP (2004) Delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents with open physes. Am J Sports Med 32:201–210
Xerogeanes JW, Hammond KE, Todd DC (2012) Anatomic landmarks utilized for physeal-sparing, anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an MRI-based study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:268–276
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Professor Gordon MacKay who provided the initial description of the internal brace.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
AJW is a consultant for Arthrex.
Appendix
Appendix
Videos demonstrating the operative procedure of the first two cases can be found at:
https://www.vumedi.com/video/acl-repair-using-the-internal-brace-in-a-5-year-old/.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, J.O., Yasen, S.K., Palmer, H.C. et al. Paediatric ACL repair reinforced with temporary internal bracing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 1845–1851 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4150-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4150-x