Abstract
The Xishimen iron skarn deposit in the Handan-Xingtai district, North China Craton, contains 256 Mt @ 43 % Fe (up to 65 %). The mineralization is dominated by massive magnetite ore along the contact zone between the early Cretaceous Xishimen diorite stock and middle Ordovician dolomite and dolomitic limestones with numerous intercalations of evaporitic beds. Minor lenticular magnetite-dominated bodies also occur in the carbonate rocks proximal to the diorite stock. Hydrothermal alteration is characterized by extensive albitization within the diorite stock and extreme development of magnesian skarn along the contact zone consisting of diopside, forsterite, serpentine, tremolite, phlogopite, and talc. Magmatic quartz and amphibole from the diorite and hydrothermal diopside from the skarns contain abundant primary or pseudosecondary fluid inclusions, most of which have multiple daughter minerals dominated by halite, sylvite, and opaque phases. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and laser Raman spectrometry confirm that pyrrhotite is the predominant opaque phase in most fluid inclusions, in both the magmatic and skarn minerals. These fluid inclusions have total homogenization temperatures of 416–620 °C and calculated salinities of 42.4–74.5 wt% NaCl equiv. The fluid inclusion data thus document a high-temperature, high-salinity, ferrous iron-rich, reducing fluid exsolved from a cooling magma likely represented by the Xishimen diorite stock. Pyrite from the iron ore has δ34S values ranging from 14.0 to 18.6 ‰, which are significantly higher than typical magmatic values (δ34S = 0 ± 5 ‰). The sulfur isotope data thus indicate an external source for the sulfur, most likely from the evaporitic beds in the Ordovician carbonate sequences that have δ34S values of 24 to 29 ‰. We suggest that sulfates from the evaporitic beds have played a critically important role by oxidizing ferrous iron in the magmatic-hydrothermal fluid, leading to precipitation of massive magnetite ore. A synthesis of available data suggests that oxidation of Fe2+-rich, magmatic-hydrothermal fluids by external sulfates could have been a common process in many of the world’s iron skarn deposits and other magnetite-dominated ores, such as iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) and iron oxide-apatite (IOA) systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Evaporitic rocks widely occur in a variety of geological environments and have close spatial relationships with several major types of iron oxide-rich ores, such as iron oxide copper and gold (IOCG) and iron oxide-apatite deposits (IOA) (Cai 1981; Barton and Johnson 1996, 2000; Hitzman 2000; Chen 2013; Li et al. 2015). Previous studies have shown that evaporites may have significantly facilitated transport of iron in hydrothermal fluids by providing sufficient amounts of chlorine to form iron-chloride complexes (Zhao et al. 1990; Barton and Johnson 1996, 2000).
It is commonly thought that iron is present predominantly as ferrous iron (Fe2+) in magmatic-hydrothermal systems (Crerar and Barnes 1976; Barnes 1979; Simon et al. 2013). In this case, the formation of voluminous iron oxides requires sufficient oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+. However, the mechanisms by which this oxidation process takes place are not well understood. Eugster and Chou (1979) proposed that O2 produced by dissociation of H2O may be responsible for the oxidation of ferrous iron and, consequently, precipitation of hydrothermal magnetite. However, the amount of O2 would be insufficient to maintain the abovementioned oxidation reaction if H2 derived from the dissociation of H2O is not efficiently removed from the reacting system (Takagi and Tsukimura 1997). Thus, an alternative mechanism must be considered to adequately explain the formation of voluminous iron oxides in magmatic-hydrothermal systems.
Iron skarns are among the largest known skarn deposits, with many containing several hundred million tons of iron metal (Meinert et al. 2005 and references therein). The ores are typically dominated by magnetite with variable amounts of associated silicate minerals such as garnet and diopside, which formed as a result of hydrothermal metasomatism between magmatic-hydrothermal fluids and marine carbonate rocks (Einaudi 1981; Meinert 1984; Meinert et al. 2005). Iron skarn-related magmas are considered to have lower oxygen fugacities relative to the varieties associated with Cu, Mo, and Zn skarn deposits (Meinert 1995; Meinert et al. 2005). The low-oxygen fugacities of the parent magmas indicate that sulfides, rather than sulfates, may have been the major sulfur species in the magmatic-hydrothermal systems, and consequently, iron is likely to have been present mainly as Fe2+. In this case, voluminous magnetite precipitation would be unlikely without oxidation of the ferrous iron by external oxidants.
Iron skarn deposits have been the most important source of high-grade iron ores (>55 % total Fe) in China since their discovery in the early 1900s (Zhao et al. 1990). The Daye, Handan-Xingtai, Linfen, and Laiwu districts in eastern China host the largest concentrations of iron skarn deposits in the country (Fig. 1). All these iron ore districts are characterized by widespread evaporites within Paleozoic or early Mesozoic marine carbonate sequences into which the ore-related plutonic bodies were emplaced. Field relationships and sulfur isotopic compositions (e.g., Yuan 1982; Cai et al. 1987; Zhang et al. 2013a; Hu et al. 2014; Xie et al. 2015) indicate that evaporites may have been critically important in the formation of those high-grade iron skarn deposits. However, how the evaporates have contributed to the large-scale iron skarn mineralization remains poorly understood. In this paper, we present fluid inclusion and sulfur isotope data of the Xishimen iron skarn deposit from the Handan-Xingtai district (Fig. 2), the second largest producer of high-grade iron ore in China to characterize the nature of the ore-forming fluids and to demonstrate the important role of evaporites as an efficient oxidant in iron skarn mineralization throughout the district. We further compile data from other localities of the world to suggest that oxidation of ferrous iron by external sulfates may have been a common process in the formation of many iron oxide-dominated ores such as IOCG and IOA.
Geological setting
The Handan-Xingtai district is located within the Trans-North China Orogen, which formed at ca. 1.85 Ga due to continental collision between the Western and Eastern Blocks of the North China Craton (NCC) that resulted in final amalgamation and stabilization of this craton (Zhao et al. 2005; Fig. 1). The basement of the NCC consists of Archean to Paleoproterozoic TTG gneisses and subordinate mafic granulites and amphibolites. From the late Paleoproterozoic to the end of the Paleozoic, the NCC was tectonically stable and received relatively continuous deposition of shallow-marine carbonate platform sediments (Yang et al. 1986).
In the Handan-Xingtai district, the Precambrian basement is overlain unconformably by about 3500 m of Paleozoic (Cambrian to Permian) marine sedimentary rocks (Zheng 2007). The Cambrian strata consist of limestones, sandstones, and shales, which are conformably overlain by early Ordovician dolomites. Middle Ordovician strata conformably overlie the early Ordovician dolomites and consist chiefly of evaporite-bearing carbonates, which host numerous economic gypsum deposits (Cai et al. 1987). More than 95 % of the total iron reserves in the Handan-Xingtai district are hosted by the middle Ordovician sequence (Fig. 2). The middle Ordovician strata can be divided, from the base upward, into the Majiagou, Cixian, and Fengfeng Formations (Fms.; Fig. 3). The 140- to 344-m-thick Majiagou Fm. is composed of shales and evaporites in its lower member, dolomites, dolomitic limestones, and interbedded evaporites in the middle member and brecciated evaporites and dolomites in the upper member. The Cixian Fm., with a total thickness of 186–343 m, is also divided into lower, middle, and upper members, which are dominated by dolomitic limestones with many evaporite intercalations and brecciated evaporites with minor amounts of dolomite, respectively. The Fengfeng Fm. consists of 118–210 m of dolomitic limestones and multiple evaporitic beds in a lower member and limestones in an upper member (Fig. 3). Dissolution breccias are widespread in the middle Ordovician sequence wherever evaporitic beds are present. The Carboniferous to Permian sequences, which mainly crop out in the eastern part of the Handan-Xingtai district, are dominated by shales, coal beds, and sandstones that unconformably overlie the middle Ordovician rocks.
The Paleozoic sedimentary rocks are intruded by several major plutons and numerous smaller stocks, ranging in composition from diorite to monzonite and syenite. These intrusions form three NNE-trending magmatic belts, locally called the Fushan, Wu’an, and Hongshan belts (Fig. 2). Iron deposits in the district are restricted to the Fushan and Wu’an belts, but no economic iron ores have been discovered within the Hongshan belt. Recent zircon U-Pb geochronological studies have shown that the granitic intrusions throughout the Handan-Xingtai district formed at 136–135 and 132–130 Ma (Peng et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2008; Shen et al. 2012; Li et al. 2013a; Sun et al. 2014; Deng et al. 2015). These early Cretaceous magmatic rocks are interpreted to have resulted from mixing of lower crustal- and metasomatized mantle-derived melts in response to thinning and destruction of the mantle lithosphere beneath the NCC, a process ultimately triggered by subduction of the paleo-Pacific plate underneath the eastern China continental margin (Li et al. 2012; Shen et al. 2012).
The Xishimen iron skarn deposit
The Xishimen iron skarn deposit is situated in the middle of the Wu’an magmatic belt and has a proven resource of 256 Mt @ 35–65 % Fe (HGI 1984). Mineralization occurs predominantly along the contact zone between the Xishimen diorite stock and the upper member of the middle Ordovician Majiagou Fm., which is dominated by dolomite with numerous evaporite intercalations (Fig. 4). Minor amounts of iron ore are hosted within the upper member of the Majiagou and lower member of the Cixian Fms. in close proximity to the Xishimen diorite intrusion (Fig. 4). Logging of diamond drill core has revealed six to nine gypsum-dominated evaporitic beds in the upper member of the Majiagou Fm., individually 5 to 50 m in thickness (Cui 1983).
The Xishimen diorite has a medium-grained texture and consists of plagioclase (50–70 vol%), hornblende (10–25 vol%), K-feldspar (10–15 vol%), and quartz (5–7 vol%). The rocks contain 58.5–59.8 wt% SiO2, 16.0–16.6 wt% Al2O3, 2.02–2.79 wt% MgO, 4.88–8.20 Na2O, 0.28–3.23 K2O, 4.70–6.65 CaO, and 4.77–6.93 wt% FeOtotal, with high Mg# of 46–47 and low A/CNK values of 0.64–0.65 (Wei 2011). They are enriched in large-ion lithophile elements (e.g., Sr, Ba, Th, K) and depleted in high-field-strength elements (e.g., Nb and Ti) and are characterized by strong fractionation between light rare earth element (REE) and heavy REE but lack obvious Eu anomalies (Wei 2011). Laser ablation ICP-MS dating of zircon from a fresh diorite sample yielded a concordant U-Pb age of 134 ± 1 Ma (Li et al. 2013a). Available geochemical and isotope data indicate that the Xishimen diorite was likely derived from partial melting of late Archean lower crust, followed by fractional crystallization during magma ascent (Wei 2011).
The Xishimen iron skarn deposit consists of 28 ore bodies, most of which are unexposed and occur at between 10 and 474 m below the present surface as revealed by diamond drilling (IGSNC 1976, Fig. 4b). The main ore body accounts for >95 % of the total iron reserves and is dominated by massive magnetite-rich ores (>50 % Fe). It is about 5020 m long, 125 to 1076 m wide, and 1.2 to 103.5 m thick. Skarn assemblages are poorly developed, but sulfide minerals, dominated by pyrite as disseminations or veins, are abundant in the iron ores (Fig. 5a). Pyrite is also present as massive aggregates and veins within the limestone of the Majiagou Fm. distal to the orebodies. Hematite-magnetite ores are well developed in brecciated marble with very thin or no alteration halos.
On the basis of field and textural relationships, three hydrothermal alteration assemblages are recognized, including albitization, prograde skarn, and retrograde skarn assemblages. Albitization is extensive and mostly developed in the upper part of the Xishimen diorite, where plagioclase is typically replaced by albite and/or epidote, whereas hornblende is altered to form albite and diopside. Diopside-albite veinlets, generally 1–5 cm wide, are particularly abundant near the endoskarn. Prograde skarn assemblages are well developed in the endoskarn zone but are rare in the exoskarn zone and the magnetite ores. The prograde skarns consist of >80 % diopside, ranging from 0.2 to 20 mm in size, with minor forsterite and albite. In most cases, magnetite mineralization postdates the prograde skarn minerals (Fig. 5c, d). The retrograde skarn alteration is most extensive within the exoskarn zone and is closely associated with magnetite ores. Predominant retrograde skarn minerals include serpentine, tremolite, talc, chlorite, and phlogopite (Fig. 5b).
A phlogopite separate from a massive magnetite ore yielded an 40Ar/39Ar plateau age of 133.1 ± 1.3 Ma (Zheng et al. 2007), which is marginally consistent with a zircon U-Pb age of 134 ± 1 Ma for the Xishimen diorite (Li et al. 2013a). The age consistency indicates a temporal and possibly genetic relation between the diorite intrusion and magnetite mineralization. This view is confirmed by a more recent study that yields U-Pb age of 134.1 ± 1.2 Ma for hydrothermal zircon from an iron mineralized exoskarn and 133.6 ± 0.9 Ma for magmatic zircon from the Xishimen diorite (Deng et al. 2015).
Samples and analytical methods
Fluid inclusion study
Ten fresh diorite samples and ten mineralized diopside skarn samples were collected from underground works at 200 to 400 m below the present surface for fluid inclusion petrographic study. Polished thin sections (∼100 μm thick) of each sample were examined under transmitted light to identify the shape, size, distribution, and phases of fluid inclusions. Microthermometric measurements were then made using a Linkam THMS-600 heating-freezing stage, which was calibrated using synthetic inclusions distributed by Fluid Inc., USA. Uncertainties of the measurements were ±2 °C for runs in the range of 100 to 600 °C. The heating/freezing rate was generally 1 to 5 °C/min but was reduced to less than 1 °C/min near the phase transformations. Fluid inclusions with homogenization temperatures higher than 600 °C were carried out on a modified Leitz 1350 heating stage. The heating rate ranged from 2 to 10 °C/min but was reduced to less than 2 °C/min near the phase transformations. Uncertainties of the measurement were ±5 °C.
Daughter mineral-bearing fluid inclusions were further investigated using scanning electron microscopy and laser Raman spectroscopy. After petrographic examination, the thin sections were gently polished in kerosene until the inclusions were opened and the daughter minerals were exposed. The exposed daughter minerals were then analyzed using a JEOL Quanta-200 environmental scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS). Laser Raman spectrometry was carried out on selected fluid inclusions using a Jobyn Yvon Horiba LabRam-IRHR 800 spectrometer equipped with a 532-nm Ar-ion laser as the source of excitation. The Raman spectra were acquired from 0 to 4000 cm−1 using a measured spectrum time of 30 s.
Sulfur isotope analysis
Eleven pyrite samples were collected from the main ore body at 210 to 250 m below the present surface, whereas two calcite-pyrite veins were taken from drill holes ZK57 and ZK18, respectively. After petrographic examination, the samples were crushed, washed in distilled water in an ultrasonic bath for at least 1 h, and dried. Pyrite separates were then handpicked under a binocular microscope. Whenever possible, coarse pyrite grains were targeted to minimize contamination by other minerals. Sulfur isotopic ratios were determined using a conventional off-line method. Approximately 15 mg of pyrite was homogenized with 150 mg of Cu2O, combusted at 1050 °C for 15 min under vacuum for a quantitative conversion to sulfur dioxide (SO2), which was then analyzed for sulfur isotopic compositions on a MAT 251 mass spectrometer. The results are reported in standard δ notation in ‰ relative to Canyon Diablo troilite (CDT). The reproducibility of δ34S values was ±0.2 ‰.
Results
Fluid inclusions
Fluid inclusions are well developed both in magmatic quartz and amphibole from the diorite samples and in hydrothermal diopside from the skarn samples. Three types of fluid inclusions were distinguished based on their characteristics at room temperature, including two-phase, liquid-rich, aqueous inclusions (type 1), daughter mineral-bearing multiple phase inclusions (type 2), and two-phase, vapor-rich aqueous inclusions (type 3).
Fluid inclusions in magmatic amphibole and quartz
Amphibole hosts abundant type 2 fluid inclusions, occurring as cylindrical isolations typically 3–8 μm across (Fig. 6a, b). They are mostly distributed along the cleavage planes in the amphibole. Type 2 inclusions typically contain a vapor phase that accounts for 10 to 40 % of the total volume and have two to three daughter minerals consisting of halite, sylvite, and an opaque phase (Fig. 6a, b). The opaque mineral is euhedral to subhedral and commonly has a hexagonal shape. Its morphology and reflection color (brownish to grayish yellow) indicate that it is most likely pyrrhotite (inset of Fig. 6a), as partly confirmed by scanning electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS) and laser Raman spectroscopy (see below).
All three types of fluid inclusions are present in magmatic quartz from the diorite. Type 1 inclusions are small (<5 μm) and occur as trails penetrating crystal boundaries, features interpreted to be of secondary origin (Reodder 1984). Type 2 fluid inclusions are subhedral to anhedral, 5–10 μm in diameter, and developed along growth zones of the host mineral (Fig. 6c, d). The solid phases in type 2 inclusions are dominated by halite and pyrrhotite, with or without sylvite. Type 3 inclusions, frequently coexisting with type 2 varieties, are 5 to 8 μm in size and have round to negative crystal shapes (Fig. 6d).
Fluid inclusions in diopside from skarns
Daughter mineral-bearing, multiple-phase fluid inclusions (type 2) are abundant in diopside and can be divided into two subtypes. Type 2a inclusions contain halite ± sylvite and an opaque phase, whereas type 2b varieties only have halite ± sylvite with no associated opaque daughter minerals. Type 2a fluid inclusions are the predominant variety and range in diameter from 10 to 30 μm. In most cases, they occur mostly as isolations or clusters (Fig. 7a) but are also present as trails within diopside crystals (Fig. 7b). The occurrence and distribution of the type 2a fluid inclusions indicate a primary or pseudosecondary origin (Reodder 1984). The identified solid phases are mainly halite and pyrrhotite, but some of these inclusions also contain sylvite (Fig. 7a–d). The vapor phase accounts for 10–30 % of the total volume of individual type 2a inclusions. Type 2b inclusions are less abundant and smaller (5–20 μm) and occur as subhedral to anhedral isolations (Fig. 7c, d). The vapor-rich type 3 inclusions are rare and less than 8 μm in size. Wherever present, they coexist with type 2 inclusions.
Microthermometry
Fluid inclusions in amphibole and quartz are not considered for subsequent microthermometric study due to their small size. A total of 71 microthermometric measurements were made on type 2a and 2b inclusions hosted in diopside. Salinities of fluid inclusions containing both halite and sylvite were determined by halite and sylvite dissolution temperatures, using the NaCl-KCl-H2O diagram (Sterner et al. 1988). The microthermometric data are summarized in Table 1 and graphically illustrated in Figs. 8 and 9.
All type 2a inclusions showed similar microthermometric behavior, with vapor bubble disappearance followed by halite dissolution (Fig. 9). Vapor-liquid homogenization occurred in the range of 410–542 °C, but heating above 500 °C led to decrepitation of some inclusions. Sylvite and halite dissolution took place at temperatures of 230–310 and 420–578 °C, respectively. The salt dissolution temperatures yield calculated salinities of 49.7 to 70.8 wt% NaCl equiv. for halite-bearing inclusions and 63 to 74 wt% NaCl equiv. for halite- and sylvite-bearing inclusions (13–26 wt% KCl equiv. and 39–54 wt% NaCl equiv.; Fig. 8b). The opaque phases did not dissolve even after the heating temperature increased to 800 °C.
Type 2b fluid inclusions were homogenized to a liquid between 416 and 620 °C, either by halite dissolution or by vapor bubble disappearance. Halite dissolution and vapor bubble disappearance took place between 380 and 585 °C and between 408 and 620 °C, respectively (Fig. 8a). Sylvite dissolution occurred in the range of 185–280 °C, significantly prior to halite dissolution. The calculated salinities are 42.4–74.5 wt% NaCl equiv. (Fig. 8b). Within some assemblages, fluid inclusions homogenized to liquid by vapor and halite disappearance in a small temperature interval of 6° to 30 °C.
Scanning electron microscopy
SEM-EDS provides a powerful tool for the study of daughter minerals in opened fluid inclusions (Metzger et al. 1977). Using this tool, a variety of daughter minerals have been identified in opened type 2a and type 2b inclusions in diopside. Both halite and pyrrhotite are common in type 2a inclusions. The halite crystals typically have a cubic form and range from 2 to 15 μm in diameter (Fig. 10a–d). Pyrrhotite crystals occur at the base or along the margins of the exposed inclusions, commonly beneath or texturally associated with halite crystals (Fig. 10a–d). These pyrrhotite crystals are generally hexagonal and range from 1 to 7 μm in diameter. Sylvite crystals were locally observed, coexisting exclusively with halite whenever they occur (Fig. 10d). Halite is the major daughter mineral in type 2b inclusions (Fig. 10e, f) but is locally accompanied with cubic crystals of sylvite up to 5 μm in diameter.
Laser Raman spectroscopic analysis
Laser Raman spectroscopic analyses were performed on representative daughter mineral-bearing inclusions (type 2) in quartz of the diorite and the diopside of the skarn samples. Abundant pyrrhotite crystals have been identified in type 2 inclusions in both quartz and diopside based on Raman displacement peaks at 378 to 379 and 340 to 342 cm−1 (Fig. 11a, c), respectively, confirming results of the SEM-EDS analyses (Fig. 10). The vapor phase of type 2 inclusions in quartz and diopside is dominated by H2O, variably with minor amounts of CO2 (Fig. 11b, d).
Iron concentrations of type 2a fluid inclusions in diopside
Iron concentrations of the fluid inclusions were calculated using the phase volume method proposed by Kwak et al. (1986). The concentrations are expressed as follows: Fe (wt%) = V Po ∗ ρ Po ∗ 60 % / (V Po ∗ ρ Po + V Hl ∗ ρ Hl + V liquid ∗ ρ liquid), where V Po ∗ ρ Po indicates the mass of pyrrhotite crystal, V Hl ∗ ρ Hl represents the mass of halite crystal, and V liquid ∗ ρ liquid refers to the mass of aqueous phase. Pyrrhotite has a density of 4.65 g/cm3 at room temperature and contains about 60 wt% Fe. The density of a NaC1-saturated solution at room temperature is ∼1.2 g/cm3 (Roedder 1971). With these parameters, the calculated iron concentrations in the fluid inclusions range from 1.02 to 8.45 wt%, with a mean of 4.08 wt% (n = 13; Table 2).
Sulfur isotopes
The sulfur isotopic compositions of pyrite from the iron ore bodies and calcite-pyrite veins are presented in Table 3. The δ34SV-CDT value of pyrite ranges from 14.0 to 18.6 ‰ (Fig. 12), with a mean of 16.2 ‰ (n = 13). The results are consistent with previous sulfur isotope data reported for Xishimen (δ34S = 14.7–18.4 ‰; Li et al. 2013a).
Discussion
Nature and compositions of the ore-forming fluids
Opaque phases in fluid inclusions can be either trapped crystals or true daughter minerals precipitated from the ore-forming fluid; only true daughter minerals can be used as indicators for the composition and nature of the fluids (Kwak et al. 1986). The fact that pyrrhotite in the fluid inclusions did not dissolve during heating may imply that these crystals were trapped accidentally; the following observations and considerations, however, suggest that they are true daughter minerals. Firstly, pyrrhotite-bearing fluid inclusions are widespread in both the rock-forming minerals (quartz and amphibole) of the ore-related diorite stock and skarn minerals (e.g., diopside). The universal presence and constant relative proportions of pyrrhotite in a large number of coeval fluid inclusions (Fig. 7a–d) indicate that this mineral was probably not trapped during crystal growth; rather, its occurrence is consistent with a primary origin. Secondly, pyrrhotite crystals typically coexist with halite and sylvite within a single fluid inclusion (Fig. 10a–d). This common intergrowth indicates that pyrrhotite and the salt minerals precipitated from the same fluid system. It is noted that the two-phase, vapor- or liquid-rich, salt-free fluid inclusions do not contain pyrrhotite, supporting our interpretation that this mineral was precipitated directly from a saline fluid. Lastly, neither the diorite stock nor the mineralized skarn assemblages contain pyrrhotite as a constituent mineral, ruling out the possibility that this mineral was a trapped phase. Taken together, we conclude that the pyrrhotite crystals are true daughter minerals. The failure of the pyrrhotite crystals to dissolve throughout the heating process may be due to post-entrapment diffusion of hydrogen from the inclusions, a process that could have led to an increase in fO2 of the inclusions (Mavrogenes and Bodnar 1994), or due to leakage of the fluid inclusions during heating (Roedder 1984). Either increase in fO2 or leakage of the fluid inclusions could have disabled dissolution of pyrrhotite (Reodder 1984). The morphological features of the fluid inclusions (Fig. 7), however, suggest that leakage is a less likely mechanism. Thus, hydrogen diffusion is the most likely mechanism leading to the resistant behavior of the pyrrhotite crystals throughout the heating process.
The common occurrence of pyrrhotite-bearing fluid inclusions in both rock-forming minerals and prograde skarn minerals, together with the widespread halite and/or sylvite having or having no association with pyrrhotite, indicates that the magmatic hydrothermal fluids, which exsolved from a hydrous magma, were ferrous iron rich, saline to hyposaline, and reducing. The calculated iron concentrations of the studied fluid inclusions range from 1.02 to 8.45 wt%, comparable to values (1–9 wt%) of pyrite-bearing fluid inclusions from the Hole 16 W-Sn-F skarn deposit (Kwak et al. 1986). Higher iron concentrations would be expected for the fluid inclusions if ferrous iron dissolved in the liquid phase was considered. The high temperatures and high salinities of the fluids (Fig. 8) may explain their high iron concentrations. Whitney et al. (1985) experimentally demonstrated that iron concentrations in chloride solutions equilibrated with synthetic granite compositions are strongly affected by both temperature and salinity. They found that an increase in temperature from 400 to 500 °C caused a tenfold increase in iron concentration, with a maximum value being achieved at temperatures of 550 to 650 °C, consistent with the homogenization temperature of fluid inclusions investigated in this study (Fig. 8a). Because iron is largely complexed by chlorine in magmatic-hydrothermal fluids, increases in salinity (represented by NaCl wt% equivalent) have a profound effect in enhancing iron solubility and, therefore, its concentrations in the fluid. A threefold increase in salinity can compensate for a decrease in iron concentrations caused by decreasing the temperature from 600 to 400 °C (Whitney et al. 1985). These observations explain why iron sulfide minerals occur exclusively in fluid inclusions with high homogenization temperature (>420 to 620 °C) and high salinity (>51 to 74 wt% NaCl equiv) in the Xishimen iron skarn deposit.
Source of sulfur
The lack of sulfate minerals in the iron ores indicates that the sulfur isotopes of pyrite in the ores can be considered to approximate the isotopic compositions of the fluids (δ34SΣS) from which the ores precipitated (Zheng and Chen 2000). Pyrite from the Xishimen iron ores has δ34S ranging from 14.0 to 18.6 ‰ (Table 3), much higher than values of magmatic sulfides from the ore-related diorite in the Wu’an magmatic belt (2.5–6.5 ‰ with a mean of 4.9 ‰; Zhang and Ma 1996) but comparable to isotopic compositions typical of marine sulfates (Seal et al. 2000). The middle Ordovician strata in the Handan-Xingtai district host numerous evaporite beds with a total thickness of 210 m (Cui 1983), which have δ34S values of 24 to 29 ‰ with an average of 26 ‰ (Table 3). Evaporitic rocks are particularly abundant in the hanging wall of the main ore body of the Xishimen deposit (Fig. 4b). We therefore suggest that the sulfur in the evolving fluids was largely derived from the evaporites. Assuming that the original magmatic hydrothermal fluids degassed from the cooling magma had δ34S values of 4.9 ‰ and that the evaporite-derived sulfur has an average δ34S of 26 ‰, the mean δ34S value (16.2 ‰) of pyrite from Xishimen can be explained by a mixture of 46 % magmatic sulfur and 54 % evaporite-derived sulfur.
Mechanism of magnetite precipitation
Previous studies have shown that iron is present mainly in the ferrous state in magmatic-hydrothermal solutions (Crerar and Barnes 1976; Barnes 1979) and mostly forms ferrous chloride complexes (Holser and Schneer 1961; Chou and Eugster 1977; Eugster and Chou 1979; Kwak et al. 1986; Wood et al. 1987; Ulrich et al. 2001; Simon et al. 2013). Because two-third of the iron in magnetite is Fe3+, the formation of magnetite from such fluids requires oxidation of significant amounts of Fe2+. Fluid inclusion data confirm that the magmatic-hydrothermal fluids from which the Xishimen iron deposit formed had relatively low fO2, with the iron being dominated by Fe2+ (Figs. 6, 7, 10, and 11). Cooling of such a reduced fluid would be unlikely to precipitate large amounts of magnetite or hematite; instead, the ferrous iron would be preferentially incorporated into silicates, iron sulfides, and siderite depending on the amount of silica, CO2, and sulfur available in the fluids (Whitney et al. 1985).
In the Handan-Xingtai district, iron skarn deposits are closely related to the middle Ordovician evaporite-bearing carbonate strata, which host more than 95 % of the proven iron reserves of the district (Cai et al. 1987). The evaporitic beds, consisting mainly of gypsum, anhydrite, and halite, have a total thickness of a few hundred meters and form more than 30 economic gypsum and anhydrite deposits (Cai et al. 1987; Fig. 2). In sharp contrast, no economic iron deposits have been found in the Cambrian to early Ordovician carbonates or Carboniferous to Permian shales and sandstones where evaporites are lacking (Fig. 2). This observation indicates that the evaporitic rocks have played a critical role in the formation of the magnetite deposits. This view is confirmed by a consistently high δ34S value of pyrite from all iron deposits in the Handan-Xingtai district (5.9 to 18.7 ‰; Table 3).
Although CaSO4 has very limited solubility in pure water (Morey and Hesselgesser 1951), an increase in XNaCl in the hydrothermal fluid would significantly promote the solubility of CaSO4 at high temperature and pressure (Newton and Manning 2005). For example, the solubility of CaSO4 is about 0.4 mol in a NaCl-saturated solution at 500 °C and 10 kbar (Newton and Manning 2005). Formation water, basinal brine, or meteoric water that has sufficiently equilibrated with evaporites is commonly enriched in NaCl, enabling significant increases in sulfate in the solutions at high temperatures. These sulfate-rich fluids have high fO2, generally above the sulfate-sulfide buffer in the R H-1000/T diagram (Fig. 13; Giggenbach 1987; Einaudi et al. 2003), and thus are important oxidizing agents. The magmatic-hydrothermal fluids responsible for the Xishimen deposit were clearly reducing, as evidenced by the universal presence of pyrrhotite as a daughter mineral in fluid inclusions in both the rock-forming minerals of the diorite and the prograde skarn minerals (Figs. 6, 7, 10, and 11). Mixing of sulfate-rich, oxidizing fluids with ferrous iron-rich, reducing magmatic-hydrothermal fluids would trigger the deposition of magnetite under favorable temperature conditions (generally 300–500 °C), as illustrated by the following reaction (Figs. 13 and 14):
According to reaction (1), magnetite deposition is accompanied by a significant increase of H+ in the fluids, which may suppress the formation of magnetite. Nevertheless, H+ produced by reaction (1) would be effectively neutralized by reaction with the surrounding carbonate rocks, driving the reaction continuously toward the right. Consequently, large amounts of magnetite were likely precipitated to form the iron oxide ores.
The fO2 of the ore-forming fluid would increase due to the following reactions (Einaudi et al. 2003; Pokrovski and Dubrovinsky 2011):
or
This suggests that hematite could form if the oxygen fugacity approaches the magnetite-hematite buffer. This view is confirmed by the widespread occurrence of hematite-magnetite ores in brecciaed marble, a few hundred meters distant from the Xishimen diorite stock where evaporite beds are particularly abundant.
Oxidation-reduction reactions are common in most hydrothermal systems, mostly involving O, H, C, S, and Fe (Janecky et al. 1986). Laser Raman spectroscopic analysis indicates that H2O and CO2 (Fig. 11b, d) are the dominant components in the aqueous fluid inclusions and in the liquid phase of the daughter mineral-bearing fluid inclusions of the Xishimen deposit, without detectable CH4 and H2. Thus, ferrous iron was the only agent in the fluids capable of reducing evaporitic sulfates to form the observed iron oxides and sulfides (Fig. 13). Experimental studies of Cai (1984) provided additional evidence for magnetite precipitation via the redox reaction between sulfate and ferrous iron. His experiments were conducted at 550 to 250 °C and 500 to 100 bar with different oxygen fugacities, using 50 mg CaSO4·2H2O and 100 mg FeCl2·4H2O as the starting materials dissolved in 0.2–0.3-ml NaOH-H2O solution. All experiments produced magnetite and minor amounts of iron sulfides. For example, the experiment conducted at 350 °C and 500 bar at the magnetite-quartz-fayalite (MQF) buffer yielded 22.96 mg of magnetite, 0.59 mg of pyrrhotite, and 0.88 mg of pyrite, together with H2S.
Magnetite and pyrite are the predominant metallic minerals in the Xishimen iron skarn deposit. According to Evans (2006), the redox budget of a sample is defined as the number of moles of electrons that need to be added to the sample to reach the reference state. Thus, to form 1 mol of magnetite, 2 mol of ferrous iron needs to lose 2 mol of electrons, and to form 1 mol of pyrite, 2 mol of S6+ (sulfates as represented by gypsum and anhydrite in case of Xishimen) should gain 14 mol of electrons. To reach this charge balance, the molar ratio of magnetite to pyrite should be 7: 1, and the corresponding mass ratio of these two minerals should be 13.5:1. As discussed above, about 56 % of the sulfur in pyrite of the Xishimen deposit was derived from evaporitic sulfate; thus, the average ore grade of 43 % Fe in the deposit (HGI 1984) would correspond to 59.3 wt% magnetite, and the calculated sulfur content would be 4.3 wt% (S wt% = 64/120 ∗ Py wt%, Py wt% = 59.3/13.5/0.56 wt%). The calculated sulfur content is significantly higher than that contained in the iron ores (2 wt%; HGI 1984). This difference can be explained by the abundance of 34S-enriched pyrite in the calcite-sulfide veins hosted in the marbles within a few hundred of meters of the ore bodies.
Implications for the genesis of iron oxide-dominated deposits
Many iron oxide ores, including skarn, iron oxide-apatite (IOA) and iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) deposits, have been shown to be closely related to evaporites, and many of them contain sulfide minerals that have δ34S values significantly higher than those typical of magmatic sulfur (Table 4), indicating a likely external sulfur source (Barton and Johnson 1996, 2000; Chen 2013). Sulfides from iron skarn and IOA deposits in several major late Mesozoic iron districts in the NCC and adjacent regions (Fig. 1) are consistently characterized by unusually high δ34S values of generally >10 ‰ (e.g., Yuan 1982; Zhang et al. 2013a; Li et al. 2014, 2015, Table 4). The best examples include the Laiwu, Linfen, Daye, Ningwu, and Luzong districts (Fig. 1). Iron skarn deposits from the Laiwu and Linfen districts are hosted in middle Ordovician, evaporite-bearing, carbonate strata. They share common mineralization and alteration features with iron skarn deposits in the Handan-Xingtai district and contain abundant sulfides with high δ34S values (Cai 1981; Cai et al. 1987). For example, pyrite from the Pingshun iron skarn deposit in the Linfen district has δ34S values of 12.5 to 17.4 ‰, which are interpreted to be a mixture of magmatic- and evaporite-derived sulfur (Zhang et al. 2013a). Major iron skarn deposits in the Daye district (e.g., Chengchao, Jinshandian) of the northeastern Yangtze craton are associated with Triassic evaporite-bearing sedimentary rocks and characterized by high δ34S values of pyrite ranging from 10.3 to 20.0 ‰ (Xie et al. 2015), indicating a major contribution of external sulfur, most likely from the evaporites in the Triassic sequences (Zhu et al. 2013).
The Cornwall-type magnetite skarn deposit in Pennsylvania also shows significant 34S enrichment in sulfides, with an average δ34S of 11.4 ‰ (Rose et al. 1985). Heating and circulation of magmatic, meteoric, and sulfate-bearing connate waters or some combinations of these may have been responsible for the formation of the magnetite ores (Rose et al. 1985). Similarly, many iron skarn deposits in northern Sweden and western Mexico have sulfur isotopic signatures (e.g., δ34S > 5 ‰) indicating a mixture of magmatic-hydrothermal fluids and trapped seawater or evaporite-derived fluids during iron mineralization (Frietsch et al. 1995; Zürcher et al. 2001).
Iron oxide-apatite deposits in the Ningwu and Luzong volcanic basins, NE Yangtze craton (Fig. 1), are also related to Triassic evaporite-bearing, marine sedimentary units, which are underlain by a volcanic sequence (Li et al. 2014, 2015). High S/B and Ca/Na ratios revealed by in situ LA-ICP-MS analysis of fluid inclusions and heavy sulfur isotopic signatures of syn- and post-ore pyrite (up to 22.5 ‰ of δ34S; Table 4) from these two districts confirm a significant contribution from sedimentary sulfates (Li et al. 2015). Similarly, sulfides from many IOA deposits in central Iran (Bafq district) have very high δ34S values (up to 30 ‰), confirming a significant input of seawater sulfate or evaporite-sourced sulfur during mineralization (Jami 2005). The IOCG deposits in the Kangdian region, western Yangtze craton (not shown in Fig. 1), mostly have positive δ34S values (up to +15.9 ‰), a signature interpreted to reflect input of sulfur from evaporites in the Paleoproterozoic Yinmin Fm. (Zhao 2010; Zhao and Zhou 2011). High δ34S values have also been reported for sulfides from many deposits of other major IOCG provinces, such as Olympic Dam (Australia), Mantoverde (Chile), and Siberia (Russia) (e.g., Vakhrushev et al. 1981; Bastrakov et al. 2007; Benavides et al. 2007, Table 4). The observed high δ34S values in many of the world’s IOCG deposits have been considered as indicating evaporite-sourced sulfur (Chen 2013). Collectively, we conclude that external sulfate, either from evaporites, basinal fluids, or seawater, could have played a critical role in the formation of iron oxide ore deposits by providing a major oxidizing agent.
Conclusions
Fluid inclusion data from the Xishimen iron skarn deposit show that the magnetite-dominated ores precipitated from high-temperature, high-salinity, and ferrous iron-rich reducing fluids that exsolved from a hydrous magma. Sulfur isotope data of pyrite in the ores indicate that evaporitic sulfates in the middle Ordovician marine carbonates provided a major source of sulfur in the ore fluids. The sulfates have acted as an important oxidant responsible for converting Fe2+ to Fe3+ to allow continuous precipitation of voluminous magnetite-dominated ores. The oxidation-reduction reaction between external sulfate and ferrous iron-dominated magmatic-hydrothermal fluids could have been a vital mechanism in the formation of the world’s many iron oxide-dominated deposits such as iron skarn, IOCG, and IOA deposits.
References
Barnes HL (1979) Solubilities of ore minerals. In: Barnes HL (ed) Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp. 404–460
Barton MD, Johnson DA (1996) Evaporitic-source model for igneous-related Fe oxide–(REE-Cu-Au-U) mineralization. Geology 24:259–262
Barton MD, Johnson DA (2000) Alternative brine sources for Fe-oxide (-Cu-Au) systems: implications for hydrothermal alteration and metals. In: Porter TM (ed) Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits: a global perspective. PGC Publishing, Adelaide, pp. 43–60
Bastrakov EN, Skirrow RG, Davidson GJ (2007) Fluid evolution and origins of iron oxide Cu-Au prospects in the Olympic Dam district, Gawler Craton, South Australia. Econ Geol 102:1415–1440
Benavides J, Kyser TK, Clark AH, Oates CJ, Zamora R, Tarnovschi R, Castillo B (2007) The Mantoverde iron oxide-copper-gold district, III Región, Chile: the role of regionally derived, nonmagmatic fluids in chalcopyrite mineralization. Econ Geol 102:415–440
Cai BJ (1981) The conditions for the formation of the Daye-type iron ore deposits: the significance of evaporite beds for the formation of iron ore deposits. Bull Inst Geomech China Acad Geol Sci 1:110–118 in Chinese
Cai BJ, Li X, Wei S, Cui Y, He J (1987) Features of the middle Ordovician evaporates and its control over endogenic iron(sulfur) deposits in Han-Xing district, Hebei. Bull Inst Geomech China Acad Geol Sci 10:1–84 in Chinese
Cai YJ (1984) The experiments for transforming anhydrite to form reduced sulfur in high temperature solutions. Bull Nanjing Inst Geol Miner Res China Acad Geol Sci 5:36–53 in Chinese
Chen B, Tian W, Jahn BM, Chen ZC (2008) Zircon SHRIMP U–Pb ages and in-situ Hf isotopic analysis for the Mesozoic intrusions in South Taihang, North China craton: evidence for hybridization between mantle-derived magmas and crustal components. Lithos 102:118–137
Chen HY (2013) External sulphur in IOCG mineralization: implications on definition and classification of the IOCG clan. Ore Geol Rev 51:74–78
Chou IM, Eugster HP (1977) Solubility of magnetite in supercritical chloride solutions. Am J Sci 277:1296–1314
Crerar DA, Barnes HL (1976) Ore solution chemistry V. Solubilities of chalcopyrite and chalcocite assemblages in hydrothermal solution at 200 to 350 °C. Econ Geol 71:772–794
Cui YH (1983) The genesis of the breccia in the middle Ordovician strata from Han-Xing District. N China Inst J Hydroelectr Power 2:74–88 in Chinese
Deng XD, Li JW, Wen G (2015) U-Pb geochronology of hydrothermal zircons from the Early Cretaceous iron skarn deposits in the Handan-Xingtai District, North China Craton. Econ Geol 110:2159–2180
Einaudi MT (1981) Skarn deposits. Econ Geol 75:317–391
Einaudi MT, Hedenquist JW, Inan EE (2003) Sulfidation state of fluids in active and extinct hydrothermal systems: transitions from porphyry to epithermal environments. Soc Econ Geol Spec Publ 10:285–313
Eugster HP, Chou IM (1979) A model for the deposition of Cornwall-type magnetite deposits. Econ Geol 74:763–774
Evans KA (2006) Redox decoupling and redox budgets: conceptual tools for the study of earth systems. Geology 34:489–492
Frietsch R, Billström K, Perdahl J (1995) Sulphur isotopes in Lower Proterozoic iron and sulphide ores in northern Sweden. Mineral Deposita 30:275–284
Giggenbach WF (1987) Redox processes governing the chemistry of fumarolic gas discharges from White Island, New Zealand. Appl Geochem 2:143–161
HGI (Hebei Geological Institute) (1984) Regional geology survey report (ore deposits part ), Unpublished exploration report, Hebei, pp 85 (in Chinese)
IGSNC (Institute of Geological Sciences of North China) (1976) Hanxing-type iron ore deposits in the Taihang Mountain areas. Unpublished exploration report, Hebei, pp 154 (in Chinese)
Hitzman MW (2000) Iron oxide-Cu-Au deposits: what, where, when, and why. In: Porter TM (ed) Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits: a global perspective. PGC Publishing, Adelaide, pp. 9–25
Hitzman MW, Oreskes N, Einaudi MT (1992) Geological characteristics and tectonic setting of Proterozoic iron oxide (Cu-U-Au-REE) deposits. Precambrian Res 58:241–287
Holser WT, Schneer CJ (1961) Hydrothermal magnetite. Geol Soc Am Bull 72:369–385
Hu H, Li JW, Lentz D, Ren Z, Zhao XF, Deng XD, Hall D (2014) Dissolution–reprecipitation process of magnetite from the Chengchao iron deposit: insights into ore genesis and implication for in-situ chemical analysis of magnetite. Ore Geol Rev 57:393–405
Jami, M (2005) Geology, geochemistry and evolution of the Esfordi phosphate-iron deposit, Bafq area, Central Iran Ph.D. Thesis. University of New South Wales, Sydney
Janecky DR, Seyfried WE, Berndt ME (1986) Fe-O-S redox reactions and kinetics in hydrothermal systems. 5th international meeting on water-rock interaction, Reykjavik, Iceland: 1–4
Jin Z, Zhang Z, Hou T, Santosh M, Han L (2015) Genetic relationship of high-Mg dioritic pluton to iron mineralization: a case study from the Jinling skarn-type iron deposit in the North China Craton. J Asian Earth Sci 113:957–979
Kwak T, Brown WM, Abeysinghe PB, Tan TH (1986) Fe solubilities in very saline hydrothermal fluids: their relation to zoning in some ore deposits. Econ Geol 81:447–465
Li JW, Bi SJ, Selby D, Chen L, Vasconcelos P, Thiede D, Zhou MF, Zhao XF, Li ZK, Qiu HL (2012) Giant Mesozoic gold provinces related to the destruction of the North China craton. Earth Planet Sci Lett 349:26–37
Li SR, Santosh M, Zhang H, Shen JF, Dong G, Wang J, Zhang J (2013a) Inhomogeneous lithospheric thinning in the central North China Craton: zircon U–Pb and S–He–Ar isotopic record from magmatism and metallogeny in the Taihang Mountains. Gondwana Res 23:141–160
Li WT, Audétat A, Zhang J (2015) The role of evaporites in the formation of magnetite–apatite deposits along the Middle and Lower Yangtze River, China: evidence from LA-ICP-MS analysis of fluid inclusions. Ore Geol Rev 67:264–278
Li YH, Duan C, Han D, Chen XW, Wang CL, Yang BY, Zhang C, Liu F (2014) Effect of sulfate evaporate salt layer for formation of porphyrite iron ores in the Middle-Lower Yangtze River area. Acta Petrol Sin 30:1355–1368 in Chinese with English abstract
Li YH, Xie GQ, Duan C, Han D, Wang CL (2013b) Effect of sulfate evaporate salt layer over the formation of skarn-type iron ore. Acta Geol Sin 87:1324–1334 in Chinese with English abstract
Mavrogenes JA, Bodnar RJ (1994) Hydrogen movement into and out of fluid inclusions in quartz: experimental evidence and geologic implications. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:141–148
Meinert LD (1984) Mineralogy and petrology of iron skarns in western British Columbia, Canada. Econ Geol 79:869–882
Meinert LD (1995) Compositional variation of igneous rocks associated with skarn deposits-chemical evidence for a genetic connection between petrogenesis and mineralization. Mineral Assoc Can Short Course Ser 23:401–418
Meinert LD, Dipple GM, Nicolescu S (2005) World skarn deposits. Econ Geol 100th Anniversary Volume:299–336
Metzger FW, Kelly WC, Nesbitt BE, Essene EJ (1977) Scanning electron microscopy of daughter minerals in fluid inclusions. Econ Geol 72:141–152
Morey GW, Hesselgesser JM (1951) The solubility of some minerals in superheated steam at high pressures. Econ Geol 46:821–835
Myers JT, Eugster HP (1983) The system Fe-Si-O: Oxygen buffer calibrations to 1,500 K. Contrib Mineral Petr 82:75--90
Newton RC, Manning CE (2005) Solubility of anhydrite, CaSO4, in NaCl–H2O solutions at high pressures and temperatures:applications to fluid–rock interaction. J Petrol 46:701–716
Peng TP, Wang YJ, Fan WM, Guo F, Peng BX (2004) SHRIMP zircon U-Pb geochronology of the diorites for southern Taihang Mountains in the North China interior and its petrogenesis. Acta Petrol Sin 20:1253–1262 in Chinese with English abstract
Pokrovski GS, Dubrovinsky LS (2011) The S3 − ion is stable in geological fluids at elevated temperatures and pressures. Science 331:1052–1054
Pons JM, Franchini M, Meinert L, Recio C, Etcheverry R (2009) Iron skarns of the Vegas Peladas District, Mendoza, Argentina. Econ Geol 104:157–184
Reodder E (1984) Fluid inclusions. Rev Mineral 12:644
Roedder E (1971) Fluid inclusion studies on the porphyry-type ore deposits at Bingham, Utah, Butte, Montana, and Climax, Colorado. Econ Geol 66:98–118
Rose AW, Herrick DC, Deines P (1985) An oxygen and sulfur isotope study of skarn-type magnetite deposits of the Cornwall type, southeastern Pennsylvania. Econ Geol 80:418–443
Seal RR, Alpers CN, Rye RO (2000) Stable isotope systematics of sulfate minerals. Rev Mineral Geochem 40:541–602
Shen JF, Santosh M, Li SR, Zhang H, Yin N, Dong G, Wang Y, Ma G, Yu H (2012) The Beiminghe skarn iron deposit, eastern China: geochronology, isotope geochemistry and implications for the destruction of the North China Craton. Lithos 156-159:218–229
Simon A, Bilenker L, Bell A (2013) The importance of iron mobility in magmatic-hydrothermal systems. Mineral Mag 77:2215
Sterner SM, Hall DL, Bodnar RJ (1988) Synthetic fluid inclusions. V. Solubility relations in the system NaCl-KCl-H2O under vapor-saturated conditions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 52:989–1005
Sun Y, Xiao L, Zhu D, Wu T, Deng XD, Bai M, Wen G (2014) Geochemical, geochronological, and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic constraints on the petrogenesis of the Qicun intrusive complex from the Handan–Xingtai district: implications for the mechanism of lithospheric thinning of the North China Craton. Ore Geol Rev 57:363–374
Takagi T, Tsukimura K (1997) Genesis of oxidized-and reduced-type granites. Econ Geol 92:81–86
Ulrich T, Günther D, Heinrich CA (2001) The evolution of a porphyry Cu-Au deposit, based on LA-ICP-MS analysis of fluid inclusions: Bajo de la Alumbrera, Argentina. Econ Geol 96:1743–1774
Vakhrushev V, Ripp G, Kaviladze M (1981) Isotope composition of sulfur from iron ore deposits of East Siberia. Geol Geofiz 22:74–81
Wang, YJ (2012) The characteristics of Fushan iron deposit, Handan, Hebei province, China, and its implication to the North China Craton evolution. M.S. Thesis. China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wei, HF (2011) Geological Characteristics and Genesis of Xishimen Skarn Iron deposit in Handan-Xingtai District. M.S. Thesis. Shijiazhuang University of Economics, Shijiazhuang (in Chinese with English abstract)
Whitney JA, Hemley JJ, Simon FO (1985) The concentration of iron in chloride solutions equilibrated with synthetic granitic compositions: the sulfur-free system. Econ Geol 80:444–460
Wood SA, Crerar DA, Borcsik MP (1987) Solubility of the assemblage pyrite-pyrrhotite-magnetite-sphalerite-galena-gold-stibnite-bismuthinite-argentite-molybdenite in H2O-NaCl-CO2 solutions from 200 to 350 °C. Econ Geol 82:1864–1887
Xie GQ, Mao JW, Zhu QQ, Yao L, Li YH, Li W, Zhao HJ (2015) Geochemical constraints on Cu–Fe and Fe skarn deposits in the Edong district, Middle–Lower Yangtze River metallogenic belt, China. Ore Geol Rev 64:425–444
Yang Z, Cheng Y, Wang H (1986) The geology of China. Oxford University Press, New York, p. 306
Yuan WL (1982) Ore genesis of Jinling iron skarn deposit based on sulfur isotope analysis. J Inst Met 1 :–139in Chinese
Zhang BM, Ma G (1996) Magmatism associated metal series and metallogenic model of the main metallogenic zones in Hebei. J Geol Min Res N China 11:351–360 in Chinese
Zhang HD, Liu JC, Peng SX, Zhang S, Men WH, Wang RM, JL W, Huang SW (2013a) Ore-forming material sources of the Pingshun iron deposits in the southern Taihang Mountains: constraints from trace elements and S and Pb isotopes. Geol Explor 6:1088–1097 in Chinese with English abstract
Zhang JQ, Li SR, Wang J, Bai M, Lu J, Wei H, Nie X, Liu H (2013b) The genetic mineralogical study of magnetite in Baijian and Xishimen skarn type of iron deposit, southern Hebei province. Earth Sci Front 20:76–87 in Chinese with English abstract
Zhao, XF (2010) Paleoproterozoic crustal evolution and Fe-Cu metallogeny of the western Yangtze Block, SW China Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Zhao XF, Zhou MF (2011) Fe–Cu deposits in the Kangdian region, SW China: a Proterozoic IOCG (iron-oxide–copper–gold) metallogenic province. Mineral Deposita 46:731–747
Zhao GC, Sun M, Wilde SA, Sanzhong L (2005) Late Archean to Paleoproterozoic evolution of the North China craton: key issues revisited. Precambrian Res 136:177–202
Zhao YM, Lin W, Bi C, Li D, Jiang C (1990) Skarn deposits of China. Geological Press, Beijing in Chinese
Zheng, JM (2007) The ore-forming fluid and mineralization of skarn Fe deposits in Handan-Xingtai area, south Hebei Ph.D. Thesis. China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zheng JM, Xie GQ, Liu J, Chen M, Wang S, Guo S, Gao X, Li G (2007) 40Ar/39Ar dating of phlogopite from the Xishimen skarn iron deposit in the Handan-Xingtai area, southern Hebei, and its implication. Acta Petrol Sin 23:2513–2518 in Chinese with English abstract
Zheng YF, Chen JF (2000) Geochemistry of stable isotopes. Science Press, Beijing in Chinese
Zhu QQ, Xie GQ, Wang J, Li W, Yu B (2013) The relationship between the evaporate and skarn-type iron deposit: a case study of the Jinshandian iron skarn deposit in Hubei. Acta Geol Sin 87:1419–1428 in Chinese with English abstract
Zürcher L, Ruiz J, Barton MD (2001) Paragenesis, elemental distribution, and stable isotopes at the Peña Colorada iron skarn, Colima, Mexico. Econ Geol 96:535–557
Acknowledgments
This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012CB416802) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 41325007, 91414301, 91514303). We thank Jin Xiaoye, Li Yang, Wu Yaoqian, and Bai Ming for their help during the field work and Zhang Suxin and Zhang Yi for assistance in the SEM-EDS analysis. Prof. David Lentz (UNB) read an early version of the manuscript. Andreas Audétat, Michael Haschke, and an anonymous reviewer provided constructive reviews that have led to considerable improvement of presentation of the paper. Our thanks extend to Profs. Bernd Lehmann (Editor-in-Chief) and Shao-Yong Jiang (Associate Editor) for handling the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial handling: S.-Y. Jiang
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wen, G., Bi, SJ. & Li, JW. Role of evaporitic sulfates in iron skarn mineralization: a fluid inclusion and sulfur isotope study from the Xishimen deposit, Handan-Xingtai district, North China Craton. Miner Deposita 52, 495–514 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-016-0674-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-016-0674-8