Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
We read the article by Weissmann et al. [1] with great interest and commend all authors for demonstrating the efficacy of low- and high-dose radiotherapy (RT) in alleviating Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) symptoms. The authors reported a 63.8% improvement in symptoms following RT, with no significant differences in overall treatment response between low-dose (0.8 to 4.8 Gy) and high-dose (2 to 20 Gy) radiotherapy. However, adverse effects were reported at a higher rate in the low-dose cohort than in the high-dose cohort (14.8 vs. 3.3%; p = 0.029). Although a variety of RT regimens with varying doses and fractionations have been used, no consensus on the optimal dose and fractionation has been reached [2, 3]. Nevertheless, due to the inflammatory nature of the disease and the theoretical advantage of administering a low effective dose to a benign pathologic condition, previous studies have used a protracted regimen administering a low dose [4,5,6]. Cardoso et al. [4] recently demonstrated improvement in ocular pain, palpebral edema, visual acuity, and ocular motility in 18 patients treated with a total dose of 10 Gy fractionated into 1 Gy once weekly for 10 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the orbits was performed on all patients prior to and 6 months after treatment, and MRI revealed a decrease in the thickness of the ocular muscle and the intensity of the T2 sequence signal in the majority of patients. However, Weissmann et al. [1] evaluated treatment response during a single telephone consultation, which may be subjectively biased. Additionally, the rate of symptom palliation was lower and side effects were more severe than in patients treated with a protracted hypofractionation regimen [4,5,6].
The study by Weissmann et al. [1] requires clarification of a few points. While it was assumed that patients receiving lower doses would experience fewer adverse events, the incidence of adverse events was actually higher in the low-dose cohort. This perplexing result requires a brief explanation. Although the authors stated that no patient who received 20 Gy of RT as primary treatment received a second series, Table 2 indicates that one patient (1.7%) received a second series, a situation that requires clarification.
As a result, this is a significant study demonstrating the efficacy of low-dose RT for symptom relief in patients with GO. However, RT administered at a low dose and over a prolonged period of time should be considered a viable therapeutic option for patients with GO.
References
Weissmann T, Lettmaier S, Donaubauer AJ, Bert C, Schmidt M, Kruse F et al (2021) Low- vs. high-dose radiotherapy in Graves’ ophthalmopathy: a retrospective comparison of long-term results. Strahlenther Onkol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-021-01770-9
Gerling J, Kommerell G, Henne K, Laubenberger J, Schulte-Monting J, Fells P (2003) Retrobulbar irradiation for thyroid-associated orbitopathy: double-blind comparison between 2.4 and 16 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55(1):182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03795-1
Mourits MP, van Kempen-Harteveld ML, Garcia MB, Koppeschaar HP, Tick L, Terwee CB (2000) Radiotherapy for Graves’ orbitopathy: randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 355(9214):1505–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02165-6
Cardoso CC, Giordani AJ, Wolosker AM, Souhami L, Manso PG, Dias RS et al (2012) Protracted hypofractionated radiotherapy for Graves’ ophthalmopathy: a pilot study of clinical and radiologic response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(3):1285–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.015
Kahaly GJ, Rosler HP, Pitz S, Hommel G (2000) Low- versus high-dose radiotherapy for Graves’ ophthalmopathy: a randomized, single blind trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(1):102–108. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.1.6257
Guler OC, Onal C, Arslan G (2016) Graves’ ophthalmopathy treated with protracted hypofractionated low-dose adaptive radiotherapy: case report and review of the literature. Wien Klin Wochenschr 128(7–8):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0870-z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
C. Onal and O.C. Guler declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-021-01770-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Onal, C., Guler, O.C. Longer treatment time and lower radiation doses—an alternative for Graves’ ophthalmopathy treatment. Strahlenther Onkol 198, 663–664 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-021-01852-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-021-01852-8