Abstract
In recent years many workers have examined the implications of various sources of uncertainty for the reliability of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Indeed, the International Standardization Organization (ISO) has recognised the relevance of this work by including several cautionary statements in the ISO 14040 series of standards. However, in practice, there is a risk that the significance of these uncertainties for the results of an LCA could be overlooked as practitioners strive to complete studies on time and within budget. This paper presents the findings of a survey of LCA studies we made to determine the extent to which the problem of uncertainty had been dealt with in practice. This survey revealed that the significance of the limitations on the reliability of LCA results given in the standards has not been fully appreciated by practitioners. We conclude that the standards need to be revised to ensure that LCA studies include at least a qualitative discussion on all relevant aspects of uncertainty.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Perriman R (1995): Is LCA losing its way? LCA news 5(1): 4–5
Brunn H (1995): Putting LCA back in its track! LCA news 5(2): 2–4
Shrader-Frechette K (1996): Methodological rules for four classes of scientific uncertainty. In: Scientific Uncertainty and Environmental Problem Solving (ed Lemons J): Blackwell Science, Cambridge
Peereboom EC, Kleijn R, Lemkowitz S, Lundie S (1999): Influence of inventory data sets on life-cycle assessment results: A case Study on PVC. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(3): 109–130
Schaltegger S (Editor): (1996): Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) — Quo vadis? Birkhauser Verlag, Basel
Heijungs R (1996): Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production 4(3–4): 159–166
De Smet B, Stalmans M (1996): LCI Data and Data Quality. Int J LCA 1(2): 96–104
Donaldson J, Francis D (1996): Selection of industry specific burdens for LCIs. Int J LCA 1(2): 105–109
Maurice B, Frischknecht R, Coelho-Schwirtz V, Hungerbühler K (2000): Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production 8: 95–108
Klöpffer W (1996): Reductionism versus expansionism in LCA. IntJ LCA 1(2): 61
Owens J W (1996): The technical feasibility and accuracy of LCA impact assessment categories. IntJLCA 1(3): 151–158
ISO (1998): ISO 14041 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. Standards Australia, Australia
White P, De Smet B, Udo de Haes H, Heijungs R (1995): LCA back on track. But is it one track or two? LCA news 5(3): 2–4
Owens J W (1996): LCA Impact Assessment. IntJ LCA 1(4): 209–217
Udo de Haes H, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999): Best available practice regarding impact categories and cetegory indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Int J LCA 4(2): 66–74
Owens JW (1997): Constraints on moving from inventory to impact assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology1(1): 37–49
Potting J, Hauschild M (1997a): The linear nature of environmental impact from emissions in life-cycle assessment. Int J LCA 2(3): 171–177
Potting J, Hauschild M (1997b): Spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment via the site-dependent charaterisation of environmental impact from emissions. Int J LCA 2(4): 209–216
Ehrenfeld J R (1997): The importance of LCAs — Warts and all. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(2): 41–49
Saur K (1997): Life cycle impact assessment. Int J LCA 2(2): 66–70
Owens JW (1998): Life cycle impact assessment: The use of subjective judgements in classification and characterization. Int J LCA 3(1): 43–46
Barnthouse L, Fava J, Humphreys K, Hunt R, Laibson L, Noesen S, Owens WJ, Todd J, Vigon B, Weitz K, Young J (1997): Life cycle impact assessment. The state-of-the-art. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, Florida
ISO (1997): ISO 14040 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. Standards Australia, Australia
ISO (2000a): ISO 14042 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Life cycle impact assessment. International Standardization Organization, Geneva
SETAC-Europe (1999): Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Int J LCA 4(2): 66–74
Owens WJ (1999): Why life cycle impact assessment is now described as an indicator system. IntJ LCA 4(2): 81–86
ISO (2000): ISO 14043 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Life cycle interpretation. International Standardization Organization, Geneva
Coulon R, Camobreco V, Teulon H, J Besnainou (1997): Data quality and uncertainty in LCI. IntJ LCA 2(3): 178–182
Duda M, Shaw JS (1997): Life cycle assessment. Society 35(1): 38–43
Curran MA (1999): Editorial — the status of LCA in the USA. Int J LCA 4(3): 123–124
Abrahamsson M, Babazadeh N, Broström H, Folkstedt B, Frödin T, Högberg M, Lutman N, Tominich A (1999): Life cycle assessment on silicon and gallium arsenide transistors. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, pp 17
Andersson K, Ohlsson T (1999): Life cycle assessment of bread produced on different scales. Int J LCA 4(1): 25–40
Aresta M, Galatola M (1999): Life cycle analysis applied to the assessment of the environmental impact of alternative synthetic processes. The dimethylcarbonate case: part 1. Journal of Cleaner Production 7 181–193
Azapagic A, Clift R (1999): Life cycle assessment as a tool for improving process performance: a case study on boron products. Int J LCA 4(3): 133–142
Bárzaga-Castellanos L, Neufert R, Kayser G, Markert B (1999): Life cycle assessment of the selective catalytic reduction process for power plants. Int J LCA 4(6): 329–338
Bennett EB, Graedel TE (2000): ‘Conditioned Air’: Evaluating an environmentally preferable service. Environnmental Science and Technology34(4): 541–545
Björklund A, Delemo M, Sonesson U (1999): Evaluating a municipal waste management plan using ORWARE. Journal of Cleaner Production 7: 271–280
Cederberg C, Mattsson B (2000): Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8: 49–60
Ciantar C, Hadfield M (2000): An environmental evaluation of mechanical systems using environmentally acceptable refrigerants. Int J LCA 5(4): 209–220
Graedel TE (1998): Life-cycle assessment in the services industries. Journal of Industrial Ecology1(4): 57–70
Günther A, Langowski H (1997): Life cycle assessment on resilient floor coverings. Int J LCA 2(2): 73–80
Hall M, Woods G, Perryman D, Janssen M (1998): Buxton public school: Life cycle assessment. NSW Department of Public Works and Services, Sydney, pp 43
Huybrechts D, Vancolen D, Janssens E (1998): Wet processed and dry phototools in the manufacturing of printed circuit boards. Int J LCA 3(1): 29–35
Jönsson å, Bjorklund T, Tillman A (1998): LCA of concrete and steel building frames. Int J LCA 3(4): 216–224
Kadam KL, Camobreco VJ, Forrest LH, Simeroth DC, Blackburn WJ, Nehoda KC (1999): Environmental life cycle implication of fuel oxygenate production from California biomass — Technical Report. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado
Langowski H (1998): Life cycle assessment on resilient floorcoverings. Fraunhofer-Institute Process Engineering and Packaging, Freising, Germany
Lee J, Cho H, Choi B, Sung J, Lee S, Shin M (2000): Life cycle assessment of tractors. Int J LCA 5(4): 205–208
Legarth J B, åkesson S, Ashkin A, Imrell A (2000): A screening level life cycle assessment of the ABB EU 2000 air handling unit. Int J LCA 5(1): 47–58
Milà L, Domènech X, Rieradevall J, Fullana P, Puig R (1998): Application of life cycle assessment to footwear. Int J LCA 3(4): 203–208
Nicoletti GM, Notarnicola B, Tassielli G (1999): Comparative LCA of flooring materials: Ceramic vs Marble Tiles. Universita’ degli studi di Bari, Bari
Peereboom EC, Kleijn R, Lemkowitz S, Lundie S (1999): Influence of inventory data sets on life-cycle assessment results: A case study on PVC. Journal of Industrial Ecology2(3): 109–130
Rafenberg C, Mayer E (1998): Life cycle analysis of the newspaper Le Monde. Int J LCA 3(3): 131–144
Schmidt W, Beyer H (1999): Environmental considerations on battery-housing recovery. Int J LCA 4(2): 107–112
Strauss K I, Wiedemann M (2000): An LCA study on sludge retreatment processes in Japan. Int J LCA 5(5): 291–294
Tolle D, Vigon B, Evers D (1998): Life-cycle impact assessment demonstration for the GBU-24. US EPA, Ohio, pp 82
Tukker A (1999): A comparison of thermal treatment processes for hazardous waste. Int J LCA 4(6): 341–351
Tukker A (2000): The case of paint packaging separation and general conclusions. Int J LCA 5(2): 105–112
Tukker A, Kleijn R, van Oers L, Smeets E (1998): Combining SFA and LCA The Swedish PVC Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(4): 93–116
Werner F, Richter K (2000): A case study about aluminium window frames. Int J LCA 5(2): 79–83
Yanagitani K, Kawahara K (2000): LCA study of air conditioners with an alternative refrigerant. Int J LCA 5(5): 287–290
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, S., Evans, D. & Webber, M. How LCA studies deal with uncertainty. Int J LCA 7, 47–52 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978909
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978909