Abstract
During the period of 1972 through 1993, Environmental Concern Inc. (EC) and its recent (1989) affiliate Environmental Construction Company (ECC) have completed 216 marsh construction projects to control upland bank erosion in tributaries of the Maryland portion of Chesapeake Bay. Of these projects, 26 have involved marsh construction on unaltered existing shores and 190 have utilized marsh construction on shores that have been restored to former increased elevations through shoreline filling and grading. This paper describes the latter restoration technique. Throughout the 21-year period of applying the technique for long-term upland bank erosion control, refinements to the design standards and criteria for site suitability have been made so as to optimize its successful application. As a result of this experience, a reliable bioengineering restoration technique has evolved to control upland bank erosion. This paper describes the details of this successful technique through a review of: (1) its objectives and benefits, (2) suitability of sites for its application, (3) the design of its shore restoration, (4) its construction, (5) its maintenance, and (6) comparison of its cost with those of structural techniques for bank erosion control. Although the technique has only been applied in the Maryland portions of Chesapeake Bay, its applicability should, with modifications, be broadly applicable to all water bodies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature Cited
de la Cruz, A. A., and C. T. Hackney. 1977. Energy value, elemental composition and productivity ofJuncas tidal marsh.Ecology 58:1165–1170.
Dodd, J. D., and J. W. Webb. 1975. Establishment of vegetation for shoreline stabilization in Galveston Bay. MP6-75, US Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, 67 pp.
Gallager, J. L., and F. G. Plumley. 1979. Underground biomass profiles and productivity in Atlantic coastal marshes.American Journal of Botany 66:156–161.
Garbisch, E. W. 1986. Highways and wetlands: Compensating for wetland losses. US DOT, FHA Report No. FHWA-IP-86-22, 60 pp.
Garbisch, E. W. 1989. Wetland enhancement, restoration, and construction. Pages 261–275in S. K. Majumday, R. P. Brooks, F. J. Brenner, and R. W. Tiner (eds.), Wetlands ecology and conservation: Emphasis in Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Philadelphia.
Garbisch, E. W., P. B. Woller and R. J. McCallum. 1975a. Salt marsh establishment and development. TM 52, US Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, 110 pp.
Garbisch, E. W., P. B. Woller, W. J. Bostian, and R. J. McCallum. 1975b. Biotic techniques for shore stabilization. Pages 405–426in L. E. Cronin (ed.), Estuarine research, Vol II, Geology and engineering. Academic Press, New York.
Good, R. E., N. F. Good, and B. F. Frasco. 1982. A review of primary production and decomposition dynamics of the belowground marsh component. Pages 139–157in V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.
Hackney, C. T., and A. A. de la Cruz. 1986. Belowground productivity of roots and rhizomes in a giant cordgrass marsh.Estuaries 9(2):112–116.
Hardaway, C. S., G. R. Thomas, B. K. Fowler, C. L. Hill, J. E. Frye, and N. A. Ibison. 1985. Results of the vegetative erosion control project in the Virginia Chesapeake Baysystem. Pages 144–158in F. J. Webb, Jr. (ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth annual conference on wetlands restoration and creation. Hillsborough Community College, Tampa.
Knutson, P. L. 1977. Planting guidelines for marsh development and bank stabilization. Coastan Engineering Technical Aid No. 77-3, US Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, 21 pp.
Knutson, P. L., and W. W. Woodhouse, Jr. 1983. Shore stabilization with salt marsh vegetation. Special Report 9. US Army Corps of Engineers, Costal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir. 95 pp.
Knutson, P. L., R. A. Brochu, W. N. Seelig, and M. Inskeep. 1982. Wave damping inSpartina alterniflora marshes. Wetlands 2:87–104.
Roman, C. T., and F. D. Daiber. 1984. Aboveground and belowground primary production of two Delaware Bay tidal marshes.Bulletin of the Torrey Botany Club 111:34–41.
Sharp, W. C., and J. Vaden. 1970. Ten-year report on sloping techniques used to stabilize eroding tidal river banks.Shore and Beach 38:31–35.
Stroud, L. M. 1976. Net primary production of below-ground material and carbohydrate patterns of two height forms ofSpartina alterniflora in the North Carolina marshes. PhD thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 140 pp.
Trettel, J. R. 1989. Evaluation of constructed and vegetated shorelines (CVS) for erosion control in low energy areas of the Chesapeake Bay. MS thesis. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 89 pp.
US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Summary of monthly tidal extremes: Solomons, MD (857–7330) 1937–1990 and Annapolis, MD (857–5512) 1928–1991. Silver Spring, Maryland.
Valiela, I., J. M. Teal, and N. Y. Persson. 1976. Production and dynamics of experimentally enriched salt marsh vegetation.Limnology and Oceanography 21:245–252.
Webb, J. W., and J. D. Dodd. 1976. Vegetative establishment and shoreline stabilization, Galveston Bay. Technical Paper 76-13. US Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, 77 pp.
Woodhouse, W. W., Jr., E. D. Seneca, and S. W. Broom. 1974. Propagation ofSpartina alterniflora for substrate stabilization and salt marsh development. Technical Memorandum 46. US Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir. 155 pp.
Woodhouse, W. W., Jr., E. D. Seneca, and S. W. Broom. 1976. Propagation and use ofSpartinal alterniflora for shoreline erosion abatement. Technical Report No. 76-2. US Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir. 72 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garbisch, E.W., Garbisch, J.L. Control of upland bank erosion through tidal marsh construction on restored shores: Application in the maryland portion of Chesapeake Bay. Environmental Management 18, 677–691 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394633
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394633