Abstract
The great importance of titles being highly informative is almost unanimously accepted in literature, assuming that the more informative titles are, the more effectively they serve their functions. The most common measure of title “informativeness” has been the number of “substantive” words included in it, and one of the factors which might be associated with it is the number of authors. The present study attempted to test, in a large group of journals fromdifferent areas, and over six decades, the hypothesis that a paper signed by a larger number of authors will have more substantive words in its title. Large samples of original research papers were drawn from each decade year of fourteen leading journals. For each paper, the number of substantive words in the title was correlated with the number of authors. Findings indicate a difference between the scientific journals on the one hand, and the social sciences and humanities journals on the other. A moderate positive correlation was found in most scientific journals (excluding mathematics) for many periods. In the social sciences journals, and to a greater extent, in the humanities journals, a significant positive correlation was limited to only a few periods, while the rest showed a very low correlation, or even a negative correlation. The different findings for the sciences may be somehow associated with their higher rate of multiple authorship.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C. Balog, The information content of titles of papers in an agricultural journal,Journal of Research Communication Studies, 2 (1979–1981) 263–270.
R. T. Bottle, C. I. Preibish, The proposed KWIC index for psychology: an experimental test of its effectiveness,Journal of the American Society for Information Science 21 (1970) 427–428.
A. B. Buxton,The Bibliographical Infomation Content of Research Papers, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University, of Leicester, 1979.
A. B. Buxton, A. J. Meadows, The variation in the information content of titles of research papers with time and discipline,Journal of Documentation, 33 (1977) 46–52.
V. Diodato, The occurence of title words in parts of research papers: variation among disciplines,Journal of Documentation, 38 (1982) 192–206.
V. Diodato, K. Pearson, Source indexing in science journals and indexing services: a survey of current practices,Science & Technology Libraries, 6 (1985) 103–118.
H. Feinberg,Title Derivative Indexing Techniques: A Comparative Study, Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N.J., 1973.
J. S. Ghosh, Content representation in document titles: a case study with Prostaglandin literature,Aslib Proceedings 26 (1974) 83–86.
P. R. Hodges, Keyword in title indexes: effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches,Special Libraries, 74 (1983) 56–60.
M. Koll, T. Noreault, Relation of title length to number of authors,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30 (1979) 175–176.
T. D. C. Kuch, Relation of title length to number of authors in journal articles,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 (1978) 200–202.
H. P. Luhn, Keyword-in-Context Index for technical literature (KWIC Index),American Documentation, 11 (1960) 288–295.
A. A. Manten, J. F. D. Greenhalgh, Titles of scientific papers,Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2 (1977) 1–6.
J. H. Mitchell,Writing for Professional and Technical Journals, Wiley, N.Y., 1968.
C. Montgomery, D. R. Swanson, Machine-like indexing by people,American Documentation, 13 (1962) 359–366.
J. O'Connor, Correlation of indexing heading and title words in three medical indexing systems,American Documentation, 15 (1964) 96–104.
M. O'Connor, F. P. Woodford,Writing Scientific Papers in English, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1975.
D. J. Price, Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and nonscience, In:Communication Among Scientists and Engineers,C. E. Nelson,D. K. Pollock (Eds), Health, Lexington, Mass., 1970, pp. 3–22.
N. W. Storer, The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observations,Medical Library Association Bulletin, 55 (1967) 75–84.
J. J. Tocatlian, Are titles of chemical papers becoming more informative?,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 21 (1970) 345–350.
M. Yitzhaki, The variation in informativity of titles of research papers with time and field,Cognitive Paradigms in Knowledge Organisation, Second International ISKO Conference, Madras 26–28 August 1992, Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore, 1992, pp. 401–418.
M. Yitzhaki, D. Ben-Tamar, Multiple authorship in biochemistry and other fields; a case study of the Journal of Biological Chemistry throughout 1905–1988,Informetrics 89/90: Second International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Informetrics, London (Ontario), July 5–7, 1989, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 373–389.
A. White, A further exploration of title size and author number,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (1991) 384–385.
A. White, N. R. Hernandez, Increasing field complexity revealed through article title analyses,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (1991) 731–734.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yitzhaki, M. Relation of title length of journal articles to number of authors. Scientometrics 30, 321–332 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017231
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017231