Abstract
Previous research has documented that an offender's status may be a protective shield or a harmful liability. One model (Rosoff, 1989) contends that status effects are moderated by offense magnitude, with status providing a shield for minor offenses, but acting as a liability for major offenses. Another model (Skolnick & Shaw, 1994) asserts that the professional relatedness of an offense moderates status effects, with status acting as a shield for professionally unrelated offenses and as a liability for professionally related offenses. A study is presented to determine the moderator of these status effects. Clarifying and extending prior research of the investigators, 120 participants read one of 12 hypothetical civil case summaries and rated defendant liability, monetary damages, and other evaluative judgments. A 3×2×2 factorial design varied offense severity, defendant status, and the professional relatedness of the offense. Results strongly supported professional relatedness as the moderator of status effects, extending previous findings from criminal to civil proceedings and eliminating alternative hypotheses suggested by the earlier work.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bushman, B. J. (1988). The effects of apparel on compliance: A field experiment with a female authority figure.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 459–467.
Dittes, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1956). Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 100–107.
Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit.Psychological Review, 65, 117–127.
Jemmott, J. B., & Gonzalez, E. (1989). Social status, the status distribution, and performance in small groups.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 584–598.
McFatter, R. M. (1978). Sentencing strategies and justice: Effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1490–1500.
Neugarten, B. (1946). Social class and friendship among school children.American Journal of Sociology, 51, 305–313.
Rosoff, S. M. (1989). Physicians as criminal defendants: Specialty, sanctions, and status liability.Law and Human Behavior, 13, 231–236.
Shaw, J. I., & Skolnick, P. (1995). Effects of prohibitive and informative judicial instructions on jury decision making.Social Behavior and Personality, 23, 319–326.
Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of crime on juridic judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 410–414.
Skolnick, P., & Shaw, J. I. (1994). Is defendant status a liability or a shield? Crime severity and professional relatedness.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1827–1836.
Wiggins, J. A., Dill, F., & Schwartz, R. D. (1965). On “status-liability.”Sociometry, 28, 197–209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Shaw, J.I., Skolnick, P. When is defendant status a shield or a liability? Clarification and extension. Law Hum Behav 20, 431–442 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498979
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498979