Abstract
We study value theory for a class of games called games withn players andr alternatives. In these games, each of then players must choose one and only one of ther alternatives. A linear, efficient value is obtained using three characterizations, two of which are axiomatic. This value yields an a priori evaluation for each player relative to each alternative.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bolger E (1986) Power indices for multicandidate voting games. Int J of Game Theory 14:175–186
Bolger E (1987) A class of efficient values for games in partition function form. SIAM J. Algebraic and Discrete Methods 8:460–466
Hart S, Mas-Colell A (1989) Potential, value, and consistency. Econometrica 57:589–614
Lucas W, Thrall R (1963)n person games in partition function form. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly X:281–298
McCaulley P (1990) Axioms and values on partition function form games, (unpublished manuscript), REU Cooperative Game Theory, Drew University, Madison, New Jersey
Merki S (1991) Values on partition function form games, (unpublished manuscript), REU Cooperative Game Theory, Drew University, Madison, New Jersey
Myerson R (1980) Conference structures and fair allocation rules. Int J of Game Theory 9:169–182
Myerson R (1977) Values of games in partition function form. Int J of Game Theory 6:23–31
Shapley LS (1953) A value forn-person games. In: Kuhn H, Tucker A (eds) Contributions to the theory of games II. Princeton 307–317
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bolger, E.M. A value for games withn players andr alternatives. Int J Game Theory 22, 319–334 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240129
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240129