Conclusion
In the above, I have taken the theme of Austrian economics and economic organization through several variations. I hope to have taken steps towards establishing that not only were the Austrians important precursors of the contemporary theory of economic organization, but they may also contribute to existing theory as well as provide their distinctive perspective on economic organization. Space limitations have dictated, however, that I have been able to only scratch the surface. Assuredly, there is much more to be done on all the three themes I have been discussing, particularly on the last, constructive one.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alchian, Armen A. 1984. “Specificity, Specialization, and Coalitions.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 140: 34–49.
Alchian, Armen A., and Harold Demsetz. [1972] 1977. “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization.” In Armen A. Alchian,Economic Forces at Work. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
Alchian, Armen A., and Susan Woodward 1988. “The Firm is Dead; Long Live the Firm.”Journal of Economic Literature 26: 65–79.
Barney, Jay B., and William G. Ouchi, eds. 1988.Organizational Economics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barzel, Yoram. 1987. “The Entrepreneur's Reward for Self-Policing.”Economic Inquiry 25: 103–16.
Barzel, Yoram. 1989.Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boudreaux, Don, and Randall G. Holcombe. 1989. “The Coasian and Knightian Theories of the Firm.”Managerial and Decision Economics 10: 147–54.
Buchanan, James M. 1969.Cost and Choice. Chicago: Markham.
Cheung, S. N. S. 1983. “The Contractual Nature of the Firm.”Journal of Law and Economics 26: 1–22.
Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” In Barney and Ouchi 1988.
—— 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.”Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.
—— 1988. “The Nature of the Firm: Origin.”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4: 3–17.
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights.” InOwnership, Control and the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
——. 1969. “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint.”Journal of Law and Economics 12: 1–22.
——. 1988. “The Theory of the Firm Revisited.”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4: 141–62.
Douma, Sytse, and Hein Schreuder. 1991.Economic Approaches to Organizations. New York: Prentice Hall.
Eggertson, Thráinn. 1990.Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fama, Eugene F. 1980. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.”Journal of Political Economy 88: 288–307.
Foss, Nicolai J. 1991. “The Suppression of Evolutionary Approaches in Economics: The Case of Marshall and Monopolistic Competition.”Methodus 3 (December): 65–72.
—— 1993a. “More on Knight and the Theory of the Firm.”Managerial and Decision Economics 14 (July): 269–76.
—— 1993b. “Theories of the Firm: Contractual and Competence Perspectives.”Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3 (June): 127–44.
——. 1993c. “The Two Coasian Traditions.”Review of Political Economy 4 (December): 508–32.
Grossman, Sanford J., and Oliver D. Hart. 1986. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership.”Journal of Political Economy 94: 671–719.
Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1931.Prices and Production. London: Routledge.
——. 1935a. “Socialist Calculation I: The Nature and History of the Problem.” In Hayek 1948.
——. 1935b. “Socialist Calculation II: The State of the Debate.” In Hayek 1948.
——. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” In Hayek 1948.
——. 1940. “Socialist Calculation III: The Competitive Solution.” In Hayek 1948.
——. 1941.The Pure Theory of Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
——. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” In Hayek 1948.
——. 1948.Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
——. [1968] 1978. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” InNew Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
——. 1973.Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1988.Economics and Institutions. Oxford: Polity Press.
Holmström, Bengt R., and Jean Tirole. 1989. “The Theory of the Firm.” InHandbook of Industrial Organization. R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ikeda, Sanford. 1990. “Market Process Theory and ‘Dynamic’ Theories of the Market.”Southern Economic Journal 57: 75–92.
Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. “The Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure.” In Barney and Ouchi 1988.
Kirzner, Israel M. 1973.Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—— 1979.Perception, Opportunity and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Knight, Frank H. [1921] 1965.Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
—— [1924] 1952. “Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost.” InReadings in Price Theory. G. J. Stigler and K. E. Boulding, eds. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.
Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1971.The Legacy of Max Weber. London: Heinemann.
—— 1986.The Market As An Economic Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lange, Oskar. 1938. “On the Economic Theory of Socialism.” InOn the Economic Theory of Socialism. B. Lippincott, ed. St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.
Langlois, Richard N., ed. 1986.Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
——. 1991. “Institutions.” InAustrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions. Bruce Caldwell and Stephan Böhm, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lavoie, Don. 1985.Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Littlechild, Stephen C. 1986. “Three Types of Market Process.” In Langlois 1986.
Loasby, Brian J. 1989.The Minds and Methods of Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Machlup, F. 1967. “Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial.”American Economic Review 57: 1–33.
McNulty, Paul J. 1984. “On the Nature and Theory of Economic Organization: The Role of the Firm Reconsidered.”History of Political Economy 16: 233–53.
Malmgren, H. B. 1961. “Information, Expectations and the Theory of the Firm.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 399–421.
Menger, Carl. [1871] 1976.Principles of Economics. New York: New York University Press.
—— [1883] 1963.Problems of Economics and Sociology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Milgrom, Paul. 1988. “Employment Contracts, Influence Activities and Efficient Organization Design.”Journal of Political Economy 96: 42–60.
Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1992.Economics, Organization, and Management. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Minkler, Alanson P. 1991. “The Problem With Knowledge: An Essay on the Theory of the Firm.” Manuscript. University of Connecticut: Department of Economics.
Mises, Ludwig von. [1920] 1990.Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
——. [1936] 1981.Socialism. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
——. 1945.Bureaucracy. London: William Hodge.
——. 1949.Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. London: William Hodge.
Nelson, Richard R. 1981. “Assessing Private Enterprise: An Exegesis of Tangled Doctrine.”Bell Journal of Economics 12: 93–111.
Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter. 1982.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
O'Driscoll, Gerald P. and Mario Rizzo. 1985.The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Penrose, Edith T. 1959.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ricketts, Martin 1987.The Economics of Business Enterprise. Brighton, England: Wheatsheaf Books.
Rothbard, Murray N. [1962] 1970.Man, Economy, and State. Vol. 2. Los Angeles: Nash.
Salerno, Joseph T. 1990. “Ludwig von Mises as Social Rationalist.”Review of Austrian Economics 4: 26–54.
Silver, Morris. 1984.Enterprise and the Scope of the Firm. Aldershot: Martin Robertson.
Simon, Herbert A. 1979. “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations.”American Economic Review 69: 493–513.
—— 1991. “Organizations and Markets.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 25–44.
Thomsen, Esteban F. 1989.Prices and Knowledge: A Market-Process Perspective. Doctoral Dissertation. New York University.
Vaughn, Karen I. 1982. “Does it Matter That Costs are Subjective?”Southern Economic Journal 49 (December): 702–15.
Williamson, Oliver E. 1975.Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
—— 1985.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
—— 1991. “Economic Institutions: Spontaneous and Intentional Governance.”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7: 159–87.
Witt, Ulrich. 1987. “How Transaction Rights Are Shaped to Channel Innovativeness.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 143: 180–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A number of excellent comments from Murray Rothbard and three anonymous referees is gratefully acknowledged. All remaining errors are the author's.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foss, N.J. The theory of the firm: The Austrians as precursors and critics of contemporary theory. Rev Austrian Econ 7, 31–65 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102135
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102135