Abstract
The ability of freshwater aquatic vascular plants to accumulate heavy metals was examined in some detail during a five year study. Differences in uptake rate were found to depend on the species of plant, the seasonal growth rate changes and the metal ion being absorbed. Lead and mercury were concentrated to a greater extent than the lighter nickel and copper. Laboratory experiments were designed to establish uptake rate constants which were used to calculate water concentrations of mercury from the analyses of plant samples from the river. ‘Background’ levels of mercury in aquatic plants of 35–50 ng g-1 dry weight corresponded to a water concentration near 15 ng L-1 of total mercury of which 25–30% was methylmercury. Higher concentrations of mercury in the plants indicated a proportional increase in the mercury level in the water.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abo-RadyM. D. K.: 1980, ‘Aquatic Macrophytes as Indicator for Heavy Metal Pollution in the River Leine West Germany’, Arch. für Hydrobiologie 89, 387–404.
Dietz, F.: 1973, ‘The Enrichment of Heavy Metals in Sbmerged Plants’, in S. M. Jenkins (ed.) Advances in Water Pollution Research 6, 53–62, Pergamon Press.
DolarS. G., KeeneyD. R., and ChestersG.: 1971, ‘Mercury Accumulation by Myriophyllum spicatum L.’, Environmental Letters 1, 191–198.
ErikssonC. and MortimerD. C.: 1975, ‘Mercury Uptake in Rooted Higher Aquatic Plants; Laboratory Studies’, Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 19, 2087–2093.
FranzinW. G., and McFarlaneG. A.: 1980, ‘An Analysis of the Aquatic Macrophyte, Myriophyllum exalbescens, as an Indicator of Metal Contamination of Aquatic Ecosystems Near a Base Metal Smelter’, Bull. Environm. Cont. Toxicol. 24, 597–605.
KudoA., HisamatsuN., and OseN.: 1982, ‘Proportion of Methylmercury to the Total Amount of Mercury in River Waters in Canada and Japan’, Water Res. 16, 1011–1015.
MortimerD. C. and KudoAkira: 1975, ‘Interaction Between Aquatic Plants and Bed Sediments in Mercury Uptake From Flowing Water’, J. Environ. Quality 4, 491–495.
NakadaM., FukayaK., TakeshitaS., and WadaY.: 1979, ‘The Accumulation of Heavy Metals in the Submerged Plant Elodea nuttallii’, Bull. Environm. Contam. Toxicol. 22, 21–27.
Norstrom, R. J.: 1977, ‘Analytical Procedures for Inorganic and Organic Mercury’, Ottawa River Project. Final Report. National Research Council of Canada, Appendix 1.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment Report: 1977, ‘Concentrations of Mercury in Sediments and Fish in the St. Lawrence River’.
Ottawa River Project Group: 1979, ‘Mercury in the Ottawa River’, Environmental Research 19, 231–243.
RayS. N. and WhiteW. J. 1976, ‘Selected Aquatic Plants as Indicator Species for Heavy Metal Pollution’, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Environmental Science and Engineering 11, 717–725.
RayS. N. and WhiteW. J.: 1979, ‘Equesitum arvense, and Aquatic Vascular Plant as a Biological Monitor for Heavy Metal Pollution’, Chemosphere 8, 125–128.
SayP. J. and WhittonB. A.: 1983, ‘Accumulation of Heavy Metals by Aquatic Mosses. 1: Fontinalis antipyretica Hedw’, Hydrobiologia 100, 245–260.
StokesP. M., DreierS. I., FarkasM. O., and McLeanR. A. N.: 1983, ‘Mercury Accumulation by Filamentous Algae: A Promising Biological Monitoring System for Methylmercury in Acid-Stressed Lakes’, Environmental Pollution (Series B) 5, 255–271.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mortimer, D.C. Freshwater aquatic macrophytes as heavy metal monitors — the Ottawa River experience. Environ Monit Assess 5, 311–323 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394071
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394071