Abstract
Inter-transformant variability in the expression of introduced genes was studied in the R1 and R2 generations of 10 tobacco transformants, produced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. In replicated and physiologically equivalent material, tranformants showed considerable variability in the expression of the reporter gene uidA as shown by transcript levels and β-glucuronidase (GUS) activity. However, homozygous R2 material could be investigated for seven of the transformants and among these, and in one line in which two inserts could segregate independently, this inter-transformant variability was reduced to simple bimodal expression. The two levels of expression for GUS activity in leaves were high or low (approximately 2.5 or 0.3 nmol cm-2 min-1 respectively), with no continuous variation. Transformants in the high group had single T-DNA insertions, while those in the low group had multiple T-DNA insertions, at the same or different loci. Within each group, although T-DNA was apparently integrated at different sites in the plant genome, there was no evidence of position effects. GUS activity levels of the transformants were very similar in the field and in environmentally controlled conditions under high or low light. Plants with multiple insertions and low expression also tended to have increased methylation of the integrated T-DNA.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Benfey PN, Chau N-H: Regulated genes in transgenic plants. Science 244: 174–188 (1989).
Budar F, Thia-toong L, van Montagu M, Heralsteens J-P: Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer results mainly in transgenic plants transmitting T-DNA as a single mendelian factor. Genetics 114: 303–313 (1986).
Czernilofsky AP, Hain R, Baker B, Wirtz U: Studies of the structure and functional organization of foreign DNA integrated into the genome of Nicotiana tabacum. DNA 5: 473–482 (1986).
Dean C, Jones J, Favreau M, Dunsmuir P, Bedbrook J: Influence of flanking sequences on variability in expression levels of an introduced gene in transgenic tobacco plants. Nucl Acids Res 16: 9267–9283 (1988).
De Greef W, Delon R, De Block M, Leemans J, Botterman J: Evaluation of herbicide resistance in transgenic crops under field conditions. Bio/technology 7: 61–64 (1989).
Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB: Maize DNA miniprep. In: Malmberg R, Messing J, Sussex I (eds) Molecular Biology of Plants: a Laboratory Course Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1985).
Deroles SC, Gardner RC: Analysis of the T-DNA structure in a large number of transgenic petunias generated by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Mol Biol 11: 365–377 (1988).
Eckes P, Rosahl S, Schell J, Willmitzer L: Isolation and characterization of a light inducible, organ-specific gene from potato and analysis of its expression after tagging and transfer into tobacco and potato shoots. Mol Gen Genet 205: 14–22 (1986).
Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K: Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50: 151–158 (1968).
Heberle-Bors E, Charvat B, Thompson D, Schernthaner JP, Barta A, Matzke AJM, Matzke MA: Genetic analysis of T-DNA insertions into the tobacco genome. Plant Cell Rep 7: 571–574 (1988).
Hobbs SLA, Pelcher LE, DeLong CMO, Anderson M, Mahon JD: Genetic variability in the amount of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and its small subunit mRNA in pea. Planta 180: 510–516 (1990).
Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffman NL, Eichholz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT: A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 27: 1229–1231 (1985).
Jefferson RA, Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5: 387–405 (1987).
Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW: GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6: 3901–3907 (1987).
Jones JDG, Dunsmuir P, Bedbrook J: High level expression of introduced chimaeric genes in regenerated transformed plants. EMBO J 4: 2411–2418 (1985).
Jones JDG, Gilbert DE, Grady KL, Jorgensen RA: T-DNA structure and gene expression in petunia plants transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 derivatives. Mol Gen Genet 207: 478–485 (1987).
Jorgensen R, Snyder C, Jones JDG: T-DNA is organized predominantly in inverted repeat structures in plants transformed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 derivatives. Mol Gen Genet 207: 471–477 (1987).
Koncz C, Schell J: The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Genet 204: 383–396 (1986).
Last DI, Gray JC, Synthesis and accumulation of pea plastocyanin in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Mol Biol 14: 229–238 (1990).
Lawton MA, Tierney MA, Nakamura I, Anderson E, Komeda Y, Dube P, Hoffman N, Fraley RT, Beachy RN: Expression of a soybean β-conglycinin gene under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S and 19S promoters in transformed petunia tissues. Plant Mol Biol 9: 315–324 (1987).
Le Gal MF, Hobbs SLA, DeLong CMO: Gene expression during the infection process in nodulating and nonnodulating pea genotypes. Can J Bot 67: 2535–2538 (1989).
Matzke MA, Primig M, Trnovshy J, Matzke AJM: Reversible methylation and inactivation of marker genes in sequentially transformed tobacco plants. EMBO J 8: 643–649 (1989).
Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497 (1962).
Nagy F, Odell JT, Morelli G, Chua N-H: Properties of expression of the 35S promoter from CaMV in transgenic tobacco plants. In: Zaitling M, Day P, Hollaender A (eds) Biotechnology in Plant Science. Academic Press Inc, London (1985).
Napoli C, Lemieux C, Jorgensen R: Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible cosuppression of homologous genes in trans. Plant Cell 2: 279–289 (1990).
Nelson RS, McCormick SM, Delannay X, Dube P, Layton J, Anderson EJ, Kaniewska M, Proksch RK, Horsch RB, Rogers SG, Fraley RT, Beachy RN: Virus tolerance, plant growth, and field performance of transgenic tomato plants expressing coat protein from tobacco mosaic virus. Bio/technology 6: 403–409 (1988).
Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua N-H: Variability in 35S promoter expression between independent transformants. In: Key J, McIntosh L (eds) Plant Gene Systems and their Biology, vol 62. Alan R. Liss, New York (1987).
Potrykus I, Paskowski J, Saul M, Petruska J, Shillito RD: Molecular and general genetics of a hybrid foreign gene introduced into tobacco by direct gene transfer. Mol Gen Genet 199: 169–177 (1985).
Rogers SG, O'Connell K, Horsch RB, Fraley RT: Investigation of factors involved in foreign protein expression in transformed plants. In: Zaitlin M, Day P, Hollaender A (eds) Biotechnology in Plant Science. Academic Press Inc, London (1985).
Shirsat AH, Wilford N, Croy RRD: Gene copy number and levels of expression in transgenic plants of a seed specific gene. Plant Sci 61: 75–80 (1989).
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG: Statistical Methods. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa (1980).
Spielmann A, Simpson RB: T-DNA structure in transgenic tobacco plants with multiple independent integration sites. Mol Gen Genet 205: 34–41 (1986).
van der Krol AR, Mur LA, Beld M, Mol JNM, Stuitje AR: Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. Plant Cell 2: 291–299 (1990).
Watt F, Molloy PL: Cytosine methylation prevents binding to DNA of an HeLa cell transcription factor required for optimal expression of the adenovirus major late promoter. Genes Dev 2: 1136–1143 (1988).
Williamson JD, Hirsch-Wyncott ME, Larkins BA, Gelvin SB: Differential accumulation of a transcript driven by the CaMV 35S promoter in transgenic tobacco. Plant Physiol 90: 1570–1576 (1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hobbs, S.L.A., Kpodar, P. & DeLong, C.M.O. The effect of T-DNA copy number, position and methylation on reporter gene expression in tobacco transformants. Plant Mol Biol 15, 851–864 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039425
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039425