Abstract
Background: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) surgery is indicated for the end-stage disease of the tibiotalarand subtalar joints.Although different fixation technique of TTCA has been proposed to achieve high fusion rate and low complication rate, there is still no consensus upon this point. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of retrograde intramedullary nail fixation (RINF) and locking plate fixation (LPF) for TTCA.
Materials and Methods: Fifty four patients who underwent TTCAthrough the lateral approach with lateral fibular osteotomy using RINF (32 patients, 18 male/14 female, mean age: 48) or LPF (22 patients, 12 male/10 female, mean age: 51) between January 2007 and January 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical characteristics, surgery (operation time, blood loss) outcomes (postoperative fusion rates, visual analog scale and foot and ankle surgery score and complications) were compared.
Results: The LPF group had a shorter operation time (72.3 ±9.2 vs. 102.8± 11.1 min, P < 0.001), less blood loss (75.9 ±20.2 vs. 140.0 ± 23.8 ml, P < 0.001) and less intraoperative fluoroscopy sessions (3.6 ± 0.9 vs. 8.4 ± 1.3, P < 0.001) than the RINF group. Patients were followed up for 12–24 months (mean of 16.2 months). Both groups had similar postoperative fusion rates (90.6% and 95.4%) and the LPF group showed a nonsignificant lower complication rate (18.2% vs. 28.1% respectively). Patients at higher risk on nonunion due to rheumatoid diseases may have a lower nonunion rate with LPF than RINF (one out of eight vs. three out of nine, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The LPF for TTCA was simpler to perform compared with RINF, but with similar postoperative outcomes and complication rates.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Kim BS, Knupp M, Zwicky L, Lee JW, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement in association with hindfoot fusion: Outcome and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:1540–7.
Nihal A, Gellman RE, Embil JM, Trepman E. Ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Surg 2008;14:1–10.
Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Saltrick KR, Dombek MF, Tullis BL, Statler TK, et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with retrograde intramedullary nailing. J Foot Ankle Surg 2004;43:82–6.
Quill G: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Tech Orthop 1996;11:269–73.
Niinimaki TT, Klemola TM, Leppilahti JI. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a compressive retrograde intramedullary nail: A report of 34 consecutive patients. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28:431–4.
Haaker R, Kohja EY, Wojciechowski M, Gruber G. Tibio-talo-calcaneal arthrodesis by a retrograde intramedullary nail. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2010;12:245–9.
Kile TA, Donnelly RE, Gehrke JC, Werner ME, Johnson KA. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an intramedullary device. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15:669–73.
Chou LB, Mann RA, Yaszay B, Graves SC, McPeake WT 3rd, Dreeben SM, et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2000;21:804–8.
Arnold H, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Hurschler C, Seehaus F, Bobrowitsch E, Waizy H. Biomechanical in v/’tro-Stability testing on human specimens of a locking plate system against conventional screw fixation of a proximal first metatarsal lateral displacement osteotomy. Open Orthop J 2012;6:133–9.
Mauffrey C, McGuinness K, Parsons N, Achten J, Costa ML. A randomised pilot trial of “locking plate” fixation versus intramedullary nailing for extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:704–8.
Frigg R. Development of the Locking Compression Plate. 2003;34 Suppl 2:B6–10.
Koukakis A, Apostolou CD, Taneja T, Korres DS, Amini A. Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: Early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;442:115–20.
Marti A, Fankhauser C, Frenk A, Cordey J, Gasser B. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:482–7.
Hanson TW, Cracchiolo A 3rd. The use of a 95 degree blade plate and a posterior approach to achieve tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2002;23:704–10.
Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994;843:1–129.
Johar RS, Smith RP. Assessing gravimetric estimation of intraoperative blood loss. J Gynecol Surg 1993;9:151–4.
Kirkpatrick JS, Goldner JL, Goldner RD. Revision arthrodesis for tibiotalar pseudarthrosis with fibular onlay-inlay graft and internal screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;268:29–36.
Tavakkolizadeh A, Klinke M, Davies M. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in treatment of hindfoot pain and deformity. Foot Ankle Surg 2006;12:59–64.
Kamath S, Ramamohan N, Kelly I. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis using the supracondylar nail. Foot Ankle Surg 2005;11:75–9.
Bennett GL, Cameron B, Njus G, Saunders M, Kay DB. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: A biomechanical assessment of stability. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:530–6.
Ahmad J, Pour AE, Raikin SM. The modified use of a proximal humeral locking plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28:977–83.
O’Neill PJ, Logel KJ, Parks BG, Schon LC. Rigidity comparison of locking plate and intramedullary fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2008;29:581–6.
O’Neill PJ, Logel KJ, Parks BG, Schon LC. Biomechanical comparison of locking plate and intramedullary fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Presented at the in American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society 22nd Annual Summer Meeting Final Program; 2006.
Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 2003;34 Suppl 2:B31–42.
Russotti GM, Johnson KA, Cass JR. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for arthritis and deformity of the hind part of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:1304–7.
Ohlson BL, Shatby MW, Parks BG, White KL, Schon LC. Periarticular locking plate vs intramedullary nail for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: A biomechanical investigation. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2011;40:78–83.
Klein MP, Rahn BA, Frigg R, Kessler S, Perren SM. Reaming versus non-reaming in medullary nailing: Interference with cortical circulation of the canine tibia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990;109:314–6.
Gaebler C, McQueen MM, Vécsei V, Court-Brown CM. Reamed versus minimally reamed nailing: A prospectively randomised study of 100 patients with closed fractures of the tibia. Injury 2011;42 Suppl 4:S17–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, C., Shi, Z. & Mei, G. Locking plate versus retrograde intramedullary nail fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. IJOO 49, 227–232 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152492
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152492
Key words
- Locking plate fixation
- retrograde intramedullary nail
- subtalar arthritis
- tibiotalar arthrodesis
- tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis