Abstract
Dual energy computed tomography (DECT) enhances tissue characterization by obtaining two or three material images from two measurements with different X-ray spectra. Recently, multi-material decomposition (MMD) in DECT has been studied to obtain decomposed material images for more than three basis materials. However, the MMD method is highly sensitive to noise fluctuation due to the direct inversion and the material triplet selection for each pixel. Although several studies have reported to reduce the noise resulting from direct inversion, no studies have researched reduction in the image quality degradation caused by material triplet selection. We proposed a MMD framework for DECT that includes pre-decomposition and post-decomposition stages to reduce image quality degradation due to material triplet selection and direct inversion. The total variation denoising method was applied to the pre-decomposition and the post-decomposition stages as a noise suppression algorithm. The digital phantom, tissue characterization phantom, and Catphan phantom were employed as test objects in this study. The volume fraction accuracy (VFA) and the standard deviation (STD) were quantitatively calculated to evaluate the quality of the decomposed images. The results of the proposed method were compared to those of the direct MMD (DMMD) and the MMD with total variation denoising (MMD-TVD) methods. Compared to the DMMD method, the proposed method improved average the VFA value by 11.40%, 17.31%, and 19.13% in the digital phantom, the tissue characterization phantom, and the Catphan phantom studies, respectively. The STD values for the proposed method are better than those of the DMMD method, and are similar to those of the MMD-TVD method. Our method successfully improved quantification accuracy and suppressed noise. In conclusion, the proposed method resulted in quantitatively better multi-material images for DECT.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
R. K. Kaza et al., RadioGraphics 32, 353 (2012).
C. H. McCollough, S. Leng, L. Yu and J. G. Fletcher, Radiology 276, 637 (2015).
M. Patino et al., Radiographics 36, 1087 (2016).
H. W. Goo and J. M. Goo, Korean J. Radiol. 18, 555 (2017).
C. Thomas et al., Eur. Radiol. 19, 1553 (2009).
M. Qu et al., Am. J. Roentgenol. 196, 1279 (2011).
J. Cloutier, L. Villa, O. Traxer and M. Daudon, World J. Urol. 33, 157 (2015).
R. F. Barber, E. Y. Sidky, T. G. Schmidt and X. Pan, Phys. Med. Biol. 61, 3784 (2016).
P. Stenner, T. Berkus and M. Kachelriess, Med. Phys. 34, 3630 (2007).
Y. Long and J. A. Fessler, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 33, 1614 (2014).
P. R. S. Mendonca, P. Lamb and D. V. Sahani, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 33, 99 (2014).
Y. Xue et al., Med. Phys. 44, 886 (2017).
Q. Ding, T. Niu, X. Zhang and Y. Long, Med. Phys. 45, 3614 (2018).
Q. Lyu, D. OConnor, T. Niu and K. Sheng, J. Med. Imaging 6, 044004 (2019).
Y. Xue et al., IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 5, 515 (2019).
Y. Jiang et al., IEEE Tras. Biomed. Eng. 67, 523 (2020).
D. S. Rigie, A. A. Sanchez and P. J. L. Riviere, Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 3284 (2017).
T. Niu, X. Dong, M. Petrongolo and L. Zhu, Med. Phys. 41, 041901 (2014).
A. Chambolle and T. Pock, J. Math. Imaging Vis. 40, 120 (2010).
P. O. Persson and G. Strang, SIAM Rev. 46, 329 (2004).
F. Mirzaei and R. Faghihi, BJR Open 1, 20180008 (2019).
J. H. Hubbell, S. M. Seltzer, NIST. X-ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients. https://www.nist.gov/pml/x-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients, last accessed May 22, 2020.
J. Punnoose et al., Med. Phys. 43, 4711 (2016).
A. K. Carton et al., Br. J. Radiol. 83, 344 (2010).
D. S. Rigie and P. J. L. Riviere, Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 1741 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, H., Kim, HJ., Lee, D. et al. Improvement with the Multi-material Decomposition Framework in Dual-energy Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 77, 515–523 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.515
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.515