Introduction

Since the discovery of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [1], there has been growing interest in their use in many applications [2]. Taking full advantage of CNTs’ properties will require large-scale production of CNTs with lengths of tens of centimeters to meters or more. CNTs are typically grown using catalytic chemical vapor deposition (CVD): carbonaceous gases like methane are flowed at elevated temperature over nanometer-sized particles of catalytic metals, such as iron or cobalt: the gases decompose upon the particles to give carbon atoms, which can dissolve into the metal particles and precipitate out on the particle surface as a graphitic carbon cap. This cap will, if the particle’s diameter is appropriate, lift off, and grow a CNT, with new carbon continuously added at the CNT/particle interface [2]. Interest in maximizing CNT length has resulted in much research on methods to increase this length [3,4,5]. Causes of CNT growth cessation often involve the instability of the catalyst particles, which can change and deactivate over time by mechanisms including Ostwald ripening, coalescence, and diffusion of catalyst into the supporting substrate [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Thus, much recent work has focused on increasing the lifetime and stability of these particles [4, 5, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].

One method to stabilize catalyst particles involves combining the catalysts with heavy refractory metals with higher melting points. Li and co-workers used this method to produce single-walled CNTs (SWCNTs) with narrow, reproducible distributions of chiralities by combining cobalt with tungsten [20, 21]. Amama and co-workers achieved similar results using cobalt combined with ruthenium [22]. Our group has used combination of catalyst with heavy refractories to produce stabilized catalyst particles for growth of longer CNTs [25,26,27]. These particles can give both increased CNT growth lifetime and greater CNT length, compared to pure catalyst metals. Inclusion of rhenium stabilizer with molybdenum [25] or iron [26] catalyst increased CNT growth time and ultimate CNT length, using CO as carbon source gas. Both tungsten (W, MP: 3422 °C) and osmium (Os, MP: 3033 °C) inclusion with iron were found to increase CNT growth time, with the Fe/W combination giving greater ultimate CNT length vs pure Fe, when ethylene (C2H4) was used as carbon source. The interpretation was that the refractories act as “diffusion inhibitors” (or “Ostwald ripening inhibitors”), binding catalyst atoms strongly enough that the latter cannot detach from the nanoparticle and diffuse across the substrate and thus slowing the Ostwald ripening that would eventually deactivate the particles. This results in longer particle lifetime, longer CNT growth time, and greater ultimate CNT length. Note that, in this context, catalyst particle lifetime is the same as CNT growth time, since the particle is still considered “live” for as long as the CNT is growing.

Here, we investigate Hafnium (Hf, MP: 2233 °C), Tantalum (Ta, MP: 3017 °C), and Ruthenium (Ru MP: 2334 °C) combined with iron catalyst (Fe, MP: 1538 °C) to grow CNTs using C2H4 as carbon source. We find that both Fe/Hf and Fe/Ta catalysts increase CNT growth time compared to pure Fe, but decrease growth rate. For Fe/Hf catalysts, the ultimate CNT length is greater than for pure Fe, while for Fe/Ta, the growth rate reduction is such that ultimate CNT length is less. Fe/Ru catalyst behaves interestingly: growth rate is increased over pure Fe, while the growth time is approximately the same as for Fe alone.

Experimental

The processes of supported metal catalyst preparation and CNT growth for these studies have been described previously [25,26,27]. Substrates were silicon wafers topped with 1000-nm thermal oxide (SiO2) and 15 nm evaporatively deposited Al2O3. Onto these substrates were deposited metal catalysts of controlled composition and thickness using spin-on toluene solutions with controlled concentrations of organometallic compounds containing the metal atoms. The substrates were then plasma ashed, leaving thin films of oxides of the metals, the films’ thickness being determined by the concentration of organometallics in the spin-on solution.

CNT’s were grown on catalyst-coated substrates in a tube furnace CVD reactor containing a 1-inch-diameter quartz tube through which reactive gas mixtures were flowed at elevated temperatures. Our CNT growth process used a mixture of Ar, C2H4, and H2, with flows of 100, 25, and 25 sccm, respectively. This mixture was flowed through the reactor tube at 1 atmosphere pressure at 750 °C, which resulted in growth of dense mats of CNTs growing upward from the substrate surface. CNT length was determined by measuring the thickness of these CNT mats using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). We grew CNT mats from pure Fe catalyst and from mixed-metal catalyst films consisting of equal parts (same equivalent thicknesses) of Fe and refractory metal, with total thickness of 1.0 nm. These mixed-metal films contained metal amounts equivalent to 0.5-nm Fe and 0.5-nm diffusion inhibitor, although our preparation procedure insured that the metal atoms were intermixed at the atomic level.

Results

We have found previously [27] that, for our CVD system, the global maximum of CNT length achieved with Fe catalyst is given using Fe film thickness of 1.0 nm and temperature of 750 °C and so these conditions were used here. Under these conditions, CNTs grew from both pure Fe catalyst and from combinations of iron with heavy diffusion inhibitors. We tested a variety of high-melting point metals as diffusion inhibitors, including Hf, Ta, and Ru, which gave robust, consistent growth when combined with Fe, and were investigated further. Additionally, we tested as potential diffusion inhibitors iridium, niobium, molybdenum, and rhenium. These metals, combined with Fe, gave either no CNT growth (Mo), extremely non-reproducible and inconsistent growth (Re), or consistent growth of very short CNTs (ultimate length ≤ 3 μm, Ir and Nb). Note that combining Re with Fe gave good, consistent CNT growth previously with CO as carbon source gas [26], but not so here with C2H4.

CNT lengths were measured versus growth time for Fe/Hf, Fe/Ta, and Fe/Ru catalyst mixtures, with catalyst and diffusion inhibitor each present at equivalent thickness of 0.5 nm. These combinations are denoted below as Fe5Hf5, Fe5Ta5, and Fe5Ru5. We compared these results to CNT growth from pure Fe films with thickness of 1.0 nm (same total metal thickness) and 0.5 nm (same amount of catalytic Fe metal), which have also been investigated previously [27]. These films are denoted below as Fe10 and Fe5.

CNT growth gave dense CNT mats for the catalysts Fe5Hf5, Fe5Ta5, Fe5Ru5, Fe10, and Fe5, as described above. The time dependence of the CNT growth was determined using a series of CNT growth experiments, with time allowed for growth varied between 4 and 60 min. The observed CNT length-versus-time curves were qualitatively similar to previously observed curves: the CNTs grow initially at a constant rate, with growth slowing and eventually stopping over time. No growth was observed when using metal films of pure Hf, Ta, or Ru, indicating that, under the conditions we used, all catalytic activity for CNT growth from these mixed metals arises from iron. Note that it is possible that the pure refractory metals could yield CNT under different growth conditions.

Typical results are displayed in Fig. 1, which shows SEM images of CNT mats grown for increasing times from films of 0.5-nm Fe mixed with 0.5-nm Hf. Figure 2 shows CNT length vs growth time for all catalysts studied. Error bars in Fig. 2 show the standard error in measured CNT length from multiple growth runs (typically 2–4 for each point). For both pure Fe and Fe/inhibitor catalysts, TEM analysis showed that the CNTs were primarily double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs), with occasional nanotubes having three or more walls. Typical tube diameters were 5–10 nm. No significant differences were noted in wall number or diameter distribution between CNT grown from Fe vs Fe/inhibitor for any of the inhibitors studied. Figure 3 shows TEM images of representative nanotubes from each catalyst investigated.

Fig. 1
figure 1

SEM images of CNT mats grown using Fe5Hf5 catalyst for a 8 min; b 30 min; and c 60 min

Fig. 2
figure 2

CNT length vs growth time for all catalyst films investigated

Fig. 3
figure 3

TEM images of CNTs grown from a Fe10; b Fe5; c Fe5Hf5; d Fe5Ta5; and e Fe5Ru5

Discussion

As previously reported [27], Fe10 and Fe5 catalyst films show qualitatively similar time-dependent CNT growth behavior. CNTs from Fe5 grow rapidly for a short time, reaching approximately 350–400 µm length in 4–5-min time, after which growth ceases. Fe10 catalysts CNT grow for a longer time, reaching approximately 800 µm after 15 min of growth. Both catalysts show some run-to-run variation in final CNT length for growth times exceeding the CNT growth lifetime; however, no systematic lengthening occurs after the above growth times.

This behavior changes if the catalyst includes refractory metal stabilizer. Consider first Fe5Hf5 catalyst. The CNT growth rate is less than that for either Fe5 or Fe10, with CNT length less than those given by the pure Fe catalysts for any time during which the latter are still growing. However, CNTs from Fe5Hf5 continue to grow for times substantially past the growth cessation times of Fe10 and Fe5, so that CNTs from Fe5Hf5 eventually grow longer than the ultimate lengths from pure Fe. Indeed, it appears that CNTs from Fe5Hf5 may still be lengthening even after growth time of 1 h, the maximum growth time investigated in this study, by which time these CNTS have reached approximately 1000 µm length. Addition of Hf thus produces two effects: it decreases the catalytic activity of the catalyst, hence the slower growth rate and increases the stability of the catalyst particles, hence the greater growth time. An analogous effect is seen if Ta is used as refractory stabilizer. Figure 2 shows that CNTs from Fe5Ta5 lengthen uniformly for approximately 30 min, after which growth ceases. However, the growth rate is substantially slower Fe5Ta5 for pure iron, so that the ultimate CNT length from Fe5Ta5 is only approximately 200 µm despite the increased growth time.

The CNT growth behavior of the Fe/Hf and Fe/Ta catalysts mirrors the behavior seen in our previous studies of W and Os diffusion inhibitors [27]. Combination of diffusion inhibitor with catalytic Fe decreases the catalytic activity of the catalyst, resulting in slower growth rate than given by pure Fe. However, all these stabilizers result in longer growth times, indicating that the catalyst particles are stabilized and retain their CNT growth-generating capability for increased times. Whether greater ultimate CNT length results depends on the balance between these two effects. For stabilizers like Hf and W [27], the decrease in CNT growth rate is more than compensated for by the increase in growth time, thus the CNTs are longer when growth ceases. On the other hand, inhibitors like Ta degrade the CNT growth rate to an extent that, even with the enhanced growth time, the final CNT length is still less than given by pure Fe catalyst. In our previous work, we saw that for Os diffusion inhibitor these two effects approximately cancel, so that the ultimate CNT length for Fe/Os was approximately the same as that given by pure Fe [27]. This combination of factors appears to be a general effect for Fe catalyst: the stabilizer results in longer-lived catalyst particles and longer growth times, at the price of decreased catalytic activity and slower growth rate. Whether ultimately longer CNTs are achieved depends on the trade-off between these two factors.

The case of Fe combined with Ru shows qualitatively different behaviors. Figure 2 shows that Fe5Ru5 catalyst gives increased initial CNT growth rate over pure Fe of either tested thickness. On the other hand, growth time is certainly no greater than and possibly less than that given by Fe10, although this time is still greater than for Fe5. This behavior is reversed from that seen for the other diffusion inhibitors. The ultimate length given by CNTs from Fe5Ru5 is approximately the same as that given by Fe10, approximately 800 µm. This pattern of behavior is difficult to explain with our diffusion inhibitor ideas, and it appears that a different type of chemical reactivity change is induced in the iron by ruthenium. Ruthenium is known as a strongly catalytic metal for many reactions, either on its own or in combination with metals like iron [28,29,30]. Instances are known for which the combination of Fe plus Ru will catalytically accelerate a chemical reaction to a greater extent than either metal does separately [28, 30]. Thus, it may simply be that the combination of Fe and Ru results in a higher catalytic activity than Fe alone for the conversion of C2H4 into solid carbon (as CNTs), giving faster CNT growth rate. Future studies will continue to explore the case of CNT growth using Fe/Ru catalysts.

Conclusion

These results provide additional evidence for and examples of the increase afforded to both CNT growth time and ultimate CNT length from inclusion of heavy refractory diffusion inhibitor metals with catalytic metals. We observe that addition of Hf to Fe catalyst gives both longer growth times and greater ultimate CNT length than given by Fe alone. Fe alone gives growth time of approximately 15 min, whereas Fe/Hf appears to give CNT growth time of at least 60 min, implying at least a factor of four increase in catalytic particle lifetime. The slower growth rate from Fe/Hf vs Fe dictates that the increase in CNT length is not this great, but comparison of the ultimate lengths observed (approximately 800 μm for Fe vs 1000 μm for Fe/Hf) implies an increase in CNT length by at least a factor of 1.25. Fe/Ta behaves qualitatively similarly, with growth time of approximately 30 min, a factor of 2 greater than pure Fe. However, the lower growth rate for Fe/Ta dictates that ultimate CNT length from Fe/Ta catalyst is still less than from Fe catalyst. Fe/Ru combined catalyst gives qualitatively different behaviors, with faster growth rate and no clear difference in growth time. Ultimate CNT length from Fe/Ru is approximately equal to that from pure Fe catalyst.

Future research will include varying catalyst/inhibitor ratio and total metal thickness of our metal catalysts, as well as CVD temperature and reactive gas mixture composition. Ultimately, it is hoped that this method will enable production of large-scale quantities of ultra-long CNTs for materials applications.