Abstract
The α-amylase enzyme specificity has been classified in the Carbohydrate-Active enZyme (CAZy) database into the families GH13, GH57, GH119 and eventually also GH126. α-Amylase is a glycoside hydrolase (GH) that catalyses in an endo-fashion the hydrolysis of the α-1,4-glucosidic linkages in starch and related α-glucans employing the retaining reaction mechanism. The family GH13 is the main a-amylase family with more than 28,000 members and 30 different specificities. The entire family GH13 has already been divided into 40 subfamilies; the a-amylase enzyme specificity being found in the subfamilies GH13_1, 5, 6, 7, 15, 19, 24, 27, 28, 32, 36 and 37. The present in silico study delivers a proposal to create a novel GH13 subfamily with the specificity of a-amylase. The proposal is based on a detailed bioinformatics analysis consisting of sequence, structural and evolutionary comparison of experimentally characterized a-amylases from, e.g., Bacillus aquimaris, Anoxybacillus sp. SK3-4 and DT3-1 and Geobacillus thermoleovorans, and hypothetical proteins, accompanied by a-amylases from well-established GH13 subfamilies and by closely related amylolytic enzymes (mainly from the subfamily GH13_31). Three sequence-structural features can be ascribed to the members of the newly proposed GH13 subfamily: (i) the pair of adjacent tryptophan residues positioned between the CSR-V and CSR-II in the helix a3 of the catalytic TIM-barrel; (ii) the sequence LPDlx in their CSR-V; and (iii) a ~30-residue long C-terminal region with a motif of five conserved aromatic residues. From the evolutionary point of view, the novel GH13 a-amylase subfamily is most closely related to fungal and yeast a-amylases classified in the subfamily GH13_1.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- BaqA:
-
Bacillus aquimaris a-amylase
- CAZy:
-
Carbohydrate-Active enZymes
- CSR:
-
conserved sequence region
- GH:
-
glycoside hydrolase
- PDB:
-
Protein Data Bank
References
Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W. & Lipman D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403–410.
Ballschmiter M., Armbrecht M., Ivanova K., Antranikian G. & Liebl W. 2005. AmyA, an α-amylase with β-cyclodextrin-forming activity, and AmyB from the thermoalkaliphilic organism Anaerobranca gottschalkii: two α-amylases adapted to their different cellular localizations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 3709–3715.
Benson D.A., Clark K., Karsch-Mizrachi I., Lipman D.J., Ostell J. & Sayers E.W. 2014. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 42: D32–D37.
Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I.N. & Bourne P.E. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 235–242.
Blesak K. & Janecek S. 2012. Sequence fingerprints of enzyme specificities from the glycoside hydrolase family GH57. Ex-tremophiles 16: 497–506.
Blesak K. & Janecek S. 2013. Two potentially novel amylolytic enzyme specificities in the prokaryotic glycoside hydrolase α-amylase family GH57. Microbiology 159: 2584–2593.
Cantarel B.L., Coutinho P.M., Rancurel C., Bernard T., Lombard V. & Henrissat B. 2009. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: D233–D238.
Carvalho C.C., Phan N.N., Chen Y. & Reilly P.J. 2015. Carbohydrate-binding module tribes. Biopolymers 103: 203–214.
Chai Y.Y., Rahman R.N., Illias R.M. & Goh K.M. 2012. Cloning and characterization of two new thermostable and alkalitolerant α-amylases from the Anoxybacillus species that produce high levels of maltose. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39: 731–741.
Crooks G.E., Hon G., Chandonia J.M. & Brenner S.E. 2004. We-bLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14: 1188–1190.
Da Lage J.L., Binder M., Hua-Van A., Janecek S. & Casane D. 2013. Gene make-up: rapid and massive intron gains after horizontal transfer of a bacterial α-amylase gene to Basid-iomycetes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13: 40.
Da Lage J.L., Danchin E.G. & Casane D. 2007. Where do animal α-amylases come from? An interkingdom trip. FEBS Lett. 581: 3927–3935.
Da Lage J.L., Feller G. & Janecek S. 2004. Horizontal gene transfer from Eukarya to bacteria and domain shuffling: the α-amylase model. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 61: 97–109.
D’Amico S., Gerday C. & Feller G. 2000. Structural similarities and evolutionary relationships in chloride-dependent α-amylases. Gene 253: 95–105.
Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence-limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.
Ficko-Blean E., Stuart C.P. & Boraston A.B. 2011. Structural analysis of CPF_2247, a novel α-amylase from Clostridium perfringens. Proteins 79: 2771–2777.
Finore I., Kasavi C., Poli A., Romano I., Toksoy Oner E., Kirdar B., Dipasquale L., Nicolaus B. & Lama L. 2011. Purification, biochemical characterization and gene sequencing of a thermostable raw starch digesting α-amylase from Geobacil-lus thermoleovorans subsp. stromboliensis subsp. nov. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 27: 2425–2433.
Fritzsche H.B., Schwede T. & Schulz G.E. 2003. Covalent and three-dimensional structure of the cyclodextrinase from Flavobacterium sp. no. 92. Eur. J. Biochem. 270: 2332–2341.
Henrissat B. 1991. A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem. J. 280: 309–316.
Hondoh H., Saburi W., Mori H., Okuyama M., Nakada T., Matsuura Y. & Kimura A. 2008. Substrate recognition mechanism of α-1,6-glucosidic linkage hydrolyzing enzyme, dextran glucosidase from Streptococcus mutans. J. Mol. Biol. 378: 913–922.
Hostinova E., Janecek S. & Gasperik J. 2010. Gene sequence, bioinformatics and enzymatic characterization of α-amylase from Saccharomycopsis fibuligeraKZ. Protein J. 29: 355–364.
Janecek S. 1994. Sequence similarities and evolutionary relationships of microbial, plant and animal α-amylases. Eur. J. Biochem. 224: 519–524.
Janecek S. 2002. How many conserved sequence regions are there in the α-amylase family? Biologia 57(Suppl 11): 29–41.
Janecek S. & Kuchtova A. 2012. In silico identification of catalytic residues and domain fold of the family GH119 sharing the catalytic machinery with the α-amylase family GH57. FEBS Lett. 586: 3360–3366.
Janecek S., Svensson B. & MacGregor E.A. 2011. Structural and evolutionary aspects of two families of non-catalytic domains present in starch and glycogen binding proteins from microbes, plants and animals. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 49: 429–440.
Janecek S., Svensson B. & MacGregor E.A. 2014. α-Amylase -an enzyme specificity found in various families of glycoside hydrolases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71: 1149–1170.
Kelley L.A. & Sternberg M.J.E. 2009. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat. Protoc. 4: 363–371.
Kelly R.M., Dijkhuizen L. & Leemhuis H. 2009. Starch and α-glucan acting enzymes, modulating their properties by directed evolution. J. Biotechnol. 140: 184–193.
Kuriki T. & Imanaka T. 1999. The concept of the α-amylase family: structural similarity and common catalytic mechanism. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 87: 557–565.
Larkin M.A., Blackshields G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I.M., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J. & Higgins D.G. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948.
Lei Y., Peng H., Wang Y., Liu Y., Han F., Xiao Y. & Gao Y. 2012. Preferential and rapid degradation of raw rice starch by an α-amylase of glycoside hydrolase subfamily GH13_37. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 94: 1577–1584.
Letunic I. & Bork P. 2007. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23: 127–128.
Leveque E., Janecek S., Belarbi A. & Haye B. 2000. Thermophilic archaeal amylolytic enzymes. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 26: 2–13.
Li C., Du M., Cheng B., Wang L., Liu X., Ma C., Yang C. & Xu P. 2014. Close relationship of a novel Flavobacteriaceae α-amylase with archaeal α-amylases and good potentials for industrial applications. Biotechnol. Biofuels 7: 18.
Liu Y., Lei Y., Zhang X., Gao Y., Xiao Y. & Peng H. 2012. Identification and phylogenetic characterization of a new subfamily of α-amylase enzymes from marine microorganisms. Mar. Biotechnol. (NY) 14: 253–260.
Lombard V., Golaconda Ramulu H., Drula E., Coutinho P.M. & Henrissat B. 2014. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: D490–D495.
Long C.M., Virolle M.J., Chang S.Y., Chang S. & Bibb M.J. 1987. α-Amylase gene of Streptomyces limosus: nucleotide sequence, expression motifs, and amino acid sequence homology to mammalian and invertebrate α-amylases. J. Bacteriol. 169: 5745–5754.
MacGregor E.A., Janecek S. & Svensson B. 2001. Relationship of sequence and structure to specificity in the α-amylase family of enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1546: 1–20.
Majzlova K., Pukajova Z. & Janecek S. 2013. Tracing the evolution of the α-amylase subfamily GH13_36 covering the amylolytic enzymes intermediate between oligo-1,6-glucosidases and neopullulanases. Carbohydr. Res. 367: 48–57.
Matsuura Y., Kusunoki M., Harada W. & Kakudo M. 1984. Structure and possible catalytic residues of Takaamylase A. J. Biochem. 95: 697–702.
Mehta D. & Satyanarayana T. 2014. Domain C of thermostable α-amylase of Geobacillus thermoleovorans mediates raw starch adsorption. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98: 4503–4519.
Mok S.C., Teh A.H., Saito J.A., Najimudin N. & Alam M. 2013. Crystal structure of a compact α-amylase from Geobacillus thermoleovorans. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 53: 46–54.
Nakao M., Nakayama T., Kakudo A., Inohara M., Harada M., Omura F. & Shibano Y. 1994. Structure and expression of a gene coding for thermostable α-glucosidase with a broad substrate specificity from Bacillus sp. SAM1606. Eur J Biochem 220: 293–300.
Oslancova A. & Janecek S. 2002. Oligo-1,6-glucosidase and neop-ullulanase enzyme subfamilies from the α-amylase family defined by the fifth conserved sequence region. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59: 1945–1959.
Palomo M., Pijning T., Booiman T., Dobruchowska J.M., van der Vlist J., Kralj S., Planas A., Loos K., Kamerling J.P., Dijkstra B.W., van der Maarel M.J., Dijkhuizen L. & Leemhuis H. 2011. Thermus thermophilus glycoside hydrolase family 57 branching enzyme:crystal structure, mechanism of action, and products formed. J. Biol. Chem. 286: 3520–3530.
Park K.H., Jung J.H., Park S.G., Lee M.E., Holden J.F., Park C.S. & Woo E.J. 2014. Structural features underlying the selective cleavage of a novel exo-type maltose-forming amylase from Pyrococcus sp. ST04. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 70: 1659–1668.
Puspasari F., Nurachman Z., Noer A.S., Radjasa O.K., van der Maarel M.J.E.C. & Natalia D. 2011. Characteristics of raw starch degrading α-amylase from Bacillus aquimaris MKSC 6.2 associated with soft coral Sinularia sp. Starch - Stärke 63: 461–467.
Puspasari F., Radjasa O.K., Noer A.S., Nurachman Z., Syah Y.M., van der Maarel M., Dijkhuizen L., Janecek S. & Natalia D. 2013. Raw starch-degrading α-amylase from Bacillus aquimaris MKSC 6.2: isolation and expression of the gene, bioinformatics and biochemical characterization of the recombinant enzyme. J. Appl. Microbiol. 114: 108–120.
Ranjani V., Janecek S., Chai K.P., Shahir S., Noor R., Abdul Rahman Z.R., Chan K.G. & Goh K.M. 2014. Protein engineering of selected residues from conserved sequence regions of a novel Anoxybacillus α-amylase. Sci. Rep. 4: 5850.
Saitou N. & Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406–425.
Sharma A. & Satyanarayana T. 2013. Microbial acid-stable α-amylases: characteristics, genetic engineering and applications. Process Biochem. 48: 201–211.
Shatsky M., Nussinov R. & Wolfson H.J. 2004. A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures. Proteins 56: 143–156.
Sivakumar N., Li N., Tang J.W., Patel B.K. & Swaminathan K. 2006. Crystal structure of AmyA lacks acidic surface and provide insights into protein stability at poly-extreme condition. FEBS Lett. 580: 2646–2652.
Stam M.R., Danchin E.G., Rancurel C., Coutinho P.M. & Henrissat B. 2006. Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies:towards improved functional annotations of α-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 19: 555–562.
Stanley D., Farnden K.J.F. & MacRae E.A. 2005. Plant α-amylases: functions and roles in carbohydrate metabolism. Biologia 60(Suppl.16): 65–71.
Svensson B. 1994. Protein engineering in the α-amylase family: catalytic mechanism, substrate specificity, and stability. Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 141–157.
UniProt Consortium 2014. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 42: D191–D198.
van der Maarel M.J., van der Veen B., Uitdehaag J.C., Leemhuis H. & Dijkhuizen L. 2002. Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the α-amylase family. J. Biotechnol. 94: 137–155.
van Zyl W.H., Bloom M. & Viktor M.J. 2012. Engineering yeasts for raw starch conversion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 95: 1377–1388.
Watanabe H., Nishimoto T., Kubota M., Chaen H. & Fukuda S. 2006. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of the genes encoding an isocyclomaltooligosaccharide glucanotransferase and an α-amylase from a Bacillus circulans strain. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 70: 2690–2702.
Watanabe K., Hata Y., Kizaki H., Katsube Y. & Suzuki Y. 1997. The refined crystal structure of Bacillus cereus oligo-1,6-glucosidase at 2.0 Å resolution: structural characterization of proline-substitution sites for protein thermostabilization. J. Mol. Biol. 269: 142–153.
Zhang D., Li N., Lok S.M., Zhang L.H. & Swaminathan K. 2003. Isomaltulose synthase (PalI) of Klebsiella sp. LX3. Crystal structure and implication of mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 35428–35434.
Zona R., Chang-Pi-Hin F., O’Donohue M.J. & Janecek S. 2004. Bioinformatics of the family 57 glycoside hydrolases and identification of catalytic residues in amylopullulanase from Ther-mococcus hydrothermalis. Eur. J. Biochem. 271: 2863–2872.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Janeček, Š., Kuchtová, A. & Petrovičová, S. A novel GH13 subfamily of α-amylases with a pair of tryptophans in the helix α3 of the catalytic TIM-barrel, the LPDlx signature in the conserved sequence region V and a conserved aromatic motif at the C-terminus. Biologia 70, 1284–1294 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0165
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0165