Abstract
Wetlands have recently become of high environmental interest. The restoration effects on habitats like fens are one of the main topics of recent restoration ecology, especially due to their interconnection with other ecosystems. We studied the manual mowing effect on abandoned fen using the response of three study taxa: diurnal butterflies, flower-visiting beetles and vascular plants. Our results showed that butterflies seems to be quickly-responding indicator taxon for evaluation and that restored management had a positive effect on both species richness and composition of this insect group. The results indicated that the manual mowing effect could be rapid. In comparison with the surrounding landscape, we found that: (i) the manually mowed site was most similar to strictly protected area, (ii) some species of high conservation value could reach higher abundance in restored than protected site, and (iii) manual mowing could bring a new type of habitat (i.e., spatial heterogeneity) compared to the other management types (abandonment, conservation and agri-environmental mowing). The main implication seems to be optimistic for practice: The manual mowing of long-term abandoned fen is leading to the creation of habitat with high conservation value in a relatively short time.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Benes J., Konvicka M., Dvorak J., Fric Z., Havelda Z., Pavlicko A., Vrabec V. & Weidenhoffer Z. 2002. Motýli České republiky: Rozšíření a ochrana I, II. SOM, Praha, 857 pp. ISBN: 8090321208
Billeter R., Peintinger M. & Diemer M. 2007. Restoration of montane fen meadows by mowing remains possible after 4–35 years of abandonment. Botanica Helvetica 117 (1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s00035-007-0743-9
Chao A. 1984. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Statist. 11 (4): 265–270.
Cizek O., Zamecnik J., Tropek R., Kocarek P. & Konvicka M. 2012. Diversification of mowing regime increases arthropods diversity in species-poor cultural hay meadows. J. Insect Con-serv. 16 (2): 215–226. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-011-9407-6
Colwell R.K. 2006. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8, http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimatesestimates. (Accessed 05.05.2010)
Ehrenfeld J.G. 2000. Defining the limits of restoration: the need for realistic goals. Restor. Ecol. 8 (1): 2–9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80002.x
Ellenberg H. 1988. Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. 4th edition. Cambridge University Press, Avon, 731 pp. ISBN: 0-531-23642-8
Faltysová H. et al. 2002. Pardubicko, pp. 18–20. In: Mackovčin P. & Sedláček M. (eds), Chráněná území ČR, svazek IV. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR a EkoCentrum Brno, Praha, 316 pp. ISBN: 80-86064-44-1
Fric Z., Wahlberg N., Pech P. & Zrzavy J. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of the Phengaris-Maculinea clade (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): total evidence and phylogenetic species concepts. Syst. Entomol. 32 (3): 558–567. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2007.00387.x
Gotelli N.J. & Colwell R.K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4 (4): 379–391. DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x
Grill A., Cleary D.F.R., Stettmer C., Brau M. & Settele J. 2008. A mowing experiment to evaluate the influence of management on the activity of host ants of Maculinea butterflies. J. Insect Conserv. 12 (6): 617–627. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-007-9098-1
Hedberg P. & Kotowski W. 2010. New nature by sowing? The current state of species introduction in grassland restoration, and the road ahead. J. Nat. Conserv. 18 (4): 304–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2010.01.003
Hobbs R.J. & Harris J.A. 2001. Restoration ecology: repairing the Earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restor. Ecol. 9 (2): 239–246. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002239.x
Horak J. 2013. Effect of site level environmental variables, spatial autocorrelation and sampling intensity on arthropod communities in an ancient temperate lowland woodland area. PLoS ONE 8 (12): e81541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081541
Horák J., Chobot K. & Horáková J. 2012. Hanging on by the tips of the tarsi: a review of the plight of the critically endangered saproxylic beetle in European forests. J. Nat. Conserv. 20 (2): 101–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.09.002
Horak J., Peltanova A., Podavkova A., Safarova L., Bogusch P., Romportl D. & Zasadil P. 2013. Biodiversity responses to land use in traditional fruit orchards of a rural agricultural landscape. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 178: 71–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.020
Humbert J.-Y., Ghazoul J., & Walter T. 2009. Meadow harvesting techniques and their impacts on field fauna. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 130 (1–2): 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.11.014
Jones H.P. & Schmitz O.J. 2009. Rapid recovery of damaged ecosystems. PLoS ONE 4 (5): e5653. DOI: 10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0005653
Klimkowska A., Kotowski W., van Diggelen R., Grootjans A.P., Dzierza P. & Brzezinska K. 2010. Vegetation re-development after fen meadow restoration by topsoil removal and hay transfer. Restor. Ecol. 18 (6): 924–933. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00554.x
Konvicka M., Benes J., Cizek O., Kopecek F., Konvicka O. & Vitaz L. 2008. How too much care kills species: grassland reserves, agrienvironmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold. J. Insect Conserv. 12 (5): 519–525. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-007-9092-7
Láska F. 1936. Obec Sruby v historii, pamětech a vzpomínkách. Loutkáře, Choceň, 275 pp.
Leps J., Dolezal J., Bezemer T.M., Brown V.K., Hedlund K., Igual Arroyo M., Jorgensen H.B., Lawson C.S., Mortimer S.R., Peix Geldart A., Rodriguez Barrueco C., Santa Regina I., Smilauer P. & van der Putten W.H. 2007. Long-term effectiveness of sowing high and low diversity seed mixtures to enhance plant community development on ex-arable fields. Appl. Veg. Sci. 10 (1): 97–110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2007.tb00508.x
Moreno-Mateos D., Power M.E., Comin F.A. & Yockteng R. 2012. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biology 10 (1): e1001247. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio. 1001247
Mouquet N., Belrose V., Thomas J.A., Elmes G.W., Clarke R.T. & Hochberg M.E. 2005. Conserving community modules: a case study the endangered Lycaenid butterfly Maculinea alcon. Ecology 86: 3160–3173. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/04-1664
Nathan R. 2006. Long-distance dispersal of plants. Science 313 (5788): 786–788. DOI: 10.1126/science. 1124975
Noordijk J., Delille K., Schaffers A.P. & Sykora K.V. 2009. Optimizing grassland management for flower-visiting insects in roadside verges. Biol. Conserv. 142 (10): 2097–2103. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.009
Novotny V. & Basset Y. 2000. Ecological characteristics of rare species in communities of tropical insect herbivores: pondering the mystery of singletons. Oikos 89 (3): 564–572. DOI: 10.1034/j. 1600-0706.2000.890316.x
Oksanen L. 2001. Logic of experiments in ecology: is pseu-doreplication a pseudoissue? Oikos 94 (1): 27–38. DOI: 10.1034/j. 1600-0706.2001.11311.x
Prach K. 1993. Vegetation changes in a wet meadow complex, South-Bohemia, Czech Republic. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 28 (1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/BF02853197
Rainio J. & Niemela J. 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Cara-bidae) as bioindicators. Biodiv. Conserv. 12 (3): 487–506. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1022412617568
Roberts L., Stone R. & Sugden A. 2009. The rise of restoration ecology. Science 325 (5940): 555. DOI: 10.1126/science. 325 555
Steffan-Dewenter I. & Tscharntke T. 1997. Early succession of butterfly and plant communities on set-aside fields. Oecologia 109 (2): 294–302. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050087
Sundberg S. 2012. Quick target vegetation recovery after restorative shrub removal and mowing in a calcareous fen. Restor. Ecol. 20 (3): 331–338. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00782.x
ter Braak C.J.F. & Smilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA, 500 pp. www. canoco. com
Václavík F. 1869. Meliorace, čili zlepšení pozemků pro umělé povodňování a opatrování luk, rolí a lesů s poukázáním na dřímající dosud v zemi kapitály, na důležitost lesů, nutnost brzké opravy zákona vodního, na drenažování vlhkých pozemnků a na kanalizování Čech. Praha, Tiskem dra. Edv. Grégrá, 254 pp.
Valkó O., Török P., Matus G. & Tóthmérész B. 2012. Is regular mowing the most appropriate and cost-effective management maintaining diversity and biomass of target forbs in mountain hay meadows? Flora–Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 207 (4): 303–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2012.02.003
Wynhoff I. 1998. Lessons from the reintroduction of Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous in the Netherlands. J. Insect Conserv. 2 (1): 47–57. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009692723056
Zedler J.B. & Callaway J.C. 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow established trajectories? Restor. Ecol. 7 (1): 69–73. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.07108.x
Zedler J.B. 2000. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 (10): 402–407. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01959-5
Zimmermann K., Fric Z., Filipova L. & Konvicka M. 2005. Adult demography, dispersal and behaviour of Brenthis ino (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): how to be a successful wetland butterfly. Eur. J. Entomol. 102 (4): 699–706. DOI: 10.14411/eje.2005.100
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the non-governmental organisation Lesák, o.s. (http://www.lesak.eu) for logistics and the creation of different management activities, D. Kurková, J. Stratílek, J. Matoušek and J. Šimek for historical information, L. Bourdon for English proof reading and two reviewers for suggestions. This research was partly supported by the Grant CIGA no. 20144302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horak, J., Safarova, L. Effect of reintroduced manual mowing on biodiversity in abandoned fen meadows. Biologia 70, 113–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0009
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0009