Abstract
Under investigation in this paper is a (2+1)-dimensional generalized Bogoyavlensky–Konopelchenko equation in fluid mechanics and plasma physics. We obtain the Lie point symmetry generators, Lie symmetry group and symmetry reductions via the Lie group method. Hyperbolic-function, power-series, trigonometric-function, soliton and rational solutions are derived via the power-series expansion, polynomial expansion and \(\left( \frac{G^{'}}{G}\right) \) expansion method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Nonlinear evolution equations (NLEEs) have been applied in fluid mechanics, plasma physics and nonlinear optics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Researchers have proposed certain methods for solving the NLEEs, such as the Darboux transformation, Bäcklund transformation, inverse scattering transformation, Lie group, consistent Riccati expansion, power-series expansion, polynomial expansion, \(\left( \frac{G^{'}}{G}\right) \) expansion and Hirota bilinear methods [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. The Lie group method has been used to look for the group invariance and certain reductions to the NLEEs [38, 54,55,56,57]. Based on the reduced equations, certain solutions for the NLEEs have been constructed [17, 18, 58, 59].
A (2+1)-dimensional generalized Bogoyavlensky–Konopelchenko (gBK) equation in fluid mechanics and plasma physics has been constructed as [60]
where \(u=u(x,y,t)\) is a real function, x and y are the scaled space variables, t is the scaled time variable, \(k_1\), \(k_2\), \(k_3\), \(\gamma _1\), \(\gamma _2\) and \(\gamma _3\) are the real constants and the subscripts denote the partial derivatives. Lump-type and lump solutions for Eq. (1) have been derived via the Hirota bilinear method [60].
Special cases for Eq. (1) in fluid mechanics and plasma physics have been seen:
-
When \(k_3=3\), \(k_2=1\) and \(k_1=\gamma _1=\gamma _2=\gamma _3=0\), by virtue of a dimensional reduction \(u_{y}\)=\(u_{x}\) and a potential function transformation h(x, t) = \(u_{x}(x,t)\), Eq. (1) has been reduced to the Korteweg-de Vries equation,
$$\begin{aligned} h_{t}+h_{xxx}+6hh_{x}=0, \end{aligned}$$(2)for certain shallow water waves, stratified internal waves in a fluid or ion-acoustic waves in a plasma [61,62,63,64,65,66].
-
When \(k_2=1\), \(k_3=4\) and \(k_1=\gamma _1=\gamma _2=\gamma _3=0\), Eq. (1) has been reduced to the Bogoyavlenskii’s breaking soliton equation,
$$\begin{aligned} u_{xt}+u_{xxxy}+4u_{xx}u_{y}+4u_{x}u_{xy}=0, \end{aligned}$$(3)for the interaction of a Riemann wave propagating along the y axis and a long wave propagating along the x axis in fluid mechanics [67].
-
When \(k_2=1\), \(k_3=3\) and \(k_1=\gamma _1=0\), Eq. (1) has been reduced to the generalized Calogero–Bogoyavlenskii–Schiff equation [68],
$$\begin{aligned} u_{xt}+u_{xxxy}+3u_{xx}u_{y}+3u_{x}u_{xy}+\gamma _2u_{xy}+\gamma _3u_{yy}=0. \end{aligned}$$(4)
However, to our knowledge, the Lie point symmetry generators, Lie symmetry group and symmetry reductions for Eq. (1) have not been discussed. Hyperbolic-function, power-series, trigonometric-function, soliton and rational solutions for Eq. (1) have not yet been investigated via the Lie group method. In Sect. 2, the Lie point symmetry generators and Lie symmetry group for Eq. (1) will be derived. In Sect. 3, symmetry reductions as well as hyperbolic-function, power-series, trigonometric-function, soliton and rational solutions for Eq. (1) will be obtained through the Lie point symmetry generators. In Sect. 4, the conclusions will be given.
2 Lie group analysis for Eq. (1)
2.1 Lie point symmetry generators for Eq. (1)
According to the Lie group method [54], we consider a one-parameter Lie group of the infinitesimal transformations acting on the independent and dependent variables as
where \({\tilde{x}}\), \({\tilde{y}}\), \({\tilde{t}}\), \({\tilde{u}}\), \(\xi \), \(\eta \), \(\tau \) and \(\phi \) are the real functions of x, y, t and u, \(\epsilon \) is a parameter of the infinitesimal transformation and \(O(\epsilon ^2)\) is the infinitesimal of the same order of \(\epsilon ^2\).
Lie point symmetry generators for Eq. (1) are
with \(\xi \), \(\eta \), \(\tau \) and \(\phi \) satisfying the condition
where
\(Pr^{(4)}V(\cdot )\) represents the fourth prolongation of V, defined as [69],
where \(D_{x}\), \(D_{y}\) and \(D_{t}\) are the total derivative operators.
Expanding Expression (7) and splitting on the derivatives of u lead to the following expressions:
Solving Expressions (10), we have the following results:
where \(r_1\), \(r_2\), \(r_3\), \(r_4\) and \(r_5\) are the real constants, \(F_1(t)\) and \(F_2(t)\) are the real function of t, and \(F_{1}^{'}(t)\) denotes derivative of \(F_{1}(t)\) with respect to t. We derive the Lie point symmetry generators for Eq. (1) as follows:
Motivated by Ref. [55], commutation relations among Generators (12) are shown in Table 1, where the entries in row i and column j are represented by the commutators \([V_{i}, V_{j}]\), which are given by
Motivated by Refs. [58, 59], we take \(F_1(t) = r_6t\), \(F_2(t) = r_7t+r_8\) with the real constants \(r_6\), \(r_7\) and \(r_8\).
Thus, we derive the Lie point symmetry generators for Eq. (1) as follows:
2.2 Lie symmetry group for Eq. (1)
In order to obtain the group transformation, which is generated by the infinitesimal generators \(\Gamma _{i}\), we need to solve the following initial problems:
Then, the Lie symmetry group \(g_{i}^{,}s\) generated by \(V_{i}\) can be derived as
On account of Lie Symmetry Group (16), if \({\bar{f}}(x, y, t)\) is a known solutions for Eq. (1), the corresponding solutions can be obtained as
3 Symmetry reductions and analytic solutions for Eq. (1)
In this section, we use the combination of Generators (14) to derive the reduction equations and construct some analytic solutions for Eq. (1).
Case 1: For the Lie point symmetry \(V_2= \partial _ y\), we have the following group-invariant solutions:
where \(x_1 = x\), \(t_1 = t\) and H is a function of \(x_1\) and \(t_1\). Substituting Expression (18) into Eq. (1) gives rise to the following reduced equation:
We suppose that the solutions for Eq. (1) be as follows:
where a, b, c, d and k are the real constants. Substituting Expression (20) into Eq. (19), we can obtain
Therefore, soliton solutions for Eq. (1) can be derived as
Case 2: For the Lie point symmetry \(V_3= \partial _ t\), we have the following group-invariant solutions:
where \(x_2 = x\) and \(y_2 = y\), while P is a function of \(x_2\) and \(y_2\). Substituting Expression (23) into Eq. (1) gives rise to the following reduced equation:
Applying the Lie group method on Eq. (24), we obtain
where \(s_1\), \(s_2\) and \(s_3\) are the real constants, while \(F_3(y_2)\) is a real function of \(y_2\). Motivated by Refs. [58, 59], we take \(F_3(y_2) = s_4\) with a real constant \(s_4\). Thus, we derive the Lie point symmetry generators for Eq. (24) as follows:
For the Lie point symmetry \(\Gamma _1 +\Gamma _2\), the symmetry produces the following invariants:
where \(\Phi \) is a real function of f. Substituting Expressions (27) into Eq. (24) gives rise to the following reduced equation:
We suppose that some solutions for Eq. (28) have the following form:
where m is a positive integer, while \(a_{i}\)’s are the real constants. Here, G satisfies the second-order linear ordinary differential equation, i.e.,
where \(G^{'}=\frac{\mathrm{d}G}{\mathrm{d}f}\) and \(G^{''}=\frac{\mathrm{d}^2G}{\mathrm{d}f^2}\), while A and B are the real constants. m can be determined via homogeneous balance method between the highest order derivative term and the nonlinear term appearing in Eq. (28). We get \(m=1\). Substituting Eq. (29) into Eq. (28) with Constraint (30) and setting the coefficients of \((\frac{G^{'}}{G})\) equal to zero, we obtain
When \(\sqrt{B^2-4A}>0\), we derive some solutions for Eq. (1) as
where \(C_1\) and \(C_2\) are the real constants.
When \(\sqrt{B^2-4A}=0\), we derive some solutions for Eq. (1) as
where \(C_3\) and \(C_4\) are the real constants.
When \(\sqrt{B^2-4A}<0\), we derive some solutions for Eq. (1) as
where \(C_5\) and \(C_6\) are the real constants.
Case 3: For the Lie point symmetry \(V_{(1)}= V_1+V_2+V_3+V_5\), we have the following group-invariant solutions:
where R is a function of \(f_1\) and \(h_1\). Substituting Expressions (35) into Eq. (1) gives rise to the following reduced equation:
Applying the Lie group method on Eq. (36), we obtain
where \(s_5\), \(s_6\), \(s_7\) and \(s_8\) are the real constants. Thus, we derive the Lie point symmetry generators for Eq. (36) as follows:
For the Lie point symmetry \(n_1\Upsilon _1 +n_2\Upsilon _2\), the symmetry produces the following invariants:
where \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the real constants, and Q is a real function of z. Substituting Expressions (39) into Eq. (36) gives rise to the following reduced equation:
Seeking the solutions for Eq. (40) in a power series of the form
and substituting Expression (41) into Eq. (40), we obtain
where \(c_q\)’s are the real constants. From Expression (42), equating the coefficients of each order of z, we can calculate \(c_{q}\) for the case of \(q= 0\), so that
For \(n\ge 1\), we obtain
Then, we derive the power series solutions for Eq. (1) as
Case 4: For the Lie point symmetry \(V_{(2)}= V_1+V_2+V_3\), we have the following group-invariant solutions:
where S is a function of \(f_2\) and \(h_2\). Substituting Expressions (46) into Eq. (1) gives rise to the following reduced equation:
Applying the Lie group method on Eq. (47), we obtain
where \(s_9\), \(s_{10}\), \(s_{11}\) and \(s_{12}\) are the real constants. Thus, we derive the Lie point symmetry generators for Eq. (46) as follows:
For the Lie point symmetry \(n_3\Theta _1 +\Theta _2\), the symmetry produces the following invariants:
where \(n_3\) is a real constant and L is a real function of \(z_1\). Substituting Expressions (50) into Eq. (47) gives rise to the following reduced equation:
We suppose that the solutions for Eq. (51) have the following form:
where M is a positive integer, \(b_0\), \(b_{j}\)’s and \(d_{j}\)’s are the real constants, W satisfies
while \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) are the real constants. M can be determined via homogeneous balance method between the highest order derivative term and the nonlinear term appearing in Eq. (51). We get \(M=1\). Substituting Expression (52) into Eq. (51) with Constraint (53) and setting the coefficients of \(W(z_1)\) equal to zero, we obtain the following results:
Case 4.1:
Hereby, the solutions for Eq. (1) are obtained as
where c is a real constant.
Case 4.2:
Hereby, the solutions for Eq. (1) are obtained as
Case 4.3:
Hereby, the solutions for Eq. (1) are obtained as
4 Conclusions
In this paper, a (2+1)-dimensional gBK equation in fluid mechanics and plasma physics, i.e., Eq. (1), has been investigated. Lie Point Symmetry Generators (14) and Lie Symmetry Group (16) for Eq. (1) have been derived via the Lie group method. Symmetry Reductions (19), (28), (40) and (51) for Eq. (1) have been obtained from Cases 1-4. Soliton Solutions (22), Hyperbolic-Function Solutions (32), Rational Solutions (33), Power-Series Solutions (45) as well as Trigonometric-Function Solutions (34) and (54)–(56) for Eq. (1) have been derived.
References
V.B. Matveev, M.A. Salle, Darboux Transformations and Solitons (Springer, Berlin, 1991)
M. Boiti, F. Pempinelli, G. Soliani, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Dynamical Systems (Springer, Berlin, 1980)
M. Mirzazadeh, M. Ekici, A. Sonmezoglu, S. Ortakaya, M. Eslami, A. Biswas, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 166 (2016)
X.Y. Gao, Y.J. Guo, W.R. Shan, Appl. Math. Lett. 104, 106170 (2020)
H.Y. Tian, B. Tian, Y.Q. Yuan, C.R. Zhang, Phys. Scr. 96, 045213 (2021)
Y. Shen, B. Tian, S.H. Liu, D.Y. Yang, Phys. Scr. 96, 075212 (2021)
D.Y. Yang, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, C.R. Zhang, S.S. Chen, C.C. Wei, Chaos Solitons Fract. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110487
K. Hosseini, S. Salahshour, M. Mirzazadeh, A. Ahmadian, D. Baleanu, A. Khoshrang, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 206 (2021)
Y.Q. Chen, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, H. Li, X.H. Zhao, H.Y. Tian, M. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 34, 2050226 (2020)
S.S. Chen, B. Tian, J. Chai, X.Y. Wu, Z. Du, Wave. Random Complex 30, 389 (2020)
Y. Shen, B. Tian, C.R. Zhang, H.Y. Tian, S.H. Liu, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35, 2150261 (2021)
O.V. Kaptsov, D.O. Kaptsov, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 723 (2020)
M. Wang, B. Tian, C.C. Hu, S.H. Liu, Appl. Math. Lett. 119, 106936 (2021)
X.Y. Gao, Y.J. Guo, W.R. Shan, Chaos Solitons Fract. 142, 110367 (2021)
M. Wang, B. Tian, Y. Sun, Z. Zhang, Comput. Math. Appl. 79, 576 (2020)
Y.Q. Chen, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, H. Li, X.H. Zhao, H.Y. Tian, M. Wang, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34, 2050287 (2020)
X.X. Du, B. Tian, Y.Q. Yuan, Z. Du, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 531, 1900198 (2019)
X.X. Du, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, Y.Q. Yuan, X.H. Zhao, Chaos Solitons Fract. 134, 109709 (2020)
B. Ghanbari, C.K. Kuo, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 334 (2019)
M. Wang, B. Tian, Y. Sun, H.M. Yin, Z. Zhang, Chin. J. Phys. 60, 440 (2019)
D.Y. Yang, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, H. Li, X.H. Zhao, S.S. Chen, C.C. Wei, Phys. Scr. 96, 045210 (2021)
X. Zhao, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, Y.Q. Yuan, X.X. Du, M.X. Chu, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34, 2050282 (2020)
V.F. Morales-Delgado, J.F. Gomez-Aguilar, S. Kumar, M.A. Taneco-Hernandez, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 200 (2018)
X.Y. Gao, Y.J. Guo, W.R. Shan, Chaos Solitons Fract. 138, 109950 (2020)
X.Y. Gao, Y.J. Guo, W.R. Shan, Chin. J. Phys. 70, 264 (2021)
S.S. Chen, B. Tian, Y. Sun, C.R. Zhang, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 531, 1900011 (2019)
X.Y. Gao, Y.J. Guo, W.R. Shan, Y.Q. Yuan, C.R. Zhang , S.S. Chen, Appl. Math. Lett. 111, 106627 (2021)
X.Y. Gao, Y.J. Guo, W.R. Shan, Acta Mech. 231, 4415 (2020)
C.R. Zhang, B. Tian, Y. Sun, H. M. Yin, EPL 127, 40003 (2019)
H.Y. Tian, B. Tian, C.R. Zhang, S.S. Chen, Int. J. Comput. Math. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2021.1900568
M. Wang, B. Tian, S.H. Liu, W.R. Shan, Y. Jiang, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 635 (2021)
X. Zhao, B. Tian, H.Y. Tian, D.Y. Yang, Nonlinear Dyn. 103, 1785 (2021)
S.H. Liu, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, H. Li, X. H. Zhao, X. X. Du, S. S. Chen, Int. J. Comput. Math. 98, 1130 (2021)
S.H. Liu, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, C.R. Zhang, C.C. Hu, M. Wang, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34, 2050243 (2020)
Y. Shen, B. Tian, Appl. Math. Lett. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107301
C.R. Zhang, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, L. Liu, H.Y. Tian, Z. Angew, Math. Phys. 71, 18 (2020)
Y. Shen, B. Tian, S.H. Liu, Phys. Lett. A 405, 127429 (2021)
P.J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations (Springer, New York, 2000)
H. Gao, R.X. Zhao, Appl. Math. Comput. 215, 2781 (2009)
C.C. Hu, B. Tian, H.M. Yin, C.R. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Comput. Math. Appl. 78, 166 (2019)
F. Chand, A.K. Malik, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. 14, 416 (2012)
M. Alquran, A. Qawasmeh, J. Appl. Anal. Comput. 4, 221 (2014)
W.A. Huang, Chaos Solitons Fract. 29, 365 (2006)
R. Hirota, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1192 (1971)
L.L. Feng, S.F. Tian, T.T. Zhang, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 43, 141 (2020)
X.E. Zhang, Y. Chen, Appl. Math. Lett. 98, 306 (2019)
X.B. Wang, B. Han, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 487, 123968 (2019)
L.Q. Li, Y.T. Gao, L. Hu, T.T. Jia, C.C. Ding, Y.J. Feng, Nonlinear Dyn. 100, 2729 (2020)
X.Y. Gao, Y.J. Guo, W.R. Shan, Phys. Lett. A 384, 126788 (2020)
M. Wang, B. Tian, Q.X. Qu, X.X. Du, C.R. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 578 (2019)
C. Chen, Y.L. Jiang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 68, 295 (2017)
S.Y. Lou, X.B. Hu, J. Math. Phys. 38, 6401 (1997)
P.G. Estévez, G.A. Hernáez, (2000). Darboux transformations for a Bogoyavlenskii equation in (2+ 1) dimensions, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Nonlinearity, Integrability and All That–Twenty Years After NEEDS’79: Lecce, Italy, 1-10 July 1999, (World Sci., 2000), p. 117
G.W. Bluman, S. Kumei, Symmetries and Differential Equations (Springer, Berlin, 1989)
P. Albares, J.M. Conde, P.G. Estévez, Appl. Math. Comput. 355, 585 (2019)
P.G. Estévez, D. Lejarreta, C. Sardón, Nonlinear Dyn. 87, 13 (2017)
B. Gao, Y. Zhang, Phys. A 525, 1058 (2019)
H.C. Hu, Y.H. Lu, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34, 2050106 (2020)
M. Kumar, D.V. Tanwar, R. Kumar, Comput. Math. Appl. 75, 218 (2018)
Q. Li, T. Chaolu, Y.H. Wang, Comput. Math. Appl. 77, 2077 (2019)
D.J. Korteweg, G. de Vries, Philos. Mag. 39, 422 (1895)
N.J. Zabusky, M.D. Kruskal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 240 (1965)
C.S. Gardner, J.M. Greene, M.D. Krustal, R.M. Miura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1095 (1967)
M.J. Ablowitz, P.A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1991)
A. Jeffrey, T. Kakutani, SIAM Rev. 14, 582 (1972)
R.M. Miura, SIAM Rev. 18, 412 (1976)
T.C. Xia, S.Q. Xiong, Comput. Math. Appl. 60, 919 (2010)
S.T. Chen, W.X. Ma, Comput. Math. Appl. 76, 1680 (2018)
W. Rui, Y. Zhang, F. Yang, Nonlinear Anal. -Real 43, 467 (2018)
Acknowledgements
The authors express their sincere thanks to the members of their discussion group for their valuable suggestions. This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11772017, and by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, FY., Gao, YT., Yu, X. et al. Lie group analysis and analytic solutions for a (2+1)-dimensional generalized Bogoyavlensky–Konopelchenko equation in fluid mechanics and plasma physics. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 656 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01469-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01469-x