Abstract
The origin of nonclassicality in quantum mechanics (QM) has been investigated recently by a number of authors with a view to identifying axioms that would single out quantum mechanics as a special theory within a broader framework such as convex operational theories. In these studies, the axioms tend to be logically unconnected in the sense that no specific ordering of the axioms is implied. Here, we identify a hierarchy of five nonclassical features that separate QM from a classical theory. By hierarchy is meant an axiomatic scheme where the succeeding axioms can be regarded as superstructure built on top of the structure provided by the preceding axioms. In a sense, the latter are necessary, but not sufficient, for the succeeding axioms. In our scheme, the axioms briefly are: (Q1) incompatibility and uncertainty; (Q2) contextuality; (Q3) entanglement; (Q4) nonlocality and (Q5) indistinguishability of identical particles. Such a hierarchy isn’t obvious when viewed from within the quantum mechanical framework, but, from the perspective of generalized probability theories (GPTs), relevant toy GPTs are introduced at each layer when useful to illustrate the action of the nonclassical features associated with the particular layer.
Graphical abstract
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Banerjee, A. Pathak, R. Srikanth, Physically inspired axioms for quantum mechanics (in press)
L. Mandel, E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1995)
R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Oxford University Press, 2000)
U. Leonhardt, Measuring the Quantum State of Light, Cambridge Studies in Modern Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997)
M. Genovese, Phys. Rep. 413, 319 (2005)
R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)
F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. de Moor, J. Mod. Opt. 49, 1277 (2002)
H. Ollivier, W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901 (2001)
J. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964)
J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)
C. Brukner, S. Taylor, S. Cheung, V. Vedral, arXiv:quant-ph/0402127v1
J. Barrett, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032304 (2007)
J. Barrett, N. Linden, S. Massar, S. Pironio, S. Popescu, D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022101 (2005)
G. Brassard, H. Buhrman, N. Linden, A.A. Méthot, A. Tapp, F. Unger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 250401 (2006)
A. Broadbent, A.A. Methot, Theor. Comput. Sci. 3, 358 (2006)
H. Barnum, J. Barrett, M. Leifer, A. Wilce, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 240501 (2007)
H. Barnum, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B 34, 343 (2003)
G. Chiribella, G.M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062348 (2010)
P. Janotta, H. Hinrichsen, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 323001 (2014)
J. Oppenheim, S. Wehner, Science 330, 1072 (2010)
M. Banik, M.R. Gazi, S. Ghosh, G. Kar, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052125 (2013)
R.W. Spekkens, Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108 (2005)
R.W. Spekkens, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032110 (2007)
C. Pfister, S. Wehner, Nat. Commun. 4, 1851 (2013)
L. Hardy, Quantum theory from five reasonable axioms, arXiv:quant-ph/0101012 (2001)
L. Hardy, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B 34, 381 (2003)
P. Mana, arXiv:quant-ph/0305117 (2003)
M. Navascués, S. Pironio, A. Acn, New J. Phys. 10, 073013 (2008)
R. Clifton, J. Bub, H. Halvorson, Found. Phys. 33, 1561 (2003)
A. Grinbaum, Br. J. Philos. Sci. 58, 387 (2007)
S. Popescu, D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994)
B. Toner, Proc. R. Soc. A 465, 59 (2009)
H.K. Lo, H.F. Chau, Science 283, 2050 (1999)
W.K. Wootters, W.H. Zurek, Nature 299, 802 (1982)
N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 242, 1 (1998)
P. Busch, T. Heinosaari, J. Schultz, N. Stevens, EPL 103, 10002 (2013)
S. Aravinda, R. Srikanth, A. Pathak, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 465303 (2017)
C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore (1984), p. 175
S. Aravinda, A. Banerjee, A. Pathak, R. Srikanth, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 12, 1560020 (2014)
I. Csiszar, J. Korner, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 24, 339 (1978)
U. Vazirani, T. Vidick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140501 (2014)
J. Barrett, L. Hardy, A. Kent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005)
S. Kochen, E.P. Specker, J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967)
A.A. Klyachko, M. Ali Can, S. Binicioğlu, A.S. Shumovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 020403 (2008)
L. Hardy, arXiv:quant-ph/9906123 (1999)
R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989)
N. Brunner, N. Gisin, V. Scarani, New J. Phys. 7, 88 (2005)
G. Tóth, A. Acn, Phys. Rev. A 74, 030306 (2006)
M.L. Almeida, S. Pironio, J. Barrett, G. Tóth, A. Acn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 040403 (2007)
R. Augusiak, M. Demianowicz, J. Tura, A. Acn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 030404 (2015)
M.T. Quintino, T. Vértesi, D. Cavalcanti, R. Augusiak, M. Demianowicz, A. Acn, N. Brunner, Phys. Rev. A 92, 032107 (2015)
R Srikanth, arXiv:1811.12409 (2018)
Ll Masanes, A. Acin, N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012112 (2006)
S. Aaronson, A. Arkhipov, The computational complexity of linear optics, in Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (ACM, 2011), pp. 333–342
M. Tillmann, B. Dakić, R. Heilmann, S. Nolte, A. Szameit, P. Walther, Nat. Photonics 7, 540 (2013)
H. Wang, W. Li, X. Jiang, Y.-M. He, Y.-H. Li, X. Ding, M.-C. Chen, J. Qin, C.-Z. Peng, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, L.-X. You, Z. Wang, J.P. Dowling, S. Hofling, C.-Y. Lu, J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 230502 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Contribution to the Topical Issue “Quantum Correlations”, edited by Marco Genovese, Vahid Karimipour, Sergei Kulik, and Olivier Pfister.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aravinda, S., Pathak, A. & Srikanth, R. Hierarchical axioms for quantum mechanics. Eur. Phys. J. D 73, 207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2019-90452-2
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2019-90452-2