Abstract
Polyvariant ontogeny (PVO) gets a visual expression in the life cycle graphs (LCGs) for Calamagrostis woodreeds as a variety of pathways for individual plants to develop through many of their states, which are distinguishable by the ontogenetic stage and chronological age (in years). PVO is recognized as the basic mechanism of adaptation in local populations of grasses to their environments, while a quantitative measure of adaptation is found by constructing a matrix model for the double-structured population, calibrating its matrix of vital rates from empirical data, and calculating the dominant eigenvalue λ1. This approach encounters an obstacle typical for grasses: while the rates of aging and ontogenetic transitions can be determined from field data mainly by the morphology of aboveground parts of the plant, the rates of vegetative propagation can be reliably determined only from digging up the belowground rhizome system, i.e., by destroying the sample plot (“reproductive uncertainty”). Therefore, the former (nondestructive) calibrations of matrix models were, to an extent, subjective, resulting in correspondingly subjective estimations. A novel method to overcome the reproductive uncertainty makes use of the maximization hypothesis: the uncertain rates are such that λ1 attains its maximal possible value under the given conditions. To test the hypothesis, we have conducted a field study by a new technique with a model species, the woodreed Calamagrostis epigeios (L.) Roth, which vegetatively reproduces in a meadow phytocenosis and a spruce forest clearance. Excavating the whole system of ramets with their rhizomes and analyzing the parent–offspring links in laboratory, we have gained (in addition to the former data on the local population structures and ontogenetic transitions) a new kind of data to calculate the status-specific rates of reproduction. The novel calibration method has enabled us to find an exact range of λ1 values, i.e., the true quantitative bounds of adaptation for a given local population. Obtained under the reproductive uncertainty and maximality hypothesis, the values of λ1 have turned out to be close to the upper bounds of the ranges, thus verifying the hypothesis. The study has discovered some generative subsidiary plants that sprout from the rhizomes of maternal ramets without entering the virginal stage. As a result, the LCG is enriched with new reproductive pathways, and there are new (not yet published) situations, in which λ1 fails in its accuracy as a measuring tool of comparative plant demography. We propose a general method to adjust the adaptation measure in this kind of situation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akshentsev, E.V., et al., Polivariantnost’ razvitiya organizmov, populyatsii i soobshchestv: monografiya (Polyvariant Development of Organisms, Populations, and Communities: Monograph), Voskresenskaya, O.L., Ed., Yoshkar-Ola: Mariisk. Gos. Univ., 2006.
Bashmakova, I.G., Diofant i diofantovy uraveneniya (Diophantus and Diophantine Equations), Moscow: LKI, 2007.
Bel’kov, V.P., Some regularities of development of living cover on logging sites, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1960, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 1370–1373.
Caswell, H., Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 1989.
Caswell, H., Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 2001, 2nd ed.
Cushing, J.M. and Yicang, Z., The net reproductive value and stability in matrix population models, Nat. Res. Model., 1994, vol. 8, pp. 297–333.
Diophantine equation. http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/5320.
Ermakova, I.M., Sugorkina, N.S., Tarasenko, T.E., and Skvortsova, E.S., Influence of economic activities on the structure and harvest of the flood land meadow, Trudy mezhd. konf. po fitotsenologii i sistematike vysshikh rastenii, posvyashchennaya 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A.A. Uranova (Proc. Int. Conf. on Phytocenology and Systematics of Higher Plants Dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of A.A. Uranov), 2001, pp. 60–62.
Gantmakher, F.R., Teoriya matrits (The Theory of Matrices), Moscow: Nauka, 1967.
Gyllenberg, M. and Service, R., Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of an optimisation principle in evolution, J. Math. Biol., 2011, vol. 62, pp. 359–369.
Harary, F., Norman, R.Z., and Cartwright, D., Structural Models: an Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs, New York: Wiley, 1965.
Horn, R.A. and Johnson, C.R., Matrix Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.
Janczyk-Weglarska, J., An ex situ ecological experiment on the morphological and developmental variation of Calamagrostis epigeios (Poaceae), Fragm. Florist. Geobot., 1997, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 239–247.
Li, C.-K. and Schneider, H., Application of Perron–Frobenius theory to population dynamics, J. Math. Biol., 2002, vol. 44, pp. 450–462.
Logofet, D.O., Matrices and Graphs: Stability Problems in Mathematical Ecology, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1993.
Logofet, D.O., Three sources and three constituents of the formalism for a population with discrete age and stage structures, Mat. Model., 2002, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 11–22.
Logofet, D.O., Convexity in projection matrices: projection to a calibration problem, Ecol. Model., 2008, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 217–228.
Logofet, D.O., Svirezhev’s substitution principle and matrix models for dynamics of populations with complex structures, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2010, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 30–40.
Logofet, D.O., Projection matrices in variable environments: m1 in theory and practice, Ecol. Model., 2013a, vol. 251, pp. 307–311.
Logofet, D.O., Calamagrostis model revisited: matrix calibration as a constraint maximization problem, Ecol. Model., 2013b, vol. 254, pp. 71–79.
Logofet, D.O., Complexity in matrix population models: polyvariant ontogeny and reproductive uncertainty, Ecol. Complexity, 2013c, vol. 15: 43–51.
Logofet, D.O., Projection matrices revisited: a potential growth indicator and the merit of indication, J. Math. Sci., 2013d, vol. 193, no. 5, pp. 671–686.
Logofet, D.O. and Belova, I.N., Nonnegative matrices as a tool to model population dynamics: classical models and contemporary expansions, J. Math. Sci., 2008, vol. 155, no. 6, pp. 894–907.
Logofet, D.O., Ulanova, N.G., and Belova, I.N., Two paradigms in mathematical population biology: an attempt at synthesis, Biol. Bull. Rev., 2012, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 89–104.
Logofet, D.O., Ulanova, N.G., and Belova, I.N. Adaptation on the ground and beneath: does the local population maximize its λ1? Ecol. Complexity, 2014, vol. 20, pp. 176–184.
Logofet, D.O., Ulanova, N.G., Klochkova, I.N., and Demidova, A.N, Structure and dynamics of a clonal plant population: classical model results in a non-classic formulation, Ecol. Model., 2006, vol. 192, pp. 95–106.
MathWorks, 2012. http://www.mathworks.com/help/toolbox/ optim/ug/fmincon.html.
Metz, J.A.J., Mylius, S.D., and Diekmann, O., When does evolution optimize? Evol. Ecol. Res., 2008a, vol. 10, pp. 629–654.
Metz, J.A.J., Mylius, S.D., and Diekmann, O., Even in the odd cases when evolution optimizes, unrelated population dynamical details may shine through in the ESS, Evol. Ecol. Res., 2008b, vol. 10, pp. 655–666.
Onipchenko, V.G. and Komarov, A.S., Life duration and dynamics of the high-altitude plant populations: analysis of three alpine species of the Northwestern Caucasus, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1997, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 64–75.
Pathikonda, S., Ackleh, A.S., Hasenstein, K.H., and Mopper, S., Invasion, disturbance, and competition: modeling the fate of coastal plant populations, Conserv. Biol., 2009, vol. 23, pp. 164–173.
Patrabolova, I.G., Biology of the bushgrass related to recovery of pine plantations in Buzulukskiy pine forest, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Moscow State Pedagog. Inst., 1953.
Prach, K. and Pyšek, P., How do species dominating in succession differ from others? J. Veg. Sci., 1999, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 383–392.
Protasov, V.Yu. and Logofet, D.O., Rank-one corrections of nonnegative matrices, with an application to matrix population models, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 2014, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 749–764.
Rabotnov, T.S., Fitotsenologiya (Phytocenology), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1978.
Sabinin, D.A., Fiziologiya razvitiya rastenii (Physiology of the Plant Development), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1963.
Serebryakova, T.I., Morfogenez pobegov i evolyutsiya zhiznennykh form zlakov (Morphogenesis of Shoots and Evolution of the Life Forms of Cereals), Moscow: Nauka, 1971.
Shea, K. and Kelly, D., Estimating biocontrol agent impact with matrix models: Carduus nutans in New Zealand, Ecol. Appl., 1998, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 824–832.
Ulanova, N.G., Calamagrostis epigeios, in Biologicheskaya flora Moskovskoi oblasti (Biological Flora of Moscow Region), Moscow: Argus, 1995, vol. 10, pp. 4–19.
Ulanova, N.G., Population dynamics of bushgrass after demutation of vegetation on the logging sites, in Populyatsii i soobshchestva rastenii: ekologiya, bioraznoobrazie, monitoring (The Plant Populations and Communities: Ecology, Biodiversity, and Monitoring), Kostroma: Kostrom. Gos. Pedagog. Univ., 1996, vol. 2, pp. 24–25.
Ulanova, N.G., Plant age stages during succession in woodland clearings in Central Russia, in Vegetation Science in Retrospective and Perspective, Uppsala: Opulus, 2000, pp. 80–83.
Ulanova, N.G., Dynamics of vegetation recovery on the solid logging sites and mass windfalls in the spruce forests of southern taiga in European Russia, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2006.
Ulanova, N.G., Belova, I.N., and Logofet, D.O., Competition among populations with discrete structure: the dynamics of populations of reed and birch growing together, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2008, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 478–494.
Ulanova, N.G. and Demidova, A.N., Population biology of the purple small-reed (Calamagrostis canescens (Web.) Roth) on the logging sites of southern spruce taiga, Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 2001, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 51–58.
Ulanova, N.G., Demidova, A.N., Logofet, D.O., and Klochkova, I.N., Structure and dynamics of Calamagrostis canescens coenopopulation: a model approach, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2002, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 509–521.
Ulanova, N.G., Klochkova, I.N., and Demidova, A.N., Modeling of the population dynamics of Calamagrostis epigeios (L.) Roth during overgrowing of the logging site of complex spruce forest, Sib. Bot. Vestn., 2007, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–96. http://journal.csbg.ru.
Uranov, A.A., Ontogenesis and age composition of the populations, in Ontogenez i vozrastnoi sostav tsevetkovykh rastenii (Ontogenesis and Age Composition of the Population of Flowering Plants), Moscow: Nauka, 1967, pp. 3–9.
Uranov, A.A., Age diversity of the plant populations as the function of time and energy wave processes, Biol. Nauki, 1975, no. 2, pp. 7–34.
Weppler, T., Stoll, P., and Stocklin, J., The relative importance of sexual and clonal reproduction for population growth in the long-lived alpine plant Geum reptans, J. Ecol., 2006, vol. 94, pp. 869–879.
Werner, P.A. and Caswell, H., Population growth rates and age versus stage distribution models for teasel (Dipsacus sylvestris Huds), Ecology, 1977, vol. 58, pp. 1103–1111.
Zhukova, L.A., Polyvariance of the meadow plants, in Zhiznennye formy v ekologii i sistematike rastenii (Life Forms in Ecology and Plant Systematics), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Pedagog. Inst., 1986, pp. 104–114.
Zhukova, L.A., Populyatsionnaya zhizn’ lugovykh rastenii (Population Life of the Meadow Plants), Yoshkar-Ola: Lanar, 1995.
Zhukova, L.A. and Komarov, A.S., Polyvariance of ontogenesis and dynamics of plant populations, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1990, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 450–461.
Zaugol’nova, L.B., Zhukova, L.A., Komarov, A.S., and Smirnova, O.V., Tsenopopulyatsii rastenii (ocherki populyatsionnoi biologii) (The Plant Cenopopulations: Reviews on Population Biology), Moscow: Nauka, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © D.O. Logofet, N.G. Ulanova, I.N. Belova, 2015, published in Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, 2015, Vol. 76, No. 6, pp. 438–460.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Logofet, D.O., Ulanova, N.G. & Belova, I.N. Polyvariant ontogeny in woodreeds: Novel models and new discoveries. Biol Bull Rev 6, 365–385 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086416050042
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086416050042