Abstract
The interaction of Co(NO3)2 and Cu(NO3)2 with hyperbranched polyester containing 7 terminal benzoyl thiocarbamate groups has been studied by IR-Fourier and electron absorption spectroscopy. А new polynuclear complexes of Co(II) and Cu(II) with poly(benzoyl thiocarbamate)-modified hyperbranched polyester have been synthesized. It has been found that the oxygen and sulfur atoms of the peripheral benzoyl thiocarbamate fragments of the macroligand are involved in coordination with metal ions, the metal to ligand ratio being 7 : 1.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Development of extraction-sorption systems for the recovery of ions of d-metals and rare-earth elements from natural and recycling objects is an important scientific and practical issue. Parameters of group separation or individual recovery of the metal ions is determined by the nature and composition of the extracting system as well as the process conditions. The extraction-sorption systems contain the reagents exhibiting coordination activity towards metal ions [1–6]. A remarkable class of them are О-alkyl-N-aroyl carbamates and thiocarbamates which have been successfully applied as highly efficient extracting agents for metal ions [7–11] as well as collectors for the recovery of trace amounts of metals during ore processing [12–14].
The introduction of macromolecules (including polymers of diverse nature and architecture) in the composition of the extraction-sorption systems can enhance the parameters of metal ions recovery due to a combination of specific and nonspecific interactions [15–21]. Promising reagents for the creation of highly efficient extraction-sorption systems include hyperbranched polyesters of dendrite structure, sparse core, and high concentration of the terminal groups [22, 23] exhibiting good solubility [24, 25], low viscosity [26, 27], biodegradability [26], low toxicity [28, 29], and pronounced complex forming properties [30, 31]. Modification of the terminal groups of polyester with efficiently coordinating (thio)carbamate fragments allows creation of efficient extraction-sorption systems for the recovery and separation of metal ions. The prospects of this approach has been confirmed by the complex formation of hyperbranched polyesters of second and third generation containing different amount of terminal thenylthiocarbamate groups with Cu(II) ions [32]. Biological activity of the thiocarbamate derivatives of polyesterpolyols can be determined by fungicide [32, 33], antitumor, and antiinflammatory properties [34–38] of the modifier.
Evaluation of the complexing activity of hyperbranched polyesterpolyol of the second generation modified with terminal benzoyl thiocarbamate groups towards Co(II) and Cu(II) ions is demanded for further development of colloidal extraction-sorption systems.
Hyperbranced polyester of the second generation 1 (Scheme 1) containing seven terminal benzoyl thiocarbamate groups (functionalization degree 0.44) was synthesized as described elsewhere [39]. Terminal benzoyl thiocarbamate fragments can form coordination nodes in the hyperbranched polyester scaffold.
To evaluate the complexing properties of compound 1, its interaction with Cо(II) and Cu(II) nitrates in DMSO was studied by means of spectrophotometry. The components of the absorption spectra were obtained via deconvolution into Gaussian peaks.
Electronic absorption spectra of compound 1 in DMSO (Fig. 1) contained the characteristic bands at 250–430 nm, the bands in visible spectral range being absent. A strong broad band at 273 nm (ε 40531 L∙cm-1∙mol-1) was due to the π–π*- and n–π*-transitions in the benzoyl (255 nm) and carbonyl (270 nm) groups of the polyester core. A weak band at 345 nm (ε = 731 L∙cm–1∙mol–1) was assigned to the n–π*-transitions in the С=S group.
Introduction of Cо(NO3)2 or Cu(NO3)2 into a solution of compound 1 was accompanied by bathochromic shift of the PhC(O) absorption band to 260 nm and hypochromic effect of the band at 270 nm, pointing at the participation of carbonyl groups in the coordination with Со(II) and Сu(II) ions.
The study of the electronic spectra of the Cо(NO3)2–compound 1 system with the increase in the salt concentration, the ligand concentration being constant (Fig. 2), revealed that the position of the C=S band remained unchanged at the Co(II)–compound 1 molar ratio up to 4 : 1. The increase in the molar ratio to 10 : 1 led to the hypsochromic shift of the band to 338 nm, which could point at the C=S group participation in the coordination of Co(II) ions at the reagents molar ratio above 4 : 1. Introduction of Cu(NO3)2 into a solution of compound 1, the Cu(II)–compound 1 molar ratio being varied between 0.5 : 1 and 10 : 1 led to hypsochromic shift of the C=S absorption band to 318 nm accompanied by significant hyperchromic effect up to 1.74 optical units, which could point at the thiocarbonyl group coordination with Cu(II) over the probed range of the reagents molar ratio.
Electronic absorption spectra of the Co salt–compound 1 system showed the increase in the absorption at 538 nm and the appearance of a new band of the d→d-transitions at 673 nm corresponding to the 4T1g(P)→4T1g and 4T2g →4T1g terms (Fig. 3). In the case of Сu(II) ion, the appearance of the octahedral coordination nodes led to the appearance of a similar band at λ = 836 nm.
Composition and conditional stability constants of coordination compounds of polyester 1 (ligand L) with Cо(II) and Cu(II) ions were calculated using the Jobs method [40, 41]. Polynuclear complexes with М : L = 7 : 1 were formed in both systems, which was further confirmed by elemental analysis data. Stability of the complex with Co(II) was higher in comparison with Cu(II), logarithms of the conditional stability constants being 17.30±2.77 and 15.92±2.28, respectively.
Basing on the obtained data on the complex formation of Co(II) and Cu(II) with compound 1, metal-polymer complexes 2 and 3 were synthesized (Scheme 1). Parameters of the electronic absorption spectra of complexes 2, 3 and Со(II)/Cu(II)–compound 1 in DMSO were similar and confirmed the participation of carbonyl and thioxo peripheral functional groups in the complexes formation. Moreover, the electronic spectrum of complex 3 contained a new band at 805 nm assigned to the charge transfer in the Cu–S group. Cu(II) ion was in the octahedral surrounding with tetragonal distortion [42].
Comparative analysis of IR spectra of complexes 2, 3 and polydentate ligand 1 [39] pointed at the participation of the carbonyl С=О and thiocarbonyl С=S groups of the benzoyl thiocarbamate fragment in the coordination with metal ions. IR spectra of complexes 2 and 3 revealed twofold weakening and shift to lower frequency of stretching bands of the С=О bond of the benzoyl fragment to 1658 (Δν = 3 cm–1, 2) and 1584 cm–1 (Δν = 77 cm–1, 3) as well as strengthening and shift to higher frequency of stretching bands of the С=S bond of the benzoyl thiocarbamate fragment to 1405 (2) and 1407 cm–1 (3). Moreover, the participation of the benzoyl thiocarbamate fragment of the polymer in the formation of the coordination node with Co(II) ion was confirmed by the shift of the amide bands (amide II 1506 cm–1, amide III 1301 cm–1, amide V 817 cm–1, amide IV 615 cm–1). In the case of the copper(II) complex, the amide III band was strengthened twofold, and the amide IV band was shifted to lower frequency by 23 cm–1. The spectra of both complexes contained the stretching bands of the М–О bond: Cо–O at 529 cm–1 [43, 44] and Cu–O at 685 cm–1 [45].
In summary, the formation of coordination compounds of Co(II) and Cu(II) ions with hyperbranched polyesterpolyol of the second generation modified with terminal N-benzoyl thiocarbamate groups was stated by a set of physico-chemical methods. Analysis of the spectral data suggested that the complexes formation involved the donor atoms of oxygen and sulfur of the peripheral benzoyl thiocarbamate fragments of the polydentate ligand which afforded the octahedral coordination nodes А and B (Scheme 2) for cobalt(II) ions (depending on the metal fraction) and mainly node В for copper(II) ions.
The obtained data will be used for the creation of colloidal extraction-sorption systems based on hyperbranched polyesterpolyols functionalized with chelating groups, to be applied in the recovery of metal ions from the model solutions as well as technogenic and ecological monitoring objects.
EXPERIMENTAL
Hyperbranched polyester 1 containing 7 terminal benzoyl thiocarbamate groups (M = 2891 g/mol) was synthesized as described elsewhere [39], Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, Cо(NO3)2·6H2O, and solvents (1.4-dioxane, ethanol, and petroleum ether) were purchased from Acros.
IR spectra were recorded using a Spectrum 400 spectrometer (PerkinElmer) equipped with an Almaz KRS-5 ATR attachment (4000–400 cm–1, spacing 1 cm–1, 10 scans). Electronic absorption spectra were recorded using a Lambda 750 spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer) (200–900 nm, 25±0.01°С, optical path l = 1 nm); the specimen temperature was maintained constant using a system containing constant-temperature cell holder, a Julabo MB-5A flow thermostat, and a PTP-1 Peltier unit. Absorbance was measured with accuracy of ±1%. 0.1 M LiClO4 was used as background electrolyte.
Composition and stability of the complexes in the studied systems were determined from the spectral data using the Jobs method [40, 41]. The experiment conditions were as follows: for the Cо(NO3)2–compound 1 system – λ = 673 nm, с1 = 1×10–2 mol/L, [Со(NO3)2] = 1×10–3–1.0×10–1 mol/L, εcomplex = 33.84 L cm–1 mol–1; for the Cu(NO3)2–compound 1 system – λ = 836 nm, с1 = 1×10–3 mol/L, [Сu(NO3)2] = 1×10–4–1.0×10–2 mol/L, εcomplex = 322.47 L cm–1 mol–1.
Complexes of compound 1 with Cо(II) and Cu(II) ions. 0.5 g (0.14 mmol) of compound 1 was dissolved in 3 mL of 1,4-dioxane, and a solution of 1.4 mmol of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O or Cо(NO3)2·6H2O in 2 mL of ethanol was added. The solution turned dark red (in the case of cobalt) and green (copper). The reaction mixture was stirred during 9 h at 40°С. The major part of the solvent was removed under vacuum, the residue was poured into petroleum ether, the precipitate was separated off and dried during 5 h in a vacuum oven at 50°С (1 mmHg).
Complex 2. Yield 92%, dark red tar. Electronic absorption spectrum (DMSO), λmax, nm (ε, L mol–1 cm–1): 262 (2674), 269 (2371), 281 (1744), 317 (378.4), 536 (112.22), 673 (33.84). IR spectrum, ν, cm–1: 3700–3000 (Н2О, О–Н, N–H, С–HPh), 1729 (C=O), 1658 (C=OBz); 1606, 1449 (C=CPh); 1506, 1301 [(C–N), δ(N–H), amide II and III]; 1405 (C=S); 1449, 1081, 817, 752 [δ(C–HPh)]; 925, 870 [γ(C–HPh)], 925 (N–O); 925, 711 [γ(C=CPh)]; 817, 615 [δ(N–H), amide V and IV]; 667 [δ(C=CPh)], 529 (Cо–O). Found, %: С 32.85; H 5.03; N 5.68; S 4.56; Co 8.23. C138H258Co7N21O138S7. Calculated, %: С 32.77; H 5.11; N 5.82; S 4.43; Co 8.17.
Complex 3. Yield 86%, dark green tar. Electronic absorption spectrum (DMSO), λmax, nm (ε, L mol–1 cm–1): 255 (21153.23), 274 (25420.08), 318 (10220.79), 805 (322.47). IR spectrum, ν, cm–1: 3700–3000 (Н2О, О–Н, N–H, С–HPh), 1726 (C=O), 1584 (C=OBz), 1456 (C=CPh), 1295 [(C–N), δ(N–H), amide III]; 1456, 1295, 1008 (N–O),1407 (C=S); 1456, 1008, 720 [δ(C–HPh)]; 921, 870, 809 [γ(C–HPh)]; 921, 685 [γ(C=CPh)], 613 [δ(N–H), amide IV]; 685 (Cu–O). Found, %: С 35.29; H 4.72; N 6.05; S 4.63; Cu 9.47. C138H216N21O117S7Cu7. Calculated, %: С 35.16; H 4.59; N 6.24; S 4.76; Cu 9.51.
REFERENCES
Popova, N.N., Zhilov, V.I., Tsivadze, A.Y., and Demin, S.V., Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 2015, vol. 60, no. 6, p. 754. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602361506011X
Turanov, A.N., Karandashev, V.K., Baulin, V.E., Kalashnikova, I.P., Tsivadze, A.Y., Kirillov, E.V., Kirillov, S.V., and Rychkov, V.N., Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 2016, vol. 61, no. 3, p. 377. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023616030232
Kuz’min, V.I., Kuz’mina, V.N., Kuznetsov, P.N., and Kolesnikova, S.M., Solid Fuel Chemistry, 2016, vol. 50, no. 2, p. 120. https://doi.org/10.3103/S036152191602004X
Ehrlich, G.V. and Lisichkin, G.V., Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2017, vol. 87, no. 6, p. 1220. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363217060196
Turanov, A.N., Karandashev, V.K., Kharlamov, A.V., and Bondarenko, N.A., Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 2018, vol. 63, no. 12, p. 1673. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023618120203
Safiulina, A.M., Ivanets, D.V., Kudryavtsev, E.M., Baulin, D.V., Baulin, V.E., and Tsivadze, A.Y., Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 2019, vol. 64, p. 536. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023619040181
Quas, L., Schrӧder, U., Schrӧder, B., Dietze, F., and Beyer, L., Solv. Extr. Ion. Exch., 2000, vol. 18, no. 6, p. 1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366290008934727
Quas, L., Ristau, T., Schrӧder, U., Dietze, F., Beyer, L., and Anorg, Z., Allg. Chem., 2001, vol. 627, p. 1909
Hakan, A., Ulrich, F., and Nevzat, K., Spectr. Acta, 2007, vol. 67, p. 936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2006.09.011
Oba, M. and Nishiyama, K., Synthesis, 1994, no. 6, p. 624. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-1994-25536
Schrӧder, U., Beyer, L., Dietze, F., Richter, R., Schmidt, S., and Hoyer, E., J. Prakt. Chem., 1995, vol. 337, p. 184.
Bogdanov, O.S., Vainshenker, I.A., Podnek, A.K., Ryaboi, V.I., and Yanis, N.A., Tsvet. Metal., 1976, p. 72.
Ryaboi, V.I., Kretov, V.P., and Smirnova, E.Yu., Obogashch. Rud, 2013, no. 2, p. 17.
Ribeiro da Silva, M.A.V., Santos, L.M.N.B.F., Schrӧder, B., Dietze, F., and Beyer, L., J. Chem. Thermodyn., 2004, vol. 36, p. 491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2004.03.004
Shirokova, A.G., Pasechnik, L.A., and Yatsenko, S.P., Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Physics, 2012, vol. 76, no. 5, p. 604. https://doi.org/10.3103/S106287381205022X
Sorokina, N.M. and Tsizin, G.I., Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Univ, Ser. 2: Khim., 2016, vol. 57, no. 3, p. 167
Zonkhoeva, E.L. and Dampilova, B.V., Sorbts. Khromatograf. Protses., 2017, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 797
Artamonov, A.V., Smirnova, D.N., Smirnov, N.N., and Il’in, A.P., Izv. Vuzov, Ser. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol., 2017, vol. 60, no. 10, p. 87. https://doi.org/10.6060/tcct.20176010.5571
Turanov, A.N., Karandashev, V.K., and Bondarenko, N.A., Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 2018, vol. 63, no. 1, p. 128. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023618010205
Oborina, E.N. and Vlasova, N.N., Fizikokhim. Poverkhn. Zashhit. Mater., 2018, vol. 54, no. 4, p. 405. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044185618040125
Troshkina, I.D., Obruchnikova, Ya.A., and Pestov, S.M., Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2019, vol. 89, no. 12, vol. 61, no. 4, p. 2721. https://doi.org/10.1134/S107036321912048X
Kutyreva, M.P., Babkina, S.S., Atanasyan, T.K., Ulakhovich, N.A., and Kutyrev, G.A., Novye materialy: biologicheski aktivnye giperrazvetvlennye polimery i ikh metallokompleksy (New Materials: Biologically Active Hyperbranched Polymers and Their Metal Complexes), Moscow: MGPU, 2014.
Нaüβler, M., Dong, H., and Tang, B.Z., Inorganic and Organometallic Macromolecules: Design and Applications, 2008, p. 21
Seiler, M., Rolker, J., and Arlt, W., Macromolecules, 2003, vol. 36, no. 6, p. 2085. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma025994n
Jang, J.G. and Bae, Y.C., J. Chem. Phys., 2001, vol. 114, no. 11, p. 5034. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1329647
Korolev, V.G. and Bubnova, M.L., Giperrazvetvlennye polimery: novyi moshchnyi stimul dal’neishego razvitiya oblasti trehhmernoi polimerizatsii i revolyutsiya v polimernom materialovedenie (Hyperbranched Polymers: A New Powerful Incentive for the Further Development of the Field of Three-Dimensional Polymerization and the Revolution in Polymer Materials Science), Moscow: IPHF RAN, 2006.
Zagar, E. and Zigon, M., Progress Polymer Sci., 2011, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.08.004
Reul, R., Nguyen, J., and Kissel, T., J. Biomaterial., 2009, vol. 30, no. 29, p. 5815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.057
Chen, Z., Meng, H., and Xing, G., Toxicology Lett., 2006, vol. 163, no. 2, p. 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.10.003
Kutyreva, M.P., Nizamov, I.S., Ulakhovich, N.A., Gataulina, A.R., and Kutyrev, G.A., Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2011, vol. 81, no. 5, p. 960. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363211050227
Kutyrev, G.A., Maksimov, A.F., Ernandes, A.-M.P., Idiyatov, I.I., Valiullin, L.R., Gallyamova, S.R., Biryulya, V.V., Gataulina, A.R., and Kutyreva, M.P., Vestn. Kazan. Tekhnol. Univ., 2017, vol. 20, no. 20, p. 16.
Kutyrev, G.A., Busygina, A.A., Akhmadulina, E.N., Rakhmadullina, L.R., Kutyreva, M.P., and Gataulina, A.R., Vestn. Kazan. Tekhnol. Univ., 2016, vol. 19, no. 14, p. 15.
Vallejos, S.T., Erben, M.F., Piro, O.E., Castellano, E.E., and Della Védova, C.O., Polyhedron, 2009, vol. 28, p. 937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2009.01.022
Faizi, S., Siddiqui, B.S., Saleem, R., Siddiqui, S., Aftab, K., and Gilani, A.U.H., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans., 1992, vol. 1, p. 3237.
Faizi, S., Siddiqui, B.S., Saleem, R., Siddiqui, S., Aftab, K., and Gilani, A.U.H., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans., 1994, vol. 1, p. 3035. https://doi.org/10.1039/P19940003035
Faizi, S., Siddiqui, B.S., Saleem, R., Noor, F., and Husnain, S., J. Nat. Prod., 1997, vol. 60, no. 12, p. 1317. https://doi.org/10.1021/np970038y
Faizi, S., Siddiqui, B.S., Saleem, R., Siddiqui, S., Aftab, K., and Gilani, A.U.H., Phytochem., 1995, vol. 38, p. 957. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(94)00729-D
Trivedi, B.K., US Patent 8810816, 1988; C. A., 1988, vol. 108, 167428d
Kutyrev, G.A., Maksimov, A.F., Ernandes, A.-M.P., Kutyreva, M.P., and Gataulina, A.R., Vestn. Kazan. Tekhnol. Univ., 2018, vol. 21, no. 19, p. 69.
Beck, M. and Nadpal, I., The Investigation of Complexation with the Latest Methods, Moscow: Mir, 1989.
Basha, M.T., Alghanmi, R.M., Shehata, M.R., and Abdel-Rahman, L.H., J. Mol. Struct., 2019, vol. 1183, p. 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.02.001
Liver, E., Electron Spectroscopy of Inorganic Compounds, Moscow: Mir, 1987.
Tang, Q., Zhang, Q., Wu, H., and Wang, Y., J. Catal., 2005, vol. 230, p. 384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2004.12.017
Bondar, O.V., Gataulina, A.R., Ulakhovich, N.A., and Kutyreva, M.P., Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2018, vol. 54, no. 9, p. 1301. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070428018090051
Medvedeva, O.I., Kambulova, S.S., Ulakhovich, N.A., Vorobev, V.V., Evtyugin, V.G., Khaldeeva, E.V., and Kutyreva, M.P., Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2017, vol. 87, no. 9, p. 1985. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363217090146
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kutyreva, M.P., Maksimov, A.F., Ernandes, A.M.P. et al. Interaction of Poly(benzoyl thiocarbamate)-Modified Hyperbranched Polyester with Co(II) and Cu(II) Nitrates. Russ J Gen Chem 90, 268–273 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363220020164
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363220020164