Abstract
Science has accumulated to date such amounts of valuable and diverse information that no scientists can be encyclopedists (like those of the 17th and 18th centuries). Now every scientist is usually well informed only in one particular area and often needs consultations of other specialists. The current situation in biology is similar. In addition to evolutionary morphology, which represents fundamentals of zoology, there is a new, clearly cutting-edge and progressive area of studies, molecular genetics, which has already revealed many important general biological patterns. But the conclusions that follow from examining natural phenomena from this new point of view using new methods sometimes prove to be at odds with conventional notions. Considerable controversies have emerged on the phylogenetic position of the type Arthropoda. The peculiar features of the general body plan and the type of development of these animals seem to give evidence that they evolved from Annelida, with which they are often combined under the name Articulata. But attempts have been made to replace this concept by the idea that the clade Ecdysozoa, which includes Arthropods as well as such animals with low levels of organization as Nematoda and Priapulida, emerged early in the evolution of Bilateria. The main reason for combining the said animals in this clade is the fact that they have molts regulated with ecdysone; this point of view is supported by molecular genetic arguments. Although in this review this controversial problem is considered from the morphological point of view, the main purpose of the review is to emphasize the need to establish mutual understanding between morphologists and molecular biologists and carefully find out the causes of the existing disagreements. Rather than ideological opponents, the two areas of science should be allies helping each other to solve complicated problems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aguinaldo, A.M., Turbeville, J.M., Linfor, L.S., Rivera, M.C., Garey, J.R., Raff, R.A., and Lake, J.A., Evidence for a clade of nematodes. Arthropods and other moulting animals, Nature, 1997, vol. 387, pp. 482–493.
Anderson, D.T., Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods, Oxford, 1973.
Beklemishev, V.N., Osnovy sravnitel’noi anatomii bespozvonochnykh (Basics of Comparative Anatomy of Invertebrates), Moscow, 1964, vols. 1–2.
Budd, G., Tardigrades as “stem-group” arthropods: the evidence from Cambrian fauna, Zool. Anz., 2001, vol. 240, pp. 265–270.
Edgecombe, G.D., Palaentological and molecular evidence linking arthropods, onychophorans, and other Ecdysozoa, Evo. Edu. Outreach., 2009.
Edgecombe, G.D., Giribet, G., Casey, W.L., et al., Higher level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions, Org. Divers. Evol., 2011, vol. 11, pp. 151–172.
Emig, J., How the ecdysozoon changes its coat, PLoS Biol., 2005, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1696–1698.
Fedotov, D.M., Evolyutsiya i filogeniya bespozvonochnykh (Evolution and Phylogeny of Invertebrates), Moscow: Nauka, 1966.
Frand, A.R., Russel, S., and Ruvkin, G., Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans molting, PLoS Biol., 2005, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1719–1733.
Gilbert, S.F., Developmental Biology, 2010.
Halanych, K.M., The new view of animal phylogeny, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 2004, vol. 35, pp. 229–256.
Ivanova-Kazas, O.M., Origin of Arthropods and of the Clades of Ecdysozoa, Russ. J. Dev. Biol., 2013, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 221–231.
Malakhov, V.V., Revolution in zoology: the new system of bilateria, Priroda (Moscow, Russ. Fed.), 2009, no. 3, pp. 40–45.
Nielsen, C., Proposing a solution of the Articulaia-Ecdysozoa controversy, Zool. Scripta, 2003, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 475–482.
Nielsen, C., Animal Evolution, Oxford, 2012.
Scholtz, G., The Articulate hypothesis—or what is a segment? Org. Divers. Evol., 2002, vol. 2, pp. 197–215.
Schmidt-Rhaesa, A., The Evolution of Organ System, Oxford, 2007.
Telford, M.J., Bourlat, S.J., Economou, A., et al., The evolution of the Ecdysozoa, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B, 2008, vol. 163, pp. 1529–1537.
Ungerer, P. and Scholtz, G., Cleavage and gastrulation in Pycnogonum litorale (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida): morphological support for the Ecdysozoa? Zoomorphology, 2009 (original paper).
Wagele, J.W. and Misof, B., On quality of evidence in phylogeny reconstruction: a reply to Zrzavy’s defence of “Ecdysozoa” hypothesis, J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 2001, vol. 35, pp. 165–176.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © O.M. Ivanova-Kazas, 2015, published in Ontogenez, 2015, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 155–161.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanova-Kazas, O.M. Articulata and Ecdysozoa. Russ J Dev Biol 46, 121–126 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360415030042
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360415030042