Abstract
A waveguide occupies a domain G with several cylindrical ends. The waveguide is described by a nonstationary equation of the form \(i{{\partial }_{t}}f = \mathcal{A}f\), where \(\mathcal{A}\) is a selfadjoint second order elliptic operator with variable coefficients (in particular, for \(\mathcal{A} = - \Delta \), where Δ stands for the Laplace operator, the equation coincides with the Schrödinger equation). For the corresponding stationary problem with spectral parameter, we define continuous spectrum eigenfunctions and a scattering matrix. The limiting absorption principle provides expansion in the continuous spectrum eigenfunctions. We also calculate wave operators and prove their completeness. Then we define a scattering operator and describe its connections with the scattering matrix.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 WAVEGUIDE AND OPERATORS
Let \(G\) be a domain in \({{\mathbb{R}}^{d}}\) coinciding outside a large ball with the union of finitely many mutually disjoint semicylinders \(\Pi _{ + }^{q} = \{ (y,z):y \in {{\Omega }^{q}},z \in {{\mathbb{R}}_{ + }}\} \), q = 1, 2, ..., \(\mathcal{T}\); the boundary \(\partial G\) is smooth. We consider initial boundary value problem
where \(\mathcal{A}(x,{{D}_{x}}) = \sum\limits_{j,l = 1}^d {{{D}_{j}}{{a}_{{j,l}}}(x){{D}_{l}}} + {{a}_{0}}(x)\), and \({{D}_{j}} = - i\partial {\text{/}}\partial {{x}_{j}}\). We assume that the matrix a(⋅) with entries \({{a}_{{j,l}}}( \cdot ) \in {{C}^{1}}(\overline G )\) is positive definite, that is \(\langle a(x)\xi ,\xi \rangle \geqslant c\langle \xi ,\xi \rangle \) for \(\xi \in {{\mathbb{C}}^{d}}\), where c > 0, and \(\langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle \) is the inner product in \({{\mathbb{C}}^{d}};{{a}_{0}}(\, \cdot \,) \in {{C}^{1}}(\bar {G})\) is a real function. Moreover, for a certain \(\delta > 0\) in every cylindrical end \(G \cap \Pi _{ + }^{q}\) there are fulfilled the stabilisation conditions
here (y, z) are local coordinates in \(G \cap \Pi _{ + }^{q}\). The operator A in \({{L}_{2}}(G)\), given by the differential expression \(\mathcal{A}(x,{{D}_{x}})\) on the domain \(\mathcal{D}(A) = {{H}^{2}}(G) \cap H_{0}^{1}(G)\), is selfadjoint, where, as it usually is, \({{H}^{2}}(G)\) and \(H_{0}^{1}(G)\) are Sobolev spaces.
2 POINT AND CONTINUOUS SPECTRA
A number \(\mu \) is called an eigenvalue (belongs to the point spectrum \({{\sigma }_{p}}(A)\)), if there exists a solution \(u \in \mathcal{D}(A)\) of the equation \(Au = \mu u\); such a solution is called an eigenfunction. The eigenvalues of the operator A are of finite multiplicities and can not accumulate at finite distance.
A number \(\mu \) is said to be in the continuous spectrum \({{\sigma }_{c}}(A)\), if the image of operator \(A - \mu \) is nonclosed in \({{L}_{2}}(G)\). This is the case if and only if there exists a solution \(u \notin {{L}_{2}}(G)\) of the problem
with \({\text{|}}u(x){\text{|}} \leqslant C{{({\text{|}}x{\text{|}} + 1)}^{N}}\), \(N < \infty \) (see [1]). Such a solution is called a continuous spectrum eigenfunction. For all \(\mu \), except a set of isolated values, the continuous spectrum eigenfunctions are bounded. These isolated values are called thresholds and accumulate at \( + \infty \) only. The semiaxis \([{{\tau }_{1}}, + \infty )\) coincides with the continuous spectrum of A; here \({{\tau }_{1}} > 0\) is the minimal threshold. Denote by \({{\mathcal{E}}_{c}}(\mu )\) the linear hull of the continuous spectrum eigenfunctions corresponding to \(\mu \); \(\dim {{\mathcal{E}}_{c}}(\mu ) < \infty \) for all \(\mu \). If a number \(\mu \) is not an eigenvalue, then \(\varkappa (\mu ): = \;{\text{dim}}{{\mathcal{E}}_{c}}(\mu )\) is called the continuous spectrum multiplicity at \(\mu \). If \(\mu \) belongs to the continuous spectrum and is an eigenvalue, we set \(\varkappa (\mu )\) := \(\dim ({{\mathcal{E}}_{c}}(\mu ){\text{/}}{{\mathcal{E}}_{p}}(\mu ))\), where \({{\mathcal{E}}_{c}}(\mu ){\text{/}}{{\mathcal{E}}_{p}}(\mu )\) is a factor-space and \({{\mathcal{E}}_{p}}(\mu )\) stands for the subspace of eigenfunctions corresponding to μ. The function \(\mu \mapsto \varkappa (\mu )\) remains constant between neighboring thresholds.
3 WAVES. CONTINUOUS SPECTRUM EIGENFUNCTIONS. SCATTERING MATRIX
In every cylinder \({{\Pi }^{q}} = {{\Omega }^{q}} \times \mathbb{R}\), \(q = 1, \ldots ,\mathcal{T}\), we consider a problem (2) changing \({{a}_{{j,l}}}(y,z)\) for \(a_{{j,l}}^{q}(y)\). For this model problem, we look for solutions of the form \((y,z) \mapsto \exp (i\lambda z)\varphi (y)\) with real λ. On the interval \(\mu \in (\tau {\kern 1pt} ',\tau {\kern 1pt} '')\) between neighbouring thresholds \(\tau {\kern 1pt} ',\tau {\kern 1pt} ''\) there exist finitely many linearly independent solutions
where \(y \in {{\Omega }^{q}}\), \(z \in \mathbb{R}\), and \(j = 1, \ldots ,{{\varkappa }^{q}}\). The functions \(\mu \mapsto N_{j}^{ \pm }(\mu ),\lambda _{j}^{ \pm }(\mu ),\varphi _{j}^{ \pm }( \cdot ,\mu )\) are analytic on the interval \(\mu \in (\tau {\kern 1pt} ',\tau {\kern 1pt} '')\) and \( \mp (\lambda _{j}^{ \pm }){\kern 1pt} '(\mu ) > 0\) (see [7, Subsect. 2.5]). The energy flux of \(u_{j}^{ + }\) (\(u_{j}^{ - }\)) through the cross-section \({{\Omega }^{q}}\) in the direction of z-axis is negative (positive). Therefore the wave \(u_{j}^{ + }\) (\(u_{j}^{ - }\)) is called incoming from \( + \infty \) (outgoing to +∞). The coefficient \(N_{j}^{ \pm }(\mu )\) is chosen so that the density of flux is equal to unit for every wave.
Let us turn to problem (2) in the domain \(G\). On the interval \((\tau {\kern 1pt} ',\tau {\kern 1pt} '')\) between neighbouring thresholds \(\tau {\kern 1pt} '\) and \(\tau {\kern 1pt} ''\) there exists the basis in the space of continuous spectrum eigenfunctions \({{\mathcal{E}}_{c}}(\mu ){\text{/}}{{\mathcal{E}}_{p}}(\mu )\) consisting of analytic functions \(\mu \mapsto Y_{j}^{ + }( \cdot ,\mu )\), \(j = 1, \ldots ,\varkappa \) with asymptotics
as \({\text{|}}x{\text{|}} \to \infty \). Here \(\alpha = \alpha (\mu ) > 0\) is a sufficiently small number, which is restricted by the rate of stabilization of coefficients (α < δ in (1)) and the distance from \(\mu \) to a threshold; for any interval \([\mu {\kern 1pt} ',\mu {\kern 1pt} ''] \subset (\tau {\kern 1pt} ',\tau {\kern 1pt} '')\) one can chose \(\alpha \) independent of \(\mu \). The \(u_{j}^{ + }\) and \(u_{j}^{ - }\) denote the incoming and outgoing waves introduced in the cylinders \({{\Pi }^{1}}, \ldots ,{{\Pi }^{\mathcal{T}}}\) and numbered by a through index j = 1, ..., \(\varkappa \), \(\varkappa = {{\varkappa }^{1}} + \ldots + {{\varkappa }^{\mathcal{T}}}\). We also assume that every of these waves is given by (3) in \(\Pi _{ + }^{q}\) for some q and vanishes in \(\Pi _{ + }^{r}\) for \(r \ne q\).
The matrix \(S(\mu ) = {\text{||}}{{S}_{{jl}}}(\mu ){\text{||}}\) is unitary; it is called the scattering matrix. The matrix-valued function \(\mu \mapsto S(\mu )\) is defined on the continuous spectrum except the thresholds; it is analytic on every interval between neighbouring thresholds.
4 LIMITING ABSORPTION PRINCIPLE. SPECTRAL MEASURE
Denote by \({{\rho }_{\alpha }}\) a smooth positive function in G that coincides with \({{e}^{{\alpha |x|}}}\) in every cylindrical end; here \(\alpha \) is the number in (4), independent of \(\mu \). We introduce the space \({{L}_{{2,\alpha }}}(G) = \{ f:{{\rho }_{\alpha }}f \in {{L}_{2}}(G)\} \). Let \(R(\mu )\) be the resolvent \({{(A - \mu )}^{{ - 1}}}\), \({{\sigma }_{c}}(A)\) is the continuous spectrum, \({{\mathcal{H}}_{c}}\) the continuous subspace of A (i.e., the orthocomplement in \({{L}_{2}}(G)\) to the linear hull of the eigenvectors of the operator A), E(x) is the spectral projection.
Lemma 1.For any\(f \in {{L}_{{2,\alpha }}}(G) \cap {{\mathcal{H}}_{c}}\)and\(\mu \in {{\sigma }_{c}}(A)\)different from the thresholds, there exist the limits\(R(\mu \pm i0)f\)while
and the coefficients in the asymptotics satisfy
where\(Y_{j}^{ - } = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\varkappa (\mu )} {S_{{jk}}^{*}Y_{k}^{ + }} \). Moreover,
Proof. Let us explain the main idea. The right-hand side in (5) gives intrinsic radiation conditions. The statement of problem
with such radiation conditions was justified in [1]. The solutions \({{u}^{ \mp }}(x;\mu )\) admit analytic continuation into a complex neighborhood of \(\mu \) [2]. By virtue of (3), the functions \(u_{j}^{ \mp }(x;\mu \pm i\varepsilon )\) are exponentially decreasing as \(\varepsilon > 0\) and \({\text{|}}x{\text{|}} \to \infty \). Therefore the solutions \({{u}^{ \mp }}(x;\mu \pm \)iε) belong to \({{L}_{2}}(G)\) and coincide with \(R(\mu \pm i\varepsilon )\). It remains to verify (7) for large |x|. \(\square \)
Lemma 2.Let the interval\([\mu {\kern 1pt} ',\mu {\kern 1pt} ''] \subset {{\sigma }_{c}}(A)\)be free from the thresholds, \([\mu {\kern 1pt} ',\mu {\kern 1pt} ''] \supset X\)an arbitrary interval, and \(f,g \in {{L}_{{2,\alpha }}}(G) \cap {{\mathcal{H}}_{c}}\). Then
and the measure\(X \mapsto (E(X)f,g)\)is absolutely continuous.
Proof. According to the Stone formula,
Taking into account (7) and (6), we obtain (9). It follows that the measure \(X \mapsto (E(X)f,g)\) is absolutely continuous. Indeed, equality (9) extends to arbitrary Borel sets \(X \subset [\mu {\kern 1pt} ',\mu {\kern 1pt} '']\) and for such X leads to the estimate \({\text{|}}(E(X)f,g){\text{|}} \leqslant c{\text{|}}X{\text{|}},\) where the constant
is finite due to analyticity of the functions \(\mu \mapsto Y_{j}^{ + }( \cdot ,\mu )\) and independent of X.
Corollary 1. The absolutely continuous spectrum \({{\sigma }_{{ac}}}(A)\) of A coincides with [τ1, +∞ ), while the singularly continuous spectrum is absent.
5 THE SPECTRAL REPRESENTATION OF THE OPERATOR A
Let \(\{ {{\tau }_{j}}\} _{{j = 1}}^{\infty }\) be the thresholds of the operator A in \(G\) numbered in order of increasing, \({{\varkappa }_{j}}\) the multiplicity of continuous spectrum on \(({{\tau }_{j}},{{\tau }_{{j + 1}}})\), while \(\{ Y_{{jk}}^{ + }\} _{{k = 1}}^{{{{\varkappa }_{j}}}}\) and \(\{ Y_{{jk}}^{ - }\} _{{k = 1}}^{{{{\varkappa }_{j}}}}\) the bases of the continuous spectrum eigenfunctions. For \(f \in {{L}_{{2,\alpha }}}(G) \cap {{\mathcal{H}}_{c}}\) and \(\mu \in ({{\tau }_{j}},{{\tau }_{{j + 1}}})\) we introduce the column vector
The function \(\mu \mapsto ({{\Phi }^{ \pm }}f)(\mu )\) is given on \({{\sigma }_{{ac}}}(A)\), except the thresholds. We denote by \(\mathfrak{h}\) the Hilbert space of vector-functions \(g \in \mathop \oplus \limits_{j = 1}^\infty {{L}_{2}}(({{\tau }_{j}},{{\tau }_{{j + 1}}});{{\mathbb{C}}^{{{{\varkappa }_{j}}}}})\) with inner product
By definition, the absolutely continuous subspace \({{\mathcal{H}}_{{ac}}}\) of the operator A consists of such elements \(f \in {{\mathcal{H}}_{c}}\) that the function \(\mu \mapsto (E( - \infty ,\mu )f,f)\) is absolutely continuous. According to Colollary 1, we have \({{\mathcal{H}}_{{ac}}} = {{\mathcal{H}}_{c}}\). Let us denote by Pac the orthogonal projection on \({{\mathcal{H}}_{{ac}}}\).
Lemma 3. For any \(f,g \in {{L}_{{2,\alpha }}}(G) \cap {{\mathcal{H}}_{{ac}}}\) there holds the equality
Proof. Let \({{\tau }_{j}}\) and \({{\tau }_{{j + 1}}}\) be some neighbouring thresholds. Since the function \(\mu \mapsto (E({{\tau }_{1}},\mu )f,f)\) is absolutely continuous, its derivative is summable on the interval \(({{\tau }_{j}},{{\tau }_{{j + 1}}})\). From (9) with g = f it follows that
The summability of the left-hand side on \(({{\tau }_{j}},{{\tau }_{{j + 1}}})\) means that the function \(\mu \mapsto (f,Y_{{jk}}^{ + }( \cdot ,\mu ))\) can have at the thresholds a square integrable singularity only.
In (9) we put \(X = ({{\tau }_{j}},{{\tau }_{{j + 1}}})\) and sum the obtained equalities over j from 1 to J. We have
Since \(E({{\tau }_{1}}, + \infty ){{P}_{{ac}}} = {{P}_{{ac}}}\) and \(f,g \in {{\mathcal{H}}_{{ac}}}\), there exists the limit as \(J \to \infty \):
The maps \({{\Phi }^{ \pm }}\) can be extended by continuity to the whole subspace \({{\mathcal{H}}_{{ac}}}\). Since the continuous spectrum eigenfunctions \(Y_{{jk}}^{ \pm }\) are orthogonal to any eigenfunction, the \({{\Phi }^{ \pm }}\) are defined on \({{\mathcal{H}}_{p}}\), while \({{\Phi }^{ \pm }}{{{\text{|}}}_{{{{\mathcal{H}}_{p}}}}} = 0\).
Lemma 4. There hold the relations
6 WAVE OPERATOR. SCATTERING OPERATOR
Let \(G_{0}^{q} \subset G \cap \Pi _{ + }^{q}\) have a smooth boundary and coincide with \(G \cap \Pi _{ + }^{q}\) at sufficiently large distance. Set \({{G}_{0}}: = {{ \cup }_{q}}G_{0}^{q}\). Let A0 be the operator in \({{L}_{2}}({{G}_{0}})\) given by the differential expression \(\mathcal{A}(x,{{D}_{x}})\) on the domain \(\mathcal{D}({{A}_{0}}) = {{H}^{2}}({{G}_{0}}) \cap H_{0}^{1}({{G}_{0}})\); in what follows, A0 plays the role of nonperturbed operator. The sets of thresholds, multiplicities of continuous spectra, and the sets of incoming and outgoing waves coincide for the waveguides G and G0. We denote by \(Y_{{0jk}}^{ \pm }\) the continuous spectrum eigenfunctions in the waveguide G0 and by \(\Phi _{0}^{ \pm }\) the corresponding spectral transforms.
Let \(\chi \) be a smooth cut-off function in G0, equal to 1 for \({\text{|}}x{\text{|}} \geqslant {{t}_{0}}\) and to zero for \({\text{|}}x{\text{|}} \leqslant {{t}_{0}} - 1\), where \({{t}_{0}}\) is a sufficiently large positive number. The identification operator \(J:{{L}_{2}}({{G}_{0}}) \to {{L}_{2}}(G)\) acts as the composition of multiplication by χ and extension by zero to G. The wave operators \({{W}^{ \pm }}\) are defined by \({{W}^{ \pm }}f\) := \({{\lim }_{{t \to \pm \infty }}}{{e}^{{iAt}}}J{{e}^{{ - i{{A}_{0}}t}}}f\).
Theorem 1. There holds the equality \({{W}^{ \pm }}f = ({{\Phi }^{ \mp }}){\text{*}}\Phi _{0}^{ \mp }f.\)
Let us calculate the scattering operator:
here we take into account the relations \(({{\Phi }^{ - }}f)(\mu )\) = \({{S}^{t}}(\mu )({{\Phi }^{ + }}f)(\mu )\) and \({{\Phi }^{ + }}({{\Phi }^{ + }}){\text{*}}\) = I. Note that \({{S}^{t}}(\mu ) = S(\mu )\) provided the coefficients of \(\mathcal{A}(x,{{D}_{x}})\) are real. Since
the operator S is the integral one with kernel
From Lemma 4 it follows that the wave operators are complete and the scattering operator is unitary on the absolutely continuous subspace of the operator A0.
7 BIBLIOGRAPHIC REMARKS
The papers by Lyford [3, 4] are devoted to scattering theory for wave equation in waveguides with several cylindrical ends. A gap in Lyfords arguments was indicated and corrected in [5]. We develop another approach to the spectral analysis of the stationary problem in the waveguide without using the specifics of the Laplacian and the methods of perturbation theory, in particular the Lippmann–Schwinger equation. This allows us to consider operators with variable coefficients.
REFERENCES
S. A. Nazarov and B. A. Plamenevskii, Elliptic Problems in Domains with Piecewise Smooth Boundaries (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1994).
B. A. Plamenevskii and A. S. Poretskii, SPb. Math. J. 30, 285 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1090/spmj/1543
W. C. Lyford, Math Ann. 218, 229 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01349697
W. C. Lyford, Math. Ann. 217, 257 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01436177
R. Picard and S. Seidler, Math. Ann. 269, 411 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01450702
Funding
The study was supported by project Russian Science Foundation no. 17-11-01126.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plamenevskii, B.A., Poretskii, A.S. & Sarafanov, O.V. Mathematical Scattering Theory in Quantum Waveguides. Dokl. Phys. 64, 430–433 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S102833581911003X
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S102833581911003X