Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the study of dust vortices on the Earth and Mars. The hydrodynamic similarity of convective vortices is considered, and the similarity criteria are determined. The motion of dust particles in a vortex is modeled. The conditions for the similarity of dust particle trajectories in a vortex in the terrestrial and Martian atmospheres are determined. It is shown that there is a similarity between terrestrial and Martian vortices. This fact can be useful for the study of the Martian atmosphere, given that there are proven methods for measuring the parameters of vortices on the Earth, while such measurements on Mars are difficult.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
INTRODUCTION
At the present time, the Red Planet is being actively studied. The surface of Mars and the near-surface layer are being studied using the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity and Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity; at the end of 2018, the InSight space probe made a successful landing on Mars. The atmosphere of Mars is sensed using the orbiters of several missions, including the Russian–European mission ExoMars. Continuous flow of data on the state of the Martian atmosphere makes it possible to build models of global atmospheric circulation (Forget et al., 1999; Bougher et al., 2015) and to study the seasonal variability and altitude distribution of atmospheric components (González-Galindo et al., 2005; Forget et al., 2009; Němec et al., 2011).
Despite the Martian atmosphere being sparse, at different times and at different altitudes, suspended particles of surface dust or condensed carbon dioxide and water are observed in it (Montmessin et al., 2006; 2007; Fedorova et al., 2014). In recent decades, considerable attention has been paid to the study of the parameters of dust and dusty plasma in space (Popel’ and Gisko, 2006; Popel’ et al., 2011), as well as in the atmospheres and exospheres of planets (Michael et al., 2008; Fedorova et al., 2014; Izvekova and Popel’, 2017) and satellites (Stubbs et al., 2006, 2007; Sternovsky et al., 2008; Popel’ et al., 2013; Popel’ et al., 2017, 2018), which is due to the significant role of dust in the conditions of a rarefied atmosphere or its absence. While the redistribution of dust particles in the Earth’s atmosphere is of major ecological importance, in rarefied atmospheres, the dust component may play a decisive role in climate formation. In the case of the charging of dust particles and formation of a plasma–dust system, the behavior of dust particles changes significantly, which must be taken into account when planning space missions.
The objective of this study is to describe convective vortices on Mars using the data obtained from the observations in the Earth’s atmosphere. Convective processes resulting from the presence of vertical temperature gradients play an important role in planetary atmospheres. The role of convection is significant, in particular, in the formation of clouds, not only in the Earth’s atmosphere, but also on other planets. For example, clouds of carbon dioxide, presumably of convective origin, were observed in the Martian atmosphere (Montmessin et al., 2007). In addition, convection is considered to be the main cause of dust vortices on the Earth and on Mars. On the Earth, dust vortices, as a rule, have sizes of the order of several meters, large vortices up to 100 meters in diameter being rare, while in the Martian atmosphere, there are vortices of hundreds of meters and even kilometers in diameter. Dust vortices on Mars attracted the attention of scientists in the middle of the last century, even before the first visual confirmation of their existence was obtained after processing the data from the Viking mission in the 1980s. This phenomenon has been actively investigated (Balme and Greeley, 2006; Delory et al., 2006; Onishchenko et al., 2014, 2016; Barth et al., 2016); however, no final generally accepted model has been constructed so far. Laboratory modeling of meteorite impacts on Mars was carried out using the similarity theory (Rybakov et al., 1997); as a result, it was found that meteorite impacts could contribute to the formation of convective dust vortices. Dust vortices can lift and carry large amount of dust from the surface, which is especially important in the rarefied atmosphere of Mars.
It should be noted that the similarity theory is an important tool for the study of processes in atmospheres of planets. The similarity theory was developed for the circulation of planetary atmospheres (Golitsyn, 1970, 2004). In this paper, we consider the hydrodynamic similarity of convective near-surface vortices.
The paper is structured as follows. The next section of the paper provides an overview of the parameters of the Martian atmosphere; the section “Similarity of Convective Structures” is dedicated to the application of the similarity theory to describe Martian vortices; the section “Modeling of Vortices on Mars and on the Earth” describes the results of numerical modeling of vortex structures; and in the last section conclusions are given.
PARAMETERS OF THE MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE
The atmosphere of Mars has certain similarities with the Earth’s atmosphere. The density and pressure on the surface are approximately one hundredth of those on the Earth; the primary gas component of the atmosphere (95%) is carbon dioxide. The temperature distribution makes it possible to distinguish the region of the troposphere from the surface to an altitude of 50–60 km, the middle atmosphere from the troposphere to 110 km, and the thermosphere above 110 km (González-Galindo et al., 2005). The average surface temperature is 210 K; the temperature profile undergoes significant diurnal and seasonal variations, especially in the troposphere. Mars has an ionosphere with electron concentrations reaching maximum values of 105 cm–3 at altitudes of 135–140 km; the lower boundary of the ionosphere usually starts from 80 km, but in some cases it can drop to 65 km (Pätzold et al., 2005). In addition, the conductivity of the gas shell of the Martian near-surface is very high (it exceeds the air conductivity near the Earth’s surface by almost two orders of magnitude), and according to various estimates it ranges from 2.8 × 10–12 S/m (Zhai et al., 2006) to 10–11 S/m (Michael et al., 2008). The concentrations of electrons and ions at the surface of the planet during the day reach values up to approximately 1 cm–3 for electrons and 103 cm–3 for ions (Michael et al., 2008).
At altitudes up to 50–70 km, an important atmospheric parameter is the distribution of suspended dust particles, which varies greatly in time and space. The dust component plays a significant role in the dynamics of the Martian atmosphere and in the radiation balance, especially during dust storms, when the concentration of suspended dust particles sharply increases. But even in quiet periods, atmospheric dust on Mars poses a number of questions, such as the causes of dust clouds at different altitudes from 4 to 80–100 km (Montmessin et al., 2006) and sources of fine-mode dust particles with an average diameter of approximately 44 nm, which were observed for a long time at altitudes of 30–40 km in the northern hemisphere and up to 70 km in the southern hemisphere (Fedorova et al., 2014). Possible sources of dust particles are dust vortices (dust devils), which are regularly observed on the surface of Mars along with dust storms. Strong electrification in these vortices suggests that in some cases electrical breakdowns may occur (Zhai et al., 2006; Renno et al., 2003). The main parameters of dust vortices on the Earth, such as size, vertical and horizontal velocities, and electric fields (Farrell et al., 1999; Jackson and Farrell, 2006), are measured experimentally in deserts, where these vortices often occur. On the Earth, such vortices typically range in size from meters to a kilometer in height and less than 100 m in diameter (Mattsson et al., 1993). Table 1 shows some of such data measured at different times in vortices at a height of 2 m (3.5 m for (Tratt et al., 2003)) above the Earth’s surface.
SIMILARITY OF CONVECTIVE STRUCTURES
Let us find out whether dust vortices on the Earth and on Mars are similar. First we discuss the main aspects of the similarity theory. Let some physical value a be a function of n other physical values and dimensional parameters a1, a2, … an:
In the theory of dimensions (see, e.g., Sedov, 1977; Barenblatt, 1982), the following statement is proved (pi-theorem).
Let k values from a1, a2, … an have an independent dimensionality; dependence (1) can then be represented as follows:
where Πa is the dimensionless unknown quantity, and Π1, Π2, … Πn – k are dimensionless complexes.
Phenomena are called similar if their physical parameters differ in magnitude, but dimensionless complexes Π1, Π2, … Πn – k coincide. It is also obvious that the physics of the phenomena should be the same. Similar phenomena are widely used in the planning of laboratory experiments.
The main role in the formation of dust vortices on Mars and Earth is played by thermal convection. Let us estimate the parameters (characteristic scale and gas flow velocity) of a vortex on Mars, which is similar to a typical vortex on the Earth.
Let us write the system of equations for the convective motion of viscous gas in the gravity field. With sufficiently slow flows, the gas can be considered incompressible, while the effect of gas expansion during heating is significant. Let us represent the temperature field T, density ρ, and pressure p as a sum of equilibrium values (with a subscript “0”) and their perturbations (with a prime):
T0 and ρ0 have constant values, and the value of p0 corresponds to the mechanical equilibrium at constant T0 and ρ0:
The density perturbation is proportional to the temperature perturbation.
where \({\beta }\) is the coefficient of thermal expansion of the gas.
The continuity equation for an incompressible gas is
The equation of motion is a consequence of the Navier–Stokes equation:
where \(\nu \) is the kinematic viscosity.
The consequence of the energy conservation law is the equation of the thermal conductivity of an incompressible viscous gas.
where Δ is the Laplace operator, χ is the coefficient of thermal diffusivity, cp is the specific heat of the gas at constant pressure, J = DijDij, and \({{D}_{{ij}}}\) = \(\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{{\partial {{{v}}_{i}}}}{{\partial {{x}_{j}}}} + \frac{{\partial {{{v}}_{j}}}}{{\partial {{x}_{i}}}}} \right).\)
According to the formulated equations (3)–(5), the gas flow rate is a function of the following parameters: x, t, l, τ, \(\Delta T,\) χ, β, ν, ρ0, T0, and g, where l and τ are the characteristic length and time scales, and ΔT is the maximum temperature difference. In the conditions of thermal convection, the Peclet number νl/χ or the Reynolds number νl/ν may be the dimensionless form of the unknown variable (in this case, velocity) and the similarity criterion is the combination of the Grashof criterion Gr and Prandtl criterion Pr (Gukhman, 1973). The Grashof criterion (number) is the ratio between the Archimedean buoyant force caused by the uneven distribution of the gas density in a nonuniform temperature field, and the viscous force:
The Prandtl criterion (number) Pr = ν/χ characterizes the ratio between the intensities of molecular transfer of momentum and heat transfer by thermal conductivity; the Prandtl number is a physical characteristic of the environment and depends only on its thermodynamic state. For gases, it is almost independent of temperature; for diatomic gases, the Prandtl number is approximately 0.72, for polyatomic gases, it ranges from 0.75 to 1. For gases, it can be assumed that \(\chi \propto {{{{T}^{{{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2}}}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{{T}^{{{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2}}}}} {\left( {p\sqrt m } \right)}}} \right. \kern-0em} {\left( {p\sqrt m } \right)}},\) where T is the temperature, p is the pressure, and m is the molar mass of the gas. In fact, in this case, the Prandtl number becomes equal to one, Pr = 1.
As a result, the relationship for the dimensionless velocity \({\mathbf{\tilde {v}}}\) in the stationary case takes the following form:
Since a developed dust vortex can be considered as a situation when the inertial force has a large relative value in comparison with the viscosity effects, we take the dimensionless velocity as \({\mathbf{\tilde {v}}} = {\mathbf{v}}{l \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {l {\chi }}} \right. \kern-0em} {\chi }},\) and we will use the value of GrPr2 as the similarity criterion, rather than Gr and Pr separately. It should be noted that in the case of the dominant role of viscosity, the GrPr criterion is used (Gukhman, 1973). In our case, (6) will look as follows:
Let us denote the parameters of the Earth’s atmosphere by the subscript “E” and parameters of the Martian atmosphere by the subscript “M”. Using (7), we find the ratio of the similarity criteria for the terrestrial and Martian vortices:
We will use the following ratios of the parameters:
According to the measurements of the Viking spacecraft (Balme and Greeley, 2006), the maximum temperature variation in Martian vortices is 5–6°С, which matches terrestrial vortices. Then, ΔTE/ΔTM ≈ 1.
Assuming for such vortices
and taking into account (8), we obtain the relation between the characteristic scales:
Further, from the equality of dimensionless velocities for the Earth and Mars
we obtain the relation of the characteristic speeds
The resulting values do not contradict the available data. The vertical velocities in the Earth’s vortices have values of the order of 10 m/s, while the velocities in the Martian vortices, according to the estimates based on the measurements of the Viking-1 and Viking-2 landers (Ryan and Lucich, 1983), are several times greater.
SIMULATION OF VORTICES ON MARS AND ON THE EARTH
Hydrodynamic equations (3)–(5) that describe convective motions can be transformed in such a way that they can describe three-dimensional vortex structures (Onishchenko et al., 2014, 2016; Izvekova and Popel’, 2017, 2018). The basic equations describing gas dynamics in dust vortices will be rewritten in the following form:
where \(\tilde {\Delta }\) = \(r\frac{\partial }{{\partial r}}\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial }{{\partial r}} + \frac{{{{\partial }^{2}}}}{{\partial {{z}^{2}}}}\) is the Grad–Shafranov operator; ψ is the function of the poloidal current flow; \(\xi \) = \(g{{\rho {{'}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\rho {{'}}} {{{\rho }_{0}}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {{{\rho }_{0}}}}\) is the normalized density perturbation; \(N\) = \({{g}^{{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2}}}}{{\left( {\frac{1}{{\gamma p}}\frac{{\partial p}}{{\partial z}} - \frac{1}{\rho }\frac{{\partial \rho }}{{\partial z}}} \right)}^{{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2}}}}\) is the Väisälä–Brent frequency; γ is the adiabatic index; \(J\left\{ {a,b} \right\}\) = \(\frac{{\partial a}}{{\partial x}}\frac{{\partial b}}{{\partial y}} - \frac{{\partial a}}{{\partial y}}\frac{{\partial b}}{{\partial x}}\) is the Jacobian; the density and pressure perturbations are small, \(\left| {\rho {{'}}} \right| \ll {{\rho }_{0}},\)\(\left| {p{{'}}} \right| \ll {{p}_{0}};\) ωz is the toroidal vorticity; and the poloidal velocity components vr and vz are determined by the function of current: \({{{v}}_{r}} = - \frac{1}{r}\frac{{\partial \psi }}{{\partial z}},\)\({{{v}}_{z}} = \frac{1}{r}\frac{{\partial \psi }}{{\partial r}}.\)
Numerical solution of system (11)–(13) allows us to determine the velocity field of the vortex. Dust particles raised from the surface are an important component of a dust vortex. In the context of the approach used in this study, dust particles are considered as an admixture that does not significantly affect the hydrodynamic parameters of the vortex. It should be noted that the influence of the dust component on the gas flow was previously considered in the context of the study of the Martian atmosphere when investigating the motion of turbulent flows with suspended particles during dust storms (Barenblatt and Golitsyn, 1974; Golitsyn, 1973; Leovy et al., 1973; Gierasch and Goody, 1972). Dust storms are more prolonged and larger-scale phenomena than dust vortices, and cover most of the planet. Moving in a vortex, particles acquire an electric charge as a result of collisions; as noted in (Melnik and Parrot, 1998; Lacks and Levandovsky, 2007), when particles of the same material collide, large particles accumulate a positive charge, while smaller particles accumulate a negative charge. The opposite charging of particles of different sizes leads to a spatial separation of charge and the generation of an electric field. In terrestrial vortices, fields of 4.35 kV/m were measured for a 7-m diameter (Farrel et al., 2004) and 20 kV/m for a vortex with a diameter of 30 m (Delory et al., 2006). Due to the lower value of the electrical breakdown field on Mars, the study of the electrification of Martian vortices is important. According to contemporary models (Barth et al., 2016), the electric field values may lie near the breakdown values. However, at present, there is no definitive answer to the question of lightning activity in dust vortices on Mars. Ground-based measurements by means of a radio telescope (Ruf et al., 2009) suggest the excitation of the Schumann resonator on Mars during dust storms. This may indicate the presence of electrical discharges during measurements. However, measurements using orbiters (Yair, 2012) gave no confirmation of thunderstorm activity. An unambiguous answer to this question requires measurements of the electric fields on the Martian surface; these are planned as part of the second stage of the ExoMars mission. To build a complete dust vortex model, it is necessary to take into account the effects of electrification. The modeling of motion of dust particles takes into account their electrification due to collisions (triboelectric effect) and the generated electric field (Izvekova and Popel’, 2017). Detailed consideration of electrical processes from the point of view of the similarity theory appears to be rather complicated. In this paper, we will focus on considering the motion of a particle without the addend determined by the force of electrical interaction, since previous calculations (Izvekova and Popel’, 2017, 2018) showed that for the most part of the trajectory, the influence of the electric field can be neglected. Let us write down the motion equation of a dust particle with a density ρp and size a in the velocity field of the vortex:
Here Vp is the velocity of the dust particle; Vpr is the velocity of the particle relative to the vortex; η is the dynamic viscosity; and Cc = 1 + Kn(A + B exp(–b/Kn)) is the Cunningham correction (Aloyan, 2002), where A = 1.257, B = 0.4, b = 1.10, and Kn = 2λ/a is the Knudsen number, while λ is the mean free path of gas molecules. We note that for particle sizes comparable to the free path, the Cunningham correction is significant. On Earth, the correction will be negligible, but on Mars, where the mean free path is approximately 5 µm, it should be considered. Let us make Eq. (14) nondimensional with the characteristic values of length r0 and velocity V0. In the dimensionless form, we have
where \({{{\mathbf{\tilde {V}}}}_{p}} = {{{{{\mathbf{V}}}_{p}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{{{\mathbf{V}}}_{p}}} {{{V}_{0}}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {{{V}_{0}}}},\)\({{{\mathbf{\tilde {V}}}}_{{pr}}} = {{{{{\mathbf{V}}}_{{pr}}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{{{\mathbf{V}}}_{{pr}}}} {{{V}_{0}}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {{{V}_{0}}}},\) and \({\mathbf{\tilde {g}}} = \frac{{{{r}_{0}}}}{{V_{0}^{2}}}{\mathbf{g}}.\)
It can be seen that the dimensionless values of the acceleration of gravity on the Earth and on Mars are the same. For the similarity of trajectories, it is necessary that the coefficients before the relative velocities are equal:
Using the relationships between the characteristic dimensions and velocities (9), (10) and assuming that the particle densities coincide, and the viscosity of the Martian atmosphere is 0.6 of the Earth’s (estimated by the viscosity of carbon dioxide at 210 K) (Babichev et al., 1991), we find
Let us construct a vortex with a core size of 10 m on the Earth and 170 m on Mars. The trajectories of dust particles in these vortices are shown in Fig. 1. It can be seen that the particle trajectories qualitatively correspond to the parameters chosen according to the estimates of the similarity theory.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we have considered the similarity of convective structures in the atmospheres of the Earth and Mars. The similarity criteria have been obtained. The characteristic parameters of the vortices and dust particles that satisfy the similarity criteria have been estimated. The relations between the velocities in the vortex and the dimensions of the vortex structures in the terrestrial and Martian atmosphere have been obtained, under which the similarity conditions are satisfied. The motion of dust particles in the velocity field of dust vortices have been considered, and the sizes of particles whose trajectories can be considered similar have been estimated. A vortex structure has been simulated, and the trajectories of dust particles in a vortex have been constructed. The estimates and simulations show that there is a similarity between dust vortices on the Earth and on Mars. Given that measurements on Earth are available to experimenters but are difficult on Mars, these conclusions may be useful in the studies of Martian vortices.
It should be noted that the above consideration is based mainly on hydrodynamic processes. Such an approach is typical for atmospheric physics (see, e.g., Golitsyn, 2004). That being said, one should take into account the possibility of the development of plasma processes in the planetary atmospheres, such as the generation of electric fields and charging of dust particles (Izvekova and Popel’, 2016, 2017). At the same time, due to the prevailing role of the neutral component in the near-surface atmosphere, the dynamics of vortices in it are determined by hydrodynamic processes. This fact makes it possible to construct a theory of hydrodynamic similarity of convective surface vortices.
REFERENCES
Aloyan, A.E., Dinamika i kinetika gazovykh primesei i aerozolei v atmosphere. Kurs lektsii (Dynamics and Kinetics of Gas Admixtures and Aerosols in Atmosphere: Course of Lecturers), Moscow: Inst. Vychislit. Matem., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2002.
Babichev, A.P., Babushkina, N.A., Bratkovskii, A.M., et al., Fizicheskie velichiny: Spravochnik (Physical Values: Handbook), Grigor’ev, I.S. and Meilikhov, E.Z., Eds., Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 1991.
Balme, M. and Greeley, R., Dust devils on Earth and Mars, Rev. Geophys., 2006, vol. 44, art. ID RG3003.
Balme, M., Metzger, S., Towner, M., Ringrose, T., Greeley, R., and Iversen, J., Friction wind speeds in dust devils: a field study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, vol. 30, no. 161830, pp. 1–4.
Barenblatt, G.I., Podobie, avtomodel’nost’, promezhutochnaya asimptomatika (Similarity, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1982.
Barenblatt, G.I. and Golitsyn, G.S., Local structure of mature dust storms, J. Atmos. Sci., 1974, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1917–1933.
Barth, E.L., Farrell, W.M., and Rafkin, S.C.R., Electric field generation in Martian dust devils, Icarus, 2016, vol. 268, pp. 253–265.
Bougher, S.W., Pawlowski, D., Bell, J.M., Nelli, S., McDunn, T., Murphy, J.R., Chizek, M., and Ridley, A., Mars Global Ionosphere-Thermosphere Model (MGITM): Solar cycle, seasonal, and diurnal variations of the Mars upper atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2015, vol. 120, pp. 311–342.
Delory, G.T., Farrell, W.M., Atreya, S.K., Renno, N.O., Wong, A.-S., Cummer, S.A., Sentman, D.D., Marshall, J.R., Rafkin, S.C.R., and Catling, D.C., Oxidant enhancement in Martian dust devils and storms: storm electric fields and electron dissociative attachment, Astrobiology, 2006, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 451–462.
Dust Devils., Reiss, D., Lorenz, R., Balme, M., Neakrase, L., Rossi, A.P., Spiga, A., and Zarnecki, J., Eds., New York: Springer-Verlag, 2017.
Farrell, W.M., Kaiser, M.L., Desch, M.D., Houser, J.G., Cummer, S.A., Wilt, D.M., and Landis, G.A., Detecting electrical activity from Martian dust storms, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 1999, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 3795–3801.
Farrell, W.M. Smith, P.H., Delory, G.T., Hillard, G.B., Marshall, J.R., Catling, D., Tratt, D.M., Renno, N., Desch, M.D., Cummer, S.A., Houser, J.G., and Johnson, B., Electric and magnetic signatures of dust devils from the 2000–2001 MATADOR desert tests, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2004, vol. 109, art. ID E03004.
Fedorova, A.A., Montmessin, F., Rodin, A.V., Korablev, O.I., Määttänen, A., Maltagliati, L., Bertaux, J.L., Evidence for a bimodal size distribution for the suspended aerosol particles on Mars, Icarus, 2014, vol. 231, pp. 239–260.
Fitzjarrald, D.E., A field investigation of dust devils, J. Appl. Meteorol., 1973, vol. 12, pp. 808–813.
Forget, F., Hourdin, F., Fournier, R., Hourdin, C., Talagrand, O., Collins, M., Lewis, S.R., Read, P.L., and Huot, J.P., Improved general circulation models of the Martian atmosphere from the surface to above 80 km, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 1999, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 24 155–24 175.
Forget, F., Montmessin, F., Bertaux, J.L., González-Galindo, F., Lebonnois, S., Quémerais, E., Reberac, A., Dimarellis, E, and López-Valverde, M.A., Density and temperatures of the upper Martian atmosphere measured by stellar occultations with Mars Express SPICAM, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2009, vol. 114, art. ID E01004.
Gierasch, P.J. and Goody, R.M., The effect of dust on the temperature of the Martian atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 1972, vol. 29, pp. 400–402.
Golitsyn, G.S., A similarity approach to the general circulation of planetary atmospheres, Icarus, 1970, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–24.
Golitsyn, G.S., On the Martian dust storms, Icarus, 1973, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 113–119.
Golitsyn, G.S., Prirodnye protsessy i yavleniya (Natural Processes and Phenomena), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2004.
González-Galindo, F., López-Valverde, M.A., Angelats i Coll, M., and Forget, F., Extension of a Martian general circulation model to thermospheric altitudes: UV heating and photochemical models, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2005, vol. 110, art. ID E9008.
Gukhman, A.A., Vvedenie v teoriyu podobiya. Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov (Introduction into the Similarity Theory: Manual for Higher Education Institutions), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1973.
Izvekova, Yu.N. and Popel, S.I., Charged dust motion in dust devils on Earth and Mars, Contrib. Plasma Phys., 2016, vol. 56, nos. 3–4, pp. 263–269.
Izvekova, Yu.N. and Popel, S.I., Plasma effects in dust devils near the Martian surface, Plasma Phys. Rep., 2017, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1172–1178.
Izvekova, Yu.N. and Popel, S.I., Nonlinear wave structures and plasma–dust effects in the Earth’s atmosphere, Plasma Phys. Rep., 2018, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 835–839.
Jackson, T.L. and Farrell, W.M., Electrostatic fields in dust devils: an analog to Mars, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2006, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2942–2949.
Lacks, D.J. and Levandovsky, A., Effect of particle size distribution on the polarity of triboelectric charging in granular insulator systems, J. Electrostat., 2007, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 107–112.
Leovy, C.B., Zurek, R.W., and Pollack, J.B., Mechanisms for Mars dust storms, J. Atmos. Sci., 1973, vol. 30, pp. 749–762.
Mattsson, J.O., Nihlen, T., and Yue, W., Observations of dust devils in a semi-arid district of southern Tunisia, Weather, 1993, vol. 48, pp. 359–363.
Melnik, O. and Parrot, M., Electrostatic discharge in Martian dust storms, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 1998, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 29 107–29 117.
Metzger, S.M., Dust devils as aeolian transport mechanisms in southern Nevada and in the Mars Pathfinder landing site, PhD Thesis, Reno: Univ. of Nevada, 1999.
Michael, M., Tripathi, S.N., and Mishra, S.K., Dust charging and electrical conductivity in the day and nighttime atmosphere of Mars, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2008, vol. 113, art. ID E7010.
Montmessin, F., Bertaux, J.L., Quémerais, E., Korablev, O., Rannou, P., Forget, F., Perrier, S., Fussend, D., Lebonnoisc, S., Rébérac, A., and Dimarellis, E., Subvisible CO2 ice clouds detected in the mesosphere of Mars, Icarus, 2006, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 403–410.
Montmessin, F., Gondet, B., Bibring, J.P., Langevin, Y., Drossart, P., Forget, F., and Fouchet, T., Hyperspectral imaging of convective CO2 ice clouds in the equatorial mesosphere of Mars, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2007, vol. 112, art. ID E11.
Němec, F., Morgan, D.D., Gurnett, D.A., and Brain, D.A., Areas of enhanced ionization in the deep nightside ionosphere of Mars, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2011, vol. 116, art. ID E06006.
Onishchenko, O.G., Horton, W., Pokhotelov, O.A., and Stenflo, L., Dust devil generation, Phys. Scr., 2014, vol. 89, no. 7, p. 075 606.
Onishchenko, O.G., Horton, W., Pokhotelov, O.A., and Fedun, V., “Explosively growing” vortices of unstably stratified atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 2016, vol. 121, no. 19, pp. 7197–7214.
Pätzold, M., Tellmann, S., Hausler, B., Hinson, D., Schaa, R., and Tyler, G.L., A sporadic third layer in the ionosphere of Mars, Science, 2005, vol. 310, no. 5749, pp. 837–839.
Popel, S.I. and Gisko, A.A., Charged dust and shock phenomena in the Solar System, Nonlin. Proc. Geophys., 2006, vol. 13, pp. 223–229.
Popel, S.I., Kopnin, S.I., Yu, M.Y., Ma, J.X., and Feng, H., The effect of microscopic charged particulates in Space Weather, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2011, vol. 44, no. 174 036, pp. 1–7.
Popel, S.I., Kopnin, S.I., Golub’, A.P., Izvekova, Yu.N., Dol’nikov, G.G., Zakharov, A.V., and Zelenyi, L.M., Dusty plasma at the surface of the moon, Sol. Syst. Res., 2013, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 419–429.
Popel, S.I., Golub’, A.P., Zakharov, A.V., and Zelenyi, L.M., Dusty plasma near the surface of Phobos, JETP Lett., 2017, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 485–490.
Popel, S.I., Golub’, A.P., and Zelenyi, L.M., Dusty plasma near the Martian satellite Deimos, Plasma Phys. Rep., 2018, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 723–728.
Renno, N.O., Wong, A.S., Atreya, S.K., de Pater, I., and Roos-Serote, M., Electrical discharges and broadband radio emission by Martian dust devils and dust storms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, vol. 30, no. 22, pp. 1–4.
Ruf, C., Renno, N.O., Kok, J.F., Bandelier, E., Sander, M.J., Gross, S., Skjerve, L., and Cantor, B., Emission of non-thermal microwave radiation by a Martian dust storm, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2009, vol. 36, art. ID L13202.
Ryan, J.A. and Carroll, J.J., Dust devil wind velocities: Mature state, J. Geophys. Res., 1970, vol. 75, pp. 531–541.
Ryan, J.A. and Lucich, R.D., Possible dust devils, vortices on Mars, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 1983, vol. 88, no. 15, pp. 11 005–11 011.
Rybakov, V.A., Nemtchinov, I.V., Shuvalov, V.V., Artemiev, V.I., and Medveduk, S.A., Mobilization of dust on the Mars surface by the impact of small cosmic bodies, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 1997, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 9211–9220.
Sedov, L.I., Metody podobiya i razmernosti v mekhanike (Methods of Similarity and Dimension in Mechanics), Moscow: Nauka, 1977, 8th ed.
Sinclair, P.C., Some preliminary dust devil measurements, Mon. Weather Rev., 1964, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 363–367.
Sinclair, P.C., The lower structure of dust devils, J. Atmos. Sci., 1973, vol. 30, pp. 1599–1619.
Sternovsky, Z., Chamberlin, P., Horanyi, M., Robertson, S., and Wang, X., Variability of the lunar photoelectron sheath and dust mobility due to solar activity, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2008, vol. 113, art. ID A10104.
Stubbs, T.J., Vondrak, R.R., and Farrell, W.M., A dynamic fountain model for lunar dust, Adv. Space Res., 2006, vol. 37, pp. 59–66.
Stubbs, T.J., Vondrak, R.R., Farrell, W.M., and Collier, M.R., Predictions of dust concentrations in the lunar exosphere, J. Astronaut., 2007, vol. 28, pp. 166–167.
Tratt, D.M., Hecht, M.H., Catling, D.C., Samulon, E.C., and Smith, P.H., In situ measurements of dust devil dynamics: toward a strategy for Mars, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2003, vol. 108, no. 11, art. ID 5116.
Yair, Y., New results on planetary lightning, Adv. Space Res., 2012, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 293–310.
Zhai, Y., Cummer, S.A., and Farrell, W.M., Quasi-electrostatic field analysis and simulation of Martian and terrestrial dust devils, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2006, vol. 111, art. ID E06016.
Funding
The study is performed as part of the project of the Russian Science Foundation no. 18-72-00119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by M. Chubarova
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Izvekova, Y.N., Popel’, S.I. & Izvekov, O.Y. On the Question of Calculating the Parameters of Vortices in the Near-Surface Atmosphere of Mars. Sol Syst Res 53, 423–430 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094619050058
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094619050058