Abstract
Behavioural research into the practice of OR needs to be grounded. Case studies written by practitioners can potentially help address this need but currently most do not. The paper explores a way of describing OR projects that place the emphasis on the ‘actors’ who provide the motivating force and the consequences of their actions. The ‘mangle’ perspective focuses on the dynamic intertwining of people, technology and concepts; this can provide the basis for an insightful narrative describing the reality of the project in terms of the planned approach, the problems met and the outcomes. Two examples are given, one of a conventional model building exercise, the second of a ‘soft OR’ intervention: both describe projects conducted by practitioners for commercial purposes. It is concluded that, by using the mangle perspective, the OR case writer can winnow the wheat from the chaff in order to write a succinct informative narrative, a narrative that could be utilized by behavioural OR (BOR) researchers. It is further concluded that BOR researchers should engage with ‘practice theory’ to deepen their understanding of what actually happens in projects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ackermann F, Howick S and Quigley JL (2014). Systemic risk elicitation: Using causal maps to engage stakeholders and build a comprehensive view of risks. European Journal of Operational Research 238(1): 290–299.
Ackermann F, Eden C and Williams T (1997). Modeling for litigation: Mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches. Interfaces 27(2): 48–65.
Anderer J, McDonald A and Nakicenovic N (1981). Energy in a finite world: Paths to a sustainable future. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Retrieved October 2, 2013, from http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/XB-81-202.pdf.
Barnes B (2001). Practice as collective action. In: Schatzki TR, Cetina KK and Savigny EV (eds). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 17–28). Abingdon: Routledge.
Becker KH (2016). An outlook on behavioural OR – Three tasks, three pitfalls, one definition. European Journal of Operational Research 249(3): 806–815.
Benebasat I, Goldstein DK and Mead M (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quaterly 11(3): 369–386.
Bendoly A, Donohue K and Schultz KL (2006). Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. Journal of Operations Management 24(6): 737–752.
Bloor D (1976). Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.
Bonoma TV (1983). A case study in case research: Marketing implementation. Working Paper 9-585-142, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Aministration, Boston, MA.
Boothroyd H (1978). Articulate Intervention: The Interface of Science, Mathematics and Administration. London: Taylor and Francis.
Brocklesby J (2009). Ethics beyond the model: How social dynamics can interfere with ethical practice in operational research/management science. Omega 37(6): 1073–1082.
Brocklesby J (2016). The what, the why and the how of behavioural operational research – An invitation to potential sceptics. European Journal of Operational Research 249(3): 796–805.
Checkland PB (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Christenson C (1976). Proposals for a program of empirical research into the properties of triangles. Decision Sciences 7(4): 631–648.
Eden C (1982). Cognitive mapping. European Journal of Operational Research 36(1): 1–13.
Franco LA and Hämäläinen RP (2016). Behavioural operational research: Returning to the roots of the OR profession. European Journal of Operational Research 249(3): 791–795.
Gans N and Croson R (2008). Introduction to the special issue on behavioral operations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10(4): 563–565.
Gerring J (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review 98(2): 341–354.
Häfele W (1981). Energy in a finite world: A global systems analysis. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Retrieved October 2, 2013, from http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/XB-81-203.pdf.
Hämäläinen RP, Lahtenan TJ (2016). Path dependence in operational research – How the modeling process can influence the results. Operations Research Perspectives 3: 14–20.
Hämäläinen RP, Luoma J and Saarinen E (2013). On the importance of behavioural research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems. European Journal of Operational Research 228(3): 623–634.
Keys P (1998). OR as technology revisited. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49(2): 99–108.
Latour B (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long R (1982). Constraints on International Trade in Coal. IEA Coal Research Economic Assessment Service Report No, GS/83, London.
MacIntyre AC (1981). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.
Meredith J (1998). Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management 16(4): 441–454.
Midgley G (1998). Theory and practice in operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49(11): 1219–1220.
Midgley G, Munlo I and Brown M (1998). The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49(5): 467–478.
Miles MB (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4): 590–601.
Nicolini D (2013). Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ormerod RJ (1995). Putting soft OR methods to work: Information systems strategy development at Sainsbury’s. Journal of the Operational Research Society 46(3): 277–293.
Ormerod RJ (1996). Information systems strategy development at Sainsbury’s supermarkets using “soft” OR. Interfaces 26(1): 102–130.
Ormerod RJ (1997). OR models assist the Sizewell B public inquiry - the NCB’s use of linear programming. OR Insight 10(3): 2–7.
Ormerod RJ (1998). JORS editorial policy. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49(11): 1221–1223.
Ormerod RJ (2005). Putting soft OR methods to work: The case of IS strategy development for the UK Parliament. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56(12): 1379–1398.
Ormerod RJ (2010). Articulate intervention revisited. Journal of the Operational Research Society 61(7): 1078–1094.
Ormerod RJ (2013). Collaborative research in energy: How the US-USSR initiated a research project 40 years ago. Journal of Research Practice 9(1), Article V5. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/389/314. Accessed 23 January 2015.
Ormerod RJ (2014). The mangle of OR practice: Towards more informative case studies of ‘technical’ projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society 65(8): 1379–1398.
Ormerod RJ and McLeod J (1984). The development and use of the NCB Strategic Model. The Statistician 33(1): 35–49.
Pettigrew AM (1985). The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pickering A (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Plackett MW, Ormerod RJ and Toft F (1982). The National Coal Board strategic model. European Journal of Operational Research 10(4): 351–360.
Ragin CC (1992). Introduction: Cases of “what is a case?” In: Ragin CC and Becker HS (eds). What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry (pp. 1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ranyard JC, Fildes R and Hu TI (2015). Reassessing the scope of OR practice: The influences of problem structuring methods and the analytics movement. European Journal of Operational Research 245(1): 1–13.
Reckwitz A (2002). Towards a theory of social practices: A development in cultural theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5(2): 243–263.
Roethlisberger FJ (1977). The elusive phenomena. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Division of Research.
Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds) (2001). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Chichester: Wiley.
Sandberg J and Tsoukas H (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. The Academy of Management Review 36(2): 338–360.
Schatzki TR (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In: Schatzki TR, Cetina KK and Savigny EV (eds). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 1–14). Abingdon: Routledge.
Schatzki TR, Cetina KK and Savigny EV (eds) (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
Strauss AL (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner S (1994). The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presuppositions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Voss C, Tsikriktsis N and Frohlich M (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22(2): 195–219.
Velez-Castiblanco J, Brocklesby J and Midgley G 2016. Boundary games: How teams of OR practitioners explore the boundaries of intervention. European Journal of Operational Research 249(3): 968–982.
White L (2009). Understanding problem structuring methods interventions. European Journal of Operational Research 93(3): 823–833.
White L (2016). Behavioural operational research: Towards a framework for understanding behaviour in OR interventions. European Journal of Operational Research 249(3): 827–841.
Wilson CL (1980). Coal – Bridge to the future: Report of the world coal study. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Winter M (2006). Problem structuring in project management: An application of soft systems methodology. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57(7): 802–812.
Yin RK (1981). The case study crisis: some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(1): 58–65.
Zhao X, Zhao X and Wu Y (2013). Opportunities for research in behavioral operations management. International Journal of Production Economics 142(1): 1–2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ormerod, R. Writing practitioner case studies to help behavioural OR researchers ground their theories: application of the mangle perspective. J Oper Res Soc 68, 507–520 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0011-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0011-8