Abstract
In an essay entitled ‘The Nobility of Sight’, Hans Jonas argues that ‘[s] ince the days of Greek philosophy sight has been recognized as the most excellent of senses’ (Jonas, 1954, p.507). Seeking to account for the historical elevation of vision over other forms of sensory engagement with the world, Jonas contends that ‘[t]he unique distinction of sight consists in what we may call the image performance, where “image” implies three characteristics: (1) simultaneity in the presentation of a manifold; (2) neutralization of the causality of sense-affection; (3) distance in the spatial and mental senses’ (ibid.). In the case of (1), what distinguishes sight from other senses is the fact that it can give us both dynamic and static reality: our eyes can survey a whole field of possible percepts as well as focus directly upon a fixed object (ibid., pp.508–9). In the case of (2), what further marks out vision is that it does not require the perceiver and the object of perception to be directly engaged — the ‘dynamic’ relation between the two is, in Jonas’ words, ‘neutralized’ (ibid., p.514). And in the case of (3), seeing’s inimitability is also guaranteed by its being ‘the only sense in which the advantage lies not in proximity but in distance: the best view is by no means the closest view’ (ibid., pp.517–8).
A philosopher says ‘Look at things like this!’ — but in the first place that doesn’t ensure that people will look at things like that, and in the second place his admonition may come altogether too late; it’s possible, moreover, that such an admonition can achieve nothing in any case and that the impetus for such a change in the way things are perceived has to originate somewhere else entirely.
(CV, 1980, p.62)
The eye has become a human eye, just as its object has become a social, human object… The forming of the five senses becomes a labour of the entire history of the world down to the present.
(Marx, 1959, pp.99, 101)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T. and Bloch, E. (1989) ‘Something’s Missing: A Discussion between Ernst Bloch and Theodor Adorno on the Contradictions of Utopian Longing’, in E. Bloch, The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays, trans. J. Zipes and F. Mecklenburg, MIT Press, pp. 1–17.
Affeldt, S. (2010) ‘On the Difficulty of Seeing Aspects and the “Therapeutic” Reading of Wittgenstein’, in W. Day and V. Krebs (eds) Seeing Wittgenstein Anew, Cambridge University Press, pp. 268–90.
Altieri, C. (2011) ‘Cavell and Wittgenstein on Morality’, in R. Eldridge and B. Rhie (eds) Stanley Cavell and Literary Studies: Consequences of Scepticism, Continuum.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1963) An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s ‘Tractatus’, Hutchinson.
Arendt, H. (1971) The Life of the Mind, Harcourt.
Baker, G. P. (2004) Wittgenstein’s Method: Neglected Aspects, K. Morris (ed), Blackwell.
Baz, A. (2011) ‘Aspect Perception and Philosophical Difficulty’, in Kuusela and McGinn (eds), pp. 697–713.
Benjamin, W. (1997) ‘Surrealism–Last Snapshot of the European Intelligentsia’, in One-Way Street, Verso.
Cavell, S. (2006) ‘The Wittgensteinian Event’, in Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Cerbone, D. (1993) ‘Don’t Look but Think: Imaginary Scenarios in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy’, Inquiry 37 (2), pp. 159–83.
Cerbone, D. (2000) ‘How to Do Things with Wood: Wittgenstein, Frege and the Problem of Illogical Thought’, in Crary and Read (eds), pp. 293–314.
Conant, J. (2002) ‘On Going the Bloody Hard Way in Philosophy’, in J. Whittaker (ed) The Possibilities of Sense, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 85–129.
Crary, A. and Read, R. (eds) (2000) The New Wittgenstein, Routledge.
Day, W. and Krebs, V. J. (eds) (2010) Seeing Wittgenstein Anew, Cambridge University Press.
Floyd, J. (1998) ‘The Uncaptive Eye: Solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus’, in L. S. Rouner (ed) Loneliness, Boston University Studies in the Philosophy of Religion, 19, University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 79–108.
Fukuyama, F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press.
Genova, J. (1995) Wittgenstein: A Way of Seeing, Routledge.
Goldfarb, W. (2011) ‘Das Überwinden: Anti-Metaphysical Readings of the Tractatus’, in R. Read and M. A. Lavery (eds) Beyond the Tractatus Wars: The New Wittgenstein Debate, Routledge, pp. 6–21.
Goldstein, L. (2004) ‘What Does “Experiencing Meaning” Mean?’ in D. Moyal-Sharrock (ed) The Third Wittgenstein, Ashgate, pp. 107–23.
Grève, S. S. (forthcoming) ‘The Morals of Writing Philosophy: Socrates, Plato, Wittgenstein’, in B. Ware (ed) Modernism and the Moral Life, Manchester University Press.
Hacker, P. M. S. (1997) Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, Thoemmes Press.
Harvey, D. (2000) Spaces of Hope, Edinburgh University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977) ‘The Age of the World Picture’, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. W. Lovitt, Harper Torchbooks, pp. 115–54.
Heidegger, M. (1994) Basic Questions of Philosophy, trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer, Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, Blackwell.
Heidegger, M. (1961) Introduction to Metaphysics, Doubleday.
Inwood, M. (1999) A Heidegger Dictionary, Blackwell.
James, W. (1981) The Principles of Psychology, Harvard University Press.
Jameson, F. (2009) ‘Utopia as Replication’, in Valences of the Dialectic, Verso, pp. 410–34.
Jay, M. (1988) ‘Scopic Regimes of Modernity’, in H. Foster (ed) Vision and Visuality, Bay Publishing, pp. 3–23.
Jay, M. (1988) ‘The Rise of Hermeneutics and the Crisis of Ocularcentrism’, Poetics Today 9: 2, pp. 307–26.
Jay, M. (1994) Downcast Eyes: The Disintegration of Vision in 20th Century French Thought, University of California Press.
Johnston, P. (1993) Wittgenstein: Rethinking the Inner, Routledge.
Jonas, H. (1954) ‘The Nobility of Sight’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14: 4, pp. 507–19.
Kraus, R. (1986) ‘Antivision’, October 36, pp. 147–54.
Kuusela, O. (2008) The Struggle Against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy, Harvard University Press.
Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M. (eds) (2011) The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, Oxford University Press.
Malcolm, N. (2001) Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir, Oxford University Press.
Marx, K. (1959) Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, Progress Publishers.
Mulhall, S. (1990) On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects, Routledge.
Mulhall, S. (2010) ‘The Work of Wittgenstein’s Words’, in Day and Krebs (eds), pp. 249–67.
Pears, D. (1987) The False Prison: A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy, vol. 1, Clarendon Press.
Pound, E. (1934) Make It New, Faber & Faber.
Pound, E. (1972) The Cantos, New Directions.
Rhees, R. (1969) ‘The Study of Philosophy’, in Without Answers, Schocken.
Rhees, R. (1984) ‘Postscript’, in R. Rhees (ed) Recollections of Wittgenstein, Oxford University Press.
Sass, L. (1995) The Paradoxes of Delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the Schizophrenic Mind, Cornell University Press.
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2010) A Confusion of the Spheres: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on Philosophy and Religion, Oxford University Press.
Stanley, S. (1939) ‘British Colonialism in India: A Chart of the Exploitation of 375 000 000 People’, New International, 5: 10, pp. 308–10.
Waismann, F. (1959) ‘How I See Philosophy’, in A. J. Ayer (ed) Logical Positivism, The Free Press.
Ware, B. (2011) ‘Ethics and the Literary in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus’, Journal of the History of Ideas 72: 4, pp. 595–611.
Ware, B. (2013) ‘Wittgenstein, Modernity and the Critique of Modernism’, Textual Practice 27: 2, pp. 187–205.
Ware, B. (2015) Dialectic of the Ladder: Wittgenstein, the ‘Tractatus’ and Modernism, Bloomsbury.
Wright, G. H. von (1971) ‘Historical Introduction: The Origin of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus’, in PsT, pp. 1–34.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Ben Ware
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ware, B. (2016). Find It New: Aspect-Perception and Modernist Ethics. In: Grève, S.S., Mácha, J. (eds) Wittgenstein and the Creativity of Language. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137472540_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137472540_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58073-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47254-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)