Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accounting Firms: Global Reach without Transnational Form

  • Chapter
Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance

  • 412 Accesses

Abstract

The market for auditing services is dominated by four accounting firms that operate worldwide: Deloitte & Touche (Deloitte), Ernst & Young (E&Y), KPMG and PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC). The so-called Big 4 offer auditing services, tax advisory and consulting. In 2011, each of the Big 4 was represented in at least 145 countries. Altogether the Big 4 employ more than half a million people and have realised a turnover of more than 100 billion USD in all three service lines. These numbers make them comparable with international corporations from other industries. However, the Big 4 accounting firms differ in three important ways from most global players. First, they belong to the group of professional service firms (Suddaby et al., 2009). Characterised by high knowledge intensity, low capital intensity and a professional workforce (Von Nordenflycht, 2010), their business model differs systematically from that of most other corporations. Second, they mainly use the corporate form of a professional partnership (Greenwood & Empson, 2003). Third, they entertain intense reciprocal relationships with their regulatory environments (Eberle & Lauter, 2011). This applies in particular to accounting and auditing standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, R., Kothari, S. P. & Robin, A. (2000). The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailas, A. & Fafaliou, I. (2008). Market Shares and Concentration in the EU Auditing Industry: The Effects of Andersen’s Demise. International Advances in Economic Research 14(4), 485–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. (1988). Organizing for Worldwide Effectiveness: The Transnational Solution. California Management Review 31(1), 54–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. (2002). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G. J., Bromwich, M. & Wagenhofer, A. (2006). Principles- versus Rules-based Accounting Standards: The FASB’s Standard Setting Strategy. Abacus 42(2), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. (2010). The Development and Status of Enforcement in the European Union. Accounting in Europe 7(1), 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London [u.a.]: The Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. & Casson, M. C. (2009). The Internalisation Theory of the Multinational Enterprise: A Review of the Progress of a Research Agenda After 30 Years. Journal of International Business Studies 40(9), 1563–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. & Fogarty, J. (2010). Approaches to Auditing Standards and Their Possible Impact on Auditor Behavior. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 7(4), 310–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caligiuri, P. M. & Colakoglu, S. (2007). A Strategic Contingency Approach to Expatriate Assignment Management. Human Resource Management Journal 17(4), 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcello, J. V., Hollingsworth, C. & Mastrolia, S. A. (2011). The Effect of PCAOB Inspections on Big 4 Audit Quality. Research in Accounting Regulation 23(2), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Sanders, W. G. & Gregersen, H. B. (2001). Bundling Human Capital with Organizational Context: The Impact of International Assignment Experience on Multinational Firm Performance and CEO Pay. Academy of Management Journal 44(3), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M., Dark, K. & Gulamhussen, M. A. (2009). Extending Internalisation Theory: From the Multinational Enterprise to the Knowledge-based Empire. International Business Review 18(3), 236–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, X., Dasgupta, S. & Hilary, G. (2009). The Effect of Auditor Quality on Financing Decisions. Accounting Review 84(4), 1085–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, M. S. & Zéghal, D. (1999). The Effect of Accounting Firm Mergers on International Markets for Accounting Services. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 8(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4(16), 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2008). The Multinationalization of Developing Country MNEs: The Case of Multilatinas. Journal of International Management 14(2), 138–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N. T. & Dickmann, M. (2012). Measuring the Return on Investment in International Assignments: An Action Research Approach. International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(16), 3434–3454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1995). Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies 26(3), 461–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (2001). The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future. International Journal of the Economics of Business 8(2), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Institutions and the OLI Paradigm of the Multinational Enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 25(4), 573–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, D. & Lauter, D. (2011). Private Interests and the EU-US Dispute on Audit Regulation: The Role of the European Accounting Profession. Review of International Political Economy 18(4), 436–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M. & Subramanian, V. (2007). An Organizing Framework for MNC Subsidiary Typologies. Management International Review 47(6), 895–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, P. N. (2010). A Single Set of Worldwide Auditing Standards: The Road is Long. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 7(4), 298–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girod, S., Bellin, J. B. & Ranjan, K. S. (2010). Operating Models for a Multipolar World: Balancing Global Integration and Local Responsiveness. Journal of Business Strategy 31(6), 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goncharov, I., Werner, J. R. & Zimmermann, J. (2009). Legislative Demands and Economic Realities: Company and Group Accounts Compared. The International Journal of Accounting 44(4), 334–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41(1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Deephouse, D. L. & Li, S. X. (2007). Ownership and Performance of Professional Service Firms. Organization Studies 28(2) (01708406), 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R. & Empson, L. (2003). The Professional Partnership: Relic or Exemplary Form of Governance? Organization Studies (01708406) 24(6), 909–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000). Difficulties in Diffusion of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(4), 357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1996). The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy P. M. & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31(1–3), 405–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. (1986). The Hypermodern MNC — A Heterarchy? Human Resource Management 25(1), 9–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-R (1982). A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-R (1986). What Is Internalization? Review of World Economics 122(4), 791–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-R (1993). Explaining the Swollen Middle: Why Most Transactions Are a Mix of ‘Market’ and ‘Hierarchy’. Organization Science 4(4), 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoarau, C. (2009). The Reform of the French Standard-Setting System: Its Peculiarities, Limits and Political Context. Accounting in Europe 6(2), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopt, K.J. & Leyens, P. C. (2004). Board Models in Europe — Recent Developments of Internal Corporate Governace Structures in Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Italy. European Company and Financial Law Review 1(2), 135–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. & Rindova, V. P. (2001). Stakeholders’ Expectations of Board Roles: The Case of Subsidiary Boards. Journal of Management and Governance 5(2), 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, P. & Gaur, A. S. (2009). Organizational Efficiency, Firm Capabilities, and Economic Organization of MNEs. Multinational Business Review (St. Louis University) 17(3), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. C. & Martíanez, J. I. (1990). Different Roles for Subsidiaries: The Case of Multinational Corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal 11(7), 501–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapler, J. K. (2007). The Theory of the Firm, the Theory of Competition and the Transnational Corporation. Competition & Change 11(4), 287–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (2000). The Network as Knowledge: Generative Rules and the Emergence of Structure. Strategic Management Journal 21(3), 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24(4), 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1996). What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning. Organization Science 7(5), 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (2003). Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation: 2003 Decade Award Winning Article. Journal of International Business Studies 34(6), 516–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. & Margineantu, A. (2009). Globalisation/Regionalisation of Accounting Firms and Their Sustainability Services. International Marketing Review 26(4/5), 396–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, H. & James, M. (2007). International Audit Firms as Strategic Networks — The Evolution of Global Professional Service Firms Economics and Management of Networks. In G. Cliquet, M. Tuunanen, G. Hendrikse & J. Windsperger (Eds), Economics and management of networks. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag HD, pp. 367–392.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. & Tadelis, S. (2005). Profit Sharing and the Role of Professional Partnerships. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(1), 131–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundan, S. M. (2010). What Are Ownership Advantages? Multinational Business Review 18(2), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundan, S. & Hagedoorn, J. (2001). Alliances, Acquisitions and Multinational Advantage. International Journal of the Economics of Business 8(2), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. & Morris, T. (2009). Heterogeneity in Professional Service Firms. Journal of Management Studies 46(6), 895–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R. (1995). The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(2), 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R. & Narula, R. (2011). Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies 48(2), 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet-Reyes, B. & Zhao, R. (2010). A Comparison Between One-Tier and Two-Tier Board Structures in France. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 21(3), 279–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes, C. (2006). The Survival of International Differences under IFRS: Towards a Research Agenda. Accounting & Business Research (Wolters Kluwer UK) 36(3), 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojo, M. (2010). The Role of the IASB and Auditing Standards in the Aftermath of the 2008/2009. European Law Journal 16(5), 604–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, C. J. (2003). Board Games: Germany’s Monopoly on the Two-Tier System of Corporate Governance and Why the Post-Enron United States Would Benefit from Its Adoption. Penn State International Law Review 22(1), 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, M., Panetta, F. & Zingales, L. (1998). Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance 53(1), 27–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, H. V. (1969). The Tortuous Evolution of the Multinational Corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business 4(1), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, H., Wilderom, C. & Douma, S. (1998). Internationalization of Dutch Accounting Firms. European Accounting Review 7(4), 697–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poynter, T. A. & White, R. E. (1984). The Strategies of Foreign Subsidiaries: Responses to Organizational Slack. International Studies of Management & Organization 14(4), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J. X. J. & Donaldson, L. (2010). The Cubic Contingency Model: Towards a More Comprehensive International Strategy-Structure Model. Journal of General Management 36(1), 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. (1980). A New Theory of the Multinational Enterprise: Internationalization versus Internalization. Columbia Journal of World Business 15(1), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. (1986). New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: An Assesment of Internalization Theory. Bulletin of Economic Research 38(2), 102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke, A. (2003). Extending the Theory of the Multinational Eenterprise: Internalization and Strategic Management Perspectives. Journal of International Business Studies 34(2), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Kennel, J. & Enderwick, P. (2004). Inter-firm Alliance and Network Relationships and the Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: An Exploratory Analysis of Quasi-internalisation at the Subsidiary Level. International Business Review 13(4), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., Gendron, Y. & Lam, H. (2009). The Organizational Context of Professionalism in Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(3–4), 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lent, L. (1999). The Economics of an Audit Firm: The Benefits of Partnership Governance. The British Accounting Review 31(2), 225–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Veen, K. & Elbertsen, J. (2008). Governance Regimes and Nationality Diversity in Corporate Boards: A Comparative Study of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16(5), 386–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A. (2003). The Evolutionary View of the MNE and the Future of Internalization Theory. Journal of International Business Studies 34(6), 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetula, M. E. (2009). From the Big Four to Big Law: The Swiss Verein and the Global Law Firm. Gorgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 22(3), 1177–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What Is a Professional Service Firm? Toward a Theory and Taxonomy of Knoweldege-intensive Firms. Academy of Management Review 35(1), 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Liu, X. & Li, X. (2009). A Dual-Role Typology of Multinational Subsidiaries. International Business Review 18(6), 578–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1973). Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations. The American Economic Review 63(2), 316–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22(2), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, C. W., Wolk, C. M. & Normand, C. (2003). An Historical Perspective on Mergers and Acquisitions by Major US Accounting Firms. Accounting History 8(1), 25–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, S. A. (2003). How the U.S. Accounting Profession Got Where It Is Today: Part I. Accounting Horizons 17(3), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, J. & Werner, J. R. (2013). Regulating capitalism: The evolution of transnational accounting governance. Barsingstoke, UK [u. a.]: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, J., Werner, J. R. & Volmer, P. B. (2008). Global governance in accounting: Rebalancing public power and private commitment. Basingstoke, UK [u.a.]: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jochen Zimmermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan-Christoph Volckmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bremen, Germany

    Sarianna Lundan

Copyright information

© 2015 Jochen Zimmermann and Jan-Christoph Volckmer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zimmermann, J., Volckmer, JC. (2015). Accounting Firms: Global Reach without Transnational Form. In: Lundan, S. (eds) Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation