Abstract
Genetic engineering, as Carey indicates in the above quotation, is a highly controversial late twentieth-century innovation, yet the modification and improvement of the human species that it seems to promise have long been both a major theme of scientific romance and a persistent, not always explicit, presence in literary utopias. The connections between eugenics and utopia will be considered in Chapters 5 and 6. It is, however, in science fiction and scientific romance that we find the earliest expressions of the mixture of wonder and fear — of, as it were, natural magic and moral panic — that has come to define public attitudes to the artificial production and modification of human life. Commentators on these issues almost invariably refer to the fictional genres with which this book is concerned, and to two texts in particular: Brave New World and Frankenstein. Huxley’s title remains infinitely quotable, but Frankenstein has a still stronger claim to be regarded (in Jon Turney’s phrase) as ‘the governing myth of modern biology’.3
Procreation’s sheer nonsense, we declare! …
By animals, no doubt, it’s still enjoyed
But man henceforth, being so highly gifted
Must have an origin much more uplifted.
Goethe, Faust: Part Two (1832)1
The promise that genetic engineering holds out for improving the human race represents the most significant scientific advance since nuclear fission. It at last brings into the sphere of the possible the production of real live utopians, disease-free, super-brainy, superfit, of the sort that the more imaginative utopian writers have been dreaming about for centuries.
John Carey, Introduction to The Faber Book of Utopias (1999)2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
J.W. von Goethe (1994) Faust: Part Two, trans. D. Luke (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 72–3.
J. Carey, ed. (1999) The Faber Book of Utopias (London: Faber & Faber), p. xvii.
J. Turney (1998) Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press), p. 3. The use of Brave New World in modern biotechnological debates is exemplified by B. Appleyard (1999) Brave New Worlds: Staying Human in the Genetic Future (London: HarperCollins). More recent examples include F. Fukuyama (2003) Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution (London: Profile); L.M. Silver (2007) Remaking Eden: How Genetic Engineering and Cloning Will Transform the American Family (New York and London: Harper Perennial), where Shakespeare’s lines from The Tempest supply the epigraph; and L. Garrett (2013) ‘Biology’s Brave New World’, Foreign Affairs (November/ December), 28–46.
M. Shelley (1965) Frankenstein Or, The Modern Prometheus (New York: New American Library), p. 158.
G.K. Chesterton (1914) ‘Mr H.G. Wells and the Giants’, in Heretics, 12th edn (New York and London: John Lane), pp. 85, 89.
See e.g. P.J. Bowler (1989) The Mendelian Revolution: The Emergence of Hereditarian Concepts in Modern Science and Society (London: Athlone Press), p. 118.
See D.J. Kevles (1995) In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press), esp. pp. 69, 184–5.
J.B.S. Haldane (1924) Daedalus; or, Science and the Future (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner), pp. 46, 49. Subsequent page references in the text are to this edition.
K.R. Dronamraju, ed. (1995) Haldane’s Daedalus Revisited (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 1.
J.B.S. Haldane (1976) The Man with Two Memories (London: Merlin), p. 91.
R. Clark (1968) J.B.S.: The Life and Work of J.B.S. Haldane (London: Hodder & Stoughton), p. 33.
See P. Parrinder (2002) ‘Dedalus (Thus Spelt)’, James Joyce Broadsheet 63 (October), 1.
J.B.S. Haldane (1932) The Inequality of Man and Other Essays (London: Chatto & Windus), p. 84.
R. Buchanan (1901) Complete Poetical Works, 2 vols (London: Chatto & Windus), ii, p. 276.
C. Baldick (1987) In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity and Nineteenth-Century Writing (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 7.
H.G. Wells (2005) The Island of Doctor Moreau, ed. P. Parrinder (London: Penguin), p. 30.
A. Stodart-Walker (1901) Robert Buchanan: The Poet of Modern Revolt (London: Grant Richards), p. 253.
J.A. Cassidy (1973) Robert W. Buchanan (New York: Twayne), p. 101.
C.S. Lewis (1955) That Hideous Strength (London: Pan), p. 25.
B. Aldiss (1982) Moreau’s Other Island (London: Triad/Panther), p. 156.
C.S. Lewis (1943) The Abolition of Man, or Refiections on Education (London: Oxford University Press), p. 39.
B. Russell (1924) Icarus, or the Future of Science (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner), pp. 47–8.
See I. Sample (2009) ‘Scientists Unravel Neanderthal Genome’, The Guardian, 12 February.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Patrick Parrinder
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parrinder, P. (2015). Satanism and Genetics: Haldane’s Daedalus and Its Begetters. In: Utopian Literature and Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456786_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456786_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58001-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45678-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)