Abstract
In the years of the post-Darwinian debate, many American naturalists invoked the name of Lamarck to signal their belief in a purposive and anti-Darwinian view of evolution. Yet Weismann’s theory of germ-plasm continuity undermined the shared tenet of the neo-Lamarckian theories as well as the idea of the interchangeability between biological and social heredity. Edward Drinker Cope, the leader of the so-called “American School,” defended his neo-Lamarckian philosophy against every attempt to redefine the relationship between behavior, development, and heredity beyond the epigenetic model of inheritance. This paper explores Cope’s late-career defense of neo-Lamarckism. Particular attention is dedicated to the debate he had with James Mark Baldwin before the publication of Baldwin’s own “A New Factor in Evolution” (1896d). I argue that Cope’s criticism was partly due to the fact that Baldwin’s theory of social heredity threatened Cope’s biologistic stance, as well as his attempt to preserve design in nature. This theoretical attitude had a remarkable impact on Baldwin’s arguments for the theory of organic selection.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Archival Sources
Edward Drinker Cope Papers (MC 956), Quaker & Special Collections, Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USA. Miscellaneous letters, referred to in-text as HCQC.
Published Sources
Baertschi, Bernard. 2005. “Diderot, Cabanis and Lamarck on Psycho-Physical Causality.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27(3/4): 451–463.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1895a. Mental Development in the Child and the Race: Methods and Processes. New York: Macmillan.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1895b. “Consciousness and Evolution.” Science 2(34): 219–223.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1895c. “Professor Baldwin on ‘Mental Development’.” The American Naturalist 29(345): 873.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1896a. “Consciousness and Evolution.” The American Naturalist 30(351): 249–255.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1896b. “Heredity and Instinct.” Science 3(64): 438–441.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1896c. “Physical and Social Heredity.” The American Naturalist 30(353): 422–428.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1896d. “A New Factor in Evolution.” The American Naturalist 30(354): 441–451.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1896e. “A New Factor in Evolution (continued).” The American Naturalist 30(355): 536–553.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1897. “Organic Selection.” Nature 55: 558.
Baldwin, James Mark. 1902. Development and Evolution. New York: Macmillan.
Bannister, Robert C. 1979. Science and Myth in Anglo-American Social Thought. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Barsanti, Giulio. 1979. Dalla storia naturale alla storia della natura. Milan: Feltrinelli.
Barsanti, Giulio. 2005. Una lunga pazienza cieca. Storia dell’evoluzionismo. Turin: Einaudi.
Boller, Paul F. 1969. American Thought in Transition: The Impact of Evolutionary Naturalism, 1859–1900. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Bowler, Peter J. 1977. “Edward Drinker Cope and the Changing Structure of Evolutionary Theory.” Isis 68(2): 249–265.
Bowler, Peter J. 1983. The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades Around 1900. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bowler, Peter J. 1985. “Scientific Attitudes to Darwinism in Britain and America.” David Kohn (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 641–681.
Bowler, Peter J. 1989. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bowler, Peter J. 2017. “Alternatives to Darwinism in the Early Twentieth Century.” Richard G. Deslile (ed.), The Darwinian Tradition in Context: Research Programs in Evolutionary Biology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 195–217.
Burkhardt, Richard W. 1977. The Spirit of the System: Lamarck and Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burkhardt, Richard W. 1979. “Closing the Door on Lord Morton’s Mare: The Rise and Fall of Telegony.” Studies in the History of Biology 3: 1–21.
Burkhardt, Richard W. 2013. “Lamarck, Evolution, and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Genetics 194(4): 793–805.
Butler, Samuel. 1880. Unconscious Memory: A Comparison of the Theory of Dr. Ewald Hering and the “Philosophy of the Unconscious” of Dr. Edward von Hartmann. London: David Bogue.
Churchill, Frederick B. 1968. “August Weismann and a Break from Tradition.” Journal of the History of Biology 1: 91–112.
Churchill, Frederick B. 1978. “The Weismann-Spencer Controversy over the Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Proceeding of the 15th International Congress of the History of Science: 451–468.
Churchill, Frederick B. 2015. August Weismann: Development, Heredity, and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clevenger, Shobal V. 1887. “The Cope-Montgomery Controversy.” The Open Court 1(14): 389.
Cockerell, Theodore Dru Alison. 1920. “Biographical Memoir of Alpheus Spring Packard.” Biographical Memoirs, National Academy of Sciences 9: 179–236.
Continenza, Barbara. 1984. “Tra lamarckismo e darwinismo: l’effetto Baldwin.” Vittorio Somenzi (ed.), Evoluzione e modelli: Il concetto di adattamento nelle teorie dei sistemi biologici, culturali e artificiali. Rome: Editori Riuniti, pp. 107–191.
Continenza, Barbara. 1986. “Simulation of Lamarckism or stimulation of Darwinism.” Rivista di Storia della Scienza 3(2): 155–190.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1871a. “The Laws of Organic Development.” The American Naturalist 5(8/9): 593–608.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1871b “The Method of Creation of Organic Forms..” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 12(86): 229–263.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1875. Vertebrata of Cretaceous Formations of the West: Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories, 2 vols. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1877. “Comparative Anatomy.” Johnson’s Universal Cyclopædia 3: 869–893.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1880. “A Review of the Modern Doctrine of Evolution.” The American Naturalist 14(4): 260–271.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887a. The Origin of the Fittest. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887b. Theology of Evolution. Philadelphia: Arnold and Company.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887c. “The Perissodactyla.” The American Naturalist 21(12): 1060–1076.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887d. “Montgomery on the Theology of Evolution - Part II.” The Open Court 1(13): 358–361.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887e. “The Relation of Mind To Matter.” The Open Court 1(19): 527–530.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1889a. “Ethical Evolution.[reprinted from The Open Court,” March 21, 1889]. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1889b. “On Inheritance in Evolution.” The American Naturalist 23(276): 1058–1071.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1890. “Two Perils of the Indo-European - Part I.” The Open Court 3(126): 2052–2053.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1895. “The Present Problems of Organic Evolution.” The Monist 5(4): 563–573.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1896a. The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1896b. “Prof. Mark Baldwin on Preformation and Epigenesis.” The American Naturalist 30(35): 342–345.
Cope, Edward Drinker. 1896c. “Observations on Prof. Baldwin’s Reply.” The American Naturalist 30(353): 428–430.
Corsi, Pietro. 1978. “The Importance of French Transformist Ideas for the Second Volume of Lyell’s Principles of Geology.” The British Journal for the History of Science 2(39): 221–244.
Corsi, Pietro. 1983. Oltre il mito: Lamarck e le scienze naturali del suo tempo. Bologna: il Mulino.
Corsi, Pietro. 1988. The Age of Lamarck: Evolutionary Theories in France 1790–1830. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Corsi, Pietro. 2011. “Jean-Baptiste Lamarck: From Myth to History.” Snait B. Gissis, Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 9–18.
Corsi, Pietro. 2012. “Idola Tribus: Lamarck, Politics and Religion in the Early Nineteenth Century.” Aldo Fasolo (ed.), The Theory of Evolution and its Impact. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 11–39.
Corsi, Pietro, Gayon, Jean, Gohau, Gabriel, Tirard, Stéphane (eds.). 2005. Lamarck, philosophe de la nature. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Davidson, Jane Pierce. 1997. The Bone Sharp: The Life of Edward Drinker Cope. Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
Depew, David J. 2003. “Baldwin and His Many Effects.” Bruce H Weber, David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–31.
Douglas, G. 1821. “A Communication of a singular Fact in Natural History.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 111: 20–22.
Forsdyke, Donald R. 2006. “Heredity as Transmission of Information: Butlerian Intelligent Design.” Centaurus 48: 133–148.
Frazer, Persifor. 1902. “Alphabetical Cross-Reference Catalogue of All the Publications of the Late Edward Drinker Cope.” Memorias y Revistas 1899–1900(2): 1–151.
Gissis, Snait B. 2011. “Introduction: Lamarckian Problematics in Historical Perspective.” Snait B. Gissis, Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 21–32.
Gissis, Snait B., Jablonka, Eva (eds.). 2011. Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gliboff, Sander. 2011. “The Golden Age of Lamarckism, 1866-1926.” Snait B. Gissis, Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 45–55.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1981. “The Rise of Neo-Lamarckism in America.” International Colloquium on Lamarck. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, pp. 81–91.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Greenfield, Theodore John. 1986. Variation, Heredity, and Scientific Explanation in the Evolutionary Theory of Four American Neo-Lamarckians, 1867–1897. Ph.D diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Griffiths, Paul E. 2003. “Beyond the Baldwin Effect: James Mark Baldwin’s ‘Social Heredity’, Epigenetic Inheritance, and Niche Construction.” Bruce H. Weber, David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 193–215.
Hall, Brian K. 2001. “Organic Selection: Proximate Environmental Effects on the Evolution of Morphology and Behaviour.” Biology and Philosophy 16(2): 215–237.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper, Kull, Kalevi. 2003. “Baldwin and Biosemiotics: What Intelligence is For.” Bruce H. Weber, David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253–272.
Hofstadter, Richard. 1944. Social Darwinism in American Thought. Massachusetts: Beacon Press.
Hyatt, Alpheus. 1884. “Evolution of the Cephalopoda.” Science 3: 122–127.
Hyatt, Alpheus. 1893a. “Bioplastology and the related Branches of Biological Research.” Proceedings of Boston Society of Natural History 26: 59–125.
Hyatt, Alpheus. 1893b. “Phylogeny and Acquired Characteristics.” The American Naturalist 27(322): 865–877.
Jablonka, Eva, Lamb, Marion J. 2014. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, Curtis. 2015. Darwin’s Dice: The Idea of Chance in the Thought of Charles Darwin. New York: Oxford University Press.
Largent, Mark. 2009. “The So-Called Eclipse of Darwinism.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 99(1): 3–21.
La Vergata, Antonello. 1995. “Il lamarckismo fra riduzionismo biologico e meliorismo sociale.” Lamarck e il Lamarckismo. Reggio Calabria: La Città del Sole, pp. 183–219.
Loison, Laurent. 2012. “The French Neo-Lamarckian Project (1880–1910).” Revue d’historie des sciences 65(1): 61–79.
Montgomery, Edmund. 1887. “Cope’s Theology of Evolution - Part I.” The Open Court 1(6): 160–164.
Moore, James Richard. 1979. The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant struggle to come to terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, Conwy Lloyd. 1896. Habit and Instinct. London-New York: Edward Arnold.
Newbold, William Romaine. 1895. “Mental Development in the Child and the Race: Methods and Processes – review.” The American Naturalist 29(343): 687–694.
Newbold, William Romaine. 1896. “American Psychological Association.” The American Naturalist 30(350): 156–161.
Numbers, Roland L. 1998. Darwinism Comes to America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1889. “The Paleontological Evidence for the Transmission of Acquired Characters.” The American Naturalist 23(271): 561–566.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1890 “The Paleontological Evidence for the Transmission of Acquired Characters.” Science 15(367): 110–111.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1891. “The Present Problem of Heredity.” The Atlantic Monthly 67(401): 353–364.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1895. “The Hereditary Mechanism and the Search for the Unknown Factors of Evolution.” The American Naturalist 29(341): 418–439.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1897a. “Organic Selection.” Science 6(146): 584–587.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1897b. “The Limits of Organic Selection.” The American Naturalist 31(371): 944–951.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1907. Evolution of Mammalian Molar Teeth to and from the Triangular Type. New York: Macmillan and Company.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1931. Cope: Master Naturalist. Life and Letters of Edward Drinker Cope, with a Bibliography of his Writings classified by Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1934. “Aristogenesis, the Creative Principle in the Origin of Species.” The American Naturalist 68(716): 193–235.
Packard, Alpheus. 1876. “A Century’s Progress in American Zoology.” The American Naturalist 10(10): 592–597.
Packard, Alpheus. 1885. “Introduction.” John Sterling Kingsley (ed.), The Standard Natural History, 1 vol. Boston: S.E. Cassino and Company, pp. I–LXXI.
Packard, Alpheus. 1901. Lamarck, the Founder of Evolution. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Pfeifer, Edward J. 1965. “The Genesis of American Neo-Lamarckism.” Isis 56(2): 156–167.
Pfeifer, Edward J. 1988. “United States.” Thomas F Glick (ed.), The Comparative Reception of Darwinism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 168–206.
Pigliucci, Massimo, Müller, Gerd B (eds.). 2010. Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Richards, Robert J. 1987. Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Roger, Jacques, (ed.). 1979. “Les Néo-lamarckiens français.” Revue de Synthèse 3 (95/96): 279–469
Romanes, Georges John. 1888. “Lamarckism versus Darwinism.” Nature 38: 413.
Romanes, Georges John. 1893. An Examination of Weismannism. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.
Romanes, Georges John. 1895. Darwin, and After Darwin: An Exposition of the Darwinian Theory and a Discussion of Post-Darwinian Questions, 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Simpson, George Gaylord. 1953. “The Baldwin Effect.” Evolution 7(2): 111–117.
Spencer, Herbert. (1855) 1890. The Principles of Psychology1 vol. London–Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
Spencer, Herbert. 1893a. “The Inadequacy of ‘Natural Selection’.” Contemporary Review 63(153–166): 439–456.
Spencer, Herbert. 1893b. “Professor Weismann Theories.” Contemporary Review 63: 743–760.
Spencer, Herbert. 1893c. “A Rejoinder to Professor Weismann.” Contemporary Review 64: 893–912.
Spencer, Herbert. 1894. “Weismannism once more.” Contemporary Review 66: 592–608.
Spencer, Herbert. 1895. “Heredity once more.” Contemporary Review 68: 608.
Stocking, George W. 1962. “Lamarckianism in American Social Science: 1890-1915.” Journal of the History of Ideas 23(2): 239–256.
Stocking, George W. 1968. Race, Culture, and Evolution. Essays in the History of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turbil, Cristiano. 2017. “Making Heredity Matter: Samuel Butler’s Idea of Unconscious Memory.” Journal of the History of Biology 51(1): 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-017-9469-8.
Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1889. Darwinism: An Exposition of the Theory of Natural Selection. London: Macmillan and Co.
Ward, Lester Frank. 1891. “Neo-Darwinism and Neo-Lamarckism.” Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 6: 11–71.
Weber, Bruce H., Depew, David J. (eds.). 2003. Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Weismann, August. 1891. In Edward B. Poulton, Selmar Schönland, and Arthur E. Shipley (eds.), Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems, 1 vol. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Weissman, Charlotte. 2011. “Germinal Selection: A Weismannian Solution to Lamarckian Problematics.” Snait B Gissis, Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 57–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ceccarelli, D. Between Social and Biological Heredity: Cope and Baldwin on Evolution, Inheritance, and Mind. J Hist Biol 52, 161–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9522-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9522-2