Abstract
This chapter argues for a semiotic approach to understanding and productively facilitating the interaction and learning that young people do via social media. As an organizing analogy for what follows, we first call forth the enduring Indian parable of The Blind Men and the Elephant. This story, many will know, describes the initial encounter between six unsighted sages and a pachyderm, an exotic creature of which none of the men have any prior knowledge. The essential premise is that each of the men differently identifies the beast, based only upon his particular tactile experience of it. Touching the elephant’s flank, one man explains it as “very like a wall,” as nineteenth-century poet John Godfrey Saxe’s version has it. The man who feels the trunk recognizes the elephant’s snake-like quality; a tusk is perceived to be a “spear”; and so forth. The important lessons, for present purposes, are that 1) what an unknown something seems like can fundamentally shape a person’s interpretation of what that thing itself is, and that 2) a thing and that which it resembles are really more subjectively and partially related than one might otherwise believe. These are ideas that resonate closely with C. S. Peirce’s (1935, 1940/1955) influential theory of “iconicity” in human meaning making, which this chapter engages and operationalizes as a critical lens through which to look afresh at learning, literacies, and global digital media.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Art Institute of Chicago. (2013). Art access. Oba’s altar tusk. Retrieved from http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/exhibitions/African/Tusk
Barker, V. (2009). Older adolescent’s motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 209–213.
Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). http://firstmonday.org/a rticle/view/1394/1312
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59–88.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.
boyd. d. (2007). Social networking sites: Public, private, or what? Knowledge Tree, 13.
boyd, d. (2008). Why youth [heart] social networking sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
boyd, d. & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday, 15 (8). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3086/2589
Brake, D. (2008). Shaping the “me” in MySpace: The framing of profiles on a social network site. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 285–299). New York: Peter Lang.
Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
Davis, K. (2012). Friendship 2.0: Adolescents’ experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1527–1536.
Eco, U. (1978). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Facebook Newsroom. (2014). Company info. Retrieved on March 22, 2014, from https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/
Fuchs, C. (2011). An alternative view of privacy on Facebook. Information, 2(1), 140–165.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Harris, R. (2003). Saussure and his interpreters (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Heath, S. B. (1988). Protean shapes in literacy events. In E. R. Kintgen, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy (pp. 348–370). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.
Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hull, G. (2003). Youth culture and digital media: New literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 229–233.
Hull, G., & Katz, M. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies on digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.
Hull, G., Kenney, N., Marple, S., & Forsman-Schneider, A. (2006). Many versions of masculine: Explorations of boys’ identity formation through multimodal composing in an after-school program. Robert F. Bowne Foundation’s Occasional Papers Series. New York: Robert F. Bowne Foundation.
Hull, G., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261.
Hull, G., & Nelson, M.E. (2009). Literacy, media, and morality: Making the case for an aesthetic turn. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 199–227). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57.
Kemp, S. (January, 2014). Social, digital and mobile worldwide in 2014. Retrieved from http://wearesocial.net/tag/qzone
Kirkland, D. (2009). Shaping the digital pen: Media literacy, youth culture, and Myspace. Youth Media Reporter, 188–200.
Kress, G. (1993). Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 169–191.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996/2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Leander, K. (2008). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 34–65). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lusk, B. (2010). Digital natives and social media behaviors: An overview. Prevention Researcher, 17(5), 3–6.
Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U. Duggan, M., Smith, A., & Beaten, M. (2013). Teens, social media, and privacy. Retrieved from the Pew Internet and American Life Project at http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/05/21/teens-social-media-and-privacy/
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
Nelson, M. E., Hull, G., & Roche-Smith, J. (2008). Challenges of multimedia self-presentation: Taking, and mistaking, the show on the road. Written Communication, 25(4), 415–440.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
O’Toole, M. (1994). The language of displayed art. London: Leicester University Press.
Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn, and A Small World. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 199–220.
Patchin, J., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Trends in online social networking: Adolescent use of MySpace over time. New Media and Society, 12(2), 179–196.
Peirce, C. S. (1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. V and VI: Pragmatism and pragmaticism and scientific metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1940/1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.
Perkel, D. (2008). Copy and paste literacy: Literacy practices in the production of a MySpace profile. In K. Drotner, H. Sigaard-Jenssen, & C. Schroeder (Eds.), Informal learning and digital media (pp. 203–224). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Saussure, F. de. (1966). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, tr.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes toward the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.
Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and morality: On the rise of the Minchome diapolis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sylvan, E. (2006). Who knows whom in a virtual learning network? Applying social network analysis to communities of learners at the Computer Clubhouse. In S. Barab, D. Hickey & K. Hay (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on the learning sciences (pp. 4–6). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
Tynes, B. M. (2007). Internet safety gone wild? Sacrificing the educational and psychosocial benefits of online social environments. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(6), 575–584.
Unsworth, L. (2002). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Unsworth, L. (2008). Multiliteracies and metalanguage: Describing image/text relations as a resource for negotiating multimodal texts. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 379–408). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Utz, S., & Kramer, N. (2009). The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2). Article 1: http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009111001&article=1
Valkenberg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet: Consequences for social competence and self-concept unity. Communication Research, 35(2), 208–231.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Willis, P. (1991). Common culture: Symbolic work at play in the everyday cultures of the young. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Willis, P. (2000). The ethnographic imagination. Oxford: Polity Press.
Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816–1836.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Scott Bulfin, Nicola F. Johnson, and Chris Bigum
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nelson, M.E., Marple, S., Hull, G. (2015). Youth Breaking New “Ground”: Iconicity and Meaning Making in Social Media. In: Bulfin, S., Johnson, N.F., Bigum, C. (eds) Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385451_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385451_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48124-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38545-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)