Skip to main content

Doing Memory in Public: Postapartheid Memorial Space as an Activist Project

  • Chapter
Memory and Postwar Memorials

Part of the book series: Studies in European Culture and History ((SECH))

Abstract

After decades of white minority rule in South Africa democratization brought with it a wave of commemorative activities to give voice to dissident histories and memories silenced during apartheid. Yet, what happens when an insurgent past is put on display in a museum? Who decides how to represent histories of national conflict, violence, and resistance? What obligations do postconflict memory projects have to museological conventions? What obligations do they have to those they claim to represent? This chapter is about the nature and limits of museums as public spaces where past atrocities are confronted and mobilized to situate, articulate, and authenticate claims about contemporary social life. The democratization of public historical space is as much about the content of the new or revised narratives as it is about how and who produces the content. In examining how these dissident histories become mainstream through new public culture institutions, I expose the activist impulses guiding this process. I look at two projects—one closely tied to the African National Congress (ANC) and the other a more grassroots initiative—that grew out of agitation against the apartheid order and as a result of deliberation on how to grapple with its legacies. The first project is Freedom Park in Pretoria (or Tshwane), a state-legislated memorial project with origins in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism (New York: Verso, 1991), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robin Wagner-Pacifici and Barry Schwartz, “The Vietnam Veterans Memorial: Commemorating a Difficult Past,” American Journal of Sociology 97, no. 2 (1991): 376–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See Albert Grundlingh, “A Cultural Conundrum? Old Monuments and New Regimes: The Voortrekker Monument as Symbol of Afrikaner Power in a Post-apartheid South Africa,” Radical History Review 81 (2001): 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Also see Elizabeth Delmont, “The Voortrekker Monument: Monolith to Myth,” South African Historical Journal 29, no. 1 (1993): 76–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. For a more detailed discussion of the TRC and symbolic reparations, see Ciraj Rassool, Leslie Witz, and Gary Minley, “Burying and Memorializing the Body of Truth: The TRC and National Heritage,” in After the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, ed. Wilmot James (Cape Town: David Phillip, 2000), 115–27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Also see Zayd Minty, “Post-apartheid Public Art in Cape Town: Symbolic Reparations and Public Space,” Urban Studies 43, no. 3 (2006): 421–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. For a discussion of motivations and practices of transformation at the Voortrekker Monument, see Robyn Autry, “Monumental Reconstruction of Memory: The Voortrekker Monument,” Theory, Culture, and Society 29, no. 6 (2012): 146–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thabo Mbeki, “The African Renaissance Statement,” Statement of the Deputy President, Gallagher Estate, Johannesburg, August 13, 1998. http://www.dfa.gov.za/docs/speeches/1998/mbek0813.htm (accessed May 2, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gary Baines, “Site of Struggle: The Freedom Park Fracas and the Divisive Legacy of South Africa’s Border War/Liberation Struggle,” Social Dynamics 35, no. 2 (2009), 330–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rashida Manjoo, the UN Rapporteur on Violence against Women, made this observation in her keynote address at the symposium “After the Violence: Memory” (University of Wisconsin-Madison, September 20, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harriet Ngubane, An African Perspective on the Management of Life and Death and Its Implications for Nation-Building and Reconciliation in South Africa (Pretoria: Freedom Park Trust, 2003), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kenneth Walker, “The History of South Africa: Twice Told,” Carnegie Reporter 2, no. 4 (Spring 2004): 2–13, http://carnegie.org/publications/carnegie-reporter/single/view/article/item/101/ (accessed March 18, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Willie Spies, quoted in “FF Plus Calls for Freedom Park Boycott,” Mail and Guardian, March 20, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mongane Wally Serote, “The Significances and Relevance of the Freedom Park in the South African Context” (Speech at the Central University of Technology, Free State, May 18, 2006). http://www.freedompark.co.za/cms/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_details&gid=58&Itemid=3 (accessed May 2, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thabo Mbeki, “Reconciliation Day Isikhumbuto Freedom Park Handover” (Presidential Address, December 16, 2006). http://www.polity.org.za/article/mbeki-reconciliation-day-isikhumbuto-freedom-park-handover-16122006–2006–12–16 (accessed March 18, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Annie Coombes, History after Apartheid: Visual Culture and Public Memory in a Democratic South Africa (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Ciraj Rassool, “Making of the District Six Museum in Cape Town,” Museum International 58, no. 1–2 (2006): 9–18, here 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Their removal was rationalized as a public health precaution after the outbreak of the bubonic plague at docks where Xhosa were heavily employed. For more about this “sanitation syndrome,” see Vivian Bickford-Smith, “Mapping Cape Town: From Slavery to Apartheid,” in Lost Communities, Living Memories: Remembering Forced Removals in Cape Town, ed. Sean Field (Cape Town: David Philip, 2001), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Julian Jonker and Karen E. Till, “Mapping and Excavating Spectral Traces in Post-Apartheid Cape Town,” Memory Studies 2, no. 3 (2009): 303–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Marc Silberman and Florence Vatan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Autry, R. (2013). Doing Memory in Public: Postapartheid Memorial Space as an Activist Project. In: Silberman, M., Vatan, F. (eds) Memory and Postwar Memorials. Studies in European Culture and History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343529_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics