Abstract
The steady decline of marriage rates in North American and European countries since the 1960s seems to have relegated marriage’s political role in relation to the state, a topic that deeply concerned prolific English writer Gilbert Chesterton in the 1920s, to a state of historical curiosity and obsolescence. If Chesterton’s words appear to have lost their relevance in regard to divorce, his initial object of concern, they nonetheless still appear to directly tap into the complex links, real or apprehended, that currently bind the state, citizenship, bodies and family when it comes to marriage migration. Indeed, though marriage migration was “relatively insignificant in the early phases of post-War immigration”, it has become the object of more intense scrutiny in the past twenty years, as family-related migration became the main legal mode of entry in Europe as well as in the United States (Kraler, 2010, p. 23). Even ignored in recent state-of-the-art surveys of migration governance (e.g. Betts, 2011; Kunz et al., 2011), such neglect certainly betrays assumptions about labour migration being the main concern of migration controls. Empirically, the lack of attention paid to marriage migration (which is itself only one dimension of family reunification or formation1) as a valid “political object of political inquiry” certainly reflects assumed dichotomies, such as those between the rational and emotional realms, and between autonomy and dependency.
It is simply that in such society the government, in dealing with the family, deals with something almost as permanent and self-renewing as itself. There can be a continuous family policy, like a continuous foreign policy. (Chesterton, 1920, pp. 39–40)
Tout le monde a droit A. l’amour, mais il faut respecter les règles. (Everybody has the right to love, but you have to respect the rules’. A reader’s comment to an article detailing increases of sham marriages in Belgium: RTL, 2011)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
Aradau, C., Lobo-Guerrero, L. and Van Munster, R. (2009) ‘Security, Technologies of Risk, and the Political: Guest Editors’Introduction’, Security Dialogue, 39(2–3): 147–154.
Bayley, A. J. and Boyle, P. J. (2004) ‘Untying and Retying Family in the New Europe’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(2): 229–241.
Betts, A. (2011) Global Migration Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Bigo, D. (2006) ‘Protection: Security, Territory and Population’, in J. Huysmans et al. (eds) The Politics of Protection: Sites of Insecurities and Political Agency (London and New York: Routledge), 84–100.
Bredal, A. (2005) ‘Tackling Forced Marriages in the Nordic Countries: Between Women’s Rights and Immigration Control’, in S. Hossain and L. Welchman (eds) Honour: Crimes, Paradigms, and Violence against Women (London and New York: Zed Books), 332–353.
Brennan, D. (2003) ‘Selling Sex for Visas: Sex Tourism as a Stepping-Stone to International Migration’, in B. Ehrenreich and A. R. Hochschield (eds), Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy (New York: Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt and Company), 154–168.
Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (2010) Migrationsbericht des Bundesamtes für Migration und Flüchtlinge im Auftrag der Bundesregierung (Nürnberg: Bundesamtfür Migration und Flüchtlinge), http://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Publikationen/Migrationsberichte/migrationsbericht-2010.pdf;jsessionid=D0A988839F34525E65618B5E8A271C94.1_cid286?_blob=publicationFile
Charsley, K. (ed.) (2012) Transnational Marriage: New Perspectives from Europe and beyond (London and New York: Routledge).
Charsley, K. and Benson, M. (2012) ‘Marriages of Convenience, and Inconvenient Marriages: Regulating Spousal Migration to Britain’, Journal of Immigration Asylum and Nationality Law, 26(1): 10–26.
Charsley, K., Storer-Church, B., Benson, M. and Van Hear, N. (2011) Marriage-Related Migration to the UK (London: UK Home Office).
Chesterton, G. K. (2007[1920]) The Superstition of Divorce (New York: Cosimo Inc).
Council of the European Union (2012) Note from Presidency to Council/Mixed Committee: EU Action on Migratory Pressure, A Strategic Response (Brussels: Council of the European Union), http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/12/st08/st08714-re01.en12.pdf
D’Aoust, A.-M. (2010) ‘Circulation of Desire: The Security Governance of the International “Mail-Order Brides” Industry’, in M. de Larrinaga and M. Doucet (eds) Security and Global Governmentality: Globalization, Governance and the State (London: Routlege), 113–131.
de Goede, M. (2008) ‘Beyond Risk: Premediation and the Post-9/11 Security Imagination’, Security Dialogue, 29(2–3): 155–176.
Delauney, M. A. (2006) L’Immigration par Escroquerie Sentimentale (Paris: Éditions Tatamis).
Deutscher Bundestag (2007) Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Umsetzung aufenthalts- und asylrechtlicher Richtlinien der Europäischen Union (Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag),http://www.migration-info.de/dum_doks/D_btd1605065.pdf
Deutscher Bundestag (2008) Schriftliche Fragen mit den in der Woche vom 8. September 2008 eingegangenen Antworten der Bundesregierung (Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag), http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/16/102/1610215.pdf
Dillon, M. (2008) ‘Underwriting Security’, Security Dialogue, 39(2–3): 309–332.
European Commission (2011) Green Paper on the Right to Family Reunification of Third-Country Nationals Living in the European Union, COM (2011) 735 final, 15 November (Brussels: European Commission), http://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/news/consulting_public/0023/2_EN_ACT_part1_v8.pdf#zoom=100
European Commission (2012) Summary of Stakeholder Responses to the Green Paper on the Right to Family Reunification of Third-Country Nationals (Brussels: EU Directorate-General Home Affairs), http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/summary-of-stakeholder-responses-to-the-green-paper-on-the-right-to-familyreunification-of-third-country-nationals.pdf
Fair, L. (2010) ‘“Why Can’t I Get Married?” Denmark and the ‘Twenty-Four Year Law’, Social and Cultural Geography, 11(2): 139–153.
Ferran, N. (2008) ‘Peu de Meilleur et Trop de Pire: Soupçonnés, Humiliés, Réprimés. Des Couples Mixtes Témoignent’, Rapport D’observation (Paris: Cimade/Amoureux au banc public), http://www.cimade.org/uploads/File/admin/Rapport_Cimade_Couples%20Mixtes.pdf
Foucault, M. (1988) ‘Technologies of the Self’, in L. H. Martin et al. (eds) Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press), 16–49.
Foucault, M. (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York and Toronto: Random House).
Foucault, M. (2007) The Archeology of Knowledge (London and New York: Routledge).
Government of the Netherlands (2012) Dutch Government Response to the Green Paper on Family Reunification (Brussels: European Commission), http://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/news/consulting_public/0023/famreun/MemberStatesNationalGovernments/Netherlands,%20The%20-%20EN.pdf#zoom=100
Green, D. (2010) Letter to the Chair of the Human Rights Joint Committee (London: Minister for Immigration and UK Home Office), http://www.parliament.uk/documents/joint-committees/human-rights/RO_Letter_from_Damian_Green_AsylumandImmigration.pdf http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201011/jtselect/jtrights/111/11110.htm
Guličová-Grethe, M. (2004) Marriage Migration and the Significance of this Migration Issue in Germany. Country Study (Berlin: Berlin Institute for Comparative Social Research).
Haut Conseil à l’Intégration (= High Council for Integration) (2011) La France Sait-Elle Encore Intégrer les Immigrés? Bilan de la Politique d’Intégration en France Depuis Vingt Ans et Perspectives (Paris: Haut Conseil à l’Intégration), http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/114000211/0000.pdf
Jones, G. and Shen, H. (2008) ‘International Marriage in East and Southeast Asia: Trends and Research Emphases’, Citizenship Studies, 12(1): 9–25.
Joo-Schauen, J. (2007) ‘Marriage Migration and Trafficking into Marriage’, in Bundesweiter Koordinierungskreise gegen Frauenhandel und Gewalt an Frauen in Migrationsprozess (ed.) Trafficking in Women in Germany (Berlin: KOK), 87–91.
Kazimirski, A., Keogh, P., Kumari, V., Smith, R., Gowland, S., Purdon, S. and Khanum, N. (2009) Forced Marriage Prevalence and Service Response (London: National Centre for Social Research).
Kofman, E. (2004) ‘Family-Related Migration: A Critical Review of European Studies’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(2): 243–262.
Kofman, E., Phizacklea, A., Raghuram, P. and Sales, R. (2000) Gender and International Migration in Europe: Employment, Welfare and Politics (London and New York: Routledge).
Kofman, E., Rogoz, M. and Lévy, F. (2010) Family Migration Policies in France, NODE Policy Report (Vienna: BMWF/ICMPD), http://research.icmpd.org/fileadmin/Research-Website/Project_material/NODE/FR_Policy_Report_formatted7May.pdf
Kraler, A. (2010) Civic Stratification, Gender and Family Migration Policies in Europe (Vienna: BMWF/ICMPD).
Kunz, R., Lavenex, S. and Panizzon, M. (2011) Multilayered Migration Governance: The Promise of Partnership (Abingdon and New York: Routledge).
Mazeaud, P. (2008) Pour une Politique des Migrations Transparente, Simple et Solidaire (Paris: Commission sur le Cadre Constitutionnel de la Nouvelle Politique d’Immigration), http://www.immigration.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_Mazeaud.pdf
Mezzadra, S. (2004) ‘The Right to Escape’, Ephemera, 4(3): 267–275.
Moeslund, K. and Strasser, E. (2008) Family Migration Policies in Denmark, NODE Policy Report (Vienna: BMWF/ICMPD).
Myrdahl, E. M. (2010) ‘Legislating Love: Norwegian Family Reunification Law as a Racial Project’, Social & Cultural Geography, 11(2): 103–116.
New to Denmark (2012) The Attachment Requirement, New to Denmark: The Official Portal for Foreigners and Integration (Copenhagen: New to Denmark), http://www.nyidanmark.dk/en-us/coming_to_dk/familyreunification/spouses/attachmentrequirement/attachment_requirement.htm
Office Français de l’Intégration et de l’Immigration (2010) Rapport d’Activité 2010 (Paris: Office Français de l’Immigration et de l’Intégration), http://www.ofii.fr/IMG/pdf/OFII-RapportActivites_2010-Client-150DPI-FeuilleAF.pdf
Povinelli, E. (2006) The Empire of Love: Toward a Theory of Intimacy, Genealogy, and Carnality (Durham and London: Duke University Press).
Razack, S. H. (2004) ‘Imperiled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Forced Marriages’, Feminist Legal Studies, 12(1): 129–174.
RTL (2011) Un Couple Marié sur Cinq Suspecté de Mariage Blanc!, 26 February, 2011 (Brussels: RTL), http://www.rtlinfo.be/info/belgique/societe/778400/un-couplemarie-sur-cinq-suspecte-de-mariage-blanc
Rytter, M. (2012) ‘Semi-Legal Family Life: Pakistani Couples in the Borderlands of Denmark and Sweden’, Global Networks, 12(1): 91–108.
Shah, P. (2010) ‘Inconvenient Marriages, or What Happens When Ethnic Minorities Marry Trans-Jurisdictionally’, Utrecht Law Review, 6(2): 17–32.
Strik, T., Böcker, A., Luiten, M. and van Oers, R. (2010) ‘Integration and Naturalization Tests: The New Way Forward with Citizenship’, in The INTEC Project: Draft Synthesis Report, Centre for Migration Law (The Netherlands: Radboud University Nijmegen), http://www.humanrights.dk/files/pdf/INTEC/Synthesis%20Intec%20final%20.pdf
UK Border Agency (2011a) UK Immigration Crackdown as Suspected Sham Marriages Rises, UK Visa Bureau News (London: UK Border Agency), http://www.visabureau.com/uk/news/24-03-11/uk-immigration-crackdown-as-suspected-shammarriages-rise.aspx
UK Border Agency (2011b) Guidance for Clergy-Foreign Nationals Seeking to Marry in the UK, Guidance issued 12 April (London: UK Border Agency), http://www.newcastle.anglican.org/userfiles/file/Newcastle%20Website/Mission%20and%20Ministry/Diocesan%20Handbook/Marriage%20ukba%20gdnce.pdf
United States Congress (1985) Hearing before the Subcommittee on Immigration and Refugee Policy of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate, Ninety-Ninth Congress, S Hrg. 99–325, First Session on Fraudulent Marriage and Fiance Arrangements to Obtain Permanent Resident Immigration Status, Serial no. J-99–43, 26 July (Washington: United States Congress).
Vaughan, J. (2011) All in the Family: Preferences for Relatives Drives U.S. Immigration and Population Growth (Alexandria, VA: Negative Population Growth Inc.), http://www.npg.org/forum_series/All%20in%20the%20Family%20022211%20final.pdf
Walters, W. (2010) ‘Imagined Migration World: The European Union’s Anti-Illegal Immigration Discourse’, in M. Geiger and A. Pécoud (eds) The Politics of International Migration Management (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 73–95.
Walters, W. (2012) Governmentality: Critical Encounters (London and New York: Routledge).
Wray, H. (2006) ‘An Ideal Husband? Marriages of Convenience, Moral Gate-Keeping and Immigration to the UK’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 8(1): 303–320.
Wray, H. (2011) Regulating Marriage Migration into the UK: A Stranger in the Home (Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Anne-Marie D’Aoust
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
D’Aoust, AM. (2013). ‘Take a Chance on Me’. In: Geiger, M., Pécoud, A. (eds) Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263070_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263070_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44243-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-26307-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)