Skip to main content

The EU, Asia and the Governance of Global Trade

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationship between EU-Asia trade and the mechanisms of governance that have emerged to regulate the global trading system.

The chapter begins with a general review of the problems attending the governance of global trade in the contemporary period, and of the institutions and interests involved in the process. It then proceeds to look at the ways in which the EU-Asia relationship reflects the more general tendencies, and identifies the range of interests and positions that can be discerned in EU-Asia trade relations. It argues in this context that a clash of interests between market-opening and modernisation is key to understanding the EU-Asia trade relationship, and also that this interacts with shifts in ‘trade power’ between the two regions in such a way as to produce problems of negotiation and mutual understanding. This argument is then pursued in a study of three levels of EU-Asia trade relations: the multilateral (primarily within the WTO), the inter-regional (within the Asia-Europe Meeting and the EU-ASEAN relationship) and the bilateral (both between the EU and its major trading partners such as China, India and Japan, and between the EU and those other countries with which it has pursued bilateral free trade agreements).

The key conclusion of the chapter is that the EU’s trade relations with Asia reflect an increasing tendency towards defensiveness and bilateralism, as opposed to previous periods in which there was at least a rhetorical commitment to openness and multilateralism. This is likely to have negative implications for the development of global governance in trade, and to promote the pursuit of ‘competitive interdependence’ based on a politics of differentiation and exclusion rather than multilateral solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Allen, D. and M. Smith (2011) ‘Relations with the Rest of the World’ in N. Copsey and T. Haughton (eds.) The JCMS Annual Review of the European Union in 2010 (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2012) ‘Relations with the Rest of the World’ in N. Copsey and T. Haughton (eds.) The JCMS Annual Review of the European Union in 2011 (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 162–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, R. and B. Bridges (eds.) (2008) Europe-Asia Relations: Building Multilateralisms (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, S., C. Hughes, N. Phillips and B. Rosamond (eds.) (2002) New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, F. (2012) An Introduction to European Foreign Policy. 2nd edition (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) A New Partnership with Southeast Asia. COM (2003) 339/4. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2006) Global Europe: Competing in the World. COM(2006)567, Brussels, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2008) Global Europe: EU Performance in the Global Economy. Brussels, October. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ (accessed 11 February 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2010) Trade, Growth and World Affairs: Trade Policy as a Core Component of the EU’s 2020 Strategy, COM(2010)612, November (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, A. (1999) ‘The European Union in Southeast Asia: continuity and change in turbulent times’, International Affairs 75(4), pp. 743–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2000) ‘Evaluating the EU-ASEM Relationship: a negotiated order approach’, Journal of European Public Policy 7(5), Special Issue, pp. 787–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, J. (2000) Japan and the European Union: A Partnership for the Twenty-First Century? (Basingstoke: Macmillan, New York: St Martin’s Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardacre, A. (2010) The Rise and Fall of Interregionalism in EU External Relations (Dordrecht: Republic of Letters Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardacre, A. and M. Smith (2009) ‘The EU and the Diplomacy of Complex Interregionalism’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 4(2), pp. 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (forthcoming) ‘The EU and the Contradictions of Complex Interregionalism’ in F. Söderbaum, F. Baert and T. Scarimagli (eds.) Intersecting Interregionalism (Dordrecht, NL: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, B. and S. McGuire (eds.) (2004) Trade Politics. 2nd edition (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, B. and M. Kostecki (2001) The Political Economy of the World Trading System: from GATT to WTO. 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. and M. Doidge (2012) Development Policy of the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hwee, L.H. (2003) Asia and Europe: The Development and Different Dimensions of ASEM (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maull, H., G. Segal and J. Wanandi (1998) Europe and the Asia-Pacific (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, S. (2007) ‘Managing Globalization?’ Journal of European Public Policy 45(4), pp. 905–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, S. and K. Nicolaïdis (2006) ‘The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(6), pp. 906–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2011) ‘The European Union as a trade power’ in C. Hill and M. Smith (eds.) International Relations and the European Union. 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 275–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. (2001) ‘International Trade’ in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. Simmons (eds.) Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 448–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, B. (2004) ‘From Seattle and Doha to Cancún: The Trade Agenda in the New Millennium’ in B. Hocking and S. McGuire (eds.) Trade Politics. 2nd edition (London: Routledge), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, P. and J. Gilson (eds.) (2001) The European Union and East Asia: Interregional Linkages in a Changing Global System (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, A. (2010) ‘The EU, the US and Trade Policy: Competitive Interdependence in the Management of Globalization’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3), pp. 368–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2006) ‘The European Union and International Political Economy: Trade, Aid and Monetary Relations’ in K.-E. Joergensen, M. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds.) Handbook of European Union Politics (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007) ‘Regions and Regionalism’ in B. White, R. Little and M. Smith (eds.) Issues in World Politics. 3rd edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2012a) ‘European Union External Relations’ in M. Cini and N. Perez-Solarzano (eds.) European Union Politics. 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2012b) ‘The European Union, the United States and China: Strategic Engagement, Political Commitment and Diplomatic Interaction’ in J. Men and W. Shen (eds.) China, the EU and the US: partners and competitors (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. and N. Vichitsorasatra (2010) ‘The European Union’s Asia Strategies: Problems of Foreign Policy and International Relations’, International Politics 47, pp. 338–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. and H. Xie (2009) ‘The European Union, China and the United States: Complex Interdependence and Bi-multilateralism in Commercial Relations’ in G. Wiessala, J. Wilson and P. Taneja (eds.) The European Union and China: Interests and Dilemmas (Amsterdam: Rodopi).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, S. (2011) European Union Economic Diplomacy: The Role of the EU in External Economic Relations (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (2002) Extending International Cooperation: the European Union and the ‘New’ International Trade Agenda (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Michael Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, M. (2013). The EU, Asia and the Governance of Global Trade. In: Christiansen, T., Kirchner, E., Murray, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378704_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics