Abstract
This chapter explores the relationship between EU-Asia trade and the mechanisms of governance that have emerged to regulate the global trading system.
The chapter begins with a general review of the problems attending the governance of global trade in the contemporary period, and of the institutions and interests involved in the process. It then proceeds to look at the ways in which the EU-Asia relationship reflects the more general tendencies, and identifies the range of interests and positions that can be discerned in EU-Asia trade relations. It argues in this context that a clash of interests between market-opening and modernisation is key to understanding the EU-Asia trade relationship, and also that this interacts with shifts in ‘trade power’ between the two regions in such a way as to produce problems of negotiation and mutual understanding. This argument is then pursued in a study of three levels of EU-Asia trade relations: the multilateral (primarily within the WTO), the inter-regional (within the Asia-Europe Meeting and the EU-ASEAN relationship) and the bilateral (both between the EU and its major trading partners such as China, India and Japan, and between the EU and those other countries with which it has pursued bilateral free trade agreements).
The key conclusion of the chapter is that the EU’s trade relations with Asia reflect an increasing tendency towards defensiveness and bilateralism, as opposed to previous periods in which there was at least a rhetorical commitment to openness and multilateralism. This is likely to have negative implications for the development of global governance in trade, and to promote the pursuit of ‘competitive interdependence’ based on a politics of differentiation and exclusion rather than multilateral solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Allen, D. and M. Smith (2011) ‘Relations with the Rest of the World’ in N. Copsey and T. Haughton (eds.) The JCMS Annual Review of the European Union in 2010 (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 209–230.
— (2012) ‘Relations with the Rest of the World’ in N. Copsey and T. Haughton (eds.) The JCMS Annual Review of the European Union in 2011 (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 162–177.
Balme, R. and B. Bridges (eds.) (2008) Europe-Asia Relations: Building Multilateralisms (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Breslin, S., C. Hughes, N. Phillips and B. Rosamond (eds.) (2002) New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy (London: Routledge).
Cameron, F. (2012) An Introduction to European Foreign Policy. 2nd edition (London: Routledge).
European Commission (2003) A New Partnership with Southeast Asia. COM (2003) 339/4. Brussels.
— (2006) Global Europe: Competing in the World. COM(2006)567, Brussels, October.
— (2008) Global Europe: EU Performance in the Global Economy. Brussels, October. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ (accessed 11 February 2012).
— (2010) Trade, Growth and World Affairs: Trade Policy as a Core Component of the EU’s 2020 Strategy, COM(2010)612, November (Brussels: European Commission).
Forster, A. (1999) ‘The European Union in Southeast Asia: continuity and change in turbulent times’, International Affairs 75(4), pp. 743–758.
— (2000) ‘Evaluating the EU-ASEM Relationship: a negotiated order approach’, Journal of European Public Policy 7(5), Special Issue, pp. 787–805.
Gilson, J. (2000) Japan and the European Union: A Partnership for the Twenty-First Century? (Basingstoke: Macmillan, New York: St Martin’s Press).
Hardacre, A. (2010) The Rise and Fall of Interregionalism in EU External Relations (Dordrecht: Republic of Letters Publishing).
Hardacre, A. and M. Smith (2009) ‘The EU and the Diplomacy of Complex Interregionalism’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 4(2), pp. 167–188.
— (forthcoming) ‘The EU and the Contradictions of Complex Interregionalism’ in F. Söderbaum, F. Baert and T. Scarimagli (eds.) Intersecting Interregionalism (Dordrecht, NL: Springer).
Hocking, B. and S. McGuire (eds.) (2004) Trade Politics. 2nd edition (London: Routledge).
Hoekman, B. and M. Kostecki (2001) The Political Economy of the World Trading System: from GATT to WTO. 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Holland, M. and M. Doidge (2012) Development Policy of the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Hwee, L.H. (2003) Asia and Europe: The Development and Different Dimensions of ASEM (London: Routledge).
Maull, H., G. Segal and J. Wanandi (1998) Europe and the Asia-Pacific (London: Routledge).
Meunier, S. (2007) ‘Managing Globalization?’ Journal of European Public Policy 45(4), pp. 905–927.
Meunier, S. and K. Nicolaïdis (2006) ‘The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(6), pp. 906–925.
— (2011) ‘The European Union as a trade power’ in C. Hill and M. Smith (eds.) International Relations and the European Union. 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 275–298.
Milner, H. (2001) ‘International Trade’ in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. Simmons (eds.) Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 448–461.
Moon, B. (2004) ‘From Seattle and Doha to Cancún: The Trade Agenda in the New Millennium’ in B. Hocking and S. McGuire (eds.) Trade Politics. 2nd edition (London: Routledge), 23–35.
Preston, P. and J. Gilson (eds.) (2001) The European Union and East Asia: Interregional Linkages in a Changing Global System (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Sbragia, A. (2010) ‘The EU, the US and Trade Policy: Competitive Interdependence in the Management of Globalization’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3), pp. 368–382.
Smith, M. (2006) ‘The European Union and International Political Economy: Trade, Aid and Monetary Relations’ in K.-E. Joergensen, M. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds.) Handbook of European Union Politics (London: Sage).
— (2007) ‘Regions and Regionalism’ in B. White, R. Little and M. Smith (eds.) Issues in World Politics. 3rd edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
— (2012a) ‘European Union External Relations’ in M. Cini and N. Perez-Solarzano (eds.) European Union Politics. 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
— (2012b) ‘The European Union, the United States and China: Strategic Engagement, Political Commitment and Diplomatic Interaction’ in J. Men and W. Shen (eds.) China, the EU and the US: partners and competitors (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Smith, M. and N. Vichitsorasatra (2010) ‘The European Union’s Asia Strategies: Problems of Foreign Policy and International Relations’, International Politics 47, pp. 338–354.
Smith, M. and H. Xie (2009) ‘The European Union, China and the United States: Complex Interdependence and Bi-multilateralism in Commercial Relations’ in G. Wiessala, J. Wilson and P. Taneja (eds.) The European Union and China: Interests and Dilemmas (Amsterdam: Rodopi).
Woolcock, S. (2011) European Union Economic Diplomacy: The Role of the EU in External Economic Relations (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Young, A. (2002) Extending International Cooperation: the European Union and the ‘New’ International Trade Agenda (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Michael Smith
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, M. (2013). The EU, Asia and the Governance of Global Trade. In: Christiansen, T., Kirchner, E., Murray, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378704_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378704_24
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49454-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37870-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)