Abstract
The EU’s trade preference plays an important role in shaping the world economy, as the EU is a highly formidable trade power worldwide. In shaping the global trade environment, two competing mainstream strategies exist: multilateralism led by WTO negotiation; and bilateralism, in which actors settle trade-related issues between themselves. Due to the EU’s significance in global trade, the EU’s choices and actions will have a great influence on the success of these two forces. This study explores the paradigm shift of the EU’s preference on a global trade arrangement in the mid-2000s. The EU-South Korea FTA is taken as an example, because the EU-South Korea FTA is considered to be the EU’s first new-generation free trade agreement. The EU asserts that its changing attitude towards bilateralism will not endanger the multilateralism that it has long supported. It also states that bilateralism constitutes a supporter of multilateralism. The EU’s paradigm shift of trade preference would have an enormous influence on global trade. Whether this shift will contribute to multilateralism, as it states, or whether the change will be deleterious to multilateralism, remains to be determined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acar S, Tekçe M (2008) Multilateralism or Bilateralism: Trade Policy of the EU in the Age of Free Trade Agreements. Esen, Oguz/Ogus, Ayla (Hg.): Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Economic Issues in a Globalizing World, Izmir: Izmir University of Economics, 272–284
Antimiani A, Salvatici L (2015) Regionalism versus multilateralism: The case of the European Union trade policy. Journal of World Trade, 49(2)
Barfield C (2007) Europe (re) joins the FTA bandwagon. American Enterprise Institute, 12
Brown CM (2011) The European Union and regional trade agreements: A case study of the EU-Korea FTA. In European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2011 (pp. 297–308). Springer , Berlin, Heidelberg
Brown W (2000) Restructuring north-south relations: ACP-EU development co-operation in a liberal international order. Review of African Political Economy 27(85):367–383
Cherry J (2012) Upgrading the ‘software’: The EU–Korea free trade agreement and sociocultural barriers to trade and investment. Pac Rev 25(2):247–268
Cherry J (2018) The Hydra revisited: Expectations and perceptions of the impact of the EU-Korea free trade agreement. Asia Europe Journal 16(1):19–35
Claar S, Nölke A (2013) Deep Integration in north–south relations: Compatibility issues between the EU and South Africa. Review of African Political Economy 40(136):274–289
da Conceição-Heldt E (2013) The clash of negotiations: The impact of outside options on multilateral trade negotiations. Int Negot 18(1):111–130
Desta MG (2006) EC-ACP economic partnership agreements and WTO compatibility: An experiment in North-South inter-regional agreements. Common Market l. Rev. 43:1343
Edwards, T. H., Guerin, G., Kim, H., Lee, H., Matthes, J., Tekee, M., & Guerin, S. S. (2007). A qualitative analysis of a potential free trade agreement between the European Union and South Korea. Centre for European Policy Studies
Erixo, F, &Lee-Makiyama H (2010) Stepping into Asia’s growth markets: Dispelling myths about the EU-Korea free trade agreement (No. 3/2010). ECIPE Policy Brief
Estevadeordal A, Suominen K, Volpe C (2013) Regional Trade Agreements: Development challenges and policy options
Lamy P (2004) Trade Policy in the Prodi Commission 1999–2004: An Assessment. European Commission, Brussels, p 19
Evenett SJ (2006) Global Europe”: An Initial Assessment of the European Commission’s New Trade Policy. Aussenwirtschaft: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationale wirtschaftsbeziehungen/The Swiss Review of International Economic Relations, 61(4), 377
Garcia-Duran P, Millet M (2015) Efficient multilateralism or bilateralism? The TTIP from an EU trade policy perspective
Gavin B, Sindzingre A (2009) EU trade relations with emerging Asia: Identifying the issues. Asia Europe Journal 7(1):9–22
Guerin, S. S., Edwards, T. H., Glania, G., Kim, H., Lee, H., Matthes, J., & Tekce, M. (2008). A Qualitative Analysis of a Potential Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and South Korea. CEPS Special Report, 25 November 2008
Horn H, Mavroidis PC, Sapir A (2010) Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements. The World Economy 33(11):1565–1588
Hwang K-S, Kim H-J (2014) Three-Level game theory and the strategy of EU-Korea fta negotiation. The Journal of East Asian Affairs 28(1):85
Lakatos C, Nilsson L (2017) The EU-Korea FTA: Anticipation, trade policy uncertainty and impact. Rev World Econ 153(1):179–198
Lamy P (2002) Stepping stones or stumbling blocks? The EU’s Approach towards the problem of multilateralism vs regionalism in trade policy. The World Economy 25(10):1399–1399
Laurence, R. Z. (1996). Regionalism, Multilateralism and Deep Integration. Discussion Paper. Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
McGuire SM, Lindeque JP (2010) The diminishing returns to trade policy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1329–1349
Meunier S (2007) Managing globalization? The EU in international trade negotiations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 905–926
Meunier S, Nicolaïdis K (2005) The European Union as a trade power. International Relations and the European Union 12:247–269
Robertson R (2021) Deep Integration in Trade Agreements
Rollo J (2008) An EU-Korea Free Trade Area Playing Catch-up Or Taking the Lead? Royal Institue of International Affairs
Tekçe M, Acar S (2015) From Multilateralism to Bilateralism: The Evolution of Global Trade Policies. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(1)
Woolcock S (2007). European Union policy towards free trade agreements (No. 03/2007). ECIPE working paper
Woolcock S (2016a) Differentiation within reciprocity: the European Union approach to preferential trade agreements. In The Trade–Development Nexus in the European Union (pp. 36–48). Routledge.
Woolcock S (2016b) European Union economic diplomacy: The role of the EU in external economic relations. Routledge
Wróbel A (2013) Multilateralism or Bilateralism: The EU Trade Policy in an Age of the WTO Crisis. Ekonomika 92(3):7–23
Acknowledgment
This article is the partly research results of the MOST project (MOST 110-2410-H-259 -010 -MY2 & NCST 112-2410-H-259 -020). The author would like to thank the funding support of National Council of Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lai, YC. (2023). Paradigm Shift of the EU’s Preference of Trade Relations: The Case of the EU-South Korea FTA. In: Chu, CP., Park, SC. (eds) Strategies in Changing Global Orders . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7246-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7246-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7245-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7246-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)