Skip to main content

Paradigm Shift of the EU’s Preference of Trade Relations: The Case of the EU-South Korea FTA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategies in Changing Global Orders
  • 184 Accesses

Abstract

The EU’s trade preference plays an important role in shaping the world economy, as the EU is a highly formidable trade power worldwide. In shaping the global trade environment, two competing mainstream strategies exist: multilateralism led by WTO negotiation; and bilateralism, in which actors settle trade-related issues between themselves. Due to the EU’s significance in global trade, the EU’s choices and actions will have a great influence on the success of these two forces. This study explores the paradigm shift of the EU’s preference on a global trade arrangement in the mid-2000s. The EU-South Korea FTA is taken as an example, because the EU-South Korea FTA is considered to be the EU’s first new-generation free trade agreement. The EU asserts that its changing attitude towards bilateralism will not endanger the multilateralism that it has long supported. It also states that bilateralism constitutes a supporter of multilateralism. The EU’s paradigm shift of trade preference would have an enormous influence on global trade. Whether this shift will contribute to multilateralism, as it states, or whether the change will be deleterious to multilateralism, remains to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acar S, Tekçe M (2008) Multilateralism or Bilateralism: Trade Policy of the EU in the Age of Free Trade Agreements. Esen, Oguz/Ogus, Ayla (Hg.): Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Economic Issues in a Globalizing World, Izmir: Izmir University of Economics, 272–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Antimiani A, Salvatici L (2015) Regionalism versus multilateralism: The case of the European Union trade policy. Journal of World Trade, 49(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barfield C (2007) Europe (re) joins the FTA bandwagon. American Enterprise Institute, 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CM (2011) The European Union and regional trade agreements: A case study of the EU-Korea FTA. In European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2011 (pp. 297–308). Springer , Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown W (2000) Restructuring north-south relations: ACP-EU development co-operation in a liberal international order. Review of African Political Economy 27(85):367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry J (2012) Upgrading the ‘software’: The EU–Korea free trade agreement and sociocultural barriers to trade and investment. Pac Rev 25(2):247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry J (2018) The Hydra revisited: Expectations and perceptions of the impact of the EU-Korea free trade agreement. Asia Europe Journal 16(1):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claar S, Nölke A (2013) Deep Integration in north–south relations: Compatibility issues between the EU and South Africa. Review of African Political Economy 40(136):274–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Conceição-Heldt E (2013) The clash of negotiations: The impact of outside options on multilateral trade negotiations. Int Negot 18(1):111–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desta MG (2006) EC-ACP economic partnership agreements and WTO compatibility: An experiment in North-South inter-regional agreements. Common Market l. Rev. 43:1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, T. H., Guerin, G., Kim, H., Lee, H., Matthes, J., Tekee, M., & Guerin, S. S. (2007). A qualitative analysis of a potential free trade agreement between the European Union and South Korea. Centre for European Policy Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Erixo, F, &Lee-Makiyama H (2010) Stepping into Asia’s growth markets: Dispelling myths about the EU-Korea free trade agreement (No. 3/2010). ECIPE Policy Brief

    Google Scholar 

  • Estevadeordal A, Suominen K, Volpe C (2013) Regional Trade Agreements: Development challenges and policy options

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamy P (2004) Trade Policy in the Prodi Commission 1999–2004: An Assessment. European Commission, Brussels, p 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenett SJ (2006) Global Europe”: An Initial Assessment of the European Commission’s New Trade Policy. Aussenwirtschaft: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationale wirtschaftsbeziehungen/The Swiss Review of International Economic Relations, 61(4), 377

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Duran P, Millet M (2015) Efficient multilateralism or bilateralism? The TTIP from an EU trade policy perspective

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin B, Sindzingre A (2009) EU trade relations with emerging Asia: Identifying the issues. Asia Europe Journal 7(1):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, S. S., Edwards, T. H., Glania, G., Kim, H., Lee, H., Matthes, J., & Tekce, M. (2008). A Qualitative Analysis of a Potential Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and South Korea. CEPS Special Report, 25 November 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn H, Mavroidis PC, Sapir A (2010) Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements. The World Economy 33(11):1565–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang K-S, Kim H-J (2014) Three-Level game theory and the strategy of EU-Korea fta negotiation. The Journal of East Asian Affairs 28(1):85

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos C, Nilsson L (2017) The EU-Korea FTA: Anticipation, trade policy uncertainty and impact. Rev World Econ 153(1):179–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamy P (2002) Stepping stones or stumbling blocks? The EU’s Approach towards the problem of multilateralism vs regionalism in trade policy. The World Economy 25(10):1399–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, R. Z. (1996). Regionalism, Multilateralism and Deep Integration. Discussion Paper. Brookings Institution, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire SM, Lindeque JP (2010) The diminishing returns to trade policy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1329–1349

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier S (2007) Managing globalization? The EU in international trade negotiations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 905–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier S, Nicolaïdis K (2005) The European Union as a trade power. International Relations and the European Union 12:247–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson R (2021) Deep Integration in Trade Agreements

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollo J (2008) An EU-Korea Free Trade Area Playing Catch-up Or Taking the Lead? Royal Institue of International Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekçe M, Acar S (2015) From Multilateralism to Bilateralism: The Evolution of Global Trade Policies. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock S (2007). European Union policy towards free trade agreements (No. 03/2007). ECIPE working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock S (2016a) Differentiation within reciprocity: the European Union approach to preferential trade agreements. In The Trade–Development Nexus in the European Union (pp. 36–48). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock S (2016b) European Union economic diplomacy: The role of the EU in external economic relations. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróbel A (2013) Multilateralism or Bilateralism: The EU Trade Policy in an Age of the WTO Crisis. Ekonomika 92(3):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This article is the partly research results of the MOST project (MOST 110-2410-H-259 -010 -MY2 & NCST 112-2410-H-259 -020). The author would like to thank the funding support of National Council of Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-Chen Lai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lai, YC. (2023). Paradigm Shift of the EU’s Preference of Trade Relations: The Case of the EU-South Korea FTA. In: Chu, CP., Park, SC. (eds) Strategies in Changing Global Orders . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7246-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics