Skip to main content
  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

Boundaries of belonging are not fixed in time and vary substantially in space. The chapters of this volume underline that boundary making and its results — concepts, markers and measures of ‘us and them’ — differ substantially between the countries compared so far and underlie changes during the last decades. (Re)Constructing boundaries of belonging is a social processes in which perceptions and ascriptions of ‘us’ and ‘them’ are shaped. Concerning the categories by which residents and citizens, in general, and labour migrants, in particular, are grouped and distinguished, national societies like the British, the Chinese, the Dutch, the French, and the German follow very different institutionalised traditions. These national patterns of categorising and distinguishing migrants’ and especially labour migrants’ rights and status from those of the majority of society are institutionalised in the sense of being cemented in legal rules and in taken-for-granted perceptions and expectations. Next to substantial national variations in the dominant categories and boundaries of belonging, substantial dynamics of change in these institutional arrangements have also been analysed. In the first section of this chapter, these pathways of national settings and change will be highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altglas, Véronique (2010) ‘Laïcité is What Laïcité Does. Rethinking the French Cult Controversy’, Current Sociology, Vol. 58(3): 489–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, Rogers (1992) Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Jack (July 24, 2009). ‘EU migrants “good for UK economy”’, The Independent (London), accessed February 17, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Schiller, Nina, Basch, Linda, Blanc Szanton, Cristina (ed.) (1992) Towards a Transnational Perspective on Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Nationalism Reconsidered. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, David (2005) Postethnic America. Beyond Multiculturalism (revised and updated tenth anniversary edition). New York: Basic Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (2003) Theories of Distinction. Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pries, Ludger (2005) ‘Configurations of Geographic and Societal Spaces: A Sociological Proposal between “Methodological Nationalism” and the “Spaces of Flows”’, Global Networks Vol. 5, No. 2: 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pries, Ludger (2012) ‘Ambiguities of Global and Transnational Collective Identities’, Global Networks Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. (forthcoming: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471–0374.2012.00368.x/abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pries, Ludger and Seeliger, Martin (2012) Transnational Social Spaces between Methodological Nationalism and ‘Cosmo-Globalism’, in Amelina, Anna, Devrimsel, Nergiz, Faist, Thomas/Glick Schiller, Nina (eds.), Beyond Methodological National-ism: Social Science Research Methodologies in Transition. London/New York: Routledge (pp. 219–238).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Ludger Pries

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pries, L. (2013). Migration and the Shifting Boundaries of Belonging. In: Shifting Boundaries of Belonging and New Migration Dynamics in Europe and China. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369726_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics