Abstract
The twentieth century has ushered in a period of far-reaching transition, with the globalisation of insecurity as one of its defining characteristics. Cross-border flows, by virtue of their speed, scale, and intensity, have generated global threats to security (e.g. weapons of mass destruction, climate change) but also information and communication systems that vastly compound the experience of insecurity. The two world wars, the dissolution of empires, and the fragility of many states have resulted in the almost continuous reconfiguration of political space. During the Cold War ideology served as a powerful transmission belt for the internationalisation of conflict. In the post-Cold War period religion has performed a similar function, as has the rise of armed non-state actors. The ambiguous and often contradictory conceptions of political space vying for efficacy and legitimacy can be considered both cause and effect of the globalisation of insecurity.
In response to these disconcerting trends, new conceptions of security have emerged, some with strategic ambitions (e.g. common security, comprehensive security, human security, responsibility to protect), and others with more limited tactical horizons (e.g. confidence and trust building, preventive diplomacy, early warning). Collectively these analytical, normative, and institutional innovations point to a paradigmatic shift in awareness and practice, which is not to say that the shift is uniform, universal, or equal to the challenge. To bear fruit, this still embryonic tendency towards holoreflexivity has to animate all three arenas of decision-making – the state, the market and civil society. Intellectuals, political and business leaders, functionaries in diverse settings, and numerous non-governmental actors all have to address the nature of contemporary risks and insecurities, their likely consequences and interconnections, and the necessary remedial policies and practices. To this end, complex questions surrounding access to and control of information as well as pedagogical theory and practice need to be radically re-examined to ensure not only holistic diagnosis but also institutional arrangements that can connect remedial responses into some relatively coherent whole. The contemporary whole, it should be noted, is not only global but also plural in that it encompasses diverse social groupings, communities, cultures and civilisations, and planetary in that it comprises the totality of relationships between the human species and the rest of the biosphere.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Albert, M., & Brock, L. (1996). Debordering the world of states: New spaces in international relations. New Political Science, 18(1), 69–106.
Alvarez, J. E. (2000). Multilateralism and its discontents. European Journal of International Law, 11(2), 393–411.
Anderson, M., & Bort, E. (Eds). (1998). The frontiers of Europe. London: Pinter.
Averchenkova, A., & Bassi, S. (2016), ‘Beyond the targets: Assessing the political credibility of pledges for the Paris’, Policy Brief, The Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, February 2016.
Axworthy, L. (2001). Human security and global governance: Putting people first. Global Governance, 7, 19–23.
Betts, A. (2013). Survival migration: Failed governance and the crisis of displacement. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bodle, R., Donat, L., & Duwe, M. (2016), ‘ The Paris Agreement: Analysis, assessment and outlook’, Background paper for the workshop ‘Beyond COP21: what does Paris mean for future climate policy?’, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conserva-tion, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB), Berlin, 28 January 2016.
Braudel, F. (1993). A history of civilizations. Trans: Richard Mayne. New York: Penguin Books.
Brooks, R. E. (2005). Failed states, or the state as failure? The University of Chicago Law Review, 72(4), 1159–1196.
Camilleri, J. (2008). The “war on terror”: Reassessing rationale and efficacy. In Hans Köchler (Ed.), The ‘global war on terror’ and the question of world order, Studies in International Relations XXX (pp. 58–84). Vienna: International Progress Organisation.
Camilleri, J. (2011). Energy governance in the era of climate change. In L. Anceschi & J. Symons (Eds.), Energy security in the era of climate change – The Asia-pacific experience (pp. 255–274). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Camilleri, J., & Falk, J. (1992). The end of sovereignty? The politics of a shrinking and fragmenting world. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Camilleri, J., & Falk, J. (2009). Worlds in transition: Evolving governance across a stressed planet. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000), The anthopocene, IGBP Newsletter 41:17–18.
Davis, D. E. (2009). “Non-state armed actors, new imagined communities, and shifting patterns of sovereignty and insecurity in the modern. World.”Contemporary Security Policy, 30(2), 221–245.
European Commission (2016), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: The road from Paris: Assessing the implications of the Paris Agreement, Brussels, 2 March 2016.
Geiss, I. (1983). War and empire in the twentieth century. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
Gogus, S. S. (2014), Understanding Impasse in Climate Change Negotiations: The North-South Conflict and Beyond. [Available at: http://climate-exchange.org/2014/02/06/understanding-impasse-in-climate-change-negotiations-the-north-south-conflict-and-beyond. Accessed 3 December 2015.
Greenpeace International (2011), Who’s holding us back – How carbon-intensive industry is preventing effective climate change legislation. Accessed at http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/publications/reports/Whos-holding-us-back/, 24 November 2013.
Habsburg, O. (1958). The social order of tomorrow: State and society in the atomic age. Trans: Ivo Jarosy. London: Wolff.
Harbom, L., & Wallensteen, P. (2005). Armed conflict and its international dimensions, 1946–2004. Journal of Peace Research, 42(5), 623–635.
Hoppe, H. (2003). Introduction. In H.-H. Hoppe (ed.), The myth of national defense: Essays on the theory and history of security production. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Institute for Economics and Peace (2015), Global Terrorism Index 2015,
Isakhan, B. (Ed.) (2015). The legacy of Iraq: From the 2003 war to the ‘Islamic State’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, R. (2010). Rethinking the NPT’s role in security: 2010 and beyond. International Affairs, 86(2), 429–445.
Kinzer, S. (2012). Libya and the limits of intervention. Current History, 111(748), 305–309.
Kuperman, A. (2013). A model humanitarian intervention? Reassessing NATO’s Libya campaign. International Security, 38(1), 105–136.
Meier, O. (2015), “The 2015 NPT Review Conference Failure Implications for the Nuclear Order”, German Institute for International and Security Affairs Working Paper FG03-WP No 04, Berlin.
Mertus, J. (1999). Reconsidering the legality of humanitarian intervention: Lessons from Kosovo. William & Mary Law. Review, 41(5), 1743–1787.
Mittelman, J. (2010). Hyperconflict: Globalization and insecurity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Moghaddam, F. M. (2010). The new global insecurity: How terrorism, environmental collapse, economic inequalities, and resource shortages are changing our world. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
Newman, E. (2007). A crisis of global institutions? Multilateralism and international security (pp. 10–29). London: Routledge.
Ortega Y Gasset, J. (1932). The revolt of the masses. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Paul, T. V., & Risman, N. M. (2004). Under pressure? Globalisation and the national security state. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 33(2), 355–380.
Reis, E. P. (2004). The lasting marriage between nation and state despite globalization. International Political Science Review, 25(3), 251–257.
Robinson, W. I. (1996). Globalization, the world system, and ‘democracy promotion’ in US Foreign policy. Theory and Society, 25(5), 615–665.
Schneckener, U. (2007), “Armed non-state actors and the monopoly of force”, in Revisiting the State Monopoly on the Legitimate Use of Force, Policy Paper 24: 10–19.
Scholte, J. A. (2011). Towards greater legitimacy in global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(1), 110–120.
Spengler, O. (1926–1928). The Decline of the West, authorised translation with notes by Charles Francis Atkinson. London: G. Allen & Unwin.
Union of Concerned Scientists. (2012). A climate of corporate control – How corporations have influenced the U.S. dialogue on climate science and policy. Accessed at http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/a-climate-of-corporate-control.html, 12 December 2013.
Victor, D. G. (2011). Global warming gridlock: Creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Von Hlatky, S., & Wenger, A. (Eds). (2015). The future of extended deterrence: The United States, NATO, and beyond. Washington, DC: Georgetown University press.
Wallerstein, I. (1984). The politics of the world economy: The states, the movements and the civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weldes, J., Laffey, M., Gusterson, H., & Duvall, R. (Eds.) (1999). Cultures of insecurity: States, communities and the production of danger. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wood, J., & Shearing, C. (2013). Imagining security. London: Routledge.
Zenko, M. (2014), “The slippery slope of US intervention”, Foreign Policy, 11
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Camilleri, J. (2017). Insecurity and Governance in an Age of Transition. In: Burke, A., Parker, R. (eds) Global Insecurity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95145-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95145-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95144-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95145-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)