Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: Knowledge Production, Area Studies and the Mobility Turn

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Area Studies at the Crossroads

Abstract

Calls for interdisciplinary and transregional Area Studies research have become ever more pressing. They are necessary to address the fact that the geographically fixed categories in which our world operates are increasingly characterized by degrees of dynamism that no longer justify a division of the world into territorially fixed units. By considering the current debate on Area Studies, as well as comparative insights, recent reinterpretations and innovations in the field, the introduction provides a frame for the subsequent ontological, theoretical, methodological and pedagogical reflections on Area Studies at the Crossroads. Indicative of this rethinking process are various forms of mobility and mobilization processes, borders and boundaries, processes of boundary production, weakening and crossing, as well as a deepened emphasis on reflexivity and considerations of positionality. This process is then conceptualized as part of a larger ethical-pzolitical project that Area Studies should take on in challenging science policy and academic power structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Alpers, E., & Roberts, A. (2002). What Is African Studies? Some Reflections. African Issues, 30(2), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large. Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination. Public Culture, 12(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aung-Thwin, M. (2013). Continuing, Re-Emerging, and Emerging Trends in the Field of Southeast Asian History. Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 1(1), 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baberowski, J. (1998). Das Ende der Osteuropäischen Geschichte. Bemerkungen zur Lage einer geschichtswissenschaftlichen Disziplin. Osteuropa, 48(8–9), 784–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann-Medick, D. (2007). Cultural Turns. Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basedau, M., & Köllner, P. (2007). Area Studies, Comparative Area Studies, and the Study of Politics. Context, Substance, and Methodological Challenges. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 1(1), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R. (1996). Letter from the President. Area Studies and the Discipline. APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics, 7(1), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, P., & Morton, A. (2002). Historicising Representations of “Failed States.” Beyond the Cold-War Annexation of the Social Sciences? Third World Quarterly, 23(1), 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatca, M. (2012). Catching up with the (New) West. The German “Excellence Initiative,” Area Studies, and the Re-Production of Inequality. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 10(1), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braig, M., & Hentschke, F. (2005). Die Zukunft der Area Studies in Deutschland. Tagungsbericht 14.-16.7.2005, Max-Liebermann-Haus, Berlin. Afrika Spectrum, 40(3), 547–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, T. (2013). City Networks as Alternative Geographies of Southeast Asia. Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 1(1), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, C. (2004). The Asian Studies “Crisis.” Putting Cultural Studies into Asian Studies and Asia into Cultural Studies. International Journal of Asian Studies, 1(1), 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C., & Houben, V. (2006). Introduction. In C. Chou & V. Houben (Eds.), Southeast Asian Studies. Debates and New Directions (pp. 1–22). Leiden: International Institute for Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. (2006). Reconceptualizing Southeast Asian Studies. In C. Chou & V. Houben (Eds.), Southeast Asian Studies. Debates and New Directions (pp. 123–139). Leiden: International Institute for Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellings, R., Hathaway, R., Clarke, C., Yang, A., Bobrow, D., Acharya, A., et al. (2010). Roundtable. Are We Adequately Training the Next Generation of Asia Experts? Asia Policy, 9, 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson, D. (1984). “Southeast Asia”: What’s in a Name? Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, U. (2003). Gedanken zur Afrikanistik. Zustand und Zukunft einer Regionalwissenschaft in Deutschland. Afrika Spectrum, 38(1), 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, K. (1994). Getting Personal. Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, H.-D. (2000). Die Globalisierung der epistemischen Kultur. Entwicklungstheorie und Wissensgesellschaft. In U. Menzel (Ed.), Vom ewigen Frieden und vom Wohlstand der Nationen (pp. 396–417). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, H., & Hornidge, A.-K. (2015). Higher Education Cooperation in ASEAN: Building towards Integration or Manufacturing Consent? Comparative Education, 51(3), 327–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, U., & von Oppen, A. (2010). “Translocality.” An Approach to Connection and Transfer in Regional Studies [Introduction]. In U. Freitag & A. von Oppen (Eds.), Translocality. The Study of Globalising Processes from a Southern Perspective (pp. 1–24). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick Schiller, N., Basch, L., & Szanton Blanc, C. (1995). From Immigrant to Transmigrant: Theorizing Transnational Migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1), 48–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godehardt, N., & Lembcke, O. (2010). Regionale Ordnungen in politischen Räumen. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie regionaler Ordnungen. GIGA Working Paper Series 124, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L., & Kantor, J.-M. (2007). “Soft” Area Studies versus “Hard” Social Science: A False Opposition. Slavic Review, 66(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotz, F., Langenohl, A., Lentz, S., Middell, M., Obertreis, J., von Steinsdorff, S., et al. (2013). Streit der Fakultäten: Area Studies und Fachdisziplinen in der Globalisierung. Osteuropa, 63(2–3), 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, J. (2004). Anthropology in Area Studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 499–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. (2009). The Contribution of Area Studies. In T. Landman & N. Robinson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 159–174). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hentschke, F. (2009). Area Studies Revisited [Conference Report]. Available at:. http://www.hsozkult.de/conferencereport/id/tagungsberichte-2625 [Accessed 26 May 2016].

  • Hornidge, A.-K., & Mielke, K. (2015). Crossroads Studies: From Spatial Containers to Studying the Mobile. Middle East—Topics and Arguments, 4, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornidge, A.-K., Oberkircher, L., & Kudryavtseva, A. (2013). Boundary Management and the Discursive Sphere—Negotiating “Realities” in Khorezm, Uzbekistan. Geoforum, 45, 266–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houben, V., & Rehbein, B. (2010). Regional- und Sozialwissenschaften nach dem Aufstieg des globalen Südens. ASIEN, 116, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. (2003). Mapping Poststructuralism’s Borders. The Case for Poststructuralist Area Studies. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 18(1), 42–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing Sociospatial Relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, V. (2005). Defining Southeast Asia and the Crisis in Area Studies. Personal Reflections on a Region. Working Papers in Contemporary Asian Studies 13, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, V. (2006). Southeast Asia. Personal Reflections on a Region. In C. Chou & V. Houben (Eds.), Southeast Asian Studies. Debates and New Directions (pp. 23–44). Leiden: International Institute for Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinen, J. (2013). New Trends in the Anthropology of Southeast Asia. Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 1(1), 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures—How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauth, W.-H., & Wolz, R. (1998). Wissenschaft und Wiedervereinigung: Asien- und Afrikawissenschaften im Umbruch. Berlin: Akademie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner, M., & Werner, M. (1999). Der cultural turn in den Humanwissenschaften. Area Studies im Auf- oder Abwind des Kulturalismus? Bad Homburg: Programmbeirat der Werner Reimers Konferenzen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, S., & Schmid, S. (2005). Blauer Riese. Das OSTEUROPA-Raumbild 1951–1955. Osteuropa, 55(12), 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., & Wigen, K. (1997). The Myth of Continents. A Critique of Metageography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., & Sziarto, K. (2008). The Spatialities of Contentious Politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClennen, S. (2007). Area Studies beyond Ontology: Notes on Latin American Studies, American Studies, and Inter-American Studies. A Contracorriente: A Journal on Social History and Literature in Latin America 5(1), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melber, H. (2005). African Studies: Why, What for and by Whome? [Editorial]. Afrika Spectrum, 40(3), 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1949). Social Theory and Social Structure. Toward the Codification of Theory and Research. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middell, M., & Naumann, K. (2010). Global History and the Spatial Turn: From the Impact of Area Studies to the Study of Critical Junctures of Globalization. Journal of Global History, 5, 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, K., & Hornidge, A.-K. (2014). Crossroads Studies: From Spatial Containers to Interactions in Differentiated Spatialities. Crossroads Asia Working Paper Series 15, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. (1998). The Localization of Anthropological Practice. From Area Studies to Transnationalism. Critique of Anthropology, 18(2), 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mommsen, M. (2013). Paradigmenwechsel. 60 Jahre politikwissenschaftliche Osteuropaforschung. Osteuropa, 63(2–3), 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuscheler, F. (2000). Vom (großen) Nutzen und (kleinen) Elend der Komparatistik in der Entwicklungstheorie. In U. Menzel (Ed.), Vom ewigen Frieden und vom Wohlstand der Nationen (pp. 467–492). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R., Klinke, I., Jazeel, T., Daley, P., Kamata, N., Heffernan, M., et al. (In Press). Geography, Area Studies, and the Imperative of Singularity. Political Geography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K. (1996). Presidential Items. Items, 50(2/3), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K. (2003). Area Studies Responding to Globalization. Redefining International Scholarship. Berliner Osteuropa Info, 18, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, P. (2005). Between and Betwixt. African Studies in Germany. Afrika Spectrum, 30(3), 403–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puhle, H.-J. (2005). Area Studies im Wandel. Zur Organisation von Regionalforschung in Deutschland [pdf]. Available at: http://crossroads-asia.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Literatur/Area_Studies/Puhle2005_Area_Studies_im_Wandel.pdf [Accessed 15 May 2015].

  • Rigg, J. (2013). From Rural to Urban. A Geography of Boundary Crossing in Southeast Asia. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 1(1), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. (2002). Reflexivity Redux: A Pithy Polemic on “Positionality.” Anthropological Quarterly, 75(4), 755–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (1997). Situating Knowledges. Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlögel, K. (2005). Die Wiederkehr des Raums—auch in der Osteuropakunde. Osteuropa, 55(3), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, K. (2008). Leaving Area Studies Behind. The Challenge of Diasporic Connections in the Field of African Studies. African and Black Diaspora: An International Journal, 1(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segbers, K. (2000). Vom (großen) Nutzen und (kleinen) Elend der Komparatistik in der Transformationsforschung. In U. Menzel (Ed.), Vom ewigen Frieden und vom Wohlstand der Nationen (pp. 493–517). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern Geographies. The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. (1993). Outside in the Teaching Machine. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, H. (2005). Contingent Devices. In P. Kratoska, R. Raben, & H. Schulte Nordholt (Eds.), Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space (pp. 20–59). Singapore: Singapore University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornow, S. (2005). Was ist Osteuropa? Handbuch der osteuropäischen Text- und Sozialgeschichte von der Spätantike bis zum Nationalstaat. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troebst, S. (2013). Sonderweg zur Geschichtsregion. Die Teildisziplin Osteuropäische Geschichte. Osteuropa, 63(2–3), 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schendel, W. (2002). Geographies of Knowing, Geographies of Ignorance: Jumping Scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20(6), 647–668.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC), Bonn, Germany

    Katja Mielke & Anna-Katharina Hornidge

Authors
  1. Katja Mielke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna-Katharina Hornidge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC), Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Katja Mielke

  2. Leibniz Center for Tropical Marine, Research (ZMT) & University of Bremen Institute of Sociology, Bremen, Germany

    Anna-Katharina Hornidge

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mielke, K., Hornidge, AK. (2017). Introduction: Knowledge Production, Area Studies and the Mobility Turn. In: Mielke, K., Hornidge, AK. (eds) Area Studies at the Crossroads. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59834-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation