Zusammenfassung
Dieser Artikel biete eine Einführung in jüngere Debatten über Area Studies und ihren weniger bekannten „Cousin“ Vergleichende Area Studies. Obwohl aus politikwissenschaftlicher Perspektive verfasst, beziehen sich viele der in dem Artikel behandelten Aspekte auch auf andere Disziplinen. Wir zeigen zunächst einige der Entwicklungen und Debatten auf, die auf die Area Studies seit Ende des Kalten Krieges eingewirkt haben. Im Anschluss weisen wir auf einige zeitgenössische Verständnisse von Area Studies hin und präsentieren unsere eigene Definition von Vergleichenden Area Studies. Die Bedeutung sowohl von Area Studies als auch Vergleichenden Area Studies wird in einem weiteren Schritt herausgearbeitet. Besondere Aufmerksamkeit gilt im Folgenden zwei methodologischen Herausforderungen, vor denen Vergleichende Area Studies stehen: der Gebrauch von Konzepten und die Auswahl geeigneter Forschungsstrategien. Eine Zusammenfassung der zentralen Punkte schließt das Papier ab.
Abstract
This article provides an introduction to recent debates on area studies and its less well-known ‘cousin’ comparative area studies. Though written from a political science angle, many of the aspects covered in the article equally apply to other disciplines. We begin by noting the developments and debates that have accompanied area studies since the end of the Cold War. We then highlight some contemporary understandings of area studies and present our own definition of comparative area studies. The importance of both area studies and comparative area studies is spelled out in a further section. Two of the methodological challenges comparative area studies are faced with-the use of concepts and the choice of research strategies-are subsequently addressed in some detail. The paper closes by summing up the main points raised.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, Benedict. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso
APSA-CP. (2003) Symposium: The Relevance of Comparative Politics for Public Life. In: APSA-CP Newsletter (14). 7–22
Asia Policy. (2006) Special Roundtable: Bridging the Gap Between the Academic and Policy Worlds. In: Asia Policy (1). 1–41
Basedau, Matthias and Patrick Köllner. (2006) Area Studies and Comparative Area Studies: Opportunities and Challenges for the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies. GIGA Discussion Paper. October (2006) http://www.giga-hamburg.de/content/forumregional/pdf/acas_mbpk_0610.pdf
Bates, Robert H. (1997) Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy? In: PS: Political Science & Politics (30). 166–169
Bonnell, Victoria E. and George Breslauer. (2003 / 2002) Soviet and Post-Soviet Area Studies. In: Szanton, David L. (ed.). The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. http://repositories.cdlib.org/uciaspubs/editedvolumes/3/4 (accessed 8 March 2006)
Brady, Henry E. and David Collier (eds.). (2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools. Shared Standards. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield
Breslin, Shaun, Richard Higgott and Ben Rosamond. (2002) Regions in Comparative Perspective. CSGR Working Paper No. 107/02. University of Warwick
Carothers, Thomas. (2002) The End of the Transition Paradigm. In: Journal of Democracy (13). 5–21
Chehabi, H. E. and Juan J. Linz (eds.). (1998) Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore, London: John Hopkins University Press
Collier, Paul, V.L. Elliott, Håvard Hegre, Anke Hoeffler, Marta Reynal-Querol and Nicholas Sambanis. (2003) Breaking the Conflict Trap. Civil War and Development Policy. A World Bank Policy Research Report. London, Washington: Oxford University Press and World Bank
Collier, Ruth Berins and David Collier. (1991) Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures. the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu. (2006) Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications. In: Journal of Political Ideologies (11). 211–246
Collier, David and Steven Levitsky. (1997) Democracy with Adjectives. Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. In: World Politics (49). 430–451
Collier, David and James E. Mahon. (1993) ’Conceptual Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis. In: American Political Science Review (87). 845–855
Coppedge, Michael. (2002) Using Nested Inference to Explain Democratic Deterioration in Venezuela. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Boston. 26 August–1 September
Creswell, John W. and Vicki L. Plano Clark. (2007) Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage
Croissant, Aurel and Wolfgang Merkel (eds.). (2004) Consolidated or Defective Democracy? Problems of Regime Change. Special issue of Democratization
Dogan, Mattei and Dominique Pelassy. (1990) How to Compare Nations. 2nd Edition. Chatham NJ: Chatham House Publications
Drake, Paul and Lisa Hilbink. (2003 / 2002) Latin American Studies: Theory and Practice. In: Szanton, David L. (ed.). The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. http://repositories.cdlib.org/uciaspubs/editedvolumes/3/2 (accessed 7 March 2006)
Dunning, Thad. (2007) Improving Causal Inference: Strengths and Limitations of Natural Experiments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago. 30 August–2 September. Forthcoming in Political Research Quarterly
Eckert, Andreas. (2005) Bitte erklären Sie uns die Welt. In: Internationale Politik. October (2005) 42–49
Eckstein, Harry. (1975) Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In: Greenstein, Fred and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.). Handbook of Political Science. Vol. 7. Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley. 79–137
Eidlin, Fred. (2006) Reconciling the Unique and the General: Area Studies, Case Studies, and History vs. Theoretical Social Science. Committee on Concepts and Methods. Political Methodology, Working Paper No. 8. www.concepts-methods.org/papers_list.php?id_categoria=2&titulo=Political%20Methodology (accessed 10 September 2006)
Erdmann, Gero and Ulf Engel. (2006) Neopatrimonialism Reconsidered — Critical Review and Elaboration of an Elusive Concept. In: Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Studies (45). 95–119
Foreign Affairs. (2006) The Rise of India (special theme section). July/August 2006. 2–56
Friedman, Thomas F. (1999) The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
Friedman, Thomas F. (2004) The World is Flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
Geddes, Barbara. (1990) How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. In: Stimsoin, James A. (ed.), Political Analysis: An Annual Publication of the Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 131–150
George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennett. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, London: MIT Press
Gereffi, Gary and Donald L. Wyman. (1990) Manufacturing Miracles — Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Gerring, John. (2001) Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gerring, John. (2004) What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For? In: American Political Science Review (98). 341–198
Gerring John (2006) Descriptive Inference. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia. 1–4 September
Gerring, John. (2007) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gerring, John and Jason Seawright. (2007) Techniques for Choosing Cases. In: Gerring, John. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 86–150
Gerring, John and Craig W. Thomas. (2005) Comparability: A Key Issue in Research Design. Committee on Concepts and Methods. Political Methodology, Working Paper No. 2. http://www.concepts-methods.org/papers_download.php?id_categoria=2&titulo=Political%20Methodology&id_wp=23 (accessed 15 July 2007)
Goertz, Gary. (2006) Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Hall, Peter A. and Sidney Tarrow. (1998) Globalization and Area Studies: When Is Too Broad Too Narrow? In: Chronicle of Higher Education (44). 115–115. http://chronicle.com/data/articles.dir/art-44.dir/issue20.dir/20b00401.htm (accessed 7 March 2006)
Helmke, Gretchen und Steven Levitsky. (2004) Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics. In: Perspectives on Politics (2). 725–740
Helmke, Gretchen and Steven Levitsky. (2006) Introduction. In: Helmke, Gretchen and Steven Levitsky (eds.). Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press
Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith. (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Huber, Evelyne. (2003) Letter from the President: The Role of Cross-regional Comparison. In: APSA-CP Newsletter (14). www.nd.edu/apsacp/pdf/APSA-CP%20Summer%20issue%202003.pdf (accessed 22 March 2006)
Huntington, Samuel P. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster
Internationale Politik. (2005) China, China, China! (special theme section). December 2005. 6–83
Internationale Politik. (2006) Weltmacht Indien (special theme section). October 2006. 6–61
Jones Luong, Pauline. (2002) Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2001) Area and Regional Studies in the United States. In: PS: Political Science & Politics (34). 789–791
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Katzenstein, Peter J. and Takashi Shiraishi (eds.). (2006) Beyond Japan: East Asian Regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Interference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press
King, Victor T. (2005) Defining Southeast Asia and the Crisis in Area Studies: Personal Reflections on a Region. Working Paper No 13. Center for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. www.ace.lu.se/publications/workingpapers/King.pdf (accessed 7 March 2006)
Kohli, Atul. (2004) State-Directed Development. Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Köllner, Patrick. (2005) Formale und informelle Politik aus institutioneller Perspektive: Ein Analyseansatz für die vergleichenden Area Studies. GIGA Working Paper. August (2005) www.giga-hamburg.de/content/publikationen/pdf/wp06_koellner.pdf
Lauth, Hans-Joachim. (2000) Informal Institutions and Democracy. In: Democratization (7). 21–50
Lieberman, Evan S. (2005) Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. In: American Political Science Review (99). 435–452
Lijphart, Arend (1975) The Comparable Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. In: Comparative Political Studies (8). 158–175
Mahoney, James (2007) Debating the State of Comparative Politics: Views from Qualitative Research. In: Comparative Political Studies (40). 32–38
Mainwaring, Scott and Aníbal Pérez-Liñán. (2007) Why Regions of the World Are Important: Regional Specifities and Region-Wide Diffusion of Democracy. In: Gerardo Munck (ed.) (2007) Regimes and Democracy in Latin America: Theories and Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 199–229
Merton, Robert K. (1968) On Sociological Theories of the Middle-Range. In: Merton, Robert K. (ed.). Social Theory and Social Structure. London: The Free Press. 39–72
Mill, John Stuart. (1997) Zur Logik der Moralwissenschaften. Frsankfurt a.M.: Klostermann
Mitchell, Timothy. (2003 / 2002) The Middle East in the Past and Future of Social Science. In: Szanton, David L. (ed.). The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. http://repositories.cdlib.org/uciaspubs/editedvolumes/3/3 (accessed 7 March 2006)
Mols, Manfred. (1998) Integration und Kooperation in zwei Kontinenten. Das Streben um Einheit in Lateinamerika und in Südosdtasien. Stuttgart: Steiner Franz Verlag
Mols, Manfred and Claudia Derichs. (1995) Das Ende der Geschichte oder ein Zusammenstoß der Zivilisationen? — Bemerkungen zu einem interkulturellen Disput um ein asiatisch-pazifisches Jahrhundert. In: Zeitschrift für Politik. 3/1995. 225–249
Moran, Michael. (2006) Interdisciplinarity and Political Science. In: Politics (26). 73–83
Munck, Gerardo L. and Richard Snyder. (2007) Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics: An Analysis of Leading Journals. In: Comparative Political Studies (40). 5–31
Nohlen, Dieter. (2004) Die Vergleichende Methode. In: Nohlen, Dieter and Rainer-Olaf Schultze (eds.). Politikwissenschaft. Theorien — Methoden — Begriffe. 2 volumes. 2nd edition. Munich: C.H. Beck. 1020–1031
O’Donnell, Guillermo, Philippe C. Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead. (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for Democracy. 4 volumes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Osteuropa. (2005) Schattenspiele: Informelle Politik im Osten Europas (special theme section). October 2005. 3–130
Pempel, T. J. (ed.). (2005) Remapping East Asia. The Construction of a Region. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press
Prewitt, Kenneth. (2003) Area Studies Responding to Globalization: Redefining International Scholarship. In: Berliner Osteuropa Info, No. 18: Regionalstudien kontrovers. 8–11
Przeworski, Adam and Henry Teune. (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience
Puhle, Hans-Jürgen (2005) Area Studies im Wandel. Zur Organisation von Regionalforschung in Deutschland. http://web.uni-frankfurt.de/zenaf/contac/AreaStudies.pdf (accessed 25 May 2006)
Pye, Lucian (ed.). (1975) Political Science and Area Studies: Rivals or Partners? Bloomington, London: Indiana University Press
Ragin, Charles C. (1987) The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press
Ragin, Charles C. (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press
Qualitative Methods. (2007) Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines. Spring 2007. 9–28
Sartori, Giovanni. (1994) Compare Why and How. Comparing, Miscomparing and the Comparative Method. In: Dogan, Mattei and Ali Kazancigil (eds.). Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance. Oxford: Blackwell. 14–34
Sassen, Saskia. (2003) The Subnational as a Site for Studying Globalization: Rediscovering Area Studies? In: Berliner Osteuropa Info, No. 18: Regionalstudien kontrovers. 11–12.
Schedler, Andreas (ed.). (2006) Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner
Shambaugh, David. (2006) Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics. Berkeley: University of California Press
Stokes, Susan (2004) Region, Contingency, and Democratization. Paper presented at the conference on contingency in the study of policy. Yale University. 3–4 December
Szanton, David L. (2003, [2002]) The Origin, Nature, and Challenges of Area Studies in the United States. In: Szanton, David L. (ed.), The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. http://repositories.edlib.org/uciaspubs/editedvolumes/3/1 (accessed 7 March 2006)
Thompson, Mark R. (2001) Whatever Happened to ‘Asian Values’? In: Journal of Democracy (12). 154–165
Watzlawick, Paul. (1993) Situation is Hopeless, but not Serious (The Pursuit of Unhappiness). London: W.W. Norton & Company
Wibbels, Erik. (2007) No Method to the Comparative Politics Madness. In: Comparative Political Studies (40), 37–44
Wissenschaftsrat. (2006) Empfehlungen zu den Regionalstudien (area studies) in den Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen. Mainz: Wissenschaftsrat
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basedau, M., Köllner, P. Area studies, comparative area studies, and the study of politics: Context, substance, and methodological challenges. Z Vgl Polit Wiss 1, 105–124 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-007-0009-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-007-0009-3
Schlüsselwörter
- Area Studies
- Vergleichende Area Studies
- Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
- Vergleichende Methode
- Forschungsstrategie