Abstract
This chapter attends to the early modern nexus of affect, substance, and method around the glory of King Arthur, as it is engaged in historiographic controversy and in Spenser’s Faerie Queene. Bringing new standards of historical fact to bear on the English past, some sixteenth-century historians judged Arthur and his deeds unreal. Other historians, however, defended Arthur’s reality and charged that what had changed in the practice of history was a new envy felt in the present toward the glory of the past. Adopting a “new materialist” perspective, Landreth argues that Spenser’s pseudo-historical epic engages the strife in the Arthurian controversy between dubious facts and negative affects in ontological terms, investigating the different ways the past may “matter” in the present.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Anderson, Judith. Words that Matter: Linguistic Perception in Renaissance English. Stanford, C.A.: Stanford UP, 1996.
Arab, Ronda, Michelle M. Dowd, and Adam Zucker, eds. Historical Affects and the Early Modern Theater. New York: Routledge, 2015.
Burke, Peter. The Renaissance Sense of the Past. London: Edward Arnold, 1969.
Butler, Judith. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge, 1993.
Byatt, A. S. “Envy.” In Deadly Sins. Ed. Thomas Pynchon et al., 82–103. New York: William Morrow, 1993.
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer. Ed. Larry D. Benson. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987.
Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost, eds. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, Politics. Durham, N.C.: Duke UP, 2010.
Daston, Lorraine, “Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity.” Annals of Scholarship 8, nos. 3–4 (1991), 337–364.
Drayton, Michael. The Poly-Olbion: A Chorographicall Description of Great Britain. Manchester: Spenser Society, 1889.
Escobedo, Andrew. Nationalism and Historical Loss in Renaissance England: Foxe, Dee, Spenser, Milton. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell UP, 2004.
Ferguson, Arthur. Clio Unbound: Perception of the Social and Cultural Past in Renaissance England. Durham, N. C.: Duke UP, 1979.
Girard, René. A Theater of Envy: William Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1991.
Goldsmith, Steven. Blake’s Agitation: Criticism and the Emotions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2013.
Goodman, Kevis. Georgic Modernity and British Romanticism: Poetry and the Mediation of History. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004.
Gross, Kenneth. Shakespeare’s Noise. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2001.
Grossberg, Lawrence. Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Durham, N. C.: Duke UP, 2010.
Harris, Jonathan Gil. Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare. Philadelphia: U of Penn. P, 2009.
James, Heather. “The Problem of Poetry in The Faerie Queene, Book V.” Spenser Review 45.1.1 (Spring-Summer 2015).
Kaplan, M. Lindsay. The Culture of Slander in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997.
King, Andrew. The Faerie Queene and Middle English Romance: The Matter of Just Memory. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.
Leland, John. A Learned and True Assertion of the Original, Life, Actes, and Death of the Most Noble, Valiant, and Renoumed Prince Arthure, King of Great Brittaine. Tr. Richard Robinson. London, 1582, via EEBO.
Levy, F. J. Tudor Historical Thought. San Marino, C.A.: Huntington Library Publications, 1967.
Mazzio, Carla. The Inarticulate Renaissance: Language Trouble in an Age of Eloquence. Philadelphia: U. of Penn. P, 2009.
Mommsen, Theodor E. “Petrarch’s Conception of the ‘Dark Ages,’” Speculum 17 no. 2 (April 1942), 226–242.
Mullaney, Steven. The Reformation of the Emotions in the Age of Shakespeare. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2015.
Nagel, Alexander, and Christopher S. Wood. Anachronic Renaissance. Brooklyn: Zone Books, 2010.
Ngai, Sianne. Ugly Feelings. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard UP, 2005.
Ovid. Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Translated by Arthur Golding. Ed. Madeleine Forey. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2002.
Panofsky, Erwin. Renaissance and Renascences in Western Art. New York: Harper, 1969.
Paster, Gail Kern. Humoring the Body: Emotions and the Shakespearean Stage. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004.
Plutarch. “Of Envy and Hatred.” In Moralia, 322–327. Tr. Philemon Holland. London: J. M. Dent & Co., 1911.
Poovey, Mary. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998.
Price, John. Historiae Brytannicae Defensio. London, 1573 (via EEBO).
Robinson, Benedict. “Disgust c. 1600.” ELH 81 no. 2 (Summer 2014), 553–583.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, N.C.: Duke UP, 2003.
Shakespeare, William. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1974.
Shapiro, Barbara J. A Culture of Fact: England, 1550–1720. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell UP, 2000.
Spenser, Edmund. The Faerie Queene. Ed. Thomas P. Roche, Jr. New York: Penguin, 1978.
Teskey, Gordon. “The Thinking of History in Spenserian Romance.” In Romance and History: Imagining Time from the Medieval to the Early Modern Period. Ed. Jon Whitman, 214–227. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2015.
Van Es, Bart. Spenser’s Forms of History. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002.
Vergil, Polydore. Polydore Vergil’s English History, from an Early Translation Preserved Among the Mss. of the Old Royal Library in the British Museum, v. 1. Ed. Henry Ellis. London: Camden Society, 1846.
Whigham, Frank. Ambition and Privilege: The Social Tropes of Elizabethan Courtesy Theory. Berkeley: U of California P, 1984.
White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1973.
Woolf, D. R. The Idea of History in Early Stuart England. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Landreth, D. (2017). Spenser’s Envious History. In: Bailey, A., DiGangi, M. (eds) Affect Theory and Early Modern Texts. Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56126-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56126-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57074-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56126-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)