Skip to main content

Affect Studies and Cognitive Approaches to Literature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism

Abstract

Offering a brief survey of cognitive literary studies, this chapter traces the field’s emergence from psychological and phenomenological approaches to literary studies, and it describes a variety of influential approaches within the field as well as perspectives on the prospects of the approach. Taken together, cognitive literary theories offer a wide-ranging investigation of the forms and status of knowing in relation to narrative. Turning to affect theory, this chapter explores its studies’ contrasting emphasis on how personal and social experience is shaped by forces not reducible to conscious knowledge. After reviewing a key critique of the theoretical basis of such work, this chapter describes affined political and aesthetic projects between well-known statements about affect theory and the approaches and positions adopted by cognitive literary scholars. Emphasis is placed upon how conceptions of the social, material, and virtual inform the projects of cognitive literary studies. It considers how recent scientific accounts of affect that emphasize the role of emotion in shaping thought and memory, and recent philosophical interest in embodiment and enactivism , might promote linkages between the two fields of inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Abbott, H. Porter. “Cognitive Literary Studies: The ‘Second Generation’; The Work of Fiction: Cognition, Culture, and Complexity.” Poetics Today 27, no. 4 (2006): 711–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.” In Cultural Theory: An Anthology, edited by Imre Szeman and Timothy Kaposy, 282–95. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Paul. How Literature Plays with the Brain: The Neuroscience of Reading and Art. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmanspacher, Harald. Dual-aspect monism à la Pauli and Jung. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19, no. 9/10(2002): 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann-Medick, Doris, and Frederik Tygstrup, editors. Structures of Feeling: Affectivity and the Study of Culture. De Gruyter, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banville, John. The Book of Evidence. New York: Vintage, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar, Moshe. “The Proactive Brain: Using Analogies and Associations to Generate Predictions.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11, no. 7 (2007): 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson, Lone and Andrew Murphie. “An Ethics of Every Infinities and Powers.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory Seigworth, 138–159. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollmer, Grant David. “Pathologies of Affect.” Cultural Studies, 28, no. 2 (2014): 298–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernaerts, Lars, Dirk de Geest, Luc Hermann, and Bart Vervaeck, editors. Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Andy, Julian Kiverstein and Tillmann Vierkant, editors. Decomposing the Will. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Andy. Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Bruce. “Narrating Intellectual Microbes.” ELINAS Symposium: Narrative, Cognition, and Science Lab. October 22, 2016. Erlangen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, Patricia. “The Affective Turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies.” in The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 206–225. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Affective Turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies.” Theory, Culture & Society 25, no. 1 (2008): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti, Giovanna. The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. MIT Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, Antonio. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, Stanilas, and Jean-Pierre Changeux. “Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Conscious Processing.” Neuron 70, no. 2 (2011): 200–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, Stanislas, Jean-Pierre Changeux, and Lionel Naccache. “The Global Neuronal Workspace Model of Conscious Access: From Neuronal Architectures to Clinical Applications.” In Characterizing Consciousness: From Cognition to Clinic? edited by Stanislas Dehaene and Yves Christen, 55–84. Berlin: Springer, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deigh, John. “Cognitivism in the Theory of Emotions.” Ethics 104, no. 4 (1994): 824–55. Reprinted in John Deigh. Emotions, Values, and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 39–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Concepts of Emotions in Modern Philosophy and Psychology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, edited by Peter Goldie, 17–40. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. “Percept, Affect, and Concept.” What is Philosophy? Translators Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchill. London: Verso, 1994. 163–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Arne and Hilde Haider. “Human Creativity, Evolutionary Algorithms, and Predictive Representations: The Mechanics of Thought Trials.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22, no. 4 (2015): 897–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, Paul John. Living Autobiographically: How We Create Identity in Narrative. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen Spolsky, “Preface” to The Works of Fiction: Cognition, Culture, and Complexity, ed. Ellen Spolsky and Alan Richardson. New York: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fludernik, Monika. “Narratology in the Twenty-First Century: The Cognitive Approach to Narrative.” PMLA 125, no. 4 (2010): 924–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory J. Seigworth. editors. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, James. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. New York: Psychology Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldie, Peter, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Mess Inside: Narrative, Emotion, and the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greicius, Michael, Ben Krasnow, Allan Reiss, and Vinod Menon. “Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, no. 1 (2003): 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, Lawrence. “Postmodernity and Affect: All Dressed Up With No Place To Go.” Communication 10, nos. 3–4 (1988): 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Affect’s Future: Rediscovering the Virtual in the Actual.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory Seigworth, 309–338. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatimoysis, Anthony. “‘Pioneering’ Emotion: Emotions, Thoughts, and Feelings: What is a cognitive theory of the emotions and does it neglect affectivity.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 2003, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, Clare. “Invoking Affect: Cultural Theory and the Ontological Turn.” Cultural Studies, vol. 19, no. 5 (2005): 548–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, Patrick Colm. Affective Narratology: The Emotional Structure of Stories. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohwy, Jakob. The Predictive Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, Daniel. “Narrative Practice and Understanding Reasons: Reply to Gallagher.” In Radical Enactivism: Intentionality, Phenomenology, and Narrative, edited by Richard Menary, 231–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaén, Isabel, and Julien Jacques Simon. “An Overview of Recent Developments in Cognitive Literary Studies.” In Cognitive Literary Studies: Current Themes and New Directions, edited by Isabel Jaén, and Julien Jacques Simon, 1–13. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Joel. “The Phenomenology of Person Perception.” In Cognition, Literature, and History, edited by Mark J. Bruhn and Donald R. Wehrs, 153–173. New York: Routledge, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labanyi, Jo. “Doing Things: Emotion, Affect, and Materiality.” Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, vol. 11, nos. 3–4 (2010): 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, Joseph E. and Richard Brown. “A Higher-Order Theory of Emotional Consciousness,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 10 (2017): e2016–e2025, doi:10.1073/pnas.1619316114/-/DCSupplemental.

  • Leverage, Paula, Howard Mancing, Richard Schweickert, and Jennifer William, editors. Theory of Mind and Literature. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, Ruth, “The Turn to Affect: A Critique,” Critical Inquiry 37, no. 3 (2011): 434–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancing, Howard. “The Mind of a Pícaro: Lázaro de Tormes.” In Cognition, Literature, and History, edited by Mark J. Bruhn and Donald R. Wehrs, 174–189. New York: Routledge, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Erin. The Politics of Touch: Sense, Movement, Sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota P, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. Parables of the Virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConachie, Bruce. Evolution, Cognition, and Performance. Cambridge University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, Jesse. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabaté, Jean-Michel. “Literature and Affect.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Body in Literature, edited by David Hillman and Ulrika Maude, 230–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raichle, Marcus, Ann Mary MacLeod, Abraham Snyder, William Powers, Debra Gusnard, and Gordon Shulman. “A Default Mode of Brain Function.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98, no. 2 (2001): 676–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Alan. “Cognitive Science and the Future of Literary Studies.” Philosophy and Literature 23, no. 1 (1999): 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Jenefer. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and its Role in Literature, Music and Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelvink, Gerda, and Magdalena Zolkos. “Posthumanist Perspectives on Affect: Framing the Field.” Angelaki 20, no. 3 (2015) 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky and Adam Frank. “Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 21, no. 2, 1995, pp. 496–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Duke University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigworth, Gregory J., and Melissa Gregg. “An Inventory of Shimmers.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 1–25. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Devika and Frederik Tygstrup. “Introduction.” In Structures of Feeling: Affectivity and the Study of Culture, edited by Doris Bachmann-Medick and Frederik Tygstrup, 1–19. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein, Michael. “Essay Review: Why Neutral Monism is Superior to Panpsychism.” Mind and Matter 7, no. 2 (2009): 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slonczewski, Joan. Brain Plague. Rockville, MD: Phoenix Pick, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, Silvan, and E. Virginia Demos (editor). Exploring Affect: The Selected Writings of Silvan S. Tomkins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tononi, Giulio. “The integrated information theory of consciousness: an updated account.” Archives Italiennes de Biologie 150, no. 2/3 (2011): 56–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, Don and Phan Luu. Cognition and Neural Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. The Long Revolution. Broadview Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Preface to Film. London: Film Drama, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerilli, Linda. “The Turn to Affect and th Problem of Judgment.” New Literary History 46, no. 2 (2015): 261–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunshine, Lisa. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Introduction to Cognitive Literary Studies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies, edited by Lisa Zunshine, 1–9. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miller, B. (2017). Affect Studies and Cognitive Approaches to Literature. In: Wehrs, D., Blake, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63303-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics